Is there any way to start strapi/strapi docker images with pm2? Since the default command for strapi/strapi docker images is strapi develop.
PM2 is already included in the Docker image
Use docker-compose to start your project then you will be able to get inside your guest os image and run commands.
sudo docker exec -it strapi bash
create ecosystem.config.js file
pm2 start ecosystem.config.js --env production
Please check this blog post.
Looks like the only way to do this is install strapi using cli, then ship it to docker using strapi/base docker image and add pm2 in the Dockerfile.
FROM strapi/base
WORKDIR /srv/app
COPY ./package.json ./
COPY ./yarn.lock ./
RUN npm install pm2 -g
RUN yarn install
COPY . .
ENV NODE_ENV production
RUN yarn build
EXPOSE 1337
CMD ["pm2-runtime", "server.js"]
Related
I have a problem after creating a docker image.
If I build applications without Docker (npm run build, npm start), everything works correctly. Screenshots below.
Please suggest how to fix the problem
Dockerfile:
FROM node:alpine
RUN apk add --no-cache libc6-compat
RUN mkdir /brahhouse
WORKDIR /brahhouse
COPY ./package*.json /brahhouse
RUN npm install
COPY . /brahhouse
RUN npm run build
CMD ["npm", "start"]
I build docker image with command:
docker build -t brahouse .
I run docker image with command:
docker run -p 3000:3000 brahouse
Screenshots:
App without Docker
App in Docker Images
Problem solved
Thank you brc-dd
Solution:
Editing tailwind.config.js (purge -> content) Set the correct paths for components, pages and other folders used by tailwind-css
I am trying some something out with gitlab-runner image,
FROM gitlab/gitlab-runner:alpine
WORKDIR /app
COPY . /app
RUN apk add yarn && yarn install
RUN yarn --version # this layer prints 1.16.0
RUN ng build --prod
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["yarn", "run", "start"]
above is the docker file I have created
docker build -t runner:1 .
I was able to build the image successfully
docker run -p 3000:3000 runner:1
but when I try to run the container it gives me below error
`*FATAL: Command yarn not found.*`
not sure about the behavior, if it is able to install yarn (apk add yarn) in base images and install the dependencies using yarn install then how it is not able to find the yarn command while running the container? Where I am going wrong.
Also at which directory yarn is installed in the alpine ?
I know it is not an efficient docker file, but I am trying to run the container first before optimizing it.
It outputs the version. It means the yarn is installed already. You could find the path the same as you find the version.
RUN which yarn
Step 6/10 : RUN which yarn
---> Running in 0f633b81f2ed
/usr/bin/yarn
We can see the /usr/bin/ has added to PATH.
Step 7/11 : RUN echo $PATH
---> Running in fc3f40b6bfd9
/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
But I couldn't figure out why isn't reading yarn from the PATH.
So, we have set the PATH explicitly in our Dockerfile.
ENV PATH=${PATH}
But still, the issue persists. Now we have to separate yarn and commands as ENTRYPOINT and CMD respectively in the Dockerfile.
ENTRYPOINT ["yarn"]
CMD ["run", "start"]
Updated Dockerfile
FROM gitlab/gitlab-runner:alpine
ENV PATH=${PATH}
WORKDIR /app
COPY . /app
RUN apk add yarn && yarn install
RUN yarn --version # this layer prints 1.16.0
RUN ng build --prod
EXPOSE 3000
ENTRYPOINT ["yarn"]
CMD ["run", "start"]
---
$ docker run -p 3000:3000 harik8/yarn:latest
yarn run v1.16.0
error Couldn't find a package.json file in "/app"
info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.
The behaviours of the base image look unusual. It'd be better to go through it.
To build your app you shouldn't use gitlab-runner image, but a 'node' one.
Gilab-runner image is for running a gitlab agent which can be connected to docker engine and spawn the node container in which you will execute your build, in your case a docker image build.
To use gilab you need to prepare a gitlab-ci file where you will define what steps and which 'services' you need to do your build.
Tl;dr: change base image to node:latest and as a entirely separate work setup gitlab runner.
However if your aim is to have your application to extend gitlab runner, try docker multistage builds.
First, use node:latest image to build your app, and then copy the build output into gitlab-runner.
Runtime images such as gitlab-runner are stripped from build tools like yarn or npm, that's why your image fails. Main goal is to keep runtime images as small as possible and sdk's are not needed and sometimes dangerous when it comes to production-level work.
I am having a problem running Docker container after upgrading from NodeJS 8.2 to 9.1. This is the message I am getting.
I used the Dockerfile I found in Docker Hub but got an error of not being able to find package.json. So I commented it out and use the one I found on NodeJS website.
Below is the Docker File:
Dockerfile
FROM node:9.1.0
RUN mkdir -p /usr/src/app
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
ONBUILD ARG NODE_ENV
ONBUILD ENV NODE_ENV $NODE_ENV
ONBUILD COPY package*.json ./
ONBUILD RUN npm install && npm cache clean --force
ONBUILD COPY . /usr/src/app
CMD [ "npm", "start" ]
I would appreciate help from more experienced users.
Your docker run command syntax is wrong. Everything after the image name is used to override the command run in your container. So docker run myimage -d will try to run -d inside the container, while docker run -d myimage will run your container with the -d option to docker run (detached mode).
The Dockerfile you referenced is meant to be used as parent image for an easy dockerization of your application.
So to dockerize your nodejs application, you'd need to create a dockerfile using the docker image created by said dockerfile.
The ONBUILD instruction gets executed whenever a new image is built with this particular image as parent image (FROM instruction). More info
I've never used an image like this, but from the looks of it, it should be enough to reference the image with the FROM instruction and then provide the NODE_ENV via build args.
The dockerfile to add into your project:
FROM this_image:9.1
How to build your application image:
docker build -t IMAGE_NAME:TAG --build-arg NODE_ENV=production .
I'd like to run thumbd as a service inside a node Docker image! At the moment I'm just running it before I start my app, which is no use to me! Is there a way I could setup my Dockerfile to run it as an init.d service on startup without blocking any of my other docker commands?
My Dockerfile goes as follows:
FROM node:6.2.0
# Create app directory
RUN mkdir -p /usr/src/app
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
# Install app dependencies
COPY package.json /usr/src/app/
RUN npm install
# Thumbd
RUN npm install -g thumbd
RUN mkdir -p /var/log/
RUN echo "" > /var/log/thumbd.log
RUN thumbd server --aws_key=<KEY> --aws_secret=<SECRET> --sqs_queue=<QUEUE> --bucket=<BUCKET> --aws_region=us-west-1 --s3_acl=public-read
# Bundle app source
COPY . /usr/src/app
EXPOSE 8080
CMD npm run build && npm start
It's probably easiest to run thumbd in it's own container due to the way it works without direct links to your application. Docker likes to push the idea of a single process per container too.
FROM node:6.2.0
# Thumbd
RUN set -uex; \
npm install -g thumbd; \
mkdir -p /var/log/; \
touch /var/log/thumbd.log
CMD thumbd server --aws_key=<KEY> --aws_secret=<SECRET> --sqs_queue=<QUEUE> --bucket=<BUCKET> --aws_region=us-west-1 --s3_acl=public-read
You can use Docker Compose to orchestrate running multiple containers in your project.
If you really want to run multiple processes in a container, use an init system like s6 or possibly supervisord.
I created an image from my angular2 app created by angular-cli using below dockerfile.
FROM node:latest
MAINTAINER BHUSHAN GADEKAR
ENV NODE_ENV=production
ENV PORT=4200
COPY . /var/www
WORKDIR /var/www
RUN npm install
EXPOSE $PORT
ENTRYPOINT ["npm","start"]
After successful creation of image , I tried to run this image using below command
docker run --rm -p 8080:4200 -w "/var/www" bhushan001/angular2-cli npm start
Now I can see my container getting started.but it runs into error that:
ng serve "npm" "start" sh: 1: ng: not found
So I know that angular-cli is not present inside my container but I had installed it locally using npm install in dockerfile.
any inputs?
thanks in advance.
How can I troubleshoot this?
use bash -c -l 'npm start' - this ensure your ENV is populated, which you need.