I have a settings activity and I want to use those settings on other screens I am developing an app to send balance for phones, normally the one who makes these sales must enter a series of codes on his sales phone, what I want is to save that annoyance to the vendor and have the codes fixed but there is a pin that is unique to each vendor which in my application should enter (your vendor pin) only once in settings and then not worry about anything
This is the settings Activity u have to enter your pin in that EditText and then the app have to remember the pin at each transaction u do
override fun onCreatelsavedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstance5tate)
setContentView(R. Layout.activity_main)
loadData()
savebutton. setonClicklistener (){saveData() }
}
private fun loadData (){
val sharePref = getPreferences(Context.MODE_PRIVATE)
val mydata = sharePref.getString( key: "mydata", defValue: "")
dataEditText.setText (dato)
}
private fun saveData(){
sharePref = getPreferences (Context.MODE_PRIVATE)
with(sharePref.edit()){
putString("pin", dataEditText.text.tostring())
commit() ^with
}
}
You can use getSharedPreferences
Because getPreferences: use only one shared preference file for the activity.
getSharedPreferences: use this if you need multiple shared preference files identified by name, which you specify with the first parameter. You can call this from any Context in your app.
val sharedPref = getSharedPreferences(
getString(R.string.preference_file_key),
Context.MODE_PRIVATE
)
Related
Given I executed some steps, then on certain step I get a value from a database cell. Since this value is unknown prior to execution, I cannot use any binding or table value defined in feature file, is there any way to populate this value into Step Definition => then it is showed on other report?
For ex a feature file:
Given I drop the file to the server's UNC path
When the file is processed successfully
Then a new account is loaded as (.*) (this is the number generated at runtime)
The account can only be know at the last step through a connection to the database, is there any way to put it to the step definition so that later it shows as:
The a new account is loaded as 100051359
What you want to do is not possible with SpecFlow. However, you can still get a good test out of this, but you will likely need to share data between steps using the ScenarioContext.
The step that processes the file will need to know the newly loaded account Id. Then that step can put that account Id in the ScenarioContext:
[Binding]
public class FileSteps
{
private readonly ScenarioContext scenario;
public FileSteps(ScenarioContext scenario)
{
this.scenario = scenario;
}
[When(#"the file is processed successfully"]
public void WhenTheFileIsProcessedSuccessfully()
{
var account = // process the file
scenario.Set(account.Id, "AccountId");
}
}
Later when making the assertion, get the account Id from the scenario context before making your assertion:
[Binding]
public class AccountSteps
{
private readonly ScenarioContext scenario;
public AccountSteps(ScenarioContext scenario)
{
this.scenario = scenario;
}
[Then(#"a new account is loaded")]
public void ThenANewAccountIsLoaded()
{
var account = accountRepository.Find(scenario.Get<int>("AccountId"));
// Assert something about the account
}
}
And your test becomes:
Scenario: ...
Given I drop the file to the server's UNC path
When the file is processed successfully
Then a new account is loaded
I have a custom module getting executed right after the PDFGenerator finished. I followed this guide on how to create a custom module
https://stackoverflow.com/a/55799101/9945420
When processing a batch document I want to manipulate the generated PDF file and add a footer to that file. The content of that footer needs to get configured in the Administration module.
So within my project called "StampOnScanProcess" I added a Folder called "Setup" with two files. A Form called "FrmSetup"
public partial class FrmSetup : Form
{
private IBatchClass batchClass;
public FrmSetup()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public DialogResult ShowDialog(IBatchClass batchClass)
{
this.batchClass = batchClass;
// Load previous Settings ...
return this.ShowDialog();
}
private void btnCancel_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.Close();
}
private void btnSave_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Save ...
this.Close();
}
}
and a UserControl called "UserCtrlSetup"
[InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsIDispatch)]
public interface ISetupForm
{
[DispId(1)]
AdminApplication Application { set; }
[DispId(2)]
void ActionEvent(int EventNumber, object Argument, out int Cancel);
}
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)]
[ProgId(CUSTOM_MODULE_NAME_SETUP)]
public partial class UserCtrlSetup : UserControl, ISetupForm
{
private const string CUSTOM_MODULE_NAME_SETUP = "StampOnScanProcess.Setup";
private AdminApplication adminApplication;
public AdminApplication Application
{
set
{
value.AddMenu(CUSTOM_MODULE_NAME_SETUP, CUSTOM_MODULE_NAME_SETUP, "BatchClass");
adminApplication = value;
}
}
public void ActionEvent(int EventNumber, object Argument, out int Cancel)
{
Cancel = 0;
if ((KfxOcxEvent)EventNumber == KfxOcxEvent.KfxOcxEventMenuClicked && (string)Argument == CUSTOM_MODULE_NAME_SETUP)
{
FrmSetup form = new FrmSetup();
form.ShowDialog(adminApplication.ActiveBatchClass);
}
}
}
I modified my registration file and added the setup form to it
[Modules]
StampOnScanProcess
[StampOnScanProcess]
RuntimeProgram=StampOnScanProcess.exe
ModuleID=StampOnScanProcess.exe
Description=...
Version=10.2
SupportsNonImageFiles=True
SupportsTableFields=True
SetupProgram=StampOnScanProcess.Setup
[Setup Programs]
StampOnScanProcess.Setup
[StampOnScanProcess.Setup]
Visible=0
OCXFile=StampOnScanProcess.exe
ProgID=StampOnScanProcess.Setup
When launching the Administration module I head over to the Batch Class Properties => Queues and want to call this setup form by clicking the Properties button in the middle.
Unfortunately the properties button is disabled so I can't open the setup form. This form gets added to the context menu of the batch class
How can I bind this form to the properties button instead? And what is the best way to store configured data and access it when the runtime application gets executed?
I need to think about how to store data because some users have user profiles
and the runtime application currently logs in with no credentials.
public void LoginToRuntimeSession()
{
login = new Login();
login.EnableSecurityBoost = true;
login.Login();
login.ApplicationName = CUSTOM_MODULE_ID;
login.Version = "1.0";
login.ValidateUser($"{CUSTOM_MODULE_ID}.exe", false, "", "");
session = login.RuntimeSession;
}
So it might happen that I have to store the credentials on setup too.
How can I bind this form to the properties button instead?
All interactions with menu entries are handled by ISetupForm.ActionEvent. New entries are added with the AddMenu method of the AdminApplication object. Kofax differentiates between multiple entries by name - imagine that you could have multiple menu entries at the same time, one on batch class level, another one on document class level, and another one in the ribbon - just to name a few examples. Kofax uses the same approach in any component that integrates into Administration (e.g. Custom Modules or Workflow Agents).
This is an example from one of our components. Note that three entries are added on BatchClass level and two more on DocumentClass level.
value.AddMenu("BatchClass.GeneralConfig", "Field Panel - General Configuration", "BatchClass");
value.AddMenu("BatchClass.FieldEditor", "Field Panel - Configure Batch Fields", "BatchClass");
value.AddMenu("DocumentClass.FieldEditor", "Field Panel - Configure Index Fields", "DocumentClass");
value.AddMenu("CopyBatchFieldConfig", "Field Panel - Copy Batch Field Configuration", "BatchClass");
value.AddMenu("PasteBatchFieldConfig", "Field Panel - Paste Batch Field Configuration", "BatchClass");
value.AddMenu("CopyIndexFieldConfig", "Field Panel - Copy Index Field Configuration", "DocumentClass");
value.AddMenu("PasteIndexFieldConfig", "Field Panel - Paste Index Field Configuration", "DocumentClass");
Each entry is no identified by its event text, the first parameter. For example, BatchClass.GeneralConfig is intended to open up a generic configuration dialog - on batch class level.
Now, back to our ActionEvent - this is how I distinguish between the entry selected by the user:
if ((KfxOcxEvent)EventNumber == KfxOcxEvent.KfxOcxEventMenuClicked)
{
AdminForm form = new AdminForm();
switch ((string)Argument)
{
case "BatchClass.GeneralConfig":
ConfigureGeneral(kcApp.ActiveBatchClass);
break;
[I] want to call this setup form by clicking the Properties button in
the middle.
I don't know if you can use this button - I would assume yes - yet personally I tend to put settings either on batch or document class level. For example - your PDF annotation settings may different from document class to class - having an entry on this level seems more natural.
And what is the best way to store configured data and access it when
the runtime application gets executed?
Custom Storage Strings, and you can let your imagination run wild here. The most simplistic approach is to store key-value pairs during setup, and retrieve them in runtime. Here's a generic call (BatchClass is an IBatchClass object, i.e. a pointer to the ActiveBatchClass property of the AdminApplication object):
// set a CSS
BatchClass.set_CustomStorageString(name, value);
// get a CSS
BatchClass.get_CustomStorageString(name)
I usually use a single custom storage string only and store custom object - the object is a base64-encoded serialized XML using XmlSerializer - but again, that's up to you. The only recommendation is to rely on CSS only - don't use external files to store configuration parameters. A CSS is an integral part of your batch class - so, when exporting said class and importing it on a different system, your entire configuration will be there.
I need to think about how to store data because some users have user
profiles
Usually, you don't need to worry about that. The properties for user and password in ValidateUser are entirely optional - and since you're planning to write an unattended module - ideally a Windows Service, credentials should be maintained there. Kofax and Windows would automatically make sure the credentials are passed on, and your module will run under this user's context. Just make sure the user has permissions for the module and all associated batch classes. It's different if you're planning to write an attended module, for example an enhanced Validation module.
I want to add files to salesorder line items in Acumatica using web services.
What endpoint should be used?
I want to add an image as shown in the screenshot above, using web service endpoint.
This is an old question, but I just came across this same issue while assisting a customer with a third-party integration. The third-party developers were adamant that they could only use the REST service, as they had already built the rest of their integration around it before realizing they couldn't attach files to sales order lines.
I was able to build a workaround using a customization. The issue at hand is that the way Acumatica's REST API attaches files is only accessible for Top-Level entities - which means there has to be a screen that uses the object as a primary DAC.
The workaround is to do just that, create a new custom screen that uses the SOLine object as it's primary DAC. In order to make the selectors available, I had to remove and replace a couple attributes on the key fields so that they could be visible and enabled. Here is the graph code - it's very simple, as this is basically just the bare minimum needed to be able to create a custom endpoint that uses the SOLine DAC as a top-level entity.
public class SOLineAttachmentEntry : PXGraph<SOLineAttachmentEntry, SOLine>
{
public PXSelect<SOLine> SOLineDetail;
[PXMergeAttributes(Method = MergeMethod.Append)]
[PXRemoveBaseAttribute(typeof(PXUIFieldAttribute))]
[PXUIField(DisplayName = "Order Type", Visible=true, Enabled = true)]
protected virtual void SOLine_OrderType_CacheAttached(PXCache sender) { }
[PXMergeAttributes(Method = MergeMethod.Append)]
[PXRemoveBaseAttribute(typeof(PXUIFieldAttribute))]
[PXUIField(DisplayName = "Order Nbr", Visible=true, Enabled = true)]
protected virtual void SOLine_OrderNbr_CacheAttached(PXCache sender) { }
[PXMergeAttributes(Method = MergeMethod.Append)]
[PXRemoveBaseAttribute(typeof(PXUIFieldAttribute))]
[PXRemoveBaseAttribute(typeof(PXLineNbrAttribute))]
[PXUIField(DisplayName = "Line Nbr", Visible=true, Enabled = true)]
protected virtual void SOLine_LineNbr_CacheAttached(PXCache sender) { }
}
The custom screen layout should be a simple Form with just these three key fields, OrderType, OrderNbr, LineNbr. In the Screen Editor of the customization, you'll want to set CommitChanges=true in the Layout Properties tab for each field.
Once the screen is published, you can use it to create a new custom endpoint and add a single entity by selecting the SOLine view from the custom screen. I named the endpoint "SalesOrderDetailAttach", assigned the endpoint version to be 1.0, and named the new entity "SalesOrderDetail". Using those names, the file attachment request should be a PUT request with the binary file data in the request body, using the url format:
[AcumaticaBaseUrl]/entity/SalesOrderDetailAttach/1.0/SalesOrderDetail/[OrderType]/[OrderNbr]/[LineNbr]/files/[Desired filename in Acumatica]
This worked for this one very specific case, attaching a file to the SOLine object. The screen and the endpoint should really never be used for anything else, and the custom screen should not be accessible to any users other than the administrator and the API user. Ultimately I would recommend using the Screen-Based method from the other answer, but if using the REST API is an absolute must-have, this is a potential workaround.
REST API needs to reference the detail line in the body. Since the body is used to pass the binary data of the attachment REST API can't be used to attach files to detail line.
Below is a screen based API snippet that creates a new master/detail document and attach images to the detail line. If you choose to use the screen based API you will need to adapt the snippet for sales order ASMX screen and fetch sales order with expanded details SOLine. The pattern to attach file will be the same:
string[] detailDescription = "Test";
List<string> filenames = "image.jpg";
List<byte[]> images = new byte[] { put_image_binary_data_here } ;
ServiceReference1.Screen context = new ServiceReference1.Screen();
context.CookieContainer = new System.Net.CookieContainer();
context.Url = "http://localhost/Demo/Soap/XYZ.asmx";
context.Login("admin#CompanyLoginName", "admin");
ServiceReference1.XY999999Content content = PX.Soap.Helper.GetSchema<ServiceReference1.XY999999Content>(context);
List<ServiceReference1.Command> cmds = new List<ServiceReference1.Command>
{
// Insert Master
new ServiceReference1.Value { Value="<NEW>", LinkedCommand = content.Document.KeyField},
new ServiceReference1.Value { Value="Description", LinkedCommand = content.Document.Description},
// Insert Detail
content.DataView.ServiceCommands.NewRow,
new ServiceReference1.Value { Value = noteDetail[0], LinkedCommand = content.DataView.Description },
// Attaching a file to detail
new ServiceReference1.Value
{
Value = Convert.ToBase64String(images[0]),
FieldName = filenames[0],
LinkedCommand = content.DataView.ServiceCommands.Attachment
},
content.Actions.Save,
content.Document.KeyField
};
var returnValue = context.PP301001Submit(cmds.ToArray());
context.Logout();
I did create an aggregate service as below
#EnableBinding(Processor.class)
class Configuration {
#Autowired
Processor processor;
#ServiceActivator(inputChannel = Processor.INPUT)
#Bean
public MessageHandler aggregator() {
AggregatingMessageHandler aggregatingMessageHandler =
new AggregatingMessageHandler(new DefaultAggregatingMessageGroupProcessor(),
new SimpleMessageStore(10));
//AggregatorFactoryBean aggregatorFactoryBean = new AggregatorFactoryBean();
//aggregatorFactoryBean.setMessageStore();
aggregatingMessageHandler.setOutputChannel(processor.output());
//aggregatorFactoryBean.setDiscardChannel(processor.output());
aggregatingMessageHandler.setSendPartialResultOnExpiry(true);
aggregatingMessageHandler.setSendTimeout(1000L);
aggregatingMessageHandler.setCorrelationStrategy(new ExpressionEvaluatingCorrelationStrategy("requestType"));
aggregatingMessageHandler.setReleaseStrategy(new MessageCountReleaseStrategy(3)); //ExpressionEvaluatingReleaseStrategy("size() == 5")
aggregatingMessageHandler.setExpireGroupsUponCompletion(true);
aggregatingMessageHandler.setGroupTimeoutExpression(new ValueExpression<>(3000L)); //size() ge 2 ? 5000 : -1
aggregatingMessageHandler.setExpireGroupsUponTimeout(true);
return aggregatingMessageHandler;
}
}
Now i want to release the group as soon as a new group is created, so i only have one group at a time.
To be more specific i do receive two types of requests 'PUT' and 'DEL' . i want to keep aggregating per the above rules but as soon as i receive a request type other than what i am aggregating i want to release the current group and start aggregating the new Type.
The reason i want to do this is because these requests are sent to another party that don't support having PUT and DEL requests at the same time and i can't delay any DEL request as sequence between PUT and DEL is important.
I understand that i need to create a custom release Pojo but will i be able to check the current groups ?
For Example
If i receive 6 messages like below
PUT PUT PUT DEL DEL PUT
they should be aggregated as below
3PUT
2 DEL
1 PUT
OK. Thank you for sharing more info.
Yes, you custom ReleaseStrategy can check that message type and return true to lead to the group completion function.
As long as you have only static correlationKey, so only one group is there in the store. When your message is stepping to the ReleaseStrategy, there won't be much magic just to check the current group for completion signal. Since there are no any other groups in the store, there is no need any complex release logic.
You should add expireGroupsUponCompletion = true to let the group to be removed after completion and the next message will form a new group for the same correlationKey.
UPDATE
Thank you for further info!
So, yes, your original PoC is good. And even static correlationKey is fine, since you are just going to collect incoming messages to batches.
Your custom ReleaseStrategy should analyze MessageGroup for a message with different key and return true in that case.
The custom MessageGroupProcessor should filter a message with different key from the output List and send that message to the aggregator back to let to form a new group for a sequence for its key.
i ended up implementing the below ReleaseStrategy as i found it simpler than removing message and queuing it again.
class MessageCountAndOnlyOneGroupReleaseStrategy implements org.springframework.integration.aggregator.ReleaseStrategy {
private final int threshold;
private final MessageGroupProcessor messageGroupProcessor;
public MessageCountAndOnlyOneGroupReleaseStrategy(int threshold,MessageGroupProcessor messageGroupProcessor) {
super();
this.threshold = threshold;
this.messageGroupProcessor = messageGroupProcessor;
}
private MessageGroup currentGroup;
#Override
public boolean canRelease(MessageGroup group) {
if(currentGroup == null)
currentGroup = group;
if(!group.getGroupId().equals(currentGroup.getGroupId())) {
messageGroupProcessor.processMessageGroup(currentGroup);
currentGroup = group;
return false;
}
return group.size() >= this.threshold;
}
}
Note that i did used new HeaderAttributeCorrelationStrategy("request_type") instead of just FOO for CollorationStrategy
Lets say I want a different main image for each page, situated above the page title. Also, I need to place page specific images in the left bar, and page specific text in the right bar. In the right and left bars, I also want layer specific content.
I can't see how I can achieve this without creating a layer for each and every page in the site, but then I end up with a glut of layers that only serve one page which seems too complex.
What am I missing?
If there is a way of doing this using Content parts, it would be great if you can point me at tutorials, blogs, videos to help get my head round the issue.
NOTE:
Sitefinity does this sort of thing well, but I find Orchard much simpler for creating module, as well as the fact that it is MVC which I find much easier.
Orchard is free, I understand (and appreciate) that. Just hoping that as the product evolves this kind of thing will be easier?
In other words, I'm hoping for the best of all worlds...
There is a feature in the works for 1.5 to make that easier, but in the meantime, you can already get this to work quite easily with just a little bit of code. You should first add the fields that you need to your content type. Then, you are going to send them to top-level layout zones using placement. Out of the box, placement only targets local content zones, but this is what we can work around with a bit of code by Pete Hurst, a.k.a. randompete. Here's the code:
ZoneProxyBehavior.cs:
=====================
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using ClaySharp;
using ClaySharp.Behaviors;
using Orchard.Environment.Extensions;
namespace Downplay.Origami.ZoneProxy.Shapes {
[OrchardFeature("Downplay.Origami.ZoneProxy")]
public class ZoneProxyBehavior : ClayBehavior {
public IDictionary<string, Func<dynamic>> Proxies { get; set; }
public ZoneProxyBehavior(IDictionary<string, Func<dynamic>> proxies) {
Proxies = proxies;
}
public override object GetMember(Func<object> proceed, object self, string name) {
if (name == "Zones") {
return ClayActivator.CreateInstance(new IClayBehavior[] {
new InterfaceProxyBehavior(),
new ZonesProxyBehavior(()=>proceed(), Proxies, self)
});
}
// Otherwise proceed to other behaviours, including the original ZoneHoldingBehavior
return proceed();
}
public class ZonesProxyBehavior : ClayBehavior {
private readonly Func<dynamic> _zonesActivator;
private readonly IDictionary<string, Func<dynamic>> _proxies;
private object _parent;
public ZonesProxyBehavior(Func<dynamic> zonesActivator, IDictionary<string, Func<dynamic>> proxies, object self) {
_zonesActivator = zonesActivator;
_proxies = proxies;
_parent = self;
}
public override object GetIndex(Func<object> proceed, object self, IEnumerable<object> keys) {
var keyList = keys.ToList();
var count = keyList.Count();
if (count == 1) {
// Here's the new bit
var key = System.Convert.ToString(keyList.Single());
// Check for the proxy symbol
if (key.Contains("#")) {
// Find the proxy!
var split = key.Split('#');
// Access the proxy shape
return _proxies[split[0]]()
// Find the right zone on it
.Zones[split[1]];
}
// Otherwise, defer to the ZonesBehavior activator, which we made available
// This will always return a ZoneOnDemandBehavior for the local shape
return _zonesActivator()[key];
}
return proceed();
}
public override object GetMember(Func<object> proceed, object self, string name) {
// This is rarely called (shape.Zones.ZoneName - normally you'd just use shape.ZoneName)
// But we can handle it easily also by deference to the ZonesBehavior activator
return _zonesActivator()[name];
}
}
}
}
And:
ZoneShapes.cs:
==============
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using Orchard.DisplayManagement.Descriptors;
using Orchard;
using Orchard.Environment.Extensions;
namespace Downplay.Origami.ZoneProxy.Shapes {
[OrchardFeature("Downplay.Origami.ZoneProxy")]
public class ZoneShapes : IShapeTableProvider {
private readonly IWorkContextAccessor _workContextAccessor;
public ZoneShapes(IWorkContextAccessor workContextAccessor) {
_workContextAccessor = workContextAccessor;
}
public void Discover(ShapeTableBuilder builder) {
builder.Describe("Content")
.OnCreating(creating => creating.Behaviors.Add(
new ZoneProxyBehavior(
new Dictionary<string, Func<dynamic>> { { "Layout", () => _workContextAccessor.GetContext().Layout } })));
}
}
}
With this, you will be able to address top-level layout zones using Layout# in front of the zone name you want to address, for example Layout#BeforeContent:1.
ADDENDUM:
I have used Bertrand Le Roy's code (make that Pete Hurst's code) and created a module with it, then added 3 content parts that are all copies of the bodypart in Core/Common.
In the same module I have created a ContentType and added my three custom ContentParts to it, plus autoroute and bodypart and tags, etc, everything to make it just like the Orchard Pages ContentType, only with more Parts, each with their own shape.
I have called my ContentType a View.
So you can now create pages for your site using Views. You then use the ZoneProxy to shunt the custom ContentPart shapes (Parts_MainImage, Parts_RightContent, Parts_LeftContent) into whatever Zones I need them in. And job done.
Not quite Sitefinity, but as Bill would say, Good enough.
The reason you have to create your own ContentParts that copy BodyPart instead of just using a TextField, is that all TextFields have the same Shape, so if you use ZoneProxy to place them, they all end up in the same Zone. Ie, you build the custom ContentParts JUST so that you get the Shapes. Cos it is the shapes that you place with the ZoneProxy code.
Once I have tested this, I will upload it as a module onto the Orchard Gallery. It will be called Wingspan.Views.
I am away on holiday until 12th June 2012, so don't expect it before the end of the month.
But essentially, with Pete Hurst's code, that is how I have solved my problem.
EDIT:
I could have got the same results by just creating the three content parts (LeftContent, RightContent, MainImage, etc), or whatever content parts are needed, and then adding them to the Page content type.
That way, you only add what is needed.
However, there is some advantage in having a standard ContentType that can be just used out of the box.
Using placement (Placement.info file) you could use the MainImage content part for a footer, for example. Ie, the names should probably be part 1, part 2, etc.
None of this would be necessary if there was a way of giving the shape produced by the TextField a custom name. That way, you could add as may TextFields as you liked, and then place them using the ZoneProxy code. I'm not sure if this would be possible.