I am querying DBpedia for information about organizations and I am using "dbpedia.org/page/[organization]" to find what name is used for those organizations. It will usually fix the inputted name to the name it uses. eg dbpedia.org/page/Tmobile will be redirected to T-Mobile.
When making a query using SPARQLwrapper to 'http://dbpedia.org/sparql' these names usually work but not always (such as the previous T-Mobile example. How can I find the specific name to use when querying DBpedia using SPARQLwrapper?
My first thought is that you're using the wrong URIs for your SPARQL queries -- .../page/... are HTML representations of the descriptions of the entities. .../resource/... are the identifiers of the entities (which get redirected to the .../page/... when you use a web browser, which requests HTML, to dereference the .../resource/... URIs).
In other words, instead of, for instance (results here) --
DESCRIBE <http://dbpedia.org/page/Tmobile>
-- try (results here) --
DESCRIBE <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tmobile>
Related
If I may have missed this in some other area of SO please redirect me but I don't think this is a duped question.
I am using Azure Search with an index field called Title which is searchable and filterable using a Standard Lucerne Analyzer.
When using the built-in explorer, if I want to return all Job Titles that are explicitly named Full Stack Developer I can achieve it this way:
$filter=Title eq 'Full Stack Developer'&$count=true
But if I want to retrieve all the Job Titles using a wildcard to return all records having Full Stack in the name this way:
$filter=Title eq 'Full Stack*'&$count=true
The first 20 or so records returned are spot on, but after that point I get a mix of records that have absolutely nothing in common with the Title I specified in the query. My initial assumption was that perhaps Azure was including my specified Title performing an inclusive keyword search on the text as well.
Though I found a few instances where that hypothesis seemed to prove out, so many more of the records returned invalidated that altogether.
Maybe I don't understand fully the mechanics under the hood of Azure Search and so though my query appears to be valid; my expectation of the result is way off.
So how should my query look to perform a wildcard resulting to guarantee the words specified in the search to be included in the Titles returned, if this should be possible? And what would be the correct syntax to condition the return to accommodate for OR operators to be inclusive?
Azure Cognitive Search allows you to perform wildcard searches limited to specific fields only. To do so, you will need to specify the name of the fields in which you want to perform the search in searchFields parameter.
Your search URL in this case would be something like:
https://accountname.search.windows.net/indexes/indexname/docs?api-version=2020-06-30&searchFields=Title&search=Full Stack*
From the link here:
I am generating a short list of 10 to 20 strings which I want to lookup on dbpedia to see if they have an organization tag and if so return the industry/sector tag. I have been looking at the SPARQLwrapper queries on their website but am having trouble constructing one that returns organization and sector/industry for my string. Is there a way to do this?
If I use the code below I get a list of industry types I think rather than the industry of the company.
from SPARQLWrapper import SPARQLWrapper, JSON
sparql = SPARQLWrapper("http://dbpedia.org/sparql")
sparql.setQuery("""
SELECT ?industry WHERE
{ <http://dbpedia.org/resource/IBM> a ?industry}
""")
sparql.setReturnFormat(JSON)
results = sparql.query().convert()
Instead of looking at queries which are meant to help you understand the querying tool, you should start by looking at the data which is being queried. For instance, just click http://dbpedia.org/resource/IBM, and look at the properties (the left hand column) to see its rdf:type values (of which there are MANY)!
Note that IBM is not described as a ?industry. IBM is described as a <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Public_company> (among other things). On the other hand, IBM is also described as having three values for <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/industry> --
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cloud_computing>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Information_technology>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cognitive_computing>
I don't know whether these are what you're actually looking for or not, but hopefully what I've done above will start you down the right path to whatever you do want to get out of DBpedia.
Can someone confirm the behaviour of the Smart search results webpart when using a Smart search filter on a particular field, documentation here, when the index, and the expected results, are compound of multiple page types?
In my scenario I have 2 page types, one is always a child of the other, my hypothetical scenario would be a Folder and File types as an example.
I've configured the index with Pages type and Standard analyzer to include all Folder and File types under the path /MyOS/% on the tree.
The search page, includes the Smart search results webpart and a Smart search filter, a checkbox for the File's field FileIsHidden.
What I'm trying to ascertain is the possibility for the results to include all folders that have a hidden field, as well as the files?
Client has a v8.2 license and now has a requirement similar to this scenario.
Thanks so much for any help in advance.
Firstly what i would do is download the latest version of LUKE, it's a lucene inspector that allows you to run queries, inspect the data, etc.
https://code.google.com/archive/p/luke/downloads
Your search indexes are in the App_Data/Modules/SmartSearch/[SearchName], now i am not sure if LUKE can query 2 indexes as the same time, however you can run hte same query against both and see if it's filtering out results one way or another.
If you are trying to query where a field must be a value, and the other page type does not have the field, it probably is filtered out. What you need to do is use the lucene syntax to say "(classname = 'cms.file' and fileonlyproperty = '' OR classname <> 'cms.file')" so to say.
You'll have to test, but say the class name is cms.file and cms.folder, and the property is FileIsHidden, i think the syntax would be:
+((FieldIsHidden:(true) and classname:('cms.file')) OR (NOT classname:('cms.file'))
But you'll have to test that.
In reference material for CouchDB and Couchbase it's common guidance to store the type of a document as a parameter within the actual document.
I've got a database, where I have different documents that record certain behaviour by URL. So naturally, I use the URL as the id of the document.
The problem I find is that by using just the key as the document id, I now get clashes between documents of different types. So I have started using the type as the first part of the key like this:
{ doc._id: "rss_entry|http://www.spiegel.de/1234", [...] }
{ doc._id: "page_text|http://www.spiegel.de/1234", [...] }
Now I start to wonder why I've never seen this approach to model type in any of the documentation.
Prefixes are commonly used. In addition to support for scenarios such as yours, prefixing allows one to perform logical range queries against views. There is use of this technique in the modeling examples, but perhaps the concept is not described in as much detail as you are expecting. In the section http://docs.couchbase.com/couchbase-devguide-2.5/#modeling-documents, the documents are keyed as beer_NNNN and brewery_NNNN. Also, the section http://docs.couchbase.com/couchbase-devguide-2.5/#using-reference-documents-for-lookups goes a bit deeper into this technique. There is a counter document named user::count and then each user is keyed as user::NNNN. Additionally, there are documents in the example that are keyed as fb::NNNN for a Facebook ID, email::XXX#YYYY.com for a user's email address, etc.
I am trying to find a list of relevant types to a certain string from Freebase, lets say for example i enter Jordan, then i will have a list with types country, person, athlete .. etc.
I have found several ways for the query, for example:
First Query
trying to get the JSON fails, using:
$.getJSON('http://api.freebase.com/api/service/search?query=jordan',function (data) {
console.log(data);
});
There is another query that gives me better result, as i only get the types here but i also cannot get the JSON file from it.
Will appreciate any help.
Your problem has probably less to do with freebase and more to do the fact that you can't do cross domain http requests. You are requesting data from api.freebase.com but you are probably hosting this page in another domain.
You can use the JSONP mechanism to circumvent that restriction, here is some documentation:
http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.getJSON/
Read the section JSONP.
Another couple of points:
Are you trying to search for all entities that somehow match the word "jordan" or are you looking for exactly all the entities that are named "jordan" ? Your best bet is to use the /search API instead of /mqlread which is for structured database queries.
You are also using the legacy API that is deprecated. Here is some docs on the new API:
http://wiki.freebase.com/wiki/API
Here's how your request will look (note that you 'll need an API key for production):
https://www.googleapis.com/freebase/v1/search?query=jordan&mql_output=[{%22name%22%20:%20null,%22type%22:[]}]