I have a test like this, but i can not get the 'sharedMap' in 'sharedSeq1' value, i don't know how to get the 'remoteFluidObjectHandle' value.
import {MockContainerRuntimeFactory, MockFluidDataStoreRuntime, MockStorage} from "#fluidframework/test-runtime-utils";
import {SharedObjectSequence, SharedObjectSequenceFactory} from "#fluidframework/sequence";
import * as mocks from "#fluidframework/test-runtime-utils";
import {SharedMap} from "#fluidframework/map";
import {IFluidHandle} from "#fluidframework/core-interfaces";
const mockRuntime: mocks.MockFluidDataStoreRuntime = new mocks.MockFluidDataStoreRuntime();
describe('ShredObjectSequence', function () {
it('should get synchronization data from another shared object', async function () {
const dataStoreRuntime1 = new MockFluidDataStoreRuntime();
const sharedSeq1: SharedObjectSequence<IFluidHandle<SharedMap>> = new SharedObjectSequence(mockRuntime, 'shareObjectSeq1', SharedObjectSequenceFactory.Attributes,)
const containerRuntimeFactory = new MockContainerRuntimeFactory();
dataStoreRuntime1.local = false;
const containerRuntime1 = containerRuntimeFactory.createContainerRuntime(
dataStoreRuntime1,
);
const services1 = {
deltaConnection: containerRuntime1.createDeltaConnection(),
objectStorage: new MockStorage(),
};
sharedSeq1.initializeLocal();
sharedSeq1.connect(services1);
const dataStoreRuntime2 = new MockFluidDataStoreRuntime();
const containerRuntime2 = containerRuntimeFactory.createContainerRuntime(
dataStoreRuntime2,
);
const services2 = {
deltaConnection: containerRuntime2.createDeltaConnection(),
objectStorage: new MockStorage(),
};
const sharedSeq2: SharedObjectSequence<IFluidHandle<SharedMap>> = new SharedObjectSequence(mockRuntime, 'shareObjectSeq2', SharedObjectSequenceFactory.Attributes,)
sharedSeq2.initializeLocal();
sharedSeq2.connect(services2);
// insert a node into sharedSeq2, it will sync to sharedSeq1
sharedSeq2.insert(0, [<IFluidHandle<SharedMap>>new SharedMap('sharedMapId', mockRuntime, SharedMap.getFactory().attributes).handle])
containerRuntimeFactory.processAllMessages();
// next case is passed, it show we got the sharedSeq2 changed
expect(sharedSeq1.getLength()).toBe(1)
const remoteFluidObjectHandle = await sharedSeq1.getRange(0, 1)[0];
// at here, i get error: Cannot read property 'mimeType' of null, it cause by remoteFluidObjectHandle.ts:51:30
const sharedMap = await remoteFluidObjectHandle.get()
expect(sharedMap).not.toBeUndefined()
});
});
run this test will get 'Cannot read property 'mimeType' of null' error, it caused by 'remoteFluidObjectHandle.ts:51:30'
The fluid mocks have very limited and specific behaviors, it looks like you are hitting the limits of them. You'll have better luck with an end-to-end test, see packages\test\end-to-end-tests. These use the same in-memory server as our as the playground on fluidframework dot com. The in-memory server uses the same code as tinylicious, our single process server and routerlicious, our docker based reference implementation.
Related
I am trying to import WalletProvider from "#truffle/hdwallet-provider"; in reactJS component it is giving me this error as soon as I execute npm run
Error: NormalModuleFactory.resolve (NormalModuleFactory) is no longer a waterfall hook, but a bailing hook instead. Do not return the passed object, but modify it instead. Returning false will ignore the request and results in no module created. Returning a Module object will result in this module used as result.
I tried in separate JS file it is working fine
const Web3 = require("web3");
const WalletProvider = require("#truffle/hdwallet-provider");
let provider = new WalletProvider({
mnemonic: {
phrase:
"***************************************************************",
},
providerOrUrl: "https://goerli.infura.io/v3/*******************",
});
const web3 = new Web3(provider);
const fetch123 = async () => {
const accounts = await web3.eth.getAccounts();
console.log(accounts);
};
fetch123();
I am currently using sql.js to view my database:
async function sqliteRun () { // eslint-disable-line
const SQL = await initSqlJs({
locateFile: () => 'misc/sql-wasm.wasm'
})
const db = new SQL.Database('public/misc/test.sqlite')
const stmt = db.prepare('SELECT * FROM test')
while (stmt.step()) { //
const row = stmt.getAsObject()
console.log('Here is a row: ' + JSON.stringify(row))
}
}
But then I am getting an error: "File is not a database". I double checked my file and it seems correct (I was able to view it in a sqlite file browser)
I also tried using .db and .sql, all give out the same error.
I prefer to load the file directly in the new SQL.Database() constructor. I wont be able to use fs. Any thoughts on how to do this?
I have the following code:
NOTE getDb() is wrapper around admin.firestore() see the link in the end of the question for more details.
let wordRef = await getDb().
.collection(DOC_HAS_WORD_COUNT)
.doc(word)
await wordRef.set({ word: word, 'count': 0 })
await wordRef.update('count', admin.firestore.FieldValue.increment(1))
When I execute it I get
FirebaseError: Function DocumentReference.update() called with invalid data. Unsupported field value: a custom object (found in field count)
How do I increment the value in node js, firestore, cloud functions?
NOTE: this problem is specific to Mocha testing, I didn't check but it will probably not fail on real env.
The problem is caused by the code using the real implementation in test, which need to be override by an emulator implementation, as explain in:
https://claritydev.net/blog/testing-firestore-locally-with-firebase-emulators/
Where u can also find the definition of getDb() I used in the code snipet
The following code will replace the firebase admin at run time, only when running in test env.
NOTE: this code is based on https://claritydev.net/blog/testing-firestore-locally-with-firebase-emulators/
and for a full solution, one need to do the same trick for db as explained in the link
//db.js
const admin = require("firebase-admin");
let firebase;
if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== "test") {
firebase = admin
}
exports.getFirebase = () => {
return firebase;
};
exports.setFirebase = (fb) => {
firebase = fb;
};
test:
// package.test.js
process.env.NODE_ENV = "test"
beforeEach(() => {
// Set the emulator firebase before each test
setFirebase(firebase)
});
import:
// package.test.js and package.js (at the top)
const { setFirebase } = require("../db.js")
code:
// package.js
let wordRef = await getDb()
.collection(DOC_HAS_WORD_COUNT)
.doc(word)
await wordRef.set({ word: word, 'count': 0 })
await wordRef.update('count', getFirebase().firestore.FieldValue.increment(1))
I'm facing a problem I'm not able to resolve on my own, maybe some of you faced the same problem.
Let me show you what I'm trying to do, here is the mock:
let mockConfig = {name: 'dude'};
jest.mock('../../../configManager', () => mockConfig);
configManager is a dependency of the function I'm trying to test.
It works well but I want to change the returning object of configManager in another test so the tested function behaves differently.
Let me show you, here is the function I'm testing:
const config = require('../../../configManager');
module.exports = () => {
if (config.name === 'dude') {
do stuff;
}
if (config.name === 'dudette') {
do something else;
}
So, typically, I want to change the config.name to 'dudette' to be able to test the second part of my function.
Naturally, when I want to do this with an imported function, I just do:
let mockJsonQueryResult = { value: 'stuff' };
jest.mock('json-query', () => jest.fn(() => mockJsonQueryResult));
and then in the test, I directly set another value to mockJsonQueryResult:
mockJsonQueryResult = { value: 'hotterStuff' };
But I don't find any way of doing this with a dependency that returns an object, with a dependency returning a function, no problem.
Is there even any way of doing this?
Thanks in advance!
Edit: this is not the same as how to change jest mock function return value in each test? as #Dor Shinar suggested because his problem is to mock a function, even if it is inside a returning object it is still a function, I just want to change a value inside the returned object.
So, I found a solution I'm not completely satisfied with but it works:
I simply set the original full object and then for my tests, change the value of specific properties by setting them directly before calling the function I want to test.
example:
let mockConfig = { person: { name: 'dude', origin: {country: 'France'} } };
jest.mock('../../../configManager', () => mockConfig);
mockConfig.person = {};
mockConfig.person.name = 'dudette';
You don't need to mock the module at all.
If your module export is just an object with property values then just change the properties as needed.
Here is a simple working example to demonstrate:
configManager.js
module.exports = {
name: 'original'
}
code.js
const config = require('./configManager');
module.exports = () => `name: ${config.name}`;
code.test.js
const config = require('./configManager');
const func = require('./code');
test('func', () => {
expect(func()).toBe('name: original'); // Success!
config.name = 'dude';
expect(func()).toBe('name: dude'); // Success!
config.name = 'dudette';
expect(func()).toBe('name: dudette'); // Success!
})
Details
A module binding can't be directly changed to something else:
const config = require('./configManager');
config = { name: 'mock' }; // <= this doesn't work
...but you can change the properties of an object representing a module binding:
const config = require('./configManager');
config.name = 'mock'; // <= this works!
...and any code using the module will automatically see the changes.
I have a problem. I want to clean my code and put function to another file but I always get an error:
getMe is not a function
why? I want to use it in already exported function getExchangeRateIntent. Is that causing a problem?
outside.js
const getRate = (base) => {
console.log('My base currency is '+base);
};
module.exports = {getRate};
getRate.js
const getMe = ('./outside.js');
module.exports = {
'getExchangeRateIntent': (conv, parameter) => {
const currencyBase = (parameter['currencyBase']);
const currencyTarget = (parameter['currencyTarget']);
const amount = (parameter['amount']);
console.log(currencyBase);
console.log(currencyTarget);
console.log(amount);
getMe('USD');
conv.ask('nothing');
},
};
module.exports = {getRate}; you are exporting an object. With your import:
const getMe = ('./outside.js');
you are importing an object. So this is not a function. This is not a proper import also.
For proper import you could write something like this:
import {getRate} from './outside.js;
And use it like this:
getRate('USD');
Or if you want to use require:
const getMe = require('./outside.js');
And then you can call function like this in second case:
getMe.getRate('USD')