I've implemented the Transactions API for the Google Assistant Action. The Action is deployed and published to the public. (So it has been tested by the Google review team.)
There are some devices that aren't supporting transactions. But not all the time. For example the Google Nest Hub. Sometimes it says it isn't able to transact and sometime it does, this differs by user. Which is weird. Does anybody know how to fix this?
Is there a user setting or something we need to change?
Related
Does anybody know, if there is a way to access the transactions made from (Google/Apple)Pay on the device?
I think of a way where the user first needs to grant the access to a specific card on his wallet to the app, before the sync is then started.
I am looking for a way to somehow verificate billings, which are initiated by our app, without handling the payment process itself. So I just want to "observe" it.
Thanks alot for any advice in the correct direction
I've been researching several different API gateway solutions to process payments, or to access bank account records, but that's all not really what the users will feel comfortable with.
Testing out the platform I was running on both a developer account and a Trial Business Pro account until I purchased a standard plan.
Up until I purchased the standard plan, envelope statuses would update by the second and the functionality built with the Apex Toolkit was working well.
Once changing to the standard paid plan, envelopes statuses take 10-15 minutes to update and some functionality is not working.
My question is:
Do the different plans have different status updating times in Salesforce?
Is functionality of the Apex Toolkit limited between the different plans?
Does the Connect option (which is missing now) have anything to do with the above?
Thanks!
They do not. Writeback to Salesforce takes place via DocuSign Connect. Some plans don't support Connect out of the box but the actual writeback times / delays do not differ between account plan types.
Indirectly, the only way that a plan type can interfere with an API call that worked on another plan type is if it had entitlement to a feature that your new plan does not, IE: The ability to allow Comments, to set recipient signing language, to set envelopeID Stamp Control, etc...
I would highly suspect that it does -- in fact I'm a little surprised that your writebacks are happening at all if you don't have Connect enabled. Salesforce adds an object reference IE: Opportunity / AccountIds to the envelope's custom fields on send. When Connect sees these fields, it knows to write back to that specific object. Without Connect enabled and configured it shouldn't be able to process these writebacks at all.
I think you should have a conversation with your Account Rep first regarding Connect entitlement, then you can reconnect your Salesforce instances to the updated DocuSign account which is something that we can help you with.
Regards,
Matt
I have successfully implemented google assistant on rpi using gassistpi and added agent on dialogflow also. The issue is that if multiple users invoke google assistant on different raspberry pi I am not able to identify which user has invoked the action as request from webhook on dialogflow doesn't have any user identity information. Thus, I am facing issues while retrieving data for particular user.
I tried using account linking on actions on google using google signup over voice but I am unable to implement that.
The Google Assistant SDK does not have voice match as a feature, so you would be unable to use it to identify individual users of the Action on that surface.
when your webhook is called, you have the ability to store data from every request. For instance look at :
https://developers.google.com/actions/assistant/save-data
That way you can maintain and know each devices session. Even if you don't know the user.
So here is what i am trying to do :
I built a bot with api.ai for my business that is hosted on my webpage and my Facebook page right now. Bot works well.
I want to push it to the next step by allowing my customers to make querys on my calendar, ask to book a specific time, see if available, if not offer other time similar, then make a booking.
I have been reading this thread and the great answer attached to it but i think my case is a bit different.
I was wondering if the bot could always have a token so every guests won't have to Auth to query the calendar ?
Obviously i am new to this, i have been reading the guide of google calendar api and api.ai but i don't really see how to do that yet. I guess there is a way to store a token somewhere and then just trigger the query with some specific intents but not to sure how.
I have also done the node.js quickstart guide of the G-calendar api, and it works fine if that helps.
Thanks for your help !
You will probably want to use a Service Account that is permitted to the calendar in question. Service Accounts are similar to regular accounts, but they are expected to do server-to-server communication only, so the method to create an auth token is a little different to keep it secure.
See https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2ServiceAccount for more information about using Service Accounts.
In general, you'll be using a shared secret to create and sign a JSON Web Token (JWT) you send to Google's servers. You'll get back an access token which you'll then use to call the Calendar API. The access token expires in about an hour, at which point you'll need to repeat the process.
There are libraries available to do much of this for you. For example, if you're using the node.js library https://github.com/google/google-api-nodejs-client, then it will take care of this for you (although you need to modify the key file - see the documentation for details).
Some time ago, it was commonplace for smartphone apps to open a browser to a registration page with a CAPTCHA, or to require separate signup via web, because API signup was seen as vulnerable.
Now most apps seem to offer registration via native form, though endpoints for this are usually not documented in their public API. I haven't seen many reports of this being abused to create spam accounts.
How is this done? Is there a standard crypto/handshake process to verify real signups, or does signup typically rely on undocumented endpoints and simple API key passing?
Embedding yields a better experience but has the issue you mention. Yes, the service owners on the other end are still worried about this and combating the problem. And undocumented APIs don't help and the service owners know this.
One of the tools in the toolbox these days is keys assigned to devices which can be used for throttling. This would essentially let you limit the amt of service that can be consumed on a per device basis and it would require you have a device (or can steal the key from one) in order to provide service. So long as the process to issue keys to new devices is strong (a solvable problem) then you can offer a CAPTCHA-free signup experience within the confines of what you are willing to give to a device.
I'd also note that there are other well known approaches you can use, like IP throttling and handshakes with other service providers (like a phone carrier). Depending upon the problem domain these are on the table too...