I'm trying to do a flexibleSearch to retrieve Products and his Leaf Categories. The leaf categories are the last categories that have no other subcategories, and the categories must be of type "category" and "productTypeCategory". I try to make some joins but I failed. I appreciate any help!
I would suggest something like this:
SELECT {c.code}, {c.itemtype}, {ccr.source} FROM
{Category as c LEFT JOIN CategoryCategoryRelation as ccr ON {c.pk}={ccr.source}
JOIN ComposedType as ct ON {c.itemtype} = {ct.pk}}
WHERE {ccr.source} IS NULL AND {ct.code} = 'Category'
At least, it should be a beginning. It will return the LEAF cats of type Category.
The rest is Joining with Products and probably considering catalog versions. Depending on the concrete use case you haven't provided, it is maybe better to ask Solr for the final result and you use the category result of my query to pass to the solr query, instead of implementing the additional JOINs, but that depends on if you're in the storefront or if you need the info for a backoffice/cronjob etc.
Related
Iam new to Flexible Search Query, I am trying to write flexible search query to retrieve the classification atrributes values matches with one of the classification attribute as below:
select {ca.code} from {ProductFeature as pf
join Product as p on {pf.product} = {p.pk}
join ClassAttributeAssignment as caa on {pf.classificationAttributeAssignment} = {caa.pk}
join ClassificationAttribute as ca on {caa.classificationAttribute} = {ca.pk}
join ClassificationClass as cc on {caa.classificationClass} = {cc.pk}
JOIN CatalogVersion as cv ON {cv.pk}={p.catalogVersion}
JOIN Catalog as cat ON {cat.pk}={cv.catalog}} where {ca.code} = 'capacity' and {cv.version} = 'Staged'
In above snippet, am able to get code of ClassficationAttribute, but how do I get values of that attribute?
I was facing the same issue. The problem is that your select statement is wrong.
You need to be using {pf.stringValue} instead of {ca.code}
Can somebody help me in converting below mentioned query in to Maximo's where clause:
select distinct workorder.wonum from workorder inner join [assignment]
On workorder.wonum=[assignment].wonum
inner join amcrew
On amcrew.amcrew=[assignment].amcrew
inner join amcrewlabor
On amcrewlabor.amcrew=amcrew.amcrew
inner join labor
On amcrewlabor.laborcode=labor.laborcode
inner join person
on labor.laborcode=person.personid where amcrewlabor.laborcode='KELLYB'
KELLYB is PERSONID used here for just reference.
If you are using a custom search query in Maximo, you can try prepending your with in (your query)
For example, if you're in Maximo's work order tracking module, the application uses select * from workorder by default. Any time you add a search filter such as work order number (wonum), then the query appends to run a query as select * from workorder where wonum = '123' if 123 is the work order number you entered.
Your where clause might look something like this:
wonum in (
select distinct workorder.wonum
from workorder
join assignment on workorder.wonum=assignment.wonum
join amcrew on amcrew.amcrew=assignment.amcrew
join amcrewlabor on amcrewlabor.amcrew=amcrew.amcrew
join labor on amcrewlabor.laborcode=labor.laborcode
join person on labor.laborcode=person.personid
where amcrewlabor.laborcode='KELLYB'
)
The SQL that is generated in Microsoft Access will not necessarily work in Maximo without some modification.
I searched a lot about sorting elements by sum of votes (in another model), like I do in SQL here :
SELECT item.* FROM item
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT
vote.item,
SUM(vote.value) AS vote.rating
FROM vote
GROUP BY vote.item
) AS res ON item.id = vote.item
ORDER BY res.rating DESC
Is there a way to do it via waterline methods ?
I think you can't do the left join with simple waterline methods, but you can use the .query method to execute your raw SQL syntax.
Sails MySQL adapter makes sum('field') conflict with sort('field'). It will generate SQL query like:
SELECT SUM(table.field) AS field FROM table ORDER BY table.field;
But I want:
SELECT SUM(table.field) AS field FROM table ORDER BY field;
It same as:
SELECT SUM(table.field) AS f FROM table ORDER BY f;
My solution is using lodash.sortBy() to process results. https://lodash.com/docs/4.16.4#sortBy
I have created a query with a subquery in Access, and cannot link it in Excel 2003: when I use the menu Data -> Import External Data -> Import Data... and select the mdb file, the query is not present in the list. If I use the menu Data -> Import External Data -> New Database Query..., I can see my query in the list, but at the end of the import wizard I get this error:
Too few parameters. Expected 2.
My guess is that the query syntax is causing the problem, in fact the query contains a subquery. So, I'll try to describe the query goal and the resulting syntax.
Table Positions
ID (Autonumber, Primary Key)
position (double)
currency_id (long) (references Currency.ID)
portfolio (long)
Table Currency
ID (Autonumber, Primary Key)
code (text)
Query Goal
Join the 2 tables
Filter by portfolio = 1
Filter by currency.code in ("A", "B")
Group by currency and calculate the sum of the positions for each currency group an call the result: sumOfPositions
Calculate abs(sumOfPositions) on each currency group
Calculate the sum of the previous results as a single result
Query
The query without the final sum can be created using the Design View. The resulting SQL is:
SELECT Currency.code, Sum(Positions.position) AS SumOfposition
FROM [Currency] INNER JOIN Positions ON Currency.ID = Positions.currency_id
WHERE (((Positions.portfolio)=1))
GROUP BY Currency.code
HAVING (((Currency.code) In ("A","B")));
in order to calculate the final SUM I did the following (in the SQL View):
SELECT Sum(Abs([temp].[SumOfposition])) AS sumAbs
FROM [SELECT Currency.code, Sum(Positions.position) AS SumOfposition
FROM [Currency] INNER JOIN Positions ON Currency.ID = Positions.currency_id
WHERE (((Positions.portfolio)=1))
GROUP BY Currency.code
HAVING (((Currency.code) In ("A","B")))]. AS temp;
So, the question is: is there a better way for structuring the query in order to make the export work?
I can't see too much wrong with it, but I would take out some of the junk Access puts in and scale down the query to this, hopefully this should run ok:
SELECT Sum(Abs(A.SumOfPosition)) As SumAbs
FROM (SELECT C.code, Sum(P.position) AS SumOfposition
FROM Currency As C INNER JOIN Positions As P ON C.ID = P.currency_id
WHERE P.portfolio=1
GROUP BY C.code
HAVING C.code In ("A","B")) As A
It might be worth trying to declare your parameters in the MS Access query definition and define their datatypes. This is especially important when you are trying to use the query outside of MS Access itself, since it can't auto-detect the parameter types. This approach is sometimes hit or miss, but worth a shot.
PARAMETERS [[Positions].[portfolio]] Long, [[Currency].[code]] Text ( 255 );
SELECT Sum(Abs([temp].[SumOfposition])) AS sumAbs
FROM [SELECT Currency.code, Sum(Positions.position) AS SumOfposition
FROM [Currency] INNER JOIN Positions ON Currency.ID = Positions.currency_id
WHERE (((Positions.portfolio)=1))
GROUP BY Currency.code
HAVING (((Currency.code) In ("A","B")))]. AS temp;
I have solved my problems thanks to the fact that the outer query is doing a trivial sum. When choosing New Database Query... in Excel, at the end of the process, after pressing Finish, an Import Data form pops up, asking
Where do you want to put the data?
you can click on Create a PivotTable report... . If you define the PivotTable properly, Excel will display only the outer sum.
I'm trying to get an average for a count on a groupBy by joining with a subquery. Don't know if that the right way to go at all but I couldn't anything about subqueries other than the mysema doc.
Scenario:
How many orders per product did a customer do on average?
Meaning: A Customer orders products. So a customer ordered a specific product a number of times (count). What's the average number of orders that customer placed for any product?
Might sound a bit hypothetical, in fact it's just part of a prototype, but it made me wonder, how to get a reference to a custom column created within a subquery with the fancy QueryDSL from Mysema.
In SQL you just give the count column an alias and join using a second ID column. QueryDSL has the "as()" method as well but I have no Idea, how to retrieve that column plus I dont't see how it can join one query with anothers, since query.list() just gets a list but for some reason the join accepts it. Feels wrong...
Here's my code:
JPQLQuery query = createJPQLQuery();
QOrdering qOrdering = QOrdering.ordering;
QProduct qProduct = QProduct.product;
QCustomer qCustomer = QCustomer.customer;
// how many of each product did a customer order?
HibernateSubQuery subQuery = new HibernateSubQuery();
subQuery.from(qOrdering).innerJoin(qOrdering.product,qProduct).innerJoin(qOrdering.customer, qCustomer);
subQuery.groupBy(qCustomer,qProduct).list(qCustomer.id,qProduct.id,qProduct.count());
// get the average number of orders per product for each customer
query.from(qCustomer);
query.innerJoin(subQuery.list(qCustomer.id,qOrdering.count().as("count_orders")));
query.groupBy(qCustomer.id);
return (List<Object[]>) query.list(qCustomer.firstname,subQuery.count_orders.avg());
Again: How do I join with a subquery?
How do I get the aliased "count" column to do more aggregation like avg (is my group right btw?)
Might be that I have some other errors in this, so any help appreciated!
Thanks!
Edit:
That's kind of the native SQL I'd like to see QueryDSL produce:
Select avg(numOrders) as average, cust.lastname from
customer cust
inner join
(select count(o.product_id) as numOrders, c.id as cid, p.name
from ordering o
inner join product p on o.product_id=p.id
inner join customer c on o.customer_id=c.id
group by o.customer_id, o.product_id) as numprods
on cust.id = numprods.cid
group by numprods.cid
order by cust.lastname;
Using subqueries in the join clause is not allowed. in JPQL, subqueries are only allowed in the WHERE and HAVING part. The join method signatures in Querydsl JPA queries are too wide.
As this query needs two levels of grouping, maybe it can't be expressed with JPQL / Querydsl JPA.
I'd suggest to write this query using the Querydsl JPA Native query support.
As Querydsl JPA uses JPQL internally, it is restricted by the expressiveness of JPQL.
I know that this question is old and already has an accepted answer, but judging from this question, it seems to still be troubling guys. See my answer in the same question. The use of JoinFlag in the join() section and Expression.path() is able to achieve left-joining a subquery. Hope this helps someone.
QueryDsl does not support subQuery in join but you can achieve this via following way:
We wanted to achieve the following query:
select A.* from A join (select aid from B group by aid) b on b.aid=A.id;
Map a View or SQL query to JPA entity:
import lombok.Setter;
import org.hibernate.annotations.Subselect;
import org.hibernate.annotations.Synchronize;
import javax.persistence.Entity;
import javax.persistence.Id;
#Entity
#Getter
#Setter
#Subselect("select aid from B group by aid")
#Synchronize("B")
public class BGroupByAid {
#Id
private Integer aId;
}
then use the equivalent QueryDSl entity in the class just like the regular entity:
JPAQuery<QAsset> query = new JPAQuery<>(entityManager);
QBGroupByAid bGroupById = QBGroupByAid.bGroupByAid;
List<A> tupleOfAssets =
query.select(A)
.from(A).innerJoin(bGroupById).on(bGroupById.aId.eq(A.aId))
.fetchResults()
.getResults();
You can also use blazebit which supports also subquery in join. I have try it and it is working. You can create SubQueryExpression f.e like this
SubQueryExpression<Tuple> sp2 = getQueryFactory().select(entity.id,
JPQLNextExpressions.rowNumber().over().partitionBy(entity.folId).orderBy(entity.creationDate.desc()).as(rowNumber))
.from(entity)
.where(Expressions.path(Integer.class, rowNumber).eq(1));
and then just join it like this:
return getBlazeQueryFactory()
.select(entity1, entity)
.from(entity1)
.leftJoin(sp2, entity).on(entity.id.eq(entity1.id)).fetch();
I have put here just simple example. So maybe it doesn't make a perfect sense but maybe can be helpful.
Also don't be confused it will can produce union in the generated select. This is just for naming columns from subquery you can read better explanation about this union here: Blaze-Persistence GROUP BY in LEFT JOIN SUBQUERY with COALESCE in root query