When creating a tabulator table one can set the groupBy options using something like:
groupBy: ["CapType"],
groupValues: [["Large", "Medium", "Small", "Micro"]],
However there doesn't seem to be a similar method to change the groupValues after the table has already been created, like you can using table.setGroupBy("")
Is there a function I have missed in the docs?
I want to do this to pretty up the group names instead of using the raw values extracted from the table.
Related
I want to do batch update for all rows, using update query. I know there is BATCH query. But, I have to list all rows..
So, I want to do something like :
UPDATE test set value=0x31 where id in ( SELECT id from test );
Is there any way doing something like the above?
The idea is the same as SQL. select all rows & and insert them into "in" part.
The reason why I want to do this is that I added a new column to the existing column family, which created null data in the new created column.
And, this cause an error for retrieving data from Cassandra.
I think the examples shown here might help: http://www.datastax.com/documentation/cql/3.1/cql/cql_reference/update_r.html?scroll=reference_ds_g4h_qzq_xj__description_unique_31
Update a column in several rows at once:
UPDATE users
SET state = 'TX'
WHERE user_uuid
IN (88b8fd18-b1ed-4e96-bf79-4280797cba80,
06a8913c-c0d6-477c-937d-6c1b69a95d43,
bc108776-7cb5-477f-917d-869c12dfffa8);
I'm looking into using RedQueryBuilder for a web-based query builder. I want my users to be able to specify what data they want to retrieve in the select clause, but the demo site
only shows selecting a single table, rendering all the columns of that table in the result. Does RedQueryBuilder support building out a more robust select clause, like specifying which specific columns to retrieve including those joined from other tables?
I'm afraid not. The project just concentrates on defining a query to return rows not what to show in those rows.
The onTableChange callback would feed you the list of tables in the expression so could go from that to a list of available columns...
Would you want/need to alter the SQL query generated or just the display of the results?
Personally I'd be interested in changing the demo into a more useful query too although the scope of that could be huge.
I have an infopath form based on a sharepoint list (worktracker).
In that form there is a repeating section which holds data from a secondary source which is the worktracker list again.
I would like to filter that table using the value in a field on the form - this enables me to run a check on duplicate items on the list by using a calculated checking reference.
I have done this by using conditional formatting to hide the non-matching items but that this killing my form as IE throws tantrum as it takes too long.
Does anyone know another way to do this? I am stuck using IE8 - not my choice!
UPDATE:
So since posting the above, I had since tried using a REST connection which doesn't work as my list is too big. I have also tried using an XML connection to a filtered view and that didn't work either!
Cheers,
In the form, select the value field. Create a rule that sets the secondary data source's query field of the same name to that value. Then query the secondary data source. It will only return the items where the value matches.
So Azure Table Storage has three default member properties for its TableServiceEntity class, one of which is Timestamp. After release to Production, we now realize we need a CreatedDateTime property instead of Timestamp b/c we have no control over the Timestamp value, which acts more like a "Last Modified" value rather than "Created Date" value.
How can I copy the value in Timestamp currently over to my new property? In SQL, this seems pretty straightforward, but the cloud is a different animal. Thanks.
In Table Storage you have no schema. In a single "table" you can have 10 rows with a C# defined class of Person and 10 rows of class Dog with COMPLETELY different properties.
The reason I am saying this is because there is no schema, so the easiest thing to do would be to "re-insert" the rows as a batch with the new column/property added to the class. You can also do an UPSERT as well:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazurestorage/archive/2011/09/15/windows-azure-tables-introducing-upsert-and-query-projection.aspx
If the column is already defined then its easy and u would just do an update, but it sounds like that new column does not exist on the previous rows entered.
If you are using a class, just add the new field for the create date time. Pull all the data down and copy the timestamp to the new field and then call update on the row. If you are already doing inserts and deletes and thigns, should be pretty straightforward.
I want to know that How to Insert New Columns to an existing database Table using Subsonic 3.0.0.5 MIGRATIONS.
Basically I want to alter an existing table in MS SqlServer database and add three more columns into it.
Please tell me How I will be able to do it
Regards,
Naveed Khan
Just change your object and the column will be added/updated whatever. So if you have an object called "Post" and add a property, it will be added as a column in the DB.
See this video...
http://subsonicproject.com/docs/Simple_Repo_5_Minute_Demo
It has to do with the conventions of SubSonic.
As the object is singular, it adds the plural to the table (or expects the table to be plural).
So it will expect an object called Order to map to a table called Orders.
There is only two solutions that I can see for you
1) Rename you table to the plural name.
2) Modify Subsonic code to remove the adding of the plural.