lifetime of function pointer is for<'a, '_> while it should be for<'r> - rust

Sometimes I struggle with lifetimes. I'm still learning and I don't know what's happening here:
use std::future::Future;
use futures::future::{BoxFuture, FutureExt};
struct M{}
struct Client{}
impl Client {
async fn send_and_expect<'a>(
&'a mut self,
m: &M
) -> std::result::Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
pub fn connection_retrier<'a, T>(
f: fn(&'a mut Self, &M) -> T,
f_self: &'a mut Self,
f_m: &'a M,
)-> BoxFuture<'a, std::result::Result<(),()>>
where
T: Future<Output = std::result::Result<(), ()>> + 'a
{
async move {
Client::send_and_expect(f_self, f_m).await
}.boxed()
}
async fn send_with_retry<'a>(&'a mut self) -> std::result::Result<(), ()> {
let m = M{};
Client::connection_retrier(
Client::send_and_expect,
&mut *self, &m).await
}
}
Error:
Compiling playground v0.0.1 (/playground)
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/lib.rs:31:21
|
11 | ) -> std::result::Result<(), ()> {
| --------------------------- the `Output` of this `async fn`'s found opaque type
...
31 | Client::send_and_expect,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ one type is more general than the other
|
= note: expected fn pointer `for<'r> fn(&mut Client, &'r M) -> impl futures::Future`
found fn pointer `for<'a, '_> fn(&'a mut Client, &M) -> impl futures::Future
Playground
I'm now completely confused about why in for<'r> fn(&mut Client, &'r M) -> impl futures::Future, &mut Client has no lifetime. And what does _ means in for<'a, '_> fn(&'a mut Client, &M) -> impl futures::Future`?
I'm very intersted in learning what's happening here.

Cleaning up the code
In order to see this code from the compiler's perspective, let's change all the lifetime parameters in this example to be explicit and have distinct names, expand the async fn sugar, and then look at how the error changes.
The above example is equivalent to the following after lifetime inference and desugaring.
// name the second lifetime, and expand the async fn sugar.
fn send_and_expect<'a, 'b>(&'a mut self, m: &'b M) -> impl Future<Item=Result<(), ()>> + 'a + 'b
{ ... }
// rename 'a to 'c to avoid ambiguous lifetime names
pub fn connection_retrier<'c, T>(
f: for<'d> fn(&'c mut Self, &'d M) -> T, // name the implicit higher-ranked lifetime here
f_self: &'c mut Self,
f_m: &'c M,
)-> BoxFuture<'c, std::result::Result<(), ()>>
where T: Future<Output = std::result::Result<(), ()>> + 'c
{ ... }
// rename 'a to 'e to avoid ambiguous lifetime names
async fn send_with_retry<'e>(&'e mut self) -> std::result::Result<(), ()> {
After making this change, the error becomes:
Compiling playground v0.0.1 (/playground)
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/lib.rs:31:21
|
11 | ) -> std::result::Result<(), ()> {
| --------------------------- the `Output` of this `async fn`'s found opaque type
...
31 | Client::send_and_expect,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ one type is more general than the other
|
= note: expected fn pointer `for<'d> fn(&mut Client, &'d M) -> impl futures::Future`
found fn pointer `for<'a, 'b> fn(&'a mut Client, &'b M) -> impl futures::Future`
This should clarify your question about '_: it's just the name the compiler gave the inferred second lifetime parameter of send_and_expect. As for the missing lifetime on &mut Client, you can see that it's still missing here. For reasons I do not completely understand, and in ways that depend on the exact error message given, the compiler will sometimes omit concrete lifetimes when printing the type of references, but make no mistake, the lifetime of that reference is 'c.
Solving the error
Onto the actual problem. The signature of f indicates that connection_retrier is expecting a function which (1) takes a reference of lifetime &'c and (2) a reference of any other lifetime, and (3) returns a Future type which will remain valid as long as 'c does, as specified by your where bound.
When we pass send_and_expect to connection_retrier, in order for the signatures to match the compiler is coercing it to the type for<'d> send_and_expect::<'c, 'd>. But that type doesn't meet condition (3) above! Unlike a regular function, the default behavior of an async function is to capture all input lifetimes in its return type, so the return type of for<'d> send_and_expect::<'c, 'd> is in fact impl Future<Item=Result<(), ()>> + 'c + 'd, as you can tell by looking at send_and_expect's expanded signature.
Since this type borrows from the two lifetimes 'c and 'd, and there is no constraint that 'd: 'c (read: 'd outlives 'c), it may not remain valid for the entirety of the lifetime 'c, if 'd ends first. It is this mismatch that results in the rather cryptic lifetime error you received. There are two ways you can solve this problem, depending on your preferred semantics. You can either:
Remove the higher-ranked bound from f entirely, and specify exactly the lifetimes you will be calling it with in connection_retrier (both &'c.)
pub fn connection_retrier<'c, T>(
f: fn(&'c mut Self, &'c M) -> T
f_self: &'c mut Self,
f_m: &'c M,
) -> BoxFuture<'c, std::result::Result<(), ()>>
where T: Future<Output = std::result::Result<(), ()>> + 'c
{ ... }
Keep the signature of connection_retrier the same and specify that the future returned by send_and_expect only borrows from its first argument. To do this, you will need to drop the async fn sugar on the signature and wrap the body in an async move block.
fn send_and_expect<'a, 'b>(&'a mut self, m: &'b M) -> impl Future<Output=Result<(), ()>> + 'a
{ async move { ... } }
Note that you cannot solve this by writing the type of f as for<'d: 'c> fn(&'c mut Self, &'d M) -> T, as bounds are currently not permitted for universally quantified lifetimes.

Related

How to convert a generic function with lifetimes into a function pointer

This is of course a simplified version of my actual problem.
fn my_func<'a, 'b>(a: &'a i32, b: &'b i32) -> i32 {
a + b
}
fn my_func_generic<'a, 'b, T>(a: &'a T, b: &'b T) -> T
where
&'a T: std::ops::Add<&'b T, Output = T>,
{
a + b
}
fn apply_function(x: &i32, y: &i32, function: fn(&i32, &i32) -> i32) -> i32 {
function(x, y)
}
fn main() {
let x = 10;
let y = 11;
println!("{}", my_func(&x, &y));
println!("{}", my_func_generic(&x, &y));
println!("{}", apply_function(&x, &y, my_func));
println!("{}", apply_function(&x, &y, my_func_generic));
}
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:23:43
|
23 | println!("{}", apply_function(&x, &y, my_func_generic));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ one type is more general than the other
|
= note: expected fn pointer `for<'r, 's> fn(&'r i32, &'s i32) -> _`
found fn pointer `fn(&i32, &i32) -> _`
The question I have is: How can I use my_func_generic as a function pointer to pass it into apply_function?
It can definitely be used as such a function, as println!("{}", my_func_generic(&x, &y)) demonstrates.
Trying to write it in a pointer gives the same error:
let function_pointer: fn(&i32, &i32) -> i32 = my_func_generic;
Annotating generic types manually gives the same error:
let function_pointer: fn(&i32, &i32) -> i32 = my_func_generic::<'_, '_, i32>;
Sadly I don't understand the error message, and don't have enough knowledge about the inner type system of Rust generics to understand how I could solve this issue, or if it's simply not possible due to some mechanism yet unknown to me.
TL;DR: In your case, you can do it as follows:
fn apply_function<'a, 'b>(x: &'a i32, y: &'b i32, function: fn(&'a i32, &'b i32) -> i32) -> i32
But in general, this is impossible.
There are two kinds of lifetimes in Rust: late-bound and early-bound. The difference between the two boils to when we bind the generic lifetime to a concrete lifetime.
For early-bound lifetime, we bind them when you're referring to their function. For late-bound lifetimes, referring to their function gives you a function pointer (or item) generic over the lifetime - what we call HRTB (for<'lifetime> fn(...)), and we choose the actual lifetime only when you call them.
The important point is that any constraints on the lifetime turns it into an early bound lifetime. This is because it is generally impossible to express constrained lifetimes as HRTB (more details on the above linked rustc-dev-guide page), although to be honest I still don't fully understand the reason.
So in my_func_generic(), 'a and 'b are early bound. However, apply_function() expects them to be late-bound (since the default desugaring for elided lifetimes in function pointers is HRTB, fn(&i32, &i32) -> i32 is actually for<'a, 'b> fn(&'a i32, &'b i32) -> i32), and so this is a type mismatch.
In this case, you can just change apply_function() to bind the lifetimes as parameters, as I suggested above. This will still accept late-bound lifetimes, as we'll just bind them immediately. However, as far as I know, in general it is impossible to convert an early-bound lifetime to a late-bound one.
It works if you change your trait bounds slightly:
fn my_func_generic<'a, 'b, T>(a: &'a T, b: &'b T) -> T
where
T: Copy + std::ops::Add<Output = T>,
{
*a + *b
}

Can a trait's impl specify a lifetime that comes from a method's input argument?

For a type
pub struct Child<'a> {
buf: &'a mut [u8],
}
I can define a trait and implement the trait for the type but with a lifetime that is bound to a calling function's context (not to a local loop context):
pub trait MakeMut<'a> {
fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self;
}
impl<'a> MakeMut<'a> for Child<'a> {
fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self {
Self { buf }
}
}
And first to show a somewhat working example because x is only borrowed within the context of the loop because Child::make_mut is hardcoded in the map1 function:
pub fn map1<F>(mut func: F)
where
F: FnMut(&mut Child),
{
let mut vec = vec![0; 16];
let x = &mut vec;
for i in 0..2 {
let offset = i * 8;
let s = &mut x[offset..];
let mut w = Child::make_mut(s);
func(&mut w);
}
}
But in trying to make map2, a generic version of map1 where the T is bound to the MakeMut trait but with lifetime of the entire function body, this won't compile, for good reasons (the T lifetimes that would be created by T: MakeMut<'a> have the lifetime of map2, not the inner loop):
pub fn map2<'a, F, T>(mut func: F) // lifetime `'a` defined here
where
T: MakeMut<'a>,
F: FnMut(&mut T),
{
let mut vec = vec![0; 16];
let x = &mut vec;
for i in 0..2 {
let offset = i * 8;
let s = &mut x[offset..];
let mut w = T::make_mut(s); // error: argument requires that `*x` is borrowed for `'a`
func(&mut w);
}
}
I want to do something almost like this but of course it doesn't compile either:
pub trait MakeMut {
fn make_mut<'a>(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self;
}
impl<'a> MakeMut for Child<'a> {
fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self { // lifetime mismatch
Self{ buf }
}
}
with the compiler errors:
error[E0308]: method not compatible with trait
--> src/main.rs:45:5
|
45 | fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ lifetime mismatch
|
= note: expected fn pointer `fn(&'a mut [u8]) -> Child<'_>`
found fn pointer `fn(&'a mut [u8]) -> Child<'_>`
note: the lifetime `'a` as defined here...
--> src/main.rs:45:5
|
45 | fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: ...does not necessarily outlive the lifetime `'a` as defined here
--> src/main.rs:44:6
|
44 | impl<'a> MakeMut for Child<'a> {
| ^^
Is there a syntax that allows a trait for a Child<'a> where the 'a is defined by the input argument to the method make_mut? So a generic function could be defined for a trait that returns an instance but where the instance lifetime is not the entire function, but just a shorter lifetime defined by an inner block?
I understand the lifetime is part of the type being returned, but it almost seems like a higher-ranked trait bound (HRTB) would suite this problem except I haven't found a way to specify the lifetime that suites the trait and the method signatures.
Here is a playground link https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=fb28d6da9d89fde645edeb1ca0ae5b21
Your first attempt is close to what you want. For reference:
pub trait MakeMut<'a> {
fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self;
}
impl<'a> MakeMut<'a> for Child<'a> {
fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self {
Self { buf }
}
}
The first problem is the bound on T in map2:
pub fn map2<'a, F, T>(mut func: F)
where
T: MakeMut<'a>,
F: FnMut(&mut T),
This requires the compiler to deduce a single 'a that applies for the whole function. Since lifetime parameters come from outside of the function, the lifetime 'a is necessarily longer than the function invocation, which means anything with lifetime 'a has to outlive the function. Working backwards from the T::make_mut() call, the compiler eventually deduces that x is &'a mut Vec<_> which means vec has to outlive the function invocation, but there's no possible way it can since it's a local.
This can be fixed by using a higher-rank trait bound indicating that T has to implement MakeMut<'a> for any possible lifetime 'a, which is expressed like this:
pub fn map2<F, T>(mut func: F)
where
T: for<'a> MakeMut<'a>,
F: FnMut(&mut T),
With this change, the code compiles.
What you'll then find is that you can't ever actually call map2 with T=Child<'_> because you'll run into the same problem in a different place. The caller must specify a specific lifetime for 'a in Child<'a>, but this disagrees with the HRTB -- you have impl<'a> MakeMut<'a> for Child<'a> but the HRTB wants impl<'a, 'b> MakeMut<'b> for Child<'a>, and that brings back the lifetime problem in that implementation's make_mut.
One way around this is to decouple the implementation of MakeMut from Child, providing a "factory type" that uses associated types. This way, the caller doesn't have to supply any pesky lifetime argument that could cause trouble later.
pub trait MakeMut<'a> {
type Item;
fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Self::Item;
}
struct ChildFactory;
impl<'a> MakeMut<'a> for ChildFactory {
type Item = Child<'a>;
fn make_mut(buf: &'a mut [u8]) -> Child<'a> {
Child { buf }
}
}
Then we modify map2 to be aware of the associated type:
pub fn map2<F, T>(mut func: F)
where
T: for<'a> MakeMut<'a>,
F: for<'a, 'b> FnMut(&'b mut <T as MakeMut<'a>>::Item),
whew
Now, finally, we can use map2:
map2::<_, ChildFactory>(|v| {});
(Playground)

Borrow checker issue trying to pass a function pointer as paramerter

I am seeking help to understand why the borrow checker fails for the following minimal non-working example, and I would be very happy to learn how to correctly implement what I was trying to do:
use std::collections::HashSet;
struct Foo {
data: HashSet<usize>
}
impl Foo {
fn test<'a, F, T>(&mut self, _operation: F) -> ()
where F: Fn(&'a HashSet<usize>, &'a HashSet<usize>) -> T,
T: Iterator<Item=&'a usize>
{
let update: HashSet<usize> = vec![4, 2, 9].into_iter().collect();
self.data = _operation(&self.data, &update).copied().collect();
}
fn new() -> Self {
Foo { data: HashSet::new() }
}
}
fn main() {
let mut foo: Foo = Foo::new();
foo.test(HashSet::intersection);
}
My main source of confusion is that, if I replace the call to _operation with HashSet::intersection, the code compiles. I thought that the type of the parameter _operation would allow me to pass both HashSet::intersection and HashSet::union as operations here.
For the record, this is the error I receive:
error[E0495]: cannot infer an appropriate lifetime for borrow expression due to conflicting requirements
--> src\main.rs:13:32
|
13 | self.data = _operation(&self.data, &update).copied().collect();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: first, the lifetime cannot outlive the anonymous lifetime defined on the method body at 8:23...
--> src\main.rs:8:23
|
8 | fn test<'a, F, T>(&mut self, _operation: F) -> ()
| ^^^^^^^^^
note: ...so that reference does not outlive borrowed content
--> src\main.rs:13:32
|
13 | self.data = _operation(&self.data, &update).copied().collect();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
note: but, the lifetime must be valid for the lifetime `'a` as defined on the method body at 8:13...
--> src\main.rs:8:13
|
8 | fn test<'a, F, T>(&mut self, _operation: F) -> ()
| ^^
note: ...so that reference does not outlive borrowed content
--> src\main.rs:13:32
|
13 | self.data = _operation(&self.data, &update).copied().collect();
| ^^^^^^^^^^
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0495`.
error: could not compile `aoc06` due to previous error
The issue, as the (albeit cryptic) compiler message suggests, is that there is a lifetime mismatch: _operation expects HashSet references that live as long as 'a, but &self.data has a lifetime 'b, the elided lifetime of &mut self, and &update has a different lifetime that lasts the duration of the test function body.
To resolve this issue, we must specify that the function type F takes in HashMap references of arbitrary lifetimes, not just the specific lifetime 'a -- this lets the compiler infer the appropriate lifetime when _operation is invoked. This is why we need Higher-Rank Trait Bounds (HRTBs):
fn test<F, T>(&mut self, _operation: F) -> ()
where F: for<'a> Fn(&'a HashSet<usize>, &'a HashSet<usize>) -> T,
However, this raises another issue. How do we apply the higher-ranked lifetime 'a to the type parameter T? Unfortunately Rust does not support higher-kinded types, but we can get away with "abstracting" out the the function type F and the higher-kinded type T to a trait and an associated type on said trait.
trait Operation<'a, T: 'a> {
type Output: Iterator<Item = &'a T>;
fn operate(self, a: &'a HashSet<T>, b: &'a HashSet<T>) -> Self::Output;
}
The Operation trait represents an operation on two HashSets that returns an iterator over references, equivalent to the functions HashSet::union, HashSet::intersection, and the like. We can achieve this using the following impl, which ensures that HashSet::intersection and the like implement Operation:
impl<'a, T: 'a, I, F> Operation<'a, T> for F
where
I: Iterator<Item = &'a T>,
F: FnOnce(&'a HashSet<T>, &'a HashSet<T>) -> I,
{
type Output = I;
fn operate(self, a: &'a HashSet<T>, b: &'a HashSet<T>) -> Self::Output {
self(a, b)
}
}
We can then use a HRTB on the Operation trait instead, which does not require any nested higher-kinded types:
fn test(&mut self, _operation: impl for<'a> Operation<'a, usize>) -> () {
let update: HashSet<usize> = vec![4, 2, 9].into_iter().collect();
self.data = _operation.operate(&self.data, &update).copied().collect();
println!("{:?}", self.data);
}
Playground
The arguments you are passing do not match the lifetime which you declared the Fn bound with.
fn test<'a, F, T>(&mut self, _operation: F) -> ()
'a is some arbitrary lifetime that may be specified by the caller,
F: Fn(&'a HashSet<usize>, &'a HashSet<usize>) -> T,
which must be adequate for the references given to _operation,
let update: HashSet<usize> = vec![4, 2, 9].into_iter().collect();
self.data = _operation(&self.data, &update).copied().collect();
but here you pass in a borrow from self (whose lifetime is not specified to outlive 'a) and a borrow from update (which is a local variable, which cannot outlive 'a).
In order to correctly write this, you need to specify that _operation may be called with any lifetime (which thus includes the lifetimes of borrows of local variables). That's simple, by itself:
fn test<F, T>(&mut self, _operation: F) -> ()
where
F: for<'a> Fn(&'a HashSet<usize>, &'a HashSet<usize>) -> T,
Note that 'a is no longer a lifetime parameter of test. Instead it's part of the bound on F: you can read this for<'a> notation as “for any lifetime, which we will call 'a, F may be called as a function with references &'a ...”.
However, this isn't actually a solution, because you also have T: Iterator<Item = &'a usize>, which uses 'a again. It isn't currently possible to write a where clause that expresses this relationship, particularly as even without the item being a reference, the iterator will be borrowing the &'a HashSets.
This is an unfortunate limitation of current Rust — it also comes up in trying to write a function that takes an async function which borrows an input (which is structurally the same as your situation, with Future in place of Iterator). However, there is a workaround: you can define a trait for the function, which has a single lifetime parameter that links everything together. (This doesn't impose any extra work on the caller of your function, because the trait is blanket implemented for all suitable functions.)
Here's your code with such a trait added and the needed modifications to fn test():
use std::collections::HashSet;
trait IteratorCallback<'a> {
type Output: Iterator<Item = &'a usize> + 'a;
fn call(self, a: &'a HashSet<usize>, b: &'a HashSet<usize>) -> Self::Output;
}
impl<'a, F, T> IteratorCallback<'a> for F
where
F: FnOnce(&'a HashSet<usize>, &'a HashSet<usize>) -> T,
T: Iterator<Item = &'a usize> + 'a,
{
type Output = T;
fn call(self, a: &'a HashSet<usize>, b: &'a HashSet<usize>) -> T {
// Delegate to FnOnce
self(a, b)
}
}
struct Foo {
data: HashSet<usize>,
}
impl Foo {
fn test<F>(&mut self, _operation: F) -> ()
where
F: for<'a> IteratorCallback<'a>,
{
let update: HashSet<usize> = vec![4, 2, 9].into_iter().collect();
self.data = _operation.call(&self.data, &update).copied().collect();
}
fn new() -> Self {
Foo {
data: HashSet::new(),
}
}
}
fn main() {
let mut foo: Foo = Foo::new();
foo.test(HashSet::intersection);
}
Note: I changed the function bound to FnOnce because that's more permissive than Fn and all you need in this case, but the same technique will work with Fn as long as you change fn call(self, to fn call(&self,.
Credit: I used this Reddit comment by user Lej77 as an example to work from for the trait technique.

One type (function pointer) is more general than the other

I reached this error in this example, and I'm trying to understand what's happening.
use futures::future::{BoxFuture, FutureExt};
use std::sync::Arc;
use futures::lock::Mutex;
struct Message {}
struct Client {}
enum Error {
ConnectionClosed,
}
#[derive(Default)]
struct MyType{}
impl Client {
fn send_and_expect<'a, R: 'a + Default + Send>(
client: Arc<Mutex<Self>>,
message: &'a Message,
) -> BoxFuture<'a, Result<R, Error>> {
async move { Ok(R::default()) }.boxed()
}
pub fn connection_retrier<'a, R: 'a + Default + Send>(
client: Arc<Mutex<Self>>,
f: for<'b> fn(Arc<Mutex<Self>>, &'b Message) -> BoxFuture<'b, Result<R, Error>>,
f_m: &'a Message,
) -> BoxFuture<'a, Result<R, Error>>
{
async move {Ok(R::default())}.boxed()
}
async fn send_with_retry<'a>(
client: Arc<Mutex<Self>>,
message: &'a Message,
) -> Result<MyType, Error> {
let client = Arc::new(Mutex::new(Client{}));
Self::connection_retrier::<MyType>(client, Self::send_and_expect, message)
.await
}
}
Error:
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/lib.rs:36:52
|
36 | Self::connection_retrier::<MyType>(client, Self::send_and_expect, message)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ one type is more general than the other
|
= note: expected fn pointer `for<'b> fn(Arc<_>, &'b Message) -> Pin<Box<(dyn futures::Future<Output = std::result::Result<MyType, Error>> + std::marker::Send + 'b)>>`
found fn pointer `fn(Arc<_>, &Message) -> Pin<Box<dyn futures::Future<Output = std::result::Result<MyType, Error>> + std::marker::Send>>`
Playground
Well, connection_retrier requres a function f: for<'b> fn(Arc<Mutex<Self>>, &'b Message) -> BoxFuture<'b, Result<R, Error>>,. The one I passed seems to fit the signature.
The way I view for<'b> fn... is: I accept a function f for any lifetime 'b presented. So, for the particular lifetime 'a, send_and_expect seems to fit everything.
The only suspicion I have is for the lifetime of R being fixed at 'a in connection_retrier so the f with its for<'b> is not free to give any lifetime for its R. I think the lifetime of the R in f should be 'b. Is it possible to force f to have R with lifetime 'b?
Something like this:
f: for<'b> fn<RR: 'b>(Arc<Mutex<Self>>, &'b Message) -> BoxFuture<'b, Result<RR, Error>>,
This error looks to be caused by limitation of the compiler's ability to automatically convert generic functions which include a type bounded by a lifetime into a function pointer that is fully generic over that lifetime. I'm not quite sure why this limitation exists, but it can be worked around by wrapping the generic call in a non-generic closure. All you need to do to make your example compile is to change:
Self::send_and_expect
to
|c, m| Self::send_and_expect(c, m)
Thus hiding the generic from the compiler.

Why Rust complains about lifetime of types in functions that don't use instances of these types?

Rust requires lifetimes for types that don't have instances:
use futures::future::BoxFuture;
struct A{
}
impl A{
async fn send_and_expect<T>(&mut self, unauthorized_retry: i32) -> std::result::Result<(),()>{
Err(())
}
fn send_and_expect_wrapper<'a, T>(&'a mut self, unauthorized_retry: i32)
-> BoxFuture<'a, std::result::Result<(),()>> {
Box::pin(self.send_and_expect::<T>(unauthorized_retry))
}
}
Error:
Standard Error
Compiling playground v0.0.1 (/playground)
error[E0309]: the parameter type `T` may not live long enough
--> src/lib.rs:15:9
|
13 | fn send_and_expect_wrapper<'a, T>(&'a mut self, unauthorized_retry: i32)
| - help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...: `T: 'a`
14 | -> BoxFuture<'a, std::result::Result<(),()>> {
15 | Box::pin(self.send_and_expect::<T>(unauthorized_retry))
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ...so that the type `impl futures::Future` will meet its required lifetime bounds
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0309`.
error: could not compile `playground`
To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
I have to do fn send_and_expect_wrapper<'a, T>(&'a mut self, unauthorized_retry: i32)
Is there a reason? I never use an instance of T so there are no concerns about lifetime.
The type check does checking on types. From its point of view, a value only does propagating it's type and triggering actions on the type (such as coercing). And in your example T is involved into unsized coercion with : 'a bound. Why? See how BoxFuture is declared
pub type BoxFuture<'a, T> = Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = T> + Send + 'a, Global>>;
Desugared and extremely minimized example would be like:
pub trait Future {}
struct Closure<'a, T> {
receiver: &'a mut (),
params: std::marker::PhantomData<T>,
}
impl<'a, T> Future for Closure<'a, T> {}
fn foo<'a, T>() {
let x: *mut Closure<'a, T>;
let coerced: *mut (dyn Future + 'a) = x;
}
This gives the same error[E0309].
The point is in a type checking rule: U = dyn _ + 'a implies U: 'a. Or simply (dyn _ + 'a): 'a
Applying this to our example (U = Closure<'a, T>) we get Closure<'a, T>: 'a which implies the same bound should hold on the substitutions, i.e. 'a: 'a and T: 'a. But our environment (the foo fn signature) tells nothing about the T: 'a requirement, hence the error.

Resources