I want to use input from a user as a regex pattern for a search over some text. It works, but how I can handle cases where user puts characters that have meaning in regex?
For example, the user wants to search for Word (s): regex engine will take the (s) as a group. I want it to treat it like a string "(s)" . I can run replace on user input and replace the ( with \( and the ) with \) but the problem is I will need to do replace for every possible regex symbol.
Do you know some better way ?
Use the re.escape() function for this:
4.2.3 re Module Contents
escape(string)
Return string with all non-alphanumerics backslashed; this is useful if you want to match an arbitrary literal string that may have regular expression metacharacters in it.
A simplistic example, search any occurence of the provided string optionally followed by 's', and return the match object.
def simplistic_plural(word, text):
word_or_plural = re.escape(word) + 's?'
return re.match(word_or_plural, text)
You can use re.escape():
re.escape(string)
Return string with all non-alphanumerics backslashed; this is useful if you want to match an arbitrary literal string that may have regular expression metacharacters in it.
>>> import re
>>> re.escape('^a.*$')
'\\^a\\.\\*\\$'
If you are using a Python version < 3.7, this will escape non-alphanumerics that are not part of regular expression syntax as well.
If you are using a Python version < 3.7 but >= 3.3, this will escape non-alphanumerics that are not part of regular expression syntax, except for specifically underscore (_).
Unfortunately, re.escape() is not suited for the replacement string:
>>> re.sub('a', re.escape('_'), 'aa')
'\\_\\_'
A solution is to put the replacement in a lambda:
>>> re.sub('a', lambda _: '_', 'aa')
'__'
because the return value of the lambda is treated by re.sub() as a literal string.
Usually escaping the string that you feed into a regex is such that the regex considers those characters literally. Remember usually you type strings into your compuer and the computer insert the specific characters. When you see in your editor \n it's not really a new line until the parser decides it is. It's two characters. Once you pass it through python's print will display it and thus parse it as a new a line but in the text you see in the editor it's likely just the char for backslash followed by n. If you do \r"\n" then python will always interpret it as the raw thing you typed in (as far as I understand). To complicate things further there is another syntax/grammar going on with regexes. The regex parser will interpret the strings it's receives differently than python's print would. I believe this is why we are recommended to pass raw strings like r"(\n+) -- so that the regex receives what you actually typed. However, the regex will receive a parenthesis and won't match it as a literal parenthesis unless you tell it to explicitly using the regex's own syntax rules. For that you need r"(\fun \( x : nat \) :)" here the first parens won't be matched since it's a capture group due to lack of backslashes but the second one will be matched as literal parens.
Thus we usually do re.escape(regex) to escape things we want to be interpreted literally i.e. things that would be usually ignored by the regex paraser e.g. parens, spaces etc. will be escaped. e.g. code I have in my app:
# escapes non-alphanumeric to help match arbitrary literal string, I think the reason this is here is to help differentiate the things escaped from the regex we are inserting in the next line and the literal things we wanted escaped.
__ppt = re.escape(_ppt) # used for e.g. parenthesis ( are not interpreted as was to group this but literally
e.g. see these strings:
_ppt
Out[4]: '(let H : forall x : bool, negb (negb x) = x := fun x : bool =>HEREinHERE)'
__ppt
Out[5]: '\\(let\\ H\\ :\\ forall\\ x\\ :\\ bool,\\ negb\\ \\(negb\\ x\\)\\ =\\ x\\ :=\\ fun\\ x\\ :\\ bool\\ =>HEREinHERE\\)'
print(rf'{_ppt=}')
_ppt='(let H : forall x : bool, negb (negb x) = x := fun x : bool =>HEREinHERE)'
print(rf'{__ppt=}')
__ppt='\\(let\\ H\\ :\\ forall\\ x\\ :\\ bool,\\ negb\\ \\(negb\\ x\\)\\ =\\ x\\ :=\\ fun\\ x\\ :\\ bool\\ =>HEREinHERE\\)'
the double backslashes I believe are there so that the regex receives a literal backslash.
btw, I am surprised it printed double backslashes instead of a single one. If anyone can comment on that it would be appreciated. I'm also curious how to match literal backslashes now in the regex. I assume it's 4 backslashes but I honestly expected only 2 would have been needed due to the raw string r construct.
Related
Groovy How to replace the exact match word in a String.
I wanted to replace the exact matched word in a given string in Groovy. and when i tried the below am not getting the exact matched word
def str="My Name is Richards and Richardson"
log.info(str)
str=str.replace("Richards","Praveen")
log.info("After"+str)
Output after executing the above
My Name is Richards and Richardson
AfterMy Name is Praveen and Praveenon
Am Looking for the output like : AfterMy Name is Praveen and Richardson
I tried the boundaries \b
str=str.replace("\bRichards\b","Praveen")
which is in Java and its not working. Looks \b is ba backslash escape sequence in the Groovy
can someone help
def str="My Name is Richards and Richardson"
log.info(str)
str=str.replace("Richards","Praveen")
log.info("After"+str)
expecting:AfterMy Name is Praveen and Richardson
Using boundaries (/b) will not work with String::replace because the method argument does not accept a regular expression pattern but a simple string literal.
You have two options to get the expected outcome:
Instead of using String::replace you can use String::replaceFirst. As the method name suggests it will replace only the first occurrence of the Richards substring leaving the Richardson as is.
str = str.replaceFirst("Richards", "Praveen")
Instead of using String::replace you can use String::replaceAll, in opposite to String::replace it supports regular expressions so you can use word boundaries tokens
str = str.replaceAll("\\bRichards\\b","Praveen")
Mind the double slashes!
Also, according to the String::replaceAll documentation:
Note that backslashes (\) and dollar signs ($) in the replacement string may cause the results to be different than if it were being treated as a literal replacement string; see Matcher.replaceAll. Use Matcher.quoteReplacement(java.lang.String) to suppress the special meaning of these characters, if desired.
Here is example of string
Hi {{1}},
The status of your leave application has changed,
Leaves: {{2}}
Status: {{3}}
See you soon back at office by Management.
Expected Result:
Variables Count = 3
i tried python count() using if/else, but i'm looking for sustainable solution.
You can use regular expressions:
import re
PATTERN = re.compile(r'\{\{\d+\}\}', re.DOTALL)
def count_vars(text: str) -> int:
return sum(1 for _ in PATTERN.finditer(text))
PATTERN defines the regular expression. The regular expression matches all strings that contain at least one digit (\d+) within a pair of curly brackets (\{\{\}\}). Curly brackets are special characters in regular expressions, so we must add \. re.DOTALL makes sure that we don't skip over new lines (\n). The finditer method iterates over all matches in the text and we simply count them.
Is there a way to replace the matched pattern substring using a single re.sub() line?.
What I would like to avoid is using a string replace method to the current re.sub() output.
Input = "/J&L/LK/Tac1_1/shareloc.pdf"
Current output using re.sub("[^0-9_]", "", input): "1_1"
Desired output in a single re.sub use: "1.1"
According to the documentation, re.sub is defined as
re.sub(pattern, repl, string, count=0, flags=0)
If repl is a function, it is called for every non-overlapping occurrence of pattern.
This said, if you pass a lambda function, you can remain the code in one line. Furthermore, remember that the matched characters can be accessed easier to an individual group by: x[0].
I removed _ from the regex to reach the desired output.
txt = "/J&L/LK/Tac1_1/shareloc.pdf"
x = re.sub("[^0-9]", lambda x: '.' if x[0] is '_' else '', txt)
print(x)
There is no way to use a string replacement pattern in Python re.sub to replace with two possible strings, as there is no conditional replacement construct support in Python re.sub. So, using a callable as the replacement argument or use other work-arounds.
It looks like you only expect one match of <DIGITS>_<DIGITS> in the input string. In this case, you can use
import re
text = "/J&L/LK/Tac1_1/shareloc.pdf"
print( re.sub(r'^.*?(\d+)_(\d+).*', r'\1.\2', text, flags=re.S) )
# => 1.1
See the Python demo. See the regex demo. Details:
^ - start of string
.*? - zero or more chars as few as possible
(\d+) - Group 1: one or more digits
_ - a _ char
(\d+) - Group 2: one or more digits
.* - zero or more chars as many as possible.
Need help with a regular expression to grab exactly n lines of text between two regex matches. For example, I need 17 lines of text and I used the example below, which does not work. I
Please see sample code below:
import re
match_string = re.search(r'^.*MDC_IDC_RAW_MARKER((.*?\r?\n){17})Stored_EGM_Trigger.*\n'), t, re.DOTALL).group()
value1 = re.search(r'value="(\d+)"', match_string).group(1)
value2 = re.search(r'value="(\d+\.\d+)"', match_string).group(1)
print(match_string)
print(value1)
print(value2)
I added a sample string to here, because SO does not allow long code string:
https://hastebin.com/aqowusijuc.xml
You are getting false positives because you are using the re.DOTALL flag, which allows the . character to match newline characters. That is, when you are matching ((.*?\r?\n){17}), the . could eat up many extra newline characters just to satisfy your required count of 17. You also now realize that the \r is superfluous. Also, starting your regex with ^.*? is superfluous because you are forcing the search to start from the beginning but then saying that the search engine should skip as many characters as necessary to find MDC_IDC_RAW_MARKER. So, a simplified and correct regex would be:
match_string = re.search(r'MDC_IDC_RAW_MARKER.*\n((.*\n){17})Stored_EGM_Trigger.*\n', t)
Regex Demo
What is an efficient way in MATLAB to replace/insert one symbol (in series of symbols) with several others that correspond to the one that is being replaced?
For example, consider having a string Eq: Eq = 'A*exp(-((x-xc)/w)^2)'. Is there a way to replace * with .*, / with ./,\ with .\, and ^ with .^ without writing four separate strrep() lines?
Regular expressions will do the job nicely. Regular expressions simply find patterns in text. You specify what kind of pattern you are looking for by a regular expression, and the output gives you the locations of where the pattern occurred.
For our particular case, not only do we want to find where patterns occur, we also want to replace those patterns with something else. Specifically, use the function regexprep from MATLAB to replace matches in a string with something else. What you want to do is replace all *, /, \ and ^ symbols by adding a . in front of each.
How regexprep works is that the first input is the string you're looking at, the second input is a pattern that you're trying to find. In our case, we want to find any of *, /, \ and ^. To specify this pattern, you put those desired symbols in [] brackets. Regular expressions reserve \ as a special symbol to delineate characters that can be parsed as a regular expression but actually aren't. As such, you need to use \\ for the \ character and \^ for the ^ character. The third input is what you want to replace each match with. In our case, we simply want to reuse each matched character, but we add a . at the beginning of the match. This is done by doing \.$0 in the regular expression syntax. $0 means to grab the first token produced by a match... which is essentially the matched symbol from the pattern. . is also a reserved keyword using regular expressions, so we must prepend this symbol with a \ character.
Without further ado:
>> Eq = 'A*exp(-((x-xc)/w)^2)';
>> out = regexprep(Eq, '[*/\\\^]', '\.$0')
out =
A.*exp(-((x-xc)./w).^2)
The pattern we are looking for is [*/\\\^], which means that we want to find any of *, /, \ - denoted as \\ in regex, and \^ - denoted as ^ in regex. We want to find any of these symbols and replace them with the same symbol by adding a . character in front - \.$0.
As a more complicated example, let's make sure that we include all of the symbols you're looking for in a sample equation:
>> A = 'A*exp(-((x-xc)/w)^2) \ b^2';
>> out = regexprep(A, '[*/\\\^]', '\.$0')
out =
A.*exp(-((x-xc)./w).^2) .\ b.^2
I'd go with regexp as in rayryeng's answer. But here's another approach, just to provide an alternative.
ops = '*/\^'; %// operators that need a dot
ii = find(ismember(Eq, ops)); %// find where dots should be inserted
[~, jj] = sort([1:numel(Eq) ii-.5]); %// will be used to properly order the result
result = [Eq repmat('.',1,numel(ii))]; %// insert dots at the end
result = result(jj); %// properly order the result
And a variant:
ops = '*/\^'; %// operators that need a dot
ii = find(ismember(Eq, ops)); %// find where dots should be inserted
jj = sort([1:numel(Eq) ii-.5]); %// dot locations are marked with fractional part
result = Eq(ceil(jj)); %// repeat characters where the dots will be placed
result(mod(jj,1)>0) = '.'; %// place dots at indices with fractional part
The vectorize function already does almost all of what you want except that it does not convert mldivide (\) to ldivide (.\).
By "efficient," do you mean fewer lines of code or faster? Regular expressions are almost always slower than other approaches and less readable. I don't think they're necessary or a good choice in this case. If you only need to convert your string once, then speed is less of a concern than readability (strrep will still be faster). If you need to do it many times, this simple code that you alluded to is 4–5 times faster than regexrep for short strings like your example (and much faster for longer strings):
out = strrep(Eq,'*','.*');
out = strrep(out,'/','./');
out = strrep(out,'\','.\');
out = strrep(out,'^','.^');
If you want one line, use:
out = strrep(strrep(strrep(strrep(Eq,'*','.*'),'/','./'),'\','.\'),'^','.^');
which will also be slightly faster still. Or create your own version of vectorize and call that.
Where regular expressions shine is in more complex cases, e.g., if your string is already partially vectorized: Eq = 'A.*exp(-((x-xc)/w)^2)'. Even still, the vectorize function just uses strrep and then calls strfind to "remove any possible '..*', '../', etc." and replace them with the proper element-wise operators because it's faster (symbolic math strings can get very large, for example).