In my Strapi application, I have the following structure:
Footer(single type) > Section(component) > Menu(collection type) > link(component)
When performing a query Strapi only returns the id of the link and I needed its LABEL and URL, does anyone know how I can bring this in a query only?
Strapi section
Link Component
Footer API return
I used this topic on the Strapi forum, but without success yet
https://forum.strapi.io/t/how-do-i-return-only-selected-fields-from-the-model-and-its-relation/1115/2
Disclaimer; im new to Strapi.
The Strapi get requests only populates with relational data in a single layer of nesting. Your links looks to be on the second layer.
You have two options:
Query for the links by ID from your client after receiving the IDs. This can be done efficiently using Promise.all.
Modify the default GET handler for the ressource in the Strapi code. Extend the query to join on your links, and return the response in its entirity.
Update on option 2;
You can customize the logic behind any single endpoint handler in the API in your Strapi backend. The process is best descriped in their documentation on Custom Data Response's. Note that the syntax on how to query the database is based on a popular ORM depending on your database of choice. The ORMs are:
MongoDB (through Mongoose)
Postgres, MySQL, SQLite3 and more (through Bookshelf)
Redis (through ioredis).
Related
The project I'm working on uses the feathers JS framework server side. Many of the services have hooks (or middleware) that make other calls and attach data before sending back to the client. If I have a new feature that needs to query a database but for a only few specific things I'm thinking I don't want to use the already built out "find" method for this database query as that "find" method has many other unneeded hooks and calls to other databases to get data I do not need for this new query on my feature.
My two solutions so far:
I could use the standard "find" query and just write if statements in all hooks that check for a specific string parameter that can be passed in on client side so these hooks are deactivated on this specific call but that seems tedious especially if I find this need for several other different services that have already been built out.
I initialize a second service below my main service so if my main service is:
app.use('/comments', new JHService(options));
right underneath I write:
app.use('/comments/allParticipants', new JHService(options));
And then attach a whole new set of hooks for that service. Basically it's a whole new service with the only relation to the origin in that the first part of it's name is 'comments' Since I'm new to feathers I'm not sure if that is a performant or optimal solution.
Is there a better solution then those options? or is option 1 or option 2 the most correct way to solve my current issue?
You can always wrap the population hooks into a conditional hook:
const hooks = require('feathers-hooks-common');
app.service('myservice').after({
create: hooks.iff(hook => hook.params.populate !== false, populateEntries)
});
Now population will only run if params.populate is not false.
I have a few PHP scripts which I am in the process of migrating to Node.js. I am using Sails.js for this and I would like to know how I can change databases for each request based on a request parameter.
Currently I have 3-4 identical PostgreSQL databases. Let's just say that each database corresponds to a different client.
Below is a segment of the current PHP script where the database connection is established:
$database = $_GET['db'];
$conn_details = "host=localhost port=5432 dbname=$database user=****** password=******";
$dbconn = pg_connect($conn_details);
Here you can see that the database name is coming from the request parameter "db".
I would like to have a similar functionality in my sails.js controller. I know that i can declare multiple databases in the connections.js and that I can have models use different databases but what i am after is for the models to stay the same and only the database to change based on each request.
I have found 2 similar questions but they have both stayed unanswered for quite some time now. (Here and here)
I think you are looking for something like sub apps
sails-hook-subapps
but it's experimental module. So i wouldn't recommend using it on production. Other option also not good is multiplying your Models like that:
One main model with all methods, attributes and "stuff"
Many models with connections config
In 'parent' model you will select to which model you want to send send action. For example write method:
getModel: function(dbName){
return models[dbName];
}
in models Object you will store all Models with different connections. Not sure how validators will works in this scenario. You need to test if it will not be required do do something like this in child Models
attributes: parentModel.attributes
I have a hand-made collection (mymodel) in MongoDB. I have created a sails model+controller using 'sails generate api mymodel'
I am now trying to use the sails find() method using the REST api: http://localhost:1377/mymodel, but I do not get any data returned. I have even tried to write my own end-point method and used the Waterline ORM find() method, but still don't get anything returned.
Am I missing something? Is there something more to be done?
Its a simple model, like {A:123,b:"wf"}
No specific data pieces
From mongo shell, I get the complete information
Found the problem.
If a create a collection using the name "MyModel" in MongoDB, and then create a controller+model in sails.js (sails generate api MyModel), sailsjs does not seem to use the "MyModel" collection, but rather tries to create a new collection completely in lower case ("mymodel") where all the transactions are committed.
So the trick is to create a collection in lowercase only so that sails starts using it
Not sure if this is a bug in sails.js
I am currently working on an inventory management software in Node js and MongoDB. I am pretty new to MongoDB, having worked in Oracle and MySQL for most of my projects.
Is it possible to create a separate database schema for every client who uses my software, with each client having access only to his copy of the database schema and collections?
The equivalent of selecting data in Oracle database would be
Select * from User1.table,
Select * from User2.table etc
Also, if it were possible, how would it be implemented using a node js mongo db client like mongoose?
I looked at MongoDB documentation, but it talks mainly about adding users to a database for authorization.
I apologize if it seems like a silly question, but id appreciate it if someone could point me in the right direction for this.
Before starting to invest a lot of time in the development of your project, check out other possible approaches to the scenario that you are trying to build.
I did a quick search on SO and found some additional threads with similar scenarios:
MongoDB Database vs. Collection
MongoDB Web App - Database per User
Additional info about mongoose database creation
Whenever you call the connect method on the mongoose object, you are either connecting to an existing database or you are creating it in case it doesn't already exist.
You could have a function that allows you to pass in a name argument with the name and create databases programmatically:
function createDatabase(name) {
var conn_string = 'mongodb://localhost/';
if (typeof name == 'string') {
conn_string += name;
}else{
return false;
}
mongoose.connect(conn_string);
}
Also, be aware that a database will be created when you first insert a record in a collection of that particular database.
It is not sufficient to only connect to the database, you also have to insert a record.
As per my previous example, you could also pass a schema parameter to the function, tailored to each user's profile and fire an insert statement after you connect to that database.
Currently I have a project using WebAPI and EF with Breeze, it works fine with Metadata stuffs for validation on server but when migrating to NodeJS and MongoDB, I get stuck for trying get Metadata from MongoDB. I checked out zza BMEAN app but I just saw on this project:
app.get('/breeze/Breeze/Metadata', getMetadata);
function getMetadata(req, res, next) {
next({
statusCode: 404,
message: "No metadata from the server; metadata is defined on the client"
});
}
I also read all document about Breeze/MongoDB but still doesn't help me to get Metadata for this.
The main point is I just want to change backend with BMEAN instead of WebAPI+EF+Breeze, don't need to change code on client.
Thanks
The metadata is provided by EF, not by MongoDB. If you are using a CodeFirst approach with EF then you should already have a DBContext.
This talks about how to use the DBContext -
http://www.breezejs.com/documentation/entity-framework-dbcontext
This talks about how to use EF as a design tool to build your meta data from classes -
http://www.breezejs.com/documentation/ef-design-tool
Odds are you already have what you need to generate the metadata it is just extending that and exposing a service to provide it to the client.
PW Kad's answer is correct, but to clarify, there is no way to get metadata from a MongoDB database because the database itself has an indeterminate structure. So you have to tell your client what the structure is. If you want to use the same client code for EF and Mongo then saving the metadata provided by the EFContext in your Mongo project makes a lot of sense. In other cases simply define the metadata directly on the client via Breeze's metadata api calls.