I have two tables, apps and services. On services the PRIMARY KEY is set to field called orn.
I created a through table between these two tables called apps_services with appId and serviceId
appId: {
type: Sequelize.UUID,
references: {
model: 'apps',
key: 'id'
}
},
serviceId: {
type: Sequelize.STRING,
references: {
model: 'services',
key: 'orn'
}
},
But here is a problem, when i use app.addService(foundService); (this creates a relationship between that app instance and foundService). When i used node debugger, i found out that sequelize tried inserting an id into serviceId instead of an orn
Executing (default): INSERT INTO "apps_services" ("id","appId","serviceId","createdAt","updatedAt") VALUES ('8d85f9b9-b472-4165-a345-657a0fe0d8ad','49f3daa4-1df4-4890-92f8-9a06f751ffb7','8cab340d-d11b-4e3b-842c-aeea9a28c368','2021-02-16 00:22:17.919 +00:00','2021-02-16 00:22:17.919 +00:00') RETURNING "id","appId","serviceId","userId","selfGranted","createdAt","updatedAt";
the third value in the bracket, the problem is id is not the foreignKey but orn is
below is the service table, we can see the orn column, which is the PRIMARY KEY and foreign key linking to the apps_services table.
Is there a way to force sequelize to use the orn field?
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const apps_services = sequelize.define('apps_services', {
id: {
type: DataTypes.UUID,
defaultValue: new DataTypes.UUIDV4(),
unique: true,
primaryKey: true
},
appId: {
type: DataTypes.UUID,
},
serviceId: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
},
userId: {
type: DataTypes.UUID
},
selfGranted: DataTypes.BOOLEAN
}, {
timestamps: true
});
apps_services.associate = function (models) {
models.apps.belongsToMany(models.services, {
through: apps_services
});
models.services.belongsToMany(models.apps, {
through: apps_services
});
};
//apps_services.sync({alter: true});
return apps_services;
};
// this is apps_services migration
module.exports = {
up: async (queryInterface, Sequelize) => {
await queryInterface.createTable('apps_services', {
id:{
type: Sequelize.UUID,
defaultValue: new Sequelize.UUIDV4(),
unique: true,
primaryKey: true
},
appId: {
type: Sequelize.UUID,
references: {
model: 'apps',
key: 'id'
}
},
serviceId: {
type: Sequelize.STRING,
references: {
model: 'services',
key: 'orn'
}
},
userId: {
type: Sequelize.UUID,
references: {
model: 'Users',
key: 'id'
}
},
createdAt: {
allowNull: false,
type: Sequelize.DATE
},
updatedAt: {
allowNull: false,
type: Sequelize.DATE
},
selfGranted: Sequelize.BOOLEAN,
});
},
down: async (queryInterface, Sequelize) => {
await queryInterface.dropTable('apps_services');
}
};
Below is the services table
Yes you can mention which field to use from the opposite table.
apps_services.associate = function (models) {
// you can move this association to apps model file
models.apps.belongsToMany(models.services, {
// Reference: https://sequelize.org/master/class/lib/model.js~Model.html#static-method-belongsToMany
through: 'apps_services',
foreignKey: 'appId', // <-- add this
});
// you can move this association to services model file
models.services.belongsToMany(models.apps, {
through: 'apps_services',
foreignKey: 'serviceId', // <-- add this - name of field in through table
otherKey: 'orn', // <-- add this - name of field in source table
});
/**
* new relation below just to complete the Many to Many relation
*/
// you can add this association in app_services model file
models.apps_services.belongsTo(models.services, {
// Reference: https://sequelize.org/master/class/lib/model.js~Model.html#static-method-belongsTo
foreignKey: 'serviceId', // <--- name of field in source table
targetKey: 'orn', // <--- name of field in target table
});
// you can add this association in app_services model file
models.apps_services.belongsTo(models.apps, {
foreignKey: 'appId', // <--- name of field in source table
// targetKey: 'id', //(not needed as already primary key by default) <--- name of field in target table
});
};
Related
I'm trying to run the following code block, for some reason the query tries to insert it into a column labeled "users->user_group"."userUuid", despite the fact that I have not reference the string literal userUuid once in the project (through search not in the code base), also check columns in pg-admin (using PostgreSQL), both columns in the user_group table are user_uuid and group_uuid, both columns are also validated and populated properly.
const result = await group.findAll({
include: user,
});
Postman body returns the following error
"hint": "Perhaps you meant to reference the column "users->user_group.user_uuid".",
I have 3 models user, group and user_group. The relations have been defined per documentation and countless other articles and videos.
user model
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const user = sequelize.define(
"user",
{
uuid: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
primaryKey: true,
allowNull: false,
unique: true,
},
username: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
unique: true,
allowNull: false,
},
{
freezeTableName: true,
}
);
user.associate = (models) => {
user.belongsToMany(models.group, {
// as: "userUuid",
through: models.user_group,
foreignKey: "user_uuid",
});
};
return user;
};
group model
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const group = sequelize.define(
"group",
{
uuid: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
primaryKey: true,
allowNull: false,
unique: true,
},
title: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
unique: true,
allowNull: false,
},
},
{
freezeTableName: true,
}
);
group.associate = (models) => {
group.belongsToMany(models.user, {
// as: "groupUuid",
through: models.user_group,
foreignKey: "group_uuid",
});
};
return group;
};
user_group model
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const user_group = sequelize.define(
"user_group",
{
uuid: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
primaryKey: true,
allowNull: false,
unique: true,
},
user_uuid: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
allowNull: false,
references: {
model: "user",
key: "uuid",
},
},
group_uuid: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
allowNull: false,
references: {
model: "group",
key: "uuid",
},
},
author: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
unique: true,
allowNull: true,
},
},
{
freezeTableName: true,
}
);
user_group.associate = (models) => {
user_group.belongsTo(models.user, {
foreignKey: "user_uuid",
});
user_group.belongsTo(models.group, {
foreignKey: "group_uuid",
});
};
return user_group;
};
Any help is much apprecaited, thanks!
You should indicate otherKey option along with foreignKey in belongsToMany in order to indicate a foreign key column on the other model otherwise you will end up with a default name of an other key, see below:
The name of the foreign key in the join table (representing the target model) or an object representing the type definition for the other column (see Sequelize.define for syntax). When using an object, you can add a name property to set the name of the column. Defaults to the name of target + primary key of target (your case: user+uuid)
group.belongsToMany(models.user, {
// as: "groupUuid",
through: models.user_group,
foreignKey: "group_uuid",
otherKey: "user_uuid"
});
const result = await group.findAll({
include: {user},
});
you should to create like this. baecause you missing this {}.
I have a postrgresql/Sequelize model called Segment, which belongs to many models:
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const Segment = sequelize.define(
'segment',
{
id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
autoIncrement: true,
primaryKey: true
},
provider_id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
references: {
model: 'provider',
key: 'id'
}
},
summary_id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
references: {
model: 'summary',
key: 'id'
}
},
audience_id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
references: {
model: 'audience',
key: 'id'
}
},
onboarding_id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
references: {
model: 'onboarding',
key: 'id'
}
}
},
{
// disable the modification of table names; By default, sequelize will automatically
// transform all passed model names (first parameter of define) into plural.
// if you don't want that, set the following
freezeTableName: true,
tableName: 'segment'
}
);
Segment.associate = models => {
Segment.belongsTo(models.Provider, { foreignKey: 'id' });
Segment.belongsTo(models.Summary, { foreignKey: 'id' });
Segment.belongsTo(models.Audience, { foreignKey: 'id' });
Segment.belongsTo(models.Onboarding, { foreignKey: 'id' });
};
return Segment;
};
The models that segment has associations to (ie provider_id, summary_id, audience_id, onboarding_id) look like this:
Provider:
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const Provider = sequelize.define(
'provider',
{
id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
autoIncrement: true,
primaryKey: true
},
providerName: {
type: DataTypes.STRING
},
email: {
type: DataTypes.STRING
},
privacyPolicy: {
type: DataTypes.STRING
}
},
{
freezeTableName: true,
tableName: 'provider'
}
);
Provider.associate = models => {
Provider.hasMany(models.Segment, { foreignKey: 'provider_id' });
};
return Provider;
};
Summary:
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const Summary = sequelize.define(
'summary',
{
id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
autoIncrement: true,
primaryKey: true
},
summaryName: DataTypes.STRING,
standardIdName: DataTypes.STRING,
description: DataTypes.STRING,
},
{
freezeTableName: true,
tableName: 'summary'
}
);
Summary.associate = models => {
Summary.hasMany(models.Segment, { foreignKey: 'summary_id' });
};
return Summary;
};
Audience:
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const Audience = sequelize.define(
'audience',
{
id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
autoIncrement: true,
primaryKey: true
},
refreshCadence: DataTypes.STRING,
sourceLookbackWindow: DataTypes.STRING
},
{
freezeTableName: true,
tableName: 'audience'
}
);
Audience.associate = models => {
Audience.hasMany(models.Segment, { foreignKey: 'audience_id' });
};
return Audience;
};
Onboarding:
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const Onboarding = sequelize.define(
'onboarding',
{
id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER,
autoIncrement: true,
primaryKey: true
},
onboardingExpansions: DataTypes.STRING,
onboardingAudiencePrecision: DataTypes.STRING
},
{
freezeTableName: true,
tableName: 'onboarding'
}
);
Onboarding.associate = models => {
Onboarding.hasMany(models.Segment, { foreignKey: 'onboarding_id' });
};
return Onboarding;
};
My question is: what should come first when creating and saving a Segment record? Do I create and save each one of the other models first (provider, summary, audience, onboarding), and then create/save a Segment with references to those ids? I don't really know what the order of events should be in this situation. Any help is much appreciated! Thanks!
TLDR:
In order to create an instance of Segment, you must have all 4 foreign keys reference exist records on the referenced tables(provider, summary, audience and onboarding).
Explanation:
provider, summary, audience and onboarding tables are independent.
However, Segment model is not independent.
Segment model has 4 columns which are foreign keys.
From PostgresSql Tutorial:
A foreign key is a field or group of fields in a table that uniquely
identifies a row in another table. In other words, a foreign key is
defined in a table that references to the primary key of the other
table.
The table that contains the foreign key is called referencing table or
child table. And the table to which the foreign key references is
called referenced table or parent table.
It means that a foreign key is a constraint that the column should reference the primary key of the referenced table.
So, you must create all the resources of a created row of Segment.
I have 2 tables: Countries and Spots. A country can have many spots and a spot belongs to one country.
I have generated the migrations necessary with sequelize for the 2 tables:
Countries.js
'use strict';
module.exports = {
up: (queryInterface, Sequelize) => {
return queryInterface.createTable('Countries', {
id: {
allowNull: false,
autoIncrement: true,
primaryKey: true,
type: Sequelize.INTEGER
},
name: {
allowNull: false,
unique: true,
type: Sequelize.STRING
},
createdAt: {
allowNull: false,
defaultValue: Sequelize.literal('NOW()'),
type: Sequelize.DATE,
},
updatedAt: {
allowNull: false,
defaultValue: Sequelize.literal('NOW()'),
type: Sequelize.DATE
}
});
},
down: (queryInterface, Sequelize) => {
return queryInterface.dropTable('Countries');
}
};
Spots.js
'use strict';
module.exports = {
up: (queryInterface, Sequelize) => {
return queryInterface.createTable('Spots', {
id: {
allowNull: false,
autoIncrement: true,
primaryKey: true,
type: Sequelize.INTEGER
},
name: {
allowNull: false,
type: Sequelize.STRING
},
wind: {
type: Sequelize.FLOAT
},
country_id: {
type: Sequelize.INTEGER,
references: {
model: 'Countries', // name of Target table
key: 'id', // key in Target table that we're referencing
},
onDelete: 'CASCADE',
},
createdAt: {
allowNull: false,
defaultValue: Sequelize.literal('NOW()'),
type: Sequelize.DATE
},
updatedAt: {
allowNull: false,
defaultValue: Sequelize.literal('NOW()'),
type: Sequelize.DATE
}
});
},
down: (queryInterface, Sequelize) => {
return queryInterface.dropTable('Spots');
}
};
Everything works ok. I define some routes and some controllers and I try to do Spots.findAll() in my controller
const models = require('../models/index')
const Spot = models.Spot
exports.index = async (req, res, next) => {
const spots = await Spot.findAll()
res.status(200).json(spots)
}
However the query Spot.findAll() tries to ask for CountryId which is a key that obviously doesn't exist and I do not wish for it to exist.
Executing (default): SELECT `id`, `name`, `wind`, `country_id`, `createdAt`, `updatedAt`, `CountryId` FROM `Spots` AS `Spot`;
(node:13027) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: SequelizeDatabaseError: Unknown column 'CountryId' in 'field list'
These are the spot and countries models:
Country.js
'use strict';
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const Country = sequelize.define('Country', {
name: DataTypes.STRING
}, {});
Country.associate = function(models) {
// associations can be defined here
Country.hasMany(models.Spot)
};
return Country;
};
Spot.js
'use strict';
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const Spot = sequelize.define('Spot', {
name: DataTypes.STRING,
wind: DataTypes.FLOAT,
country_id: DataTypes.INTEGER
}, {});
Spot.associate = function(models) {
// associations can be defined here
Spot.belongsTo(models.Country, {
foreignKey: 'country_id'
});
Spot.hasMany(models.Favorite)
};
return Spot;
};
I added the foreign_key attribute to belongs_to as I thought that the error surely comes from the associations(I still think it does).
Why does it happen and how to fix it?
The problem is because you are mixing everything here please follow one convention either camelCase or snack_case.
Write country_id as countryId and change your table names to lowercase and you will good to go.
I'm new to Sequelize and trying to test if an n:m association I set up between two models, User and Podcast, is working. When I try to run this query, I get some kind of DB error that isn't specific about what's wrong:
User.findOne({
where: { id: id },
include: [{ model: Podcast }]
});
Does anyone know what I'm messing up? I suspect there's something wrong in how I've set up the association, like I'm referencing the names of tables slightly incorrectly, but the migration to create the association worked.
Here's my User.js model file:
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const User = sequelize.define('User', {
name: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
allowNull: false
},
email: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
allowNull: false,
unique: true
},
photo: {
type: DataTypes.STRING
}
});
User.associate = function(models) {
// associations can be defined here
User.belongsToMany(models.Podcast, {
through: 'user_podcast'
});
};
return User;
};
And here's my Podcast.js file:
'use strict';
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const Podcast = sequelize.define('Podcast', {
id: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
primaryKey: true,
allowNull: false
},
title: {
type: DataTypes.STRING,
allowNull: false
},
thumbnail: {
type: DataTypes.STRING
},
website: {
type: DataTypes.STRING
}
});
Podcast.associate = function(models) {
// associations can be defined here
Podcast.belongsToMany(models.User, {
through: 'user_podcast'
});
};
return Podcast;
};
And here's the migration I ran to join the two tables:
'use strict';
module.exports = {
up: function(queryInterface, Sequelize) {
return queryInterface.createTable('user_podcast', {
id: {
allowNull: false,
autoIncrement: true,
primaryKey: true,
type: Sequelize.INTEGER
},
userId: {
type: Sequelize.INTEGER,
references: {
model: 'Users',
key: 'id'
}
},
podcastId: {
type: Sequelize.STRING,
references: {
model: 'Podcasts',
key: 'id'
}
},
createdAt: {
allowNull: false,
type: Sequelize.DATE
},
updatedAt: {
allowNull: false,
type: Sequelize.DATE
}
});
},
down: function(queryInterface, Sequelize) {
return queryInterface.dropTable('user_podcast');
}
};
And here's the project on Github for further reference:
https://github.com/olliebeannn/chatterpod
You don't need to create a migration for the M:N table. Now you have something wrong on your user_podcast model. If you are setting a M:N relation between to tables your primary key will be the combination between the foreign key from these two models. If you still want a single id primary key for your table, then you won't use belongsToMany instead use hasMany on user and podcast models pointing to a new model user_podcast.
As far as I see on your first query, it seems that you really need a M:N relation so you can define the model as you do with user and podcast like this:
module.exports = (sequelize, DataTypes) => {
const UserPodcast = sequelize.define('user_podcast', {
userId: {
// field: 'user_id', #Use 'field' attribute is you have to match a different format name on the db
type: DataTypes.INTEGER
},
podcastId: {
// field: 'podcast_id',
type: DataTypes.INTEGER
},
});
UserPodcast.associate = function(models) {
models.User.belongsToMany(models.Podcast, {
as: 'podcasts', //this is very important
through: { model: UserPodcast },
// foreignKey: 'user_id'
});
models.Podcast.belongsToMany(models.User, {
as: 'users',
through: { model: UserPodcast },
// foreignKey: 'podcast_id'
});
};
return UserPodcast;
};
I do prefer to have the belongsToMany associations on the save function where I define the join model, and you have to notice that I used as: attribute on the association. This is very important because this will help sequelize to know which association are you referring on the query.
User.findOne({
where: { id: id },
include: [{
model: Podcast,
as: 'podcasts' //here I use the previous alias
}]
});
I have 2 models users and tags, both are associated through another model called usersTags and all 3 models have paranoid set with custom timestamps. I understand that associating models will add additional methods to work on the associations to all associated models, so i am wanting to making a simple setTags call for users, the docs shows that if in the array in the method does not contain the element that is stored in the database it should be removed, otherwise it should be created/restored.
So i try to restore a previously removed tag but for some reason it fails. The models are defined as following:
Users
module.exports = function(sequelize, DataTypes) {
const Users = sequelize.define("users", {
id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER(11),
allowNull: false,
primaryKey: true,
autoIncrement: true
},
username: {
type: DataTypes.STRING(100),
allowNull: false,
validate: {
len: {
args: [3, 100],
msg: "String length is not in this range"
}
}
},
password: {
type: DataTypes.STRING(100),
allowNull: false,
field: "password_hash"
}
}, {
tableName: "users",
createdAt: "create_time",
updatedAt: "update_time",
deletedAt: "delete_time",
paranoid: true
});
Users.associate = function(models) {
// Add this association to include tag records
this.belongsToMany(models.tags, {
through: {
model: models.usersTags,
unique: true
},
foreignKey: "users_id",
constraints: false
});
};
return Users;
};
Tags
module.exports = function(sequelize, DataTypes) {
const Tags = sequelize.define("tags", {
id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER(11),
allowNull: false,
primaryKey: true,
autoIncrement: true
},
name: {
type: DataTypes.STRING(45),
allowNull: false
}
}, {
tableName: "tags",
createdAt: "create_time",
updatedAt: "update_time",
deletedAt: "delete_time",
paranoid: true
});
Tags.associate = function(models) {
this.belongsToMany(models.users, {
through: {
model: models.usersTags,
unique: true
},
foreignKey: "tags_id",
constraints: false
});
};
return Tags;
};
usersTags
module.exports = function(sequelize, DataTypes) {
const UsersTags = sequelize.define("usersTags", {
users_id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER(11),
allowNull: false,
primaryKey: true,
references: {
model: "users",
key: "id"
}
},
tags_id: {
type: DataTypes.INTEGER(11),
allowNull: false,
primaryKey: true,
references: {
model: "tags",
key: "id"
}
}
}, {
tableName: "users_tags",
createdAt: "create_time",
updatedAt: "update_time",
deletedAt: "delete_time",
paranoid: true,
indexes: [
{
unique: true,
fields: ["users_id", "tags_id"]
}
]
});
return UsersTags;
};
Test
let _user;
models.users.findOne({where: {id: 100}})
.then(user => {
_user = user;
return _user.setTags([1]); // Successfully create association tag with id 1
})
.then(() => _user.setTags([])) // Successfully remove all associated tags
.then(() => _user.setTags([1])); // Should restore association tag with id 1 but fails
Executed query
app:database Executing (default): SELECT `id`, `username`, `first_name`, `last_name`, `birthday`, `description`, `location`, `email`, `type`, `image_path` FROM `users` AS `users` WHERE ((`users`.`delete_time` > '2018-08-28 19:40:15' OR `users`.`delete_time` IS NULL) AND `users`.`id` = 100); +0ms
app:database Executing (default): SELECT `users_id`, `tags_id`, `create_time`, `update_time`, `delete_time` FROM `users_tags` AS `usersTags` WHERE ((`usersTags`.`delete_time` > '2018-08-28 19:40:15' OR `usersTags`.`delete_time` IS NULL) AND `usersTags`.`users_id` = 100); +6ms
app:database Executing (default): INSERT INTO `users_tags` (`users_id`,`tags_id`,`create_time`,`update_time`) VALUES (100,1,'2018-08-28 19:40:15','2018-08-28 19:40:15'); +7ms
For some reason the tag search query is failing to retrieve the tag that contains the delete_time set and therefore the last query is insert instead of update, i know the workaround would be to set paranoid to false but i have to keep track of all activities, i know another workaround would be to create a custom model method to handle this but i still want to know if there is a way to achieve this without having to create an additional custom method
your code in not in a correct async order so your _user global variable is not initiated,I think this is the correct order :
let _user;
models.users.findOne({where: {id: 100}})
.then(user => {
_user = user;
_user.setTags([]).then(()=>{
_user.setTags([1])
})
})