Summing Elapsed Time Based on Two Criteria - Excel - excel

Like the title says, I'm trying to sum elapsed time based on two criteria in Excel (2016). Specifically the elapsed time of a phone call based on user and call type, examples below.
The actual data is similar to this Dummy Data Set where there would be a list of users, Full name, the duration of a given call, Duration, and the type of call, Call Type.
The expected output would be in this format; however, the main focus for my issue falls under the Total Time column, and its worth noting that the red times shown were hand-done as these are the cause of this post.
As for the logic I'm using at the moment to try and get these results, it's =SUMIFS(C2:C16, B2:B16, G2, D2:D16, H2&"*") where C2"C16 is the Duration column, B2:B16 is the Full Name column, G2 is "Generic User", D2:D16 is Call Type, and H2&"" comes to Local, worth a note is the wildcard, as there are two types of Internal and Local calls, but I'm just trying to get all Local and all Internal without distinction of sub-types.
Additional notes for the cell formats are that the Duration and Total Time columns are set for [h]:mm:ss, but I've also tried other time and number formats which didn't change the outcome.
So at this point I'm just spinning my wheels as I've Googled and looked into different ways to go about this, such as different cell formats, cell operations/logic and so on, and I'm just unsure where the issue may actually be, so any suggestions or help would be very appreciated.
Edit 1: Including a link for the file

J2 This is for your reference only.
=SUMPRODUCT((B$2:B$16=G$2)*(C$2:C$16)*ISNUMBER(FIND(H2,D$2:D$16)))

Related

How to identified the smaller number only from specific lines of a table

I am not familiar with excel as you can probaly guess by my question so I am sorry if it's a silly question but I have been googling for a long time and I can't do it.
I manage to do it in excel 365 with the function filter, but I can't on excel 2019 (I am required to do it in excel 2019)
I want to identifed the smaller number of a specific combination of cells using two table.
Table1 has name of people and places as well as a number. (the number shows the difference of the last time a person went to a place and the [in months])
(In this project the inspector cannot go to the same place twice unless 4 months have pass, thus why I want the smaller number, using the date of the last visited and the fcuntion now I get teh number of months that have pass)
Table2 has only the name of one person out of these people but has the name of all places. I want to get the smaller number for every place.
This is my table1: (I hided other peoples names so I can show a more compact examlplo)
And this is my table2:
I thought that I could use a function aggregate with a function if inside of it to get only the values that I desire.
It did not worked thou. Was I had miss undertand the fact that function if only gives me true or false. But thought that the aggregate function could wordk. It did not as well
=AGGREGATE(5;3;A2&B2=Table1[#Place]&Table1[#name];1).
overall my question could be summarize to which funtion should I used?
Which function should I use?
obs: In excel 365 I used concat to make a code an thus only used one cell, but I don't see why it wouldn't work if I just select two cells insted of one (teh concat cell)

Excel Formula Slow

is there anything i can do to further improve performance of this formula ?
=IF($A3<>"",IF(Jan!$E6<>"",LET(d_patt,IF(Jan!$E6<>"",VLOOKUP(Jan!$E6,SETTINGS!$A$12:$B$27,2,FALSE)&IF(Jan!$B6<>"",Jan!$B6,0)&IF(Jan!$C6<>"",Jan!$C6,0)&IF(Jan!$D6<>"",Jan!$D6,0),""),"ROT"&IF(LEN(Teams!$BHR4)>0,MID(Teams!$BHR4,MOD(NETWORKDAYS.INTL(Teams!$C4,I$2,"0000000")-1,LEN(Teams!$BHR4)/3)*3+1,3),"000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="OVT",d_patt,"OVT000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="SSI",d_patt,"SSI000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="SSO",d_patt,"SSO000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="SDS",d_patt,"SDS000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="HOL",d_patt,"HOL000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="LID",d_patt,"LID000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="UNP",d_patt,"UNP000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="FLD",d_patt,"FLD000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="MAT",d_patt,"MAT000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="LIS",d_patt,"LIS000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="CBR",d_patt,"CBR000")&IF(LEFT(d_patt,3)="ABS",d_patt,"ABS000")),"ROT"&IF(LEN(Teams!$BHR4)>0,MID(Teams!$BHR4,MOD(NETWORKDAYS.INTL(Teams!$C4,I$2,"0000000")-1,LEN(Teams!$BHR4)/3)*3+1,3),"000")&"OVT000SSI000SSO000SDS000HOL000LID000UNP000FLD000MAT000LIS000CBR000ABS000"),"")
i have this on a sheet for each day of the year x 400 people so 146k+ times. this is therefor taken up 80% of the sheet load time.
The sheet basically gets shift patters from Teams, check if there is any holidays, overtime etc from the relevant month tab and relevant cell for the day, and then will generate a code like below.
ROT080OVT000SSI000SSO000SDS234HOL000LID000UNP000FLD000MAT000LIS000CBR000ABS000
i have so far managed to make this faster by using the LET function, but not show if its possible to make any further improvements.
if you need an example file i can send this or upload somewhere, not sure if that is possible via stackoverflow or a preferred site to upload to.
Thanks
The following is a shortened version of your formula to reduce the complexity of computations.
Instead of building the 'OVT000SSI000...' string one piece after another while always checking if the first 3 characters of 'd_patt' match the current piece, we can set the whole string with '000's as default and only replace the section that matches 'd_patt' (see highlighted elements in screenshot below)
Which results in the full formula:
=IF(LEN($A3)>0,"ROT"&IF(LEN(Teams!$BHR4)>0,MID(Teams!$BHR4,MOD(NETWORKDAYS.INTL(Teams!$C4,I$2,"0000000")-1,LEN(Teams!$BHR4)/3)*3+1,3),"000")&LET(default,"OVT000SSI000SSO000SDS000HOL000LID000UNP000FLD000MAT000LIS000CBR000ABS000",d_patt,VLOOKUP(Jan!$E6,SETTINGS!$A$12:$B$27,2,FALSE)&IF(LEN(Jan!$B6)>0,Jan!$B6,0)&IF(LEN(Jan!$C6)>0,Jan!$C6,0)&IF(LEN(Jan!$D6)>0,Jan!$D6,0),IF(LEN(d_patt)>0,REPLACE(default,SEARCH(LEFT(d_patt,3),default),6,d_patt),default)),“”)
If $B6, $C6 and $D6 can only be either empty or a numerical number, in other words, if they are never a letter or special character, the 'd_patt' function can be further shortened as follows:
Which results in the full formula:
=IF(LEN($A3)>0,"ROT"&IF(LEN(Teams!$BHR4)>0,MID(Teams!$BHR4,MOD(NETWORKDAYS.INTL(Teams!$C4,I$2,"0000000")-1,LEN(Teams!$BHR4)/3)*3+1,3),"000")&LET(default,"OVT000SSI000SSO000SDS000HOL000LID000UNP000FLD000MAT000LIS000CBR000ABS000",d_patt,VLOOKUP(Jan!$E6,SETTINGS!$A$12:$B$27,2,FALSE)&(Jan!$B6+0)&(Jan!$C6+0)&(Jan!$D6+0),IF(LEN(d_patt)>0,REPLACE(default,SEARCH(LEFT(d_patt,3),default),6,d_patt),default)),“”)

Multiple conditions finding median in Excel

I have included a link to a sample sheet. It contains home sales for 17 years and includes the property type (Type), price (SP), Value (Price/SQF), and Size (SQF). I want to find the median of each for every type, for every year, and for every month.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ecmNoQ5g3xr2GsaxeHwupq3Rqnu84puD/view?usp=sharing
I used this formula (for example) for finding the median value each year, but when I manually check it, it is incorrect: {=AGGREGATE(17,6,Value/((YEAR(Closing_Date)=$J127)*(Type="Condo")),2)}.
I really don't understand how that formula works (specifically, the "17,6" and the "2" at the end). I've tried using the =median with all the conditions but I get missing argument errors. Not sure what to do.
I've included space and allow editing of the test file if that helps. Once I see the formulas for one property type, I'll be able to replicate for the other 2 types.
picture of data file
{=AGGREGATE(17,6,Value/((YEAR(Closing_Date)=$J127)*(Type="Condo")),2)} is the right answer. After studying quartile.inc I realized I had a different error that was the causing the problem.

Excel budget w/CC input data

I am attempting to make a budget calculator and want to import my CC data to compare my actual spending w/estimated spending based on different categories. Briefly, (see attached screen shot), I have the input from my credit card which has location specific data, I have another column with a refined transaction type, and a third and final column with the associated spending category.
I can not figure out how to use the raw transaction data to search for the refined transaction type and associated spending category.
=VLOOKUP(FIND(C2&"*",Sheet3!A:A,1),A1:B10,2,TRUE)
Problem Example
First of all, the FIND function returns a number, which then becomes a parameter for VLOOKUP. This won't get you the results you're expecting. It'll search for a number.
This is going to be complex but here's a start, for EXACTLY the data you've provided.
=VLOOKUP(LEFT(C2,FIND("#",SUBSTITUTE(C2," ","#",(LEN(C2)-LEN(SUBSTITUTE(C2," ","")))/LEN(" ")))-1),A:B,2,0)
Drop that into cell D2. Have fun.

How can this lookup (find the last relevant item) be improved?

One of the reports that wastes a bunch of my time at work is the Roster. It's a multi-site, multi-contract listing of every employee currently assigned to a specific client. Currently, it has a little over 6,000 lines by 20-something columns, indexed against 3 different datasets. Not the largest mess in the world, but still a pain. And it's almost all in excel, because I somehow don't have a business case for Access.
But one part of this monster stands apart. One tab per site Site Totals, listing off every time any agent has gone through training. A second tab (again, one per site) Site Data displaying only the most recent training class, and the credentials they had during that class.
That second tab is driven by variations of this array formula - Last_Row is a named range on another tab, and column A is a pivot of the UID column on Site Totals. I've broken it apart for readability:
=IF(INDEX('Site Totals'!B:B,LARGE(($A2=INDIRECT("'Site Totals'!$A$1:$A$"&Last_Row))*
(INDIRECT("'Site Totals'!B1:B"&Last_Row)<>"")*
ROW(INDIRECT("'Site Totals'!$A$1:$A$"&Last_Row)),1))="Trainer",
"",
INDEX('Site Totals'!B:B,LARGE(($A2=INDIRECT("'Site Totals'!$A$1:$A$"&Last_Row))*
(INDIRECT("'Site Totals'!B1:B"&Last_Row)<>"")*
ROW(INDIRECT("'Site Totals'!$A$1:$A$"&Last_Row)),1)))
I know what this formula does, but I don't know how to improve it. This formula needs to be changed, because it currently is on the order of 500 Million calculations (I'm not allowed to delete historical data), and it takes me 3 hours to calculate the workbook ... if it doesn't crash Excel first.
I'm open to VBA and / or custom functions, but would prefer to have native Excel functions. I'm not able to install anything, so any solution must be native Excel, and Must be compatible to Excel 2007.
If your source is a pivot table, try is the GETPIVOTDATA function. You might be able to accomplish what you want without INDIRECT and INDEX.
What i have understood is that every person has/has not attended a training and you want to retrive the name of that training, in case he has not, you want a blank space in the cell. If this description is correct you can try this formua, press ctrl+shift+enter to execute.
=IFERROR(INDEX('Site Totals'!B$1:B$12,MATCH(A2&"Trainer",'Site Totals'!A$1:A$12&'Site Totals'!B$1:B$12)),"")
Here A2 contians the name of the person. I can be more precise with this formula if you can provide some sample data butI would recommend to not to use entire B & Columns in Site Total workssheete as this will definately slow down computing process, instead you can use B1:B8000 or smaller range, to speed up process. Hope that helps.

Resources