I have a cabal project. It has library and test targets.
Test target depends on library because it tests the library's functionalities.
The problem is, whenever I add a package dependency to library (say, cryptohash-sha1)
library Lib
exposed-modules: Lib
other-extensions: DeriveGeneric
build-depends: base >=4.13 && <4.14,
cryptohash-sha1,
and run the test, I get error
Could not load module ‘Crypto.Hash.SHA1’.
It is a member of the hidden package ‘cryptohash-sha1-0.11.100.1’.
Perhaps you need to add ‘cryptohash-sha1’ to the build-depends in your .cabal file
What I do in this situation is to add the same package to test target
test-suite json-generator-test
hs-source-dirs: test, src
main-is: Test.hs
other-modules: Lib
build-depends: base >=4.13 && <4.14
cryptohash-sha1,
Only then the test would run.
I want test target to automatically depend on all the packages from library target. How can I do that?
You can use a cabal feature called common stanzas. You can read more about it in the following blog post:
https://vrom911.github.io/blog/common-stanzas
With this approach, you can put all common dependencies in a separate stanza, and just import it in both the library and test suite:
common common-dependencies
build-depends: base >=4.13 && <4.14
, cryptohash-sha1
library Lib
import: common-dependencies
exposed-modules: Lib
other-extensions: DeriveGeneric
test-suite json-generator-test
import: common-dependencies
hs-source-dirs: test, src
main-is: Test.hs
other-modules: Lib
Related
I am new to Haskell. I want to use Control.Lens package. I've read this and applied what it says but I get an error that says:
Resolving dependencies...
cabal-3.6.2.0.exe: Cannot build the executables in the package lens because it
does not contain any executables. Check the .cabal file for the package and
make sure that it properly declares the components that you expect.
when I try to run cabal install lens in the project folder.(I opened terminal in the project folder.)
Any help would be appreciated.
Solution: I've learned that I need to add 'lens' into build-depends part of .cabal file.Then I need to import Control.Lens inside Main.hs . I give my .cabal file as an example:
executable Prelude3
main-is: Main.hs
-- Modules included in this executable, other than Main.
--other-modules: Basic
-- LANGUAGE extensions used by modules in this package.
-- other-extensions:
build-depends: containers,lens,microlens,microlens-platform,base ^>=4.14.3.0
hs-source-dirs: app
default-language: Haskell2010
On the top of the Main.hs I write import Control.Lens. Finally after I run 'cabal build' and cabal run in the terminal necessary packages successfully downlaoaded.
I'm contributing to an open source project which defines its project setup in a cabal file that looks like this (omitting lots of properties that are not relevant for this problem):
library
hs-source-dirs: src
build-depends:
base >= 4.9 && < 5,
some-other-deps
exposed-modules:
Data.Foo.Bar,
Data.Foo.Baz
other-modules:
Data.Foo.Bar.Internal
test-suite test
hs-source-dirs:
tests
build-depends:
foo-library
other-modules:
Foo.Bar.Tests,
Foo.Baz.Tests
Now, in order to test the feature I'm adding, I want the tests to have access to the Data.Foo.Bar.Internal module, but since it's hidden in the library, I can't access it from the tests.
I looked at the cabal docs which suggested adding a third component - an internal library (unfortunately not linkable, but search for "internal libraries"). If I understand the documentation correctly, I should be able to do something like this:
library foo-internal
hs-source-dirs: src
build-depends:
base,
some-other-deps
exposed-modules:
Data.Foo.Bar.Internal
library
hs-source-dirs: src
build-depends:
base >= 4.9 && < 5,
foo-internal,
some-other-deps
exposed-modules:
Data.Foo.Bar,
Data.Foo.Baz
test-suite test
hs-source-dirs:
tests
build-depends:
foo-library,
foo-internal
other-modules:
Foo.Bar.Tests,
Foo.Baz.Tests
but running stack build here gives me warnings that Data.Foo.Bar.Internal "should be added to exposed-modules or other-modules in ./foo.cabal", and then a build error in the test that seems to be caused by failed unification (it points to a function argument for a function defined in the library, says that its type must be Data.Foo.Bar.Internal.Qux defined in package foo, and that the type foo:Data.Foo.Bar.Internal.Qux don't match).
How can I expose internal modules to the test suite, without exposing them also to consumers of the library?
As mentioned in the comments, different components (internal libraries, executables) should have modules under different roots.
This is a recurrent point of confusion. For another example: https://stackoverflow.com/a/6711739/6863749
There is an open ticket on Cabal's issue tracker about clarifying this with a suitable warning; it's apparently non-trivial to detect this situation reliably because it overlaps with legitimate use cases: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/5335
First off, I'm new to using cabal and external packages with Haskell.
I'm trying to use the Graphics.Gloss package inside of MyLib. I can make it work if I include gloss in both the build-depends of library and executable.
Here is the relevant portion of the cabal file:
library
exposed-modules: MyLib
build-depends: base ^>=4.13.0.0,
gloss ^>=1.13.1.1
default-language: Haskell2010
executable ray-tracer
main-is: Main.hs
other-modules: MyLib
build-depends: base ^>=4.13.0.0, ray-tracer,
haskell-say ^>=1.0.0.0,
gloss ^>=1.13.1.1
MyLib.hs
module MyLib (someFunc) where
import Graphics.Gloss
someFunc :: IO ()
someFunc = display (InWindow "My Window" (200,200) (10,10)) white (Circle 80)
Main.hs
module Main where
import qualified MyLib (someFunc)
import HaskellSay (haskellSay)
main :: IO ()
main = do
MyLib.someFunc
Why doesn't this work when gloss is only included in the library dependencies?
You can make it work. There is a problem in your current set up, which is that the files for the library and the executable are in the same directory. See also this question How to avoid recompiling in this cabal file? which is a symptom of the same underlying problem: when you build the executable, it rebuilds MyLib from scratch (which requires the gloss dependency) instead of reusing your library that was already built.
MyLib/
ray-tracer.cabal
MyLib.hs
Main.hs # Bad
Move the .hs files in separate directories (technically you only need to move one of them, but I think it's better to keep the root directory as uniform as possible):
MyLib/
MyLib.cabal
src/
MyLib.hs
exe/
Main.hs
And in the cabal file, add hs-source-dirs: src and hs-source-dirs: exe to the corresponding sections:
library
hs-source-dirs: src
...
executable ray-tracer
hs-source-dirs: exe
...
Here's a .cabal file:
Name: myprogram
Version: 0.1
-- blah blah blah
Cabal-version: >=1.9.2
Executable myprogram
HS-source-dirs: src
Main-is: Main.hs
Build-depends: attoparsec == 0.10.*,
base == 4.3.*,
-- long long list of packages
Test-Suite test
HS-source-dirs: test, src
Type: exitcode-stdio-1.0
Main-is: Main.hs
Build-depends: attoparsec == 0.10.*,
base == 4.3.*,
-- long long list of packages
QuickCheck == 2.4.*
Is there any way I can replace the long list of build-depends packages for the test suite with "same as for the executable, plus QuickCheck"?
Edit: version information.
cabal-dev 0.9
cabal-install 0.10.2
Cabal library 1.10.2.0
GHC 7.0.4
Haskell Platform 2011.4.0.0
NOTE: superseded by phadej's answer suggesting common stanzas.
Is there any way I can replace the long list of build-depends packages for the test suite with "same as for the executable, plus QuickCheck"?
Not that I know of. However, there is a way to only mention the list of build-depends packages once, by structuring your project into three targets:
a library that contains all your code, and needs the long build-depends list.
an executable that consists of only one file, and depends on base and the library from above.
a test-suite that depends on the library from above, and the testing packages you are using.
Maybe this approach is what indygemma's answer proposes, but the Cabal file proposed there will not quite achieve it, as Norman Ramsey points out in a comment. Here's the main points of what you need in a Cabal file. For a full example that works for me, you can look at this Cabal file.
name: my-program
version: ...
library
hs-source-dirs: src-lib
build-depends: base, containers, ...
exposed-modules: My.Program.Main, ...
executable my-program
hs-source-dirs: src-exec
main-is: my-program.hs
Build-depends: base, my-program
test-suite tests
type: exitcode-stdio-1.0
hs-source-dirs: src-test
main-is: tests.hs
other-modules: ...
build-depends: base, my-program, test-framework, ...
Important points:
There are three separate source directories for the three targets. This is necessary to stop GHC from recompiling library files when building the other targets.
All of the application code is in the library. The executable is just a wrapper, like this:
import My.Program.Main (realMain)
main = realMain
The library exposes all modules that are necessary for testing.
The last point highlights the drawback of this approach: You end up having to expose internal modules. The main benefit of this approach is that you have less duplication in the Cabal file, and maybe more importantly, less duplication in the build process: The library code will be built only once, and then linked into both the executable and the test-suite.
Since version 2.2 Cabal supports common stanzas, to dedup build info fields:
https://cabal.readthedocs.io/en/latest/developing-packages.html#common-stanzas
cabal-version: 2.2
name: myprogram
version: 0.1
-- blah blah blah
common deps
build-depends: base ^>= 4.11,
-- long long list of packages
ghc-options: -Wall
library
import: deps
exposed-modules: Foo
test-suite tests
import: deps
type: exitcode-stdio-1.0
main-is: Tests.hs
build-depends: foo
You could also consider using hpack instead of writing the .cabal file by hand:
In hpack's package.yaml format, you can specify a common dependencies field whose entries are added to every components' build-depends field when generating the .cabal file.
For example, see hpack's own package.yaml and the generated hpack.cabal.
To start using hpack with an existing package, you can use hpack-convert which will generate the package.yaml from an existing .cabal file.
To create a new package that uses hpack, you can use stack's simple-hpack template like so: stack new mypkg simple-hpack.
If you use stack for development, you don't have to call hpack manually to regenerate the .cabal file from an updated package.yaml – stack will do that automatically.
No easy way:
you can use m4 and specify your dependencies once, but then you will need to reprocess your Cabal file through m4 whenever you change it.
you can move the code you are testing out to a library, and then specify the library in your Build-depends for the test. That requires you to install a library even just to run the test.
You can just not put the test in the cabal file at all. Build it with ghc --make, which will pull in dependencies. But then you lose cabal integration.
There is an optional library section for .cabal files, which solves your problem.
name: myprogram
version: 0.1
-- blah blah blah
cabal-version: >=1.9.2
library
build-depends: attoparsec == 0.10.*
, base == 4.3.*
-- long long list of packages
executable myprogram
hs-source-dirs: src
main-is: Main.hs
test-suite test
hs-source-dirs: test, src
type: exitcode-stdio-1.0
main-is: Main.hs
build-depends: QuickCheck == 2.4.*
I am trying to write a package in Haskell. This package contains a library and an executable. I am specifying this in the Cabal file. There are three basic components of the library:
1) There are the exposed modules of the library
2) There are internal build-dependencies that should not be exported as part of the library
3) There are external build-dependencies.
There is a bit of overlap in the Cabal file. For the library I write:
exposed-modules: The List of Exposed Modules
other-modules: The List of other modules
build-depends: The List of build dependencies
Then for the executable
other-modules: The list of exposed modules and other modules are needed in the executable
build-depends: The list of build dependencies
What would be nice is if Cabal lets me have a variable.
V1 = List exposed modules
V2 = List other modules
V3 = List build dependencies
Then in the executable, for example, I could do
other-modules: V1,V2
build-depends: V3
Alternatively, I would take a recommendation for a better way to use the Cabal system!
No, this is not possible yet. I think we have a feature request for something like this on the issue tracker somewhere. Note, however, that your executable can depend on the library defined in the same .cabal file, so you don't have to share exposed-modules and other-modules:
Name: some-package
Version: 0.1
[...]
Library
build-depends: some-dependency >= 1.0, ...
exposed-modules: A, B, C
other-modules: C, D, E
[...]
Executable some-exe
main-is: SomeExe.hs
build-depends: some-package == 0.1
For a real-world example, see here.