How can I setup a reactive flow using DSL for the following steps:
Receive an SQS Message using SqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter
Validate the Json message [JsonSchemaValidator class with validate method]
Transform the json to objects
Pass the objects to a service activator (BusinessService : business logic, state machine)
Persist the Objects R2DBC outbound adapter
I was looking at this : https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-integration/blob/master/spring-integration-core/src/test/java/org/springframework/integration/dsl/reactivestreams/ReactiveStreamsTests.java
In the above example, there are dedicated flows created that return a Publisher and in the tests the Publishers are subscribed. However, my flow will be triggered when SqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter brings in a message into a channel.
How to achieve a reactive flow configuration, for the scenario above steps 1 to 5?
Update : Sample code added
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow importFlow() {
IntegrationFlows.from(sqsInboundChannel())
.handle((payload, messageHeaders) -> jsonSchemaValidator.validate(payload.toString()))
.transform(Transformers.fromJson(Entity.class))
.handle((payload, messageHeaders) ->businessService.process((Entity) payload))
.handle(
Jpa.outboundAdapter(this.entityManagerFactory)
.entityClass(Entity)
.persistMode(PersistMode.PERSIST),
ConsumerEndpointSpec::transactional)
.get();
}
#Bean
public MessageProducer sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter() {
SqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter =
new SqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter(asyncSqsClient, queueName);
sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter.setAutoStartup(true);
sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter.setOutputChannel(sqsInboundChannel());
return sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter;
}
#Bean
public MessageChannel sqsInboundChannel() {
return MessageChannels.flux().get();
}
Update 2 : Moved JPA to a diff thread using executor channel
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow importFlow() {
IntegrationFlows.from(sqsInboundChannel())
.handle((payload, messageHeaders) -> jsonSchemaValidator.validate(payload.toString()))
.transform(Transformers.fromJson(Entity.class))
.handle((payload, messageHeaders) ->businessService.process((Entity) payload))
.channel(persistChannel())
.handle(
Jpa.outboundAdapter(this.entityManagerFactory)
.entityClass(Entity)
.persistMode(PersistMode.PERSIST),
ConsumerEndpointSpec::transactional)
.get();
}
#Bean
public MessageProducer sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter() {
SqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter =
new SqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter(asyncSqsClient, queueName);
sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter.setAutoStartup(true);
sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter.setOutputChannel(sqsInboundChannel());
return sqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter;
}
#Bean
public MessageChannel sqsInboundChannel() {
return MessageChannels.flux().get();
}
#Bean
public MessageChannel persistChannel() {
return MessageChannels.executor(Executors.newCachedThreadPool()).get();
}
You probably need to make yourself more familiar with what we have so far for Reactive Streams in Spring Integration: https://docs.spring.io/spring-integration/docs/current/reference/html/reactive-streams.html#reactive-streams
The sample you show with that test class is fully not relevant to your use case. In that test we try to cover some API we expose in Spring Integration, kinda unit tests. It has nothing to do with the whole flow.
Your use-case is really just a full black box flow starting with SQS listener and ending in the R2DBC. Therefore there is no point in your flow to try to convert part of it into the Publisher and then bring it back to another part of the flow: you are not going to track some how and subscribe to that Publisher yourself.
You may consider to place a FluxMessageChannel in between endpoints in your flow, but it still does not make sense for your use-case. It won't be fully reactive as you expect just because a org.springframework.cloud.aws.messaging.listener.SimpleMessageListenerContainer is not blocking on the consumer thread to be ready for a back-pressure from downstream.
The only really reactive part of your flow is that R2DBC outbound channel adapter, but probably it does not bring you too much value because the source of data is not reactive.
As I said: you can try to place a channel(channels -> channels.flux()) just after an SqsMessageDrivenChannelAdapter definition to start a reactive flow from that point. At the same time you should try to set a maxNumberOfMessages to 1 to try to make it waiting for a free space in before pulling the next mesasge from SQS.
Related
My Message handler for publishing messages to the kinesis stream is as follows
public MessageHandler kinesisMessageHandler(final AmazonKinesisAsync amazonKinesis,
#Qualifier("successChannel") MessageChannel successChannel,
#Qualifier("errorChannel") MessageChannel errorChannel) {
KinesisMessageHandler kinesisMessageHandler = new KinesisMessageHandler(amazonKinesis);
kinesisMessageHandler.setSync(false);
kinesisMessageHandler.setOutputChannel(successChannel);
kinesisMessageHandler.setFailureChannel(errorChannel);
return kinesisMessageHandler;
}
#Bean(name = "errorChannel")
public MessageChannel errorChannel() {
return MessageChannels.direct().get();
}
#Bean(name = "successChannel")
public MessageChannel successChannel() {
return MessageChannels.direct().get();
}
The setSync flag is set as false so that the messages are getting processed asynchronously.Also, I have created separate IntegrationFlow to receive and process Kinesis response from the success & error channel.
public IntegrationFlow successMessageIntegrationFlow(MessageChannel successChannel,
MessageChannel inboundKinesisMessageChannel,
MessageReceiverServiceActivator kinesisMessageReceiverServiceActivator) {
return IntegrationFlows.from(successChannel).channel(inboundKinesisMessageChannel)
.handle(kinesisMessageReceiverServiceActivator, "receiveMessage").get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow errorMessageIntegrationFlow(MessageChannel errorChannel,
MessageChannel inboundKinesisErrorChannel,
MessageReceiverServiceActivator kinesisErrorReceiverServiceActivator
) {
return IntegrationFlows.from(errorChannel).channel(inboundKinesisErrorChannel)
.handle(kinesisErrorReceiverServiceActivator, "receiveMessage").get();
}
I wanted to know if you see any issues in using Direct Channel to receive success & error responses from Kinesis and processing it using an IntegrationFlow. As far as I know, with Direct Channel a producer is a blocker during send until the consumer finishes its work and returns management to the producer caller back. Is it a correct assumption that here the producer is executed in a different set of thread pools by the AmazonKinesisAsyncClient and the producer will not wait for the IntegrationFlow to process the messages? Let me know If I need to implement it differently
Your assumption about blocking is correct: the control does not come back to the producing thread. So, if have a limited number of threads in that Kinesis client, you need to be sure that you free them as soon as possible. You might consider to have those callbacks in the queue channel instead. They are asynchronous anyway, but won’t hold Kinesis client if that.
You still have a flaw in your flows: .channel(inboundKinesisMessageChannel) . That means the same channel in the middle if two different flows . And if it is a direct one , then you end up with round robin distribution. I would just remove it altogether .
I want to take records from the database and transform it to json. This runs on Spring Cloud Dataflow.
I suspect I am missing some call on the IntegrationFlow.
The error output is:
Caused by: org.springframework.messaging.core.DestinationResolutionException: no output-channel or replyChannel header available
at org.springframework.integration.handler.AbstractMessageProducingHandler.sendOutput(AbstractMessageProducingHandler.java:440)
at org.springframework.integration.handler.AbstractMessageProducingHandler.doProduceOutput(AbstractMessageProducingHandler.java:319)
at org.springframework.integration.handler.AbstractMessageProducingHandler.produceOutput(AbstractMessageProducingHandler.java:267)
at org.springframework.integration.handler.AbstractMessageProducingHandler.sendOutputs(AbstractMessageProducingHandler.java:231)
at org.springframework.integration.handler.AbstractReplyProducingMessageHandler.handleMessageInternal(AbstractReplyProducingMessageHandler.java:140)
at org.springframework.integration.handler.AbstractMessageHandler.handleMessage(AbstractMessageHandler.java:62)
#Bean
public MessageSource<Object> jdbcMessageSource() {
String query = "select cd_int_controle, de_tabela from int_controle rowlock readpast " +
"where id_status = 0 order by cd_int_controle";
JdbcPollingChannelAdapter adapter =
new JdbcPollingChannelAdapter(dataSource, query);
adapter.setMaxRows(properties.getPollSize());
adapter.setUpdatePerRow(true);
adapter.setRowMapper((RowMapper<IntControle>) (rs, i) -> new IntControle(rs.getLong(1), rs.getString(2)));
adapter.setUpdateSql("update int_controle set id_status = 1 where cd_int_controle = :cdIntControle");
return adapter;
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow jsonSupplier() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(jdbcMessageSource(),
c -> c.poller(Pollers.fixedRate(properties.getPollRateMs(), TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS).transactional()))
.transform((GenericTransformer<List<IntControle>, String>) ints -> {
//transform to Json
})
.get();
}
You are missing several points:
The transform() in the Spring Integration indeed requires an output channel or reply channel header. There is just no way in Spring Integration to bypass channels between endpoints. Even if it is not requested in your flow between JDBC and transform, it is present there by the framework anyway. Since you call get() in the end of the flow and don't provide any hints what channel send transform result to, such a DestinationResolutionException is thrown.
Spring Cloud Stream functional model deals with basic Java interfaces - Supplier, Function & Consumer. Calling a bean as jsonSupplier doesn't make it as a Supplier. You really need to say the framework what bean to use for binding. See docs for more info: https://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-static/spring-cloud-stream/3.0.6.RELEASE/reference/html/spring-cloud-stream.html#spring_cloud_function
So, you are missing a connection point between an IntegrationFlow and Supplier declaration. Probably this one could work for you:
#Bean
PollableChannel jsonChannel() {
return new QueueChannel();
}
...
.transform((GenericTransformer<List<IntControle>, String>) ints -> {
//transform to Json
})
.channel(jsonChannel())
.get();
...
#Bean
public Supplier<Message<?>> jsonSupplier() {
return jsonChannel()::receive;
}
So, the idea is to dump result of the flow into some channel and then bridge that data from a Supplier which is already visible for Spring Cloud Stream binding logic.
See also here: https://sagan-production.cfapps.io/blog/2019/10/25/spring-cloud-stream-and-spring-integration
I have this direct channel:
#Bean
public DirectChannel emailingChannel() {
return MessageChannels
.direct( "emailingChannel")
.get();
}
Can I define multiple flows for the same channel like this:
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow flow1FromEmailingChannel() {
return IntegrationFlows.from( "emailingChannel" )
.handle( "myService" , "handler1")
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow flow2FromEmailingChannel() {
return IntegrationFlows.from( "emailingChannel" )
.handle( "myService" , "handler2" )
.get();
}
EDIT
#Service
public class MyService {
public void handler1(Message<String> message){
....
}
public void handler2(Message<List<String>> message){
....
}
}
Each flow's handle(...) method manipulates different payload data types but the goal is the same, i-e reading data from the channel and call the relevant handler. I would like to avoid many if...else to check the data type in one handler.
Additional question: What happens when multiple threads call the same channel (no matter its type: Direct, PubSub or Queue) at the same time (as per default a #Bean has singleton scope)?
Thanks a lot
With a direct channel messages will be round-robin distributed to the consumers.
With a queue channel only one consumer will get each message; the distribution will be based on their respective pollers.
With a pub/sub channel both consumers will get each message.
You need to provide more information but it sounds like you need to add a payload type router to your flow to direct the messages to the right consumer.
EDIT
When the handler methods are in the same class you don't need two flows; the framework will examine the methods and, as long as there is no ambiguity) will call the method that matches the payload type.
.handle(myServiceBean())
I want to consume messages from a Queue channel using java-dsl, but Integrations.from doesn't have a signature allowing me to specify a Poller.
How can I achieve this?
Ex.:
#Bean
IntegrationFlow flow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(this.channel())
.handle(...)
.get();
}
#Bean
MessageChannel channel() {
return MessageChannels.queue().get();
}
Well, actually it is an endpoint responsibility to provide poller properties.
If you are familiar with an XML configuration you should remember that to poll from <queue> we should configure <poller> sub-element for <service-activator> etc.
The same approach is applied in Java DSL as well. The next endpoint definition should be with desired poller:
IntegrationFlows.from(this.channel())
.handle(..., e -> e.poller(Pollers...))
.get();
I've had trouble for some reason setting a poller on the endpoint definition as Artem described - for some reason it gets ignored. You can always set a default poller. This has worked for me:
#Bean(name = PollerMetadata.DEFAULT_POLLER)
public PollerMetadata poller() {
return Pollers.fixedRate(500).get();
}
I am trying to write a simple message flow using Spring Integration v4's DSL APIs which would look like this:
-> in.ch -> Processing -> JmsGatewayOut -> JMS_OUT_QUEUE
Gateway
<- out.ch <- Processing <- JmsGatewayIn <- JMS_IN_QUEUE
With the request/response being asynchronous, when I inject a message via the initial Gateway, the message goes all the way to JMS_OUT_QUEUE. Beyond this message flow, a reply message is put back into JMS_IN_QUEUE which it is then picked up by JmsGatewayIn. At this point, the message is Processed and placed into out.ch (I know the response gets to out.ch because I have a logger interceptor there which logs the message being placed there) but, the Gateway never receives the response.
Instead of a response, the system outside of this message flow which picked up the message from JMS_OUT_QUEUE and placed the response in JMS_IN_QUEUE, receives a javax.jms.MessageFormatException: MQJMS1061: Unable to deserialize object on its own JmsOutboundgateway (I think it is failing to deserialize a jms reply object from looking at the logs).
I have clearly not got something configured correctly but I don't know exactly what. Does anyone know what I am missing?
Working with spring-integration-core-4.0.3.RELEASE, spring-integration-jms-4.0.3.RELEASE, spring-integration-java-dsl-1.0.0.M2, spring-jms-4.0.6.RELEASE.
My Gateway is configured as follows:
#MessagingGateway
public interface WsGateway {
#Gateway(requestChannel = "in.ch", replyChannel = "out.ch",
replyTimeout = 45000)
AResponse process(ARequest request);
}
My Integration flow is configured as follows:
#Configuration
#EnableIntegration
#IntegrationComponentScan
#ComponentScan
public class IntegrationConfig {
#Bean(name = "in.ch")
public DirectChannel inCh() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Bean(name = "out.ch")
public DirectChannel outCh() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Autowired
private MQQueueConnectionFactory mqConnectionFactory;
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow requestFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from("in.ch")
.handle("processor", "processARequest")
.handle(Jms.outboundGateway(mqConnectionFactory)
.requestDestination("JMS_OUT_QUEUE")
.correlationKey("JMSCorrelationID")
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow responseFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(Jms.inboundGateway(mqConnectionFactory)
.destination("JMS_IN_QUEUE"))
.handle("processor", "processAResponse")
.channel("out.ch")
.get();
}
}
Thanks for any help on this,
PM.
First of all your configuration is bad:
Since you start the flow from WsGateway#process you really should wait reply there.
The gateway's request/reply capability is based on TemporaryReplyChannel, which is placed to the headers as non-serializable value.
As long as you wait rely on that gateway, actually there is no reason to provide the replyChannel, if you aren't going to do some publish-subscribe logic on the reply.
As you send message to the JMS queue, you should understand that consumer part might be a separete remote application. And the last one might know nothing about your out.ch.
The JMS request/reply capability is really based on JMSCorrelationID, but it isn't enough. The one more thing here is a ReplyTo JMS header. Hence, if you are going to send reply from the consumer you should really just rely on the JmsGatewayIn stuff.
So I'd change your code to this:
#MessagingGateway
public interface WsGateway {
#Gateway(requestChannel = "in.ch", replyTimeout = 45000)
AResponse process(ARequest request);
}
#Configuration
#EnableIntegration
#IntegrationComponentScan
#ComponentScan
public class IntegrationConfig {
#Bean(name = "in.ch")
public DirectChannel inCh() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Autowired
private MQQueueConnectionFactory mqConnectionFactory;
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow requestFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from("in.ch")
.handle("processor", "processARequest")
.handle(Jms.outboundGateway(mqConnectionFactory)
.requestDestination("JMS_OUT_QUEUE")
.replyDestination("JMS_IN_QUEUE"))
.handle("processor", "processAResponse")
.get();
}
}
Let me know, if it is appropriate for you or try to explian why you use two-way gateways for one one-way cases. Maybe Jms.outboundAdapter() and Jms.inboundAdapter() are more good for you?
UPDATE
How to use <header-channels-to-string> from Java DSL:
.enrichHeaders(e -> e.headerChannelsToString())