This test:
import { render } from '#testing-library/svelte';
import { setRoutes } from '../router';
import SLink from '../router/components/SLink.svelte';
import routes from '../routes';
beforeAll(() => setRoutes(routes));
test('Instantiates components', () => {
expect(() => render(SLink, { props: { name: 'About' } })).not.toThrow();
});
Produces this error:
Error name: "TypeError"
Error message: "Cannot read property 'forEach' of undefined"
137 |
138 | const matchRoute = passedRoutes => {
> 139 | passedRoutes.forEach(compare => {
| ^
140 | if (matchedRoute) return;
141 |
142 | const { regex, fullRegex } = compare as FormattedRoute;
Which comes from this function:
const compareRoutes = (routes, route) => {
let matchedRoute;
const matchRoute = passedRoutes => {
passedRoutes.forEach(compare => {
// ...
});
};
matchRoute(routes);
return matchedRoute;
};
Which is called by the component I'm trying to render in the test:
<script>
import { routes } from '../logic';
import { compareRoutes } from '../static';
export let name;
// Error stems from 'routes' being undefined here
const route = compareRoutes(routes, { name });
</script>
This line:
beforeAll(() => setRoutes(routes));
Sets the routes imported by SLink which are then passed to compareRoutes, so they shouldn't be undefined.
I've used the same line for other functions and the tests run as expected.
Can #testing-library/svelte not resolve imports? Or, is there another reason for this?
setRoutes:
let routes;
const setRoutes = (userRoutes) => {
// ...
routes = userRoutes;
};
export { routes };
I guess this is rendered in JSDom, and I suspect it might not support live bindings like what you're doing with your export { routes }.
Try exporting a function instead, to confirm:
export const getRoutes = () => routes
Also, this is off topic, but it really feels like your compareRoutes function could be simplified as a filter (or map, or reduce) operation. Something like that:
const compareRoutes = (routes, route) => routes.filter(
x => route.path.startsWith(x.path)
)
Related
I'm trying to mock out axios that is inside an async function that is being wrapped in useQuery:
import { useQuery, QueryKey } from 'react-query'
export const fetchWithAxios = async () => {
...
...
...
const response = await someAxiosCall()
...
return data
}
export const useFetchWithQuery = () => useQuery(key, fetchWithAxios, {
refetchInterval: false,
refetchOnReconnect: true,
refetchOnWindowFocus: true,
retry: 1,
})
and I want to use moxios
moxios.stubRequest('/some-url', {
status: 200,
response: fakeInputData,
})
useFetchWithQuery()
moxios.wait(function () {
done()
})
but I'm getting all sorts of issues with missing context, store, etc which I'm iterested in mocking out completely.
Don't mock useQuery, mock Axios!
The pattern you should follow in order to test your usages of useQuery should look something like this:
const fetchWithAxios = (axios, ...parameters) => {
const data = axios.someAxiosCall(parameters);
return data;
}
export const useFetchWithQuery = (...parameters) => {
const axios = useAxios();
return useQuery(key, fetchWithAxios(axios, ...parameters), {
// options
})
}
Where does useAxios come from? You need to write a context to pass an axios instance through the application.
This will allow your tests to look something like this in the end:
const { result, waitFor, waitForNextUpdate } = renderHook(() => useFetchWithQuery(..., {
wrapper: makeWrapper(withQueryClient, withAxios(mockedAxios)),
});
await waitFor(() => expect(result.current.isFetching).toBeFalsy());
I use prisma to interact with my database and i would like to use jest-mock to mock the findMany call. https://jestjs.io/docs/jest-object#jestmockedtitem-t-deep--false
brands.test.ts
import { PrismaService } from "#services/mysql.service";
import { mocked } from "jest-mock";
import faker from "#faker-js/faker";
import { GetBrands } from "./brand";
jest.mock("#services/mysql.service");
/**
* #group unit
*/
describe("Brand", () => {
afterAll(async () => {});
const mockedPrismaService = mocked(PrismaService, true);
it("should get a list of brands", async () => {
const mockedData = [
{
id: faker.datatype.uuid(),
name: faker.datatype.string(),
image: {
source: "some_source",
dtype: "some_dtype",
},
},
];
//#ts-ignore - because of relational data mockedData.image
mockedPrismaService.brand.findMany.mockResolvedValueOnce(mockedData);
const [response, error] = await GetBrands();
console.log(response, error);
});
});
mysql.service.ts
import mysql from "mysql2/promise";
import { Config } from "#config";
import { PrismaClient, Prisma } from "#prisma/client";
export const MySQLEscape = mysql.escape;
export const MySQLPreparedStatement = mysql.format;
export const PrismaService = new PrismaClient({});
export const PrismaHelper = Prisma;
However when i run this test i get the following error.
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'brand')
Factory Mock
One option is to option use the factory approach when mocking your client.
jest.mock("#services/mysql.service", () => ({
PrismaService: {
brand: {
findMany: jest.fn(() => { })
}
},
}));
Then within your test, you can mock the findMany function to return your test data, then call the function being tested.
const mockedData = [...];
PrismaService.brand.findMany.mockResolvedValueOnce(mockedData);
const result = await GetBrands();
It's a bit cumbersome, but it works.
Note that in my example, I've implemented GetBrands as follows:
import { PrismaService } from "#services/mysql.service"
export const GetBrands = async () => {
const data = await PrismaService.brand.findMany();
return data;
}
Your example
In your example, you're using automatic mocking, and I'm not too familiar with it so I'm not sure how to get it working.
What seems to be happening to cause the error is your PrismaService is undefined when it's imported here:
import { PrismaService } from "#services/mysql.service";
And then calling the mocked function with an undefined parameter returns undefined:
const mockedPrismaService = mocked(undefined, true); // returns undefined
And finally, calling the following is what throws the error:
mockedPrismaService.brand.findMany.mockResolvedValueOnce(mockedData);
// TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'brand')
I would have thought something like this would be what you're after, but this throws an error:
jest.mock("#services/mysql.service", () => ({
PrismaService: mocked(PrismaService, true)
}));
// 6 |
// 7 | jest.mock("#services/mysql.service", () => ({
//> 8 | PrismaService: mocked(PrismaClient, true)
// | ^
// 9 | }));
Check out the docs
Might be worth checking out the Prismas documentation on unit testing, as they suggest a couple of pretty different approaches.
When I run test, it show TypeError: Cannot destructure property 'travelDatas' of '(0 , _GetTravelDatas.getTravelDatas)(...)' as it is undefined.
As you see the screenshot: unit test
There isn't any console error or warning.
Could anyone help please
travelListTest.spec.js
import { mount, shallowMount } from '#vue/test-utils'
import TravelList from '../../src/components/TravelList.vue'
import { getTravelDatas } from '../../src/composables/GetTravelDatas'
import ElementPlus from 'element-plus'
const wrapper = shallowMount(TravelList, {
global: {
plugins: [ElementPlus]
}
})
jest.mock('../../src/composables/GetTravelDatas')
describe('TravelList Test', () => {
test('click more will call GoToTravelDetailPage', () => {
wrapper.vm.GoToTravelDetailPage = jest.fn()
console.log(wrapper.html())
wrapper.find('.el-button').trigger('click')
expect(wrapper.vm.GoToTravelDetailPage).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
TravelList.vue
.....
<script>
import { ref } from '#vue/reactivity';
import { useRouter } from "vue-router";
import { getTravelDatas } from '../composables/GetTravelDatas'
export default {
name: 'TravelList',
setup() {
const { travelDatas } = getTravelDatas();
const router = useRouter();
function GoToTravelDetailPage(acctractionId) {
router.push({ path: `/travelDetail/${acctractionId}` })
}
return { travelDatas, GoToTravelDetailPage };
},
};
</script>
GetTravelDatas.js
import axios from "axios";
import { ref } from '#vue/runtime-core';
export function getTravelDatas() {
const travelDatas = ref([])
axios.get('https://localhost:5001/MyTravel/GetTravelData')
.then((response) => {
if (!response.data.success) {
alert(response.data.errorMessage)
}else{
travelDatas.value = response.data.travelDetail
}
}).catch((error) => {
alert('Unexpected Error: ', error.message)
console.log(error)
});
return { travelDatas }
}
You are mocking the GetTravelDatas module with an auto-mock version by calling:
jest.mock('../../src/composables/GetTravelDatas')
That means that all the methods exported from that module will be mocked (the real code of the method will not be called) and the mocked version will return undefined when called.
In the code you are testing you then have:
const { travelDatas } = getTravelDatas();
Reading the travelDatas property from undefined is causing the error you are seeing.
You should mock the getTravelDatas method so that it returns the appropriate data. For example, returning an empty array would look like:
getTravelDatas.mockReturnValue([]);
Testing libs...always fun. I am using next-i18next within my NextJS project. We are using the useTranslation hook with namespaces.
When I run my test there is a warning:
console.warn
react-i18next:: You will need to pass in an i18next instance by using initReactI18next
> 33 | const { t } = useTranslation(['common', 'account']);
| ^
I have tried the setup from the react-i18next test examples without success. I have tried this suggestion too.
as well as just trying to mock useTranslation without success.
Is there a more straightforward solution to avoid this warning? The test passes FWIW...
test('feature displays error', async () => {
const { findByTestId, findByRole } = render(
<I18nextProvider i18n={i18n}>
<InviteCollectEmails onSubmit={jest.fn()} />
</I18nextProvider>,
{
query: {
orgId: 666,
},
}
);
const submitBtn = await findByRole('button', {
name: 'account:organization.invite.copyLink',
});
fireEvent.click(submitBtn);
await findByTestId('loader');
const alert = await findByRole('alert');
within(alert).getByText('failed attempt');
});
Last, is there a way to have the translated plain text be the outcome, instead of the namespaced: account:account:organization.invite.copyLink?
Use the following snippet before the describe block OR in beforeEach() to mock the needful.
jest.mock("react-i18next", () => ({
useTranslation: () => ({ t: key => key }),
}));
Hope this helps. Peace.
use this for replace render function.
import { render, screen } from '#testing-library/react'
import DarkModeToggleBtn from '../../components/layout/DarkModeToggleBtn'
import { appWithTranslation } from 'next-i18next'
import { NextRouter } from 'next/router'
jest.mock('react-i18next', () => ({
I18nextProvider: jest.fn(),
__esmodule: true,
}))
const createProps = (locale = 'en', router: Partial<NextRouter> = {}) => ({
pageProps: {
_nextI18Next: {
initialLocale: locale,
userConfig: {
i18n: {
defaultLocale: 'en',
locales: ['en', 'fr'],
},
},
},
} as any,
router: {
locale: locale,
route: '/',
...router,
},
} as any)
const Component = appWithTranslation(() => <DarkModeToggleBtn />)
const defaultRenderProps = createProps()
const renderComponent = (props = defaultRenderProps) => render(
<Component {...props} />
)
describe('', () => {
it('', () => {
renderComponent()
expect(screen.getByRole("button")).toHaveTextContent("")
})
})
I used a little bit more sophisticated approach than mocking to ensure all the functions work the same both in testing and production environment.
First, I create a testing environment:
// testing/env.ts
import i18next, { i18n } from "i18next";
import JSDomEnvironment from "jest-environment-jsdom";
import { initReactI18next } from "react-i18next";
declare global {
var i18nInstance: i18n;
}
export default class extends JSDomEnvironment {
async setup() {
await super.setup();
/* The important part start */
const i18nInstance = i18next.createInstance();
await i18nInstance.use(initReactI18next).init({
lng: "cimode",
resources: {},
});
this.global.i18nInstance = i18nInstance;
/* The important part end */
}
}
I add this environment in jest.config.ts:
// jest.config.ts
export default {
// ...
testEnvironment: "testing/env.ts",
};
Sample component:
// component.tsx
import { useTranslation } from "next-i18next";
export const Component = () => {
const { t } = useTranslation();
return <div>{t('foo')}</div>
}
And later on I use it in tests:
// component.test.tsx
import { setI18n } from "react-i18next";
import { create, act, ReactTestRenderer } from "react-test-renderer";
import { Component } from "./component";
it("renders Component", () => {
/* The important part start */
setI18n(global.i18nInstance);
/* The important part end */
let root: ReactTestRenderer;
act(() => {
root = create(<Component />);
});
expect(root.toJSON()).toMatchSnapshot();
});
I figured out how to make the tests work with an instance of i18next using the renderHook function and the useTranslation hook from react-i18next based on the previous answers and some research.
This is the Home component I wanted to test:
import { useTranslation } from 'next-i18next';
const Home = () => {
const { t } = useTranslation("");
return (
<main>
<div>
<h1> {t("welcome", {ns: 'home'})}</h1>
</div>
</main>
)
};
export default Home;
First, we need to create a setup file for jest so we can start an i18n instance and import the translations to the configuration. test/setup.ts
import i18n from "i18next";
import { initReactI18next } from "react-i18next";
import homeES from '#/public/locales/es/home.json';
import homeEN from '#/public/locales/en/home.json';
i18n.use(initReactI18next).init({
lng: "es",
resources: {
en: {
home: homeEN,
},
es: {
home: homeES,
}
},
fallbackLng: "es",
debug: false,
});
export default i18n;
Then we add the setup file to our jest.config.js:
setupFilesAfterEnv: ["<rootDir>/test/setup.ts"]
Now we can try our tests using the I18nextProvider and the useTranslation hook:
import '#testing-library/jest-dom/extend-expect';
import { cleanup, render, renderHook } from '#testing-library/react';
import { act } from 'react-dom/test-utils';
import { I18nextProvider, useTranslation } from 'react-i18next';
import Home from '.';
describe("Index page", (): void => {
afterEach(cleanup);
it("should render properly in Spanish", (): void => {
const t = renderHook(() => useTranslation());
const component = render(
<I18nextProvider i18n={t.result.current.i18n}>
<Home / >
</I18nextProvider>
);
expect(component.getByText("Bienvenido a Pocky")).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it("should render properly in English", (): void => {
const t = renderHook(() => useTranslation());
act(() => {
t.result.current.i18n.changeLanguage("en");
});
const component = render(
<I18nextProvider i18n={t.result.current.i18n}>
<Home/>
</I18nextProvider>
);
expect(component.getByText("Welcome to Pocky")).toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
Here we used the I18nextProvider and send the i18n instance using the useTranslation hook. after that the translations were loaded without problems in the Home component.
We can also change the selected language running the changeLanguage() function and test the other translations.
I'm having trouble making the following test pass:
import { useEffect, useState } from "react";
export function useComponentResources(required) {
const [componentResources, setComponentResources] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
if (required) {
// api call
setTimeout(() => setComponentResources({}), 100);
}
}, [required]);
return componentResources;
}
import { renderHook } from "#testing-library/react-hooks";
import { useComponentResources } from "./component-resources.hook";
describe("component-resources.hook", () => {
it("fetches resources when required", () => {
//act
const { result } = renderHook(() => useComponentResources(true));
//assert
expect(result.current).toEqual({});
});
});
It keeps failing:
expect(received).toEqual(expected)
Expected value to equal:
{}
Received:
null
Difference:
Comparing two different types of values. Expected object but received null.
7 | const { result } = renderHook(() => useComponentResources(true));
9 | //assert
> 10 | expect(result.current).toEqual({});
11 | });
12 | });
I have created a repro case in codesandbox:
https://codesandbox.io/embed/priceless-browser-94ec2
renderHook doesn't wait for your setTimeout to fire; it can't know what 'side effects' your component has. So when your expect() runs, the current value is still its default - null.
We can force the test to wait until the hook updates again by using waitForNextUpdate, which is on the object renderHook returns. waitForNextUpdate is a function that returns a promise that resolves once the hook is updated again (e.g. when your setTimeout fires).
import { renderHook } from "#testing-library/react-hooks";
import { useComponentResources } from "./component-resources.hook";
describe("component-resources.hook", () => {
it("fetches resources when required", async () => {
const { result, waitForNextUpdate } = renderHook(() => useComponentResources(true));
await waitForNextUpdate();
expect(result.current).toEqual({});
});
});