Create React App doesn't properly mock modules from __mocks__ directory - jestjs

Question

I have a working example with Jest and mocks from __mocks__ directory that works :
With simple Jest setup
// package.json
{
"name": "a",
"version": "1.0.0",
"main": "index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "jest"
},
...
"devDependencies": {
"jest": "^26.6.3"
},
"dependencies": {
"#octokit/rest": "^18.0.12"
}
}
And then /index.js :
const { Octokit } = require("#octokit/rest");
const octokit = new Octokit();
module.exports.foo = function() {
return octokit.repos.listForOrg({ org: "octokit", type: "public" })
}
with its test (/index.test.js):
const { foo } = require("./index.js");
test("foo should be true", async () => {
expect(await foo()).toEqual([1,2]);
});
and the mock (/__mocks__/#octokit/rest/index.js):
module.exports.Octokit = jest.fn().mockImplementation( () => ({
repos: {
listForOrg: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue([1,2])
}
}) );
This works quite well and tests pass.
With Create React App
However doing the same with Create React App seems to be giving me a weird result:
// package.json
{
"name": "b",
"version": "0.1.0",
"dependencies": {
"#octokit/rest": "^18.0.12",
"#testing-library/jest-dom": "^5.11.4",
"#testing-library/react": "^11.1.0",
"#testing-library/user-event": "^12.1.10",
"react": "^17.0.1",
"react-dom": "^17.0.1",
"react-scripts": "4.0.1",
"web-vitals": "^0.2.4"
},
"scripts": {
"start": "react-scripts start",
"build": "react-scripts build",
"test": "react-scripts test",
"eject": "react-scripts eject"
},
...
}
And then /src/foo.js:
import { Octokit } from "#octokit/rest";
const octokit = new Octokit();
module.exports.foo = function() {
return octokit.repos.listForOrg({ org: "octokit", type: "public" })
}
with its test (/src/foo.test.js):
const { foo} = require("./foo.js");
test("foo should be true", async () => {
expect(await foo()).toEqual([1,2]);
});
and the very same mock (under /src/__mocks__/#octokit/rest/index.js):
export const Octokit = jest.fn().mockImplementation( () => ({
repos: {
listForOrg: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue([1,2])
}
}) );
This makes the test fail:
FAIL src/foo.test.js
✕ foo should be true (2 ms)
● foo should be true
expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: [1, 2]
Received: undefined
2 |
3 | test("foo should be true", async () => {
> 4 | expect(await foo()).toEqual([1,2]);
| ^
5 | });
6 |
7 |
at Object.<anonymous> (src/foo.test.js:4:25)
After reading a lot it seems that I can't make __mocks__ work inside Create React App. What's the problem?

Answer 1

The problem is that CRA's default Jest setup automatically resets the mocks, which removes the mockResolvedValue you set.
One way to solve this, which also gives you more control to have different values in different tests (e.g. to test error handling) and assert on what it was called with, is to expose the mock function from the module too:
export const mockListForOrg = jest.fn();
export const Octokit = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => ({
repos: {
listForOrg: mockListForOrg,
},
}));
Then you configure the value you want in the test, after Jest would have reset it:
import { mockListForOrg } from "#octokit/rest";
import { foo } from "./foo";
test("foo should be true", async () => {
mockListForOrg.mockResolvedValueOnce([1, 2]);
expect(await foo()).toEqual([1, 2]);
});
Another option is to add the following into your package.json to override that configuration, per this issue:
{
...
"jest": {
"resetMocks": false
}
}
This could lead to issues with mock state (calls received) being retained between tests, though, so you'll need to make sure they're getting cleared and/or reset somewhere.
Note that you generally shouldn't mock what you don't own, though - if the interface to #octokit/rest changes your tests will continue to pass but your code won't work. To avoid this issue, I would recommend either or both of:
Moving the assertions to the transport layer, using e.g. MSW to check that the right request gets made; or
Writing a simple facade that wraps #octokit/rest, decoupling your code from the interface you don't own, and mocking that;
along with higher-level (end-to-end) tests to make sure everything works correctly with the real GitHub API.
In fact, deleting the mocks and writing such a test using MSW:
import { rest } from "msw";
import { setupServer } from "msw/node";
import { foo } from "./foo";
const server = setupServer(rest.get("https://api.github.com/orgs/octokit/repos", (req, res, ctx) => {
return res(ctx.status(200), ctx.json([1, 2]));
}));
beforeAll(() => server.listen());
afterAll(() => server.close());
test("foo should be true", async () => {
expect(await foo()).toEqual([1, 2]);
});
exposes that the current assumption about what octokit.repos.listForOrg would return is inaccurate, because this test fails:
● foo should be true
expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: [1, 2]
Received: {"data": [1, 2], "headers": {"content-type": "application/json", "x-powered-by": "msw"}, "status": 200, "url": "https://api.github.com/orgs/octokit/repos?type=public"}
13 |
14 | test("foo should be true", async () => {
> 15 | expect(await foo()).toEqual([1, 2]);
| ^
16 | });
17 |
at Object.<anonymous> (src/foo.test.js:15:25)
Your implementation should actually look something more like:
export async function foo() {
const { data } = await octokit.repos.listForOrg({ org: "octokit", type: "public" });
return data;
}
or:
export function foo() {
return octokit.repos.listForOrg({ org: "octokit", type: "public" }).then(({ data }) => data);
}