Why is userName a required property for envelopeViews? - docusignapi

I'm not sure if this is a bug. But I discovered this in sandbox while creating an embedded signing link.
When attempting to call the below post with the following body, I get a 400 Bad Request Data Object errorCode: "INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER" message: "The request contained at least one invalid parameter. A value was not found for parameter 'userName'."
POST /v2/accounts/{accountId}/envelopes/{envelopeId}/views/recipient
Accept: application/json
Origin: https://apiexplorer.docusign.com
Content-Type: application/json
Show Base64 Bytes in Request
{
"authenticationMethod": "none",
"email": "myemail#example.com",
"returnUrl": "google.com"
}
So it makes sense to add a userName to my recipient right? Well, yes but no. I can type in any random userName like
{
"authenticationMethod": "none",
"email": "myemail#example.com",
"returnUrl": "google.com",
"userName": "sdlfkjsodisdofisdofm"
}
And it will generate the link a successful response with an embedded link. It appears to look for email first as precedence which is what I want. What's the purpose of userName here?

So, I think if the user is not authenticated ("none") then userName is ignored, but still is required. Which does seem like a bug, so good catch. If you want to do more testing - try v2.1, which is the latest API version we recommend you use and see if it behaves the same (most likley, but not 100% sure).
The reason userName may be needed is for example for InPersonSigner or when you use recipientAuthentication and the user needs to be correlated to a DocuSign user in some account to be able to use their auth correctly.
Edit: Actually, userName would be used to determine your set of signatures. Try this, set your signature and use the exact same userName. DocuSign should remember it and you won't have to do that again. If you use a different one - you would have to. So, maybe not a bug after all...
(same for the electronic consent that you only have to agree to once)

Related

docuSign - envelopeViews : createRecipient

ERROR: Content Type specified is not supported.
Hi there, I am new to DocuSign and I am trying to learn the implementation from last couple of days. What I did so far is, created a developer account and created a QuickStart project.
Goal
I want to integrate the DocuSign API's in my application, but I don't really want the user to leave my application. I just want to make use of DocuSign within my app. - Embedded Signing
What I did?
I successfully created an envelope with a sample document and after that I have to get that URL to view (for Recipient).
So I called the below API:
** EnvelopeViews: createRecipient**
** POST - {{baseUrl}}/v2.1/accounts/{{accountId}}/envelopes/{{envelopeId}}/views/recipient**
All the details, like accountId, envelopeId are correct, along with that the request body that I pass with this is:
Request Body
{
"authenticationMethod": "none",
"clientUserId": "bcc49234-f30b-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX",
"email": "abc#gmail.com",
"recipientId": "007",
"returnUrl":"http://localhost",
"userName": "user name"
}
Note: * clientUserId is my Integration Key (please let me know if this is what I need to pass here or something else).*
Response
{
"errorCode": "INVALID_CONTENT_TYPE",
"message": "Content Type specified is not supported."
}
Note: Apart from the solution, please provide any link(s) to resources where I can easily see the implementation(as in my use case).
Umair,
First clientUserId is a bit of a confusing term, it's not the IK (Integration Key) but any string you want. It is unique to the signer and the envelope. You choose it.
You can find a detailed example of this with code in 8 languages on the DocuSign Developer Center How To Request Signature Through your app page.
I'm not clear how you make the API calls, if you are using postman, there are headers that needs to be set. One of them is called Content-Type and it has to be set to text/plain.

DocuSign API - Reset/Unlock RecipientAuthenticationStatus

I'm using the DocuSign API to electronically sign documents within my app. I'm using the access code authentication feature, for some additional security; however, I am trying to 'Unlock' a signer (via the API) that has input the wrong access code too many times, without voided and creating a new envelope, or using the DocuSign Admin interface.
I don't care if I have to resend the initial email, I just want to be able to conserve my client's total envelope count. It's also important (if there are multiple signers) that I don't force one signer to have to sign multiple times, if they completed their signatures prior to signer2's authentication error.
I have attempted a POST to:
/v2/accounts/{accountId}/envelopes/{envelopeId}?resend_envelope=true
I have also sought a solution using the docusign-java-client:
Recipients recipients = envelopesApi.listRecipients(accountId, envelopeId);
List<Signer> signers = recipients.getSigners();
for (Signer signer : signers) {
signer.setRecipientAuthenticationStatus(null);
}
I still get the below response
"recipientAuthenticationStatus": {
"accessCodeResult": {
"status": "Failed",
"eventTimestamp": "2018-01-15T23:49:15.8600000Z"
}
I'm able to "Resend" via the DocuSign admin GUI, and everything works as expected...
Is there any way that I'm able "reset/unlock" this authentication feature programatically, through the API?
You can use below PUT endpoint
PUT /restapi/v2/accounts/<accountId>/envelopes/<envelopeId>?resend_envelope=true
Body as:
{
}
This should send another email to the signer who failed the authentication, and that user will again get option to enter the access code.
I think you will need to delete and then re-add the recipient (signer). That makes the signer become a new recipient.
However, doing so means you'll need to re-create everything about the signer: their document tabs/fields, etc.
I can't imagine that it is less expensive to simply void/resend the envelope than to spend a developer's time to work on this issue.
If this scenario is occurring a lot, then perhaps think about providing better training to your signers with respect to using the access code feature.
Per the documentation found here
I must include the json or xml with the request (if the authentication method failed). I assumed incorrectly that if there was only one recipient, then I would NOT have to specify. If you just want to resend the envelope, you don't need to include and signer data.
Such as:
{"signers" :
[{"email":"testEmail#gmail.com",
"name":"FirstName LastName",
"recipientId":"1"
}]
}
You should then get something like the below response:
{"recipientUpdateResults":
[{
"recipientId": "1",
"errorDetails":
{
"errorCode": "SUCCESS",
"message": ""
}
}]
}

docuSign /v2/login_information Authenticate User to get BaseURL

I'm passing Authorization information in json format as following.
X-DocuSign-Authentication:{ "Username" :"xxxxx", "Password" :"xxxxxx",
"IntegratorKey" :"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" }
I'm converting it ToBase64String and pass it to docuSign restapi.
It gives me UnAuthorised user error with status code 401.
I want to know which format and encoding i have to pass to "/v2/login_information" to get baseURL
No encoding is required for the X-DocuSign-Authentication header.
Also see this answer for more detailed explanation.

DocuSign Authorization Code Grant flow returns invalid_grant error

The DocuSign documentation goes through an easy to follow authorization flow for code grant. I'm able to get the "code" from the initial GET request to /oath/auth but getting the tokens gives me an error of "invalid_grant" when I try in postman. I've followed the steps and have a request that looks like this using account-d.docusign.com for host:
POST /oauth/token
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Authorization: Basic MjMwNTQ2YTctOWM1NS00MGFkLThmYmYtYWYyMDVkNTQ5NGFkOjMwODc1NTVlLTBhMWMtNGFhOC1iMzI2LTY4MmM3YmYyNzZlOQ==
grant_type=authorization_code&code=ey2dj3nd.AAAA39djasd3.dkn4449d21d
Two other members of my team have also tried with their developer accounts and all are getting invalid_grant errors. Is this no longer supported or are there common errors associated with this error that we might be able to investigate?
Re-check all of your values.
I was also getting the same invalid_grant response and could not figure out why at first. It turns out that I had a typo in the Content-Type header. I was using application/x-www-form-urlencode instead of application/x-www-form-urlencoded.
You may not be, but if you are submitting the exact Authorization Header as you've posted it here in your question (MjMwNTQ2YTctOWM1NS00MGFkLThmYmYtYWYyMDVkNTQ5NGFkOjMwODc1NTVlLTBhMWMtNGFhOC1iMzI2LTY4MmM3YmYyNzZlOQ==) it will fail with that message.
That is the base64 value for the sample integration key and sample secret key provided in their documentation. If you decode that string with an online base64decoder it will result in 230546a7-9c55-40ad-8fbf-af205d5494ad:3087555e-0a1c-4aa8-b326-682c7bf276e9. This is the same sample integration key and secret in the documentation.
Check the Authorization header you are submitting by encoding your integration key and secret (integrationKey:secret) using this online base64encoder. This will make sure the issue isn't with your base64 encoding of your integration key and secret. Once you have that value make sure your Authorization uses the word Basic before the value you got from this website. (Basic base64stringFromOnlineEncoder)
Check that the code your are submitting in the body of the post is not the sample code from their documentation. ey2dj3nd.AAAA39djasd3.dkn4449d21d is the sample code from their documentation. You may just be using that in your question as a placeholder but if you are submitting any of those values it will return invalid_grant. Make sure that the body of your post does not have any leading or trailing spaces.
Have the correct Content-Type set application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Have the correct Authorization header set Basic base64EncodedIntegrationKey:Secret
Have the correct body using the valid code received from the GET request to /oauth/auth with no leading or trailing spaces, making sure you're not using the values from your question.
If you are still having trouble and you are not doing a user application but are doing a service integration you can use Legacy Authentication to get your oAuth2 token.
Alternative Method using Legacy Authentication for Service Integrations
This method does not use a grant code. You pass in the integration key, username and password into the X-DocuSign-Authentication header in JSON format.
Demo Server: demo.docusign.net
Production Server: www.docusign.net API
Version: v2
POST https://{server}/restapi/{apiVersion}/oauth2/token
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
X-DocuSign-Authentication: {"IntegratorKey":"your_integrator_key","Password":"docusign_account_password","Username":"docusign_account_username"}
grant_type=password&client_id=your_integrator_key&username=docusign_account_username&password=docusign_account_password&scope=api
If you are building a user application that requires the user enter their docusign credentials to generate the token, this alternative will not work for you.
For anyone who is facing this error, I'd like to point out this note in the documentation:
Note: The obtained authorization code is only viable for 2 minutes. If more then two minutes pass between obtaining the authorization code and attempting to exchange it for an access token, the operation will fail.
I was struggling with the same error until I spotted the note and sped up my typing to meet the 2 minutes.
Hope it helps someone else.
In my case the problem was related to having set a wrong value for Content-Type header, namely "application/x-www-form-URIencoded" instead of the correct "application/x-www-form-urlencoded". Note though that in my case the problem was not a "typo" but an excessive trust in DocuSign documentation.
Indeed the wrong Content-Type is, at the time of writing, suggested directly into the documentation page where they describe the Authorization Code Grant workflow, see the image below for the relevant part.
Hopefully they will fix the documentation soon but for the time being be careful not to blindly copy & paste the code from their examples without thinking, as I initially did.
anyone have an idea what is wrong here I am getting a BadRequest with the following
{"error":"invalid_grant","error_description":"unauthorized_client"}
var client = new RestClient(ESIGNURL);
var request = new RestRequest("/oauth/token");
request.Method = Method.POST;
request.AddHeader("Content-Type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded");
request.AddHeader("Authorization", "Basic " + Convert.ToBase64String(System.Text.Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(integrationkey+ ":" + secret)));
string body = "grant_type=authorization_code&code=" + code;
request.Parameters.Clear();
request.AddParameter("application/x-www-form-urlencoded", body, ParameterType.RequestBody);
var response = client.Execute(request);
I was getting this error as well. What I realized is I was appending the state at the end of the code before passing it to the oauth token endpoint.
This snippet is from Docusign explaining what are some other reasons for getting that error.
Invalid-error explanation
I just spent a day doing this (in NodeJS). I'll add a couple of things to the answers from before. First, I had to put:
"Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
in the header. Otherwise it gave me the message:
{
"error": "invalid_grant",
"error_description": "unsupported_grant_type"
}
Second, the base64 encoding:
I used this in NodeJS and it worked
const integration_key = process.env.INTEGRATION_KEY;
const secret_key = process.env.SECRET_KEY;
const authinfo =
integration_key.toString("utf8") + ":" + secret_key.toString("utf8");
const buff2 = Buffer(authinfo, "utf8").toString("base64");
If you use "base64url" it dosen't work because it strips the == off of the end of the string. The = symbol is used as padding and apparently it's needed. You see a similar difference on this site https://www.base64encode.org/ when you toggle the url safe encoding option. If you don't have the padding on the end of your base64 encoded string (or if it's generally incorrect) you get this message:
{
"error": "invalid_grant",
"error_description": "unauthorized_client"
}
Finally, if you're using Postman (I'm using DocuSign's Postman Collection) remember to reset and save the codeFromUrl variable after you update it. Otherwise it doesn't update and you get the message:
{
"error": "invalid_grant",
"error_description": "expired_client_token"
}
This means the old URL code has expired and your new one didn't save.

Instagram how to get my user id from username?

I'm in the process of embedding my image feed in my website using JSON, the URL needs my user id so I can retrieve this feed.
So, where can I find/get my user id?
Update in Jun-5-2022, Instagram API no longer use Bearer Token for authentication. But I find another useful API. All you need is added extra header X-IG-App-ID with "magic value".
https://i.instagram.com/api/v1/users/web_profile_info/?username=therock
Use can use my docker container Insta-Proxy-Server to bypass the authentication.
https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/dockerer123456/insta-proxy-server
Demo video (I just run directly from source code): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frHC1jOfK1k
Update in Mar-19-2022, the API is require login now. Sorry for the bad news.
But we can solve this problem in two ways.
Using my C# lib, login using your account (without any Instagram app token stuff and graph api.)
In case the lib failed (I'm no longer maintain it long time ago), create a proxy server with logged in instagram account.
[Your app] --> [Proxy server] --> [Instagram] --> [Proxy server] -(forward)-> [Your app]
For Proxy server, you can use Nodejs app which install Chromium headless module (Puppeteer for example), logged in with an instagram account.
Proof of concept:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlnNBpCXQM8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMb9us2hH3w
Update in June-20-2019, the API is public now. No authentication required.
Update in December-11-2018, I needed to confirm that this endpoint still work.
You need to login before sending request to this site because it's not public endpoint anymore.
Update in Apr-17-2018, it's look like this endpoint still working (but its not public endpoint anymore), you must send a request with extra information to that endpoint. (Press F12 to open developer toolbar, then click to Network Tab and trace the request.)
Update in Apr-12-2018, cameronjonesweb said that this endpoint doesn't work anymore. When he/she trying to access this endpoint, 403 status code return.
You can get user info when a request is made with the url below:
https://www.instagram.com/{username}/?__a=1
E.g:
This url will get all information about a user whose username is therock
https://www.instagram.com/therock/?__a=1
Enter this url in your browser with the users name you want to find and your access token
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=[USERNAME]&access_token=[ACCESS TOKEN]
Working solution without access token as of October-14-2018:
Search for the username:
https://www.instagram.com/web/search/topsearch/?query=<username>
Example:
https://www.instagram.com/web/search/topsearch/?query=therock
This is a search query. Find the exact matched entry in the reply and get user ID from the entry.
Easily Get USER ID and User Details
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=[ USER NAME ]&client_id=[ YOU APP Client ID ]
For Example:
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=zeeshanakhter2009&client_id=enter_your_id
Result:
{"meta":{"code":200},"data":[{"username":"zeeshanakhter2009","bio":"http://about.me/zeeshanakhter","website":"http://zeeshanakhter.com","profile_picture":"http://images.ak.instagram.com/profiles/profile_202090411_75sq_1377878261.jpg","full_name":"Zeeshan
Akhter","id":"202090411"}]}
Most of the methods are obsolete since June, 1/2016 api changes
Below worked for me,
access instagram on your browser say chrome, safari or firefox.
Launch developer tools, go to console option.
on command prompt enter below command and hit enter:
window._sharedData.entry_data.ProfilePage[0].user.id
If you are lucky, you will get at first attempt, if not, be patient, refresh the page and try again. keep doing until you see user-id. Good luck!!
Instead of using the API, one can examine the Instagram userpage to get the id. Example code in PHP:
$html = file_get_contents("http://instagram.com/<username>");
$doc = new DOMDocument();
$doc->loadHTML($html);
$xpath = new DOMXPath($doc);
$js = $xpath->query('//body/script[#type="text/javascript"]')->item(1)->nodeValue;
$start = strpos($js, '{');
$end = strrpos($js, ';');
$json = substr($js, $start, $end - $start);
$data = json_decode($json, true);
$data = $data["entry_data"]["UserProfile"][0];
# The "userMedia" entry of $data now has the same structure as the "data" field
# in Instagram API responses to user endpoints queries
echo $data["user"]["id"];
Of course, this code has to be adapted if Instagram changes its page format.
Currently there is no direct Instagram API to get user id from user name. You need to call the GET /users/search API and then iterate the results and check if the username field value is equal to your username or not, then you grab the id.
I wrote this tool for retrieving Instagram IDs by username: Instagram User ID Lookup.
It utilizes the python-instagram library to access the API and includes a link to the source code (written on Django), which illustrates various implementations of the Instagram API.
Update: Added source code for port to Ruby on Rails.
I tried all the aforementioned solutions and none works. I guess Instagram has accelerated their changes. I tried, however, the browser console method and played around a bit and found this command that gave me the user ID.
window._sharedData.entry_data.ProfilePage[0].graphql.user.id
You just visit a profile's page and enter this command in the console. You might need to refresh the page for this to work though. (I had to post this as an answer, because of my low reputation)
You need to use Instagrams API to convert your username to id.
If I remember correctly you use users/search to find the username and get the id from there
Most of these answers are invalid after the 6/1/2016 Instagram API changes. The best solution now is here. Go to your feed on instagram.com, copy the link address for any of your pictures, and paste it into the textbox on that page. Worked like a charm.
to get your id, make an authenticated request to the Instagram API users/self/feed endpoint. the response will contain, among other data, the username as well as the id of the user.
Go to the api console & copy link https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/self in text field and authenticate using your instagram id & password, you will get your id in response
This can be done through apigee.com Instagram API access here on Instagram's developer site. After loging in, click on the "/users/search" API call. From there you can search any username and retrieve its id.
{
"data": [{
"username": "jack",
"first_name": "Jack",
"profile_picture": "http://distillery.s3.amazonaws.com/profiles/profile_66_75sq.jpg",
"id": "66",
"last_name": "Dorsey"
},
{
"username": "sammyjack",
"first_name": "Sammy",
"profile_picture": "http://distillery.s3.amazonaws.com/profiles/profile_29648_75sq_1294520029.jpg",
"id": "29648",
"last_name": "Jack"
},
{
"username": "jacktiddy",
"first_name": "Jack",
"profile_picture": "http://distillery.s3.amazonaws.com/profiles/profile_13096_75sq_1286441317.jpg",
"id": "13096",
"last_name": "Tiddy"
}]}
If you already have an access code, it can also be done like this:
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=USERNAME&access_token=ACCESS_TOKEN
Well you can just call this link
http://jelled.com/ajax/instagram?do=username&username=[USER_NAME_GOES_HERE]&format=json
Although it's not listed on the API doc page anymore, I found a thread that mentions that you can use self in place of user-id for the users/{user-id} endpoint and it'll return the currently authenticated user's info.
So, users/self is the same as an explicit call to users/{some-user-id} and contains the user's id as part of the payload. Once you're authenticated, just make a call to users/self and the result will include the currently authenticated user's id, like so:
{
"data": {
"id": "1574083",
"username": "snoopdogg",
"full_name": "Snoop Dogg",
"profile_picture": "http://distillery.s3.amazonaws.com/profiles/profile_1574083_75sq_1295469061.jpg",
"bio": "This is my bio",
"website": "http://snoopdogg.com",
"counts": {
"media": 1320,
"follows": 420,
"followed_by": 3410
}
}
If you are using implicit Authentication must have the problem of not being able to find the user_id
I found a way for example:
Access Token = 1506417331.18b98f6.8a00c0d293624ded801d5c723a25d3ec
the User id is 1506417331
would you do a split single seperated by . obtenies to acces token and the first element
I think the best, simplest and securest method is to open your instagram profile in a browser, view source code and look for user variable (ctrl+f "user":{") inside main javascript code. The id number inside user variable should be your id.
This is the code how it looked in the moment of writing this answer (it can, and probably will be changed in future):
"user":{"username":"...","profile_picture":"...","id":"..........","full_name":"..."}},
Here is how you can retrieve your user id from a username:
$url = "https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=[username]&access_token=[your_token]";
$obj = json_decode(#file_get_contents($url));
echo $obj->data[0]->id;
You can do this by using Instagram API ( User Endpoints: /users/search )
how-to in php :
function Request($url) {
$ch = curl_init();
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, $url);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_HEADER, 0);
$result = curl_exec($ch);
curl_close($ch);
return $result;
}
function GetUserID($username, $access_token) {
$url = "https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=" . $username . "&access_token=" . $access_token;
if($result = json_decode(Request($url), true)) {
return $result['data'][0]['id'];
}
}
// example:
echo GetUserID('rathienth', $access_token);
Here is a really easy website that works well for me:
http://www.instaid.co.uk/
Or you can do the following replacing 'username' with your Instagram username
https://www.instagram.com/username/?__a=1
Or you can login to your Instagram account and use google dev tools and look at the cookies that have been stored. 'ds_user_id' is your user ID
Working Solution December 14, 2020
For simple usage like 3rd party tools that require an Instagram user ID (like embedding an image feed) I tend to use:
https://www.thekeygram.com/find-instagram-user-id/
because it makes it really easy to copy and paste the Instagram user ID that I am looking for. Unlike most tools I get the results fast, it's free and there are no ads. I recommend you watch the youtube video before using it so you can see how simple it is and get an idea of how it's used:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HvOroY-YBw
For more advanced usage I recommend:
https://www.instagram.com/{username}/?__a=1
(replace username with the requested username)
For example to find the user ID of the username "instagram" you would use:
https://www.instagram.com/instagram/?__a=1
This is the most advanced way which returns a JSON response and it's great if you are building an app that requires the raw data. You can save it in a database or build some type of front end UI to display it. Example: for a dashboard or on a website. Also, using the url is great because you can get additional attributes about users such as their total follower count and profile bio.
Since adding ?__a=1 to a profile URL is not working anymore to get a user ID from a username, we can do it with cURL and jq (the new API endpoint can be found in the network requests of Instagram web version, for example with Firefox Developer Tools):
curl -s 'https://i.instagram.com/api/v1/users/web_profile_info/?username=alanarblanchard' -H 'X-IG-App-ID: 936619743392459' | jq -r .data.user.id
If you are using Instagram in a web browser, you don't need to use the command above and can check the response of the HTTP request directly.
You may also be interested in finding the username from a user ID, in case someone changes frequently the username. I added an answer here: Instagram get username from userId
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q="[USERNAME]"&access_token=[ACCESS TOKEN]
Please notice the quotation marks.
This does not always return a valid result but more often than non-quoted one:
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q="self"&count=1&access_token=[ACCESS TOKEN]
returns user "self" (id: 311176867)
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=self&count=1&access_token=[ACCESS TOKEN]
returns user "super_selfie" (id: 1422944651)
Working solution ~2018
I've found that, providing you have an access token, you can perform the following request in your browser:
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/self?access_token=[VALUE]
In fact, access token contain the User ID (the first segment of the token):
<user-id>.1677aaa.aaa042540a2345d29d11110545e2499
You can get an access token by using this tool provided by Pixel Union.
Python solution with Instaloader external library (install it first with pip)
import instaloader
YOUR_USERNAME = "Your username here"
USERNAME_OF_INTEREST = "Username of interest here"
L = instaloader.Instaloader()
L.interactive_login(YOUR_USERNAME)
profile = instaloader.Profile.from_username(L.context, USERNAME_OF_INTEREST)
print(profile.userid)
With this kind of questions about constantly changing private APIs, I recommend to rely on actively developing libraries, not on the services or answers.
First Create an Application on Instagram and get Client Id for your application
http://instagram.com/developer/
Now just copy paste following Url into browser window by replacing your Username and your Client Id
https://api.instagram.com/v1/users/search?q=[Your-username]&client_id=[Your-Client-Id]
you will get a Json Result containing General Information about your account along with your Numeric user Id
UPDATED 2021
Just go to Facebook Apps choose your app connected with Instagram and you will see your Instagram ID: ********
Note https://www.instagram.com/{username}/?__a=1 was NOT working for me, so this is not a solution in 2021 if you want to use the Instagram Graph API
As of june 2022, you can to run or intercept a special HTTP request in order to successfully get the user data (and user ID). If you use Puppeteer, you can intercept the request that Instagram makes in the browser, and read its response. Example code:
const username = 'user.account';
const page = await browser.newPage();
const [foundResponse] = await Promise.all([
page.waitForResponse((response) => {
const request = response.request();
return request.method() === 'GET' && new RegExp(`https:\\/\\/i\\.instagram\\.com\\/api\\/v1\\/users\\/web_profile_info\\/\\?username=${encodeURIComponent(username.toLowerCase())}`).test(request.url());
}),
page.goto(`https://instagram.com/${encodeURIComponent(username)}`),
]);
const json = JSON.parse(await foundResponse.text());
console.log(json.data.user);
See discussion here: https://github.com/mifi/SimpleInstaBot/issues/125#issuecomment-1145354294
See also working code here: https://github.com/mifi/instauto/blob/2de64d9a30dad16c89a8c45f792e10f137a8e6cb/src/index.js#L250

Resources