I have a financial time series data set. I need to make a rolling window correlation, where I can control the window size, 1 dependent variable and 2 or more independent varaibles. And it needs to be dynamic when updating the data history. I also want to be able to choose the dependent.
I already managed to make the first dynamic correlation, where i changes as I change the constant of the window size
="Data!"&ADRESS($A11;MATCH(B$7;TitleArray;0))&":"&ADRESS($B$1+ROW(Data!$A$1);MATCH(B$$7;TitleArray;0))
The cell now holds an address to the range of the data in the window of the first variable
Data is reffering to my data set.
$A11 is my starting row number of the window. might need to relative?
B$7 is a cell with the name of my dependent variable (I want to know how this corr with several other
variables, but I need to be able shift between, which is the dependent one)
TitleArray is name of a range holding the variable names
$B$1 refers the the constant explaining the size of the window
+ROW(Data!$A$1) makes sure that it adjusts when I add more history
Then I just copied this formula to the next cell in the column next to, replacing B7 with C7
Then, in a new cell I found the corr between the two in this way:
CORRELATION(INDIRECT($o$16);INDIRECT(P16))
Here I made the corr between the dependent and another variable for the set window (I tested it with 24 months).
Can anyone help me get the last steps in order to extend it to show the last corr windows for the remaining history? I suppose it should be rather easy, but I can't seem find the right way. I guess I have to remove some $ signs and then drag it down, but then I will get a lot of rows with adresses follows by correlations. Can it be made in a smarter way?
If any details are missing please let me know
thank you!
A little hard to follow the specifics of your objectives, but here is an approach using OFFSET.
=CORRELATION( OFFSET( Data!$A$1; $A11-1; MATCH($B7;TitleArray;0 )-1; ($B$1+2-$A$11); 1 );
OFFSET( Data!$A$1; $A11-1; MATCH(C7;TitleArray;0 )-1; ($B$1+2-$A$11); 1 ) )
B7 is the name of your dependent variable and C7 would be the independent variable name. As you drag this formula to the right, it would compare B7 to C7, then D7, etc.
NB: my OS is in English, so here is the working version in my machine just in case I errored in translation:
=CORREL( OFFSET( Data!$A$1, $A11-1, MATCH($B7,TitleArray,0 )-1, ($B$1+2-$A$11), 1 ),
OFFSET( Data!$A$1, $A11-1, MATCH(C7,TitleArray,0 )-1, ($B$1+2-$A$11), 1 ) )
With this approach, you can avoid having the helper cells with the formula:
="Data!"&ADDRESS($A11;MATCH(B$7;TitleArray;0))&":"&ADDRESS($B$1+ROW(Data!$A$1);MATCH(B$7;TitleArray;0))
Related
I want to create an Excel Table where the first column is the "SL" (serial number) column that starts from 1 and then increases by 1 for each subsequent entry. I want the serial number to automatically increase as I add more rows to the table.
I have tried using all manners of "=ROWS" functions, all manners of "=COUNTA" functions, and all other functions used in tutorial that I found in the web. None of them are immune from sorting or filtering. That is, if I sort the "Name" column from A to Z, the serial number that was assigned to its respective row entry changes because of how these formulae are written. For example:
This is the Original List. As you can see, Dragon Fruit's serial number is 1. I have used the "=COUNTA(B$2:[#[NAME]])" function in this example.
As you can see, when I sorted the "Name" column from A to Z, Dragon Fruit's serial number went from 1 to 2, Acai went from 4 to 1, Guava went from 9 to 3, and so on. But I want the serial numbers to be static and locked to their corresponding "Name".
Is this possible to do in Excel without manually typing the numbers in the SL column?
Good question and a tricky situation to deal with. I'm not sure if the question is better suited for SuperUser though.
The trick here is to somehow use absolute cell-references instead of relative ones. As you have now experienced, Excel filters won't work well with relative references. However, manually adding absolute references is not what we want to do.
To mimic the absolute cell-reference behaviour you can preceed the row reference with a sheet-reference which magically should counter the normal formula-behaviour and turn them into actual absolute cell-references:
Formula in A2 (which will auto-fill the 'SL' column):
=ROW(Sheet1!A1)
Data when filtered A-Z on 'Name':
Data when tabbed a new row:
You could use PowerQuery in Excel to add an index in front.
Remove the ID from your source.
Make your source a table
Import into PowerQuery and add an index
Load the output to another sheet. In this sheet you can filter and sort and everything you want.
I am looking for some decent help with my matrix table, and is there a good or best approach to properly match dependent instances in certain matrix using drop downs.
This picture represents my matrix table (Picture 1):
As you can see there are a lot of instances, but horizontally and vertically they got the same number of "headers". Those "1`s" are representing not compatibility in my case but lets call it simply "match". That is on one sheet that is gonna be populated with some new values from time to time.
On another sheet which is actually sheet for showing the data and their compatibility possibilities is equipped with drop downs. There you got "Groups (Group1, Group2...)" in a sense of main parts and "dependent groups (AA1, BB2..)" as small components that are part of main parts. To avoid misunderstanding here you have explanations, I used for the sake of this example fictional values:
Groups aka. Main Parts
Dependent groups aka. components
As you can see beneath, is my fictional table but exactly the same concept as I should use in my real case.
I PUT AN EXPLANATION IN THE PICTURE 2 SO YOU CAN FOLLOW ALONG AND SEE EXACTLY WHERE/WHAT I DID!
What I used firstly there are =match functions, one for vertical position (A3) and one for horizontal (B4). This boolean row is done using =or(index) but reffering to the match positions as you can see. And from there I should use true/false for coloring my group boxes in a case compatibility is possible - thats all the science.
So, my question is if there is another approach to this problem? As you can see I have 3 different rows of functions at one place, or imagine if I will have more "groups" that can rise in many more rows and calculations.
Picture 2
EDITED:
This is screenshot of the original sheet, I just hid some rows that were with Infos that is reason the number is not consistent. As you can see it is almost the same as dummy example I provided above. Underneath every "box" you got three rows of calculations as I mentioned before. The two times number "2" that you see here is the position of some value that I found using =match function, one is for horizontal and another for vertical lookup. In this case it is model type, 070FX is position 2, 100FX is 3 and 200FX is 4th position in the matrix table, and so on for all the other groups. And those groups (Model, Endpoint, Gas sensor...) are defined separately on another sheet where I had to make unique list and dependent list so I can reference those to my drop down list.
EDIT Nr 4! So this formula I used for true/false:
=SUMPRODUCT(('0359-matrix'!$A$2:$A$101=F10)*(('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$B$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$C$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$D$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$E$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$F$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$G$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$H$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$I$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$J$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$K$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$L$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$M$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$N$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$O$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$P$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$Q$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=F13)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=G13)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=H13)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=I13)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=J13))*'0359-matrix'!$B$2:$CW$101)>0
I copied only last part, or when it starts from second row..Because it is too long to write whole funciton - it cuts down automatically.
('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$Q$10)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$B$13)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$C$13)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$D$13)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$E$13)+('0359-matrix'!$B$1:$CW$1=$F$13))*'0359-matrix'!$B$2:$CW$101)>0
But on marked cells I am getting the same results: B22 - F22 has the same as B21 - F21 (boolean) what shouldnt be like that but to follow color, green is False, it has to be something with an array reference.
Checkout the following. A1 to E5 is the matrix that shows which pieces are incompatible (=1). The others have to be empty or 0.
In cell I8 I used the following formula (and copied it down up to I11):
=SUMPRODUCT(($A$2:$A$5=H8)*(($B$1:$E$1=$H$8)+($B$1:$E$1=$H$9)+($B$1:$E$1=$H$10)+($B$1:$E$1=$H$11))*$B$2:$E$5)
The formula result shows you the amount of incompatibilities a part has. Eg AA1 has one incompatibility with BB2 but BB2 is incompatible with 2 AA1 and CC3.
To get the TRUE/FALSE use the same formula and append >0: like =SUMPRODUCT(…)>0
For any additinonal "group" (Model, Endpoint, …) you need to add another +($B$1:$E$1=$H$12) where $B$1:$E$1 points to your matrix data and $H$12 to your selected group value.
Overview of the formula ranges:
Note that this kind of calculation can only tell the amount of incompatibilites a part has but not the names of the parts that are incompatible.
Edited horizontal version
Formula in the selected cell is
=SUMPRODUCT(($A$2:$A$5=G8)*(($B$1:$E$1=$G$8)+($B$1:$E$1=$H$8)+($B$1:$E$1=$I$8)+($B$1:$E$1=$J$8))*$B$2:$E$5)
you can pull it to the right.
I'm trying to build a spreadsheet to help automate points scoring for an office F1 fantasy league we have.
I've attached an example data set, but basically I need to search a range, then count how many times the constructor appears in the numbered positions (discounting R, D as they've not finished), then carry this over to the standings.
I also need to do something similar for the top 10 which says if 2 cars from the same constructor (Mercedes, Mercedes) appear in positions 1-10 then add points to the standings.
In the working model the data for race1 is direct from the BBC via web query, so how they appear with 'driver' in between is how it must remain (I also have other actions running which lookup the driver info, so can't be moved).
I've popped the example on my drive here and updated version.
You need to be consistent with spellings or this won't work, but for standings B2 you might try:
=IF(COUNTIFS(race1!C:C,A2,race1!A:A,"<>D",race1!A:A,"<>R")=2,20,IF(COUNTIFS(race1!C:C,A2,race1!A:A,"<>D",race1!A:A,"<>R")=1,7,-15))
and in C2:
=COUNTIF(race1!$C$2:$C$11,A2)*10
both copied down to suit.
Edit for number of cars in column B change first formula to:
=COUNTIFS(race1!C:C,A2,race1!A:A,"<>D",race1!A:A,"<>R")
and for points put first formula in C2 (copy both down to suit).
I am thinking this is gonna be a simpler answer than I'm making it, but here goes nothing. I have a project I am working on using Excel and Python, where I am going to calculate the results for a season of NASCAR using the different points systems. I had tried doing this only using Python, but figured doing it in Excel first is better. The thing is, I have all the results for all 36 races inputted in Excel, with formatting for drivers who lead a lap, drivers who lead the most laps, and drivers not elligible for points.
How I have the formatting is as follows:
Inelligible driver's names are in red text.
Driver(s) who lead a lap are in bold text.
Driver(s) who lead the most laps are in bold text and bold border.
Driver(s) who had penalties have a red background.
Is there a way I could assign values based on these formatting conditions?
As for the penalties, those I could calculate separately if needed.
Please let me know whatever you may suggest.
Each column contains the results for a single race, and since there are always 43 drivers, the block of cells contains 43 rows (plus a heading row with each race name).
An option I'm thinking of is, to have the results for each race on Sheet1, then on Sheet2 have a list of all valid driver names, then copy and paste it twice, one for each option (2 bonus points, 1 bonus point, and no bonus points), and name each list. Also, I will have names for each driver, as well as names for each position. Then, when calculating the points after a race, use an if-then-else formula similar to the following:
IF A2 = driver_most_led [Driver_Name = Driver_Name + Position_Points + Most_Led_Bonus], ELSE IF A2 = driver_lead [Driver_Name = Driver_Name + Position_Points + Lead_Bonus], ELSE [Driver_Name = Driver_Name + Position_Points])
I know it's a long example, but not sure if this is legit or not.
I have a worksheet, in where I need a search that does more than one query. The problem I am running into is this:
On the workbook there are two tabs, the first is Jobs, the second is OOR. In OOR there are multiple columns empty, Order Qty., Orig Promise Date, and Shop Order.
Now I know there are duplicates, and this is fine, what I am looking at now is to use Column B in OOR is a refrence. So in this case use B3 as the refrence point. which is a partial number of 48900421 Rev 2. What I want to do is this, use two refrence points.
I want to look up B3 in OOR, and use two points of refrence to gurantee the correct job is refrenced. Those two columns to refrence is in Jobs. The first is Column B which will always equal Dakota Systems, Inc., and the other will reference Column C, but this is where I don't know what to do here, I since C3 in OOR only shows 48900421, it will never find 48900421 Rev 2I thought about using something like this:
=IFERROR(INDEX(Jobs!$E:$E,MATCH(1,INDEX((OOR!$C:$C=$B3)*(Jobs!$C:$C="Dakota Systems, Inc."),1),0)),"")
But for some reason I am getting a blank when I don't think I should be. I'm loosing my sanity this late in the week, can someone help?
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/3327208/Excel/twosearches.xlsx
You don't seem to be referencing the right columns....and also you need a zero in the second INDEX function, not a 1
Try this version in in OOR!I3 copied down, using ISNUMBER(FIND to find your part number within other text:
=IFERROR(INDEX(Jobs!E$3:E$1000,MATCH(1,INDEX(ISNUMBER(FIND(B3,Jobs!C$3:C$1000))*(Jobs!B$3:B$1000="Dakota Systems, Inc."),0),0)),"")
format in required date format
Revised re comment below:
=IFERROR(INDEX(Jobs!E$3:E$1000,MATCH(1,INDEX(ISNUMBER(FIND(B3,Jobs!C$3:C$1000))*(Jobs!B$3:B$1000="Dakota Systems, Inc.")*(Jobs!A$3:A$1000=M3),0),0)),"")