Probably I'm asking a too much simple question but I didn't find any exact answer by googling.
In my android studio project, How to remove AdMob completely?
Well, the dependency for Google's Mobile Ads SDK is usually play-services-ads or firebase-ads if you're using Firebase. I'd remove whichever one of those is present in your build.gradle file's dependencies section, and then remove any references from your Java/Kotlin files that no longer resolve.
Well, when you download the library it might happen that it creates an exception or it is not implemented properly or not downloaded properly in this condition it is better to remove them completely.
You can search for "edit library and dependency.." inside that you will find a lot of liberals and the one which you want delete you can select it and press delete key.
I have an XPages application that has been running quite happily for the last couple of years.
The application uses some Java classes as converters that are used to convert data entry on certain fields to upper case, proper case, etc. This functionality has been present and working since the app was first deployed.
Today I was asked to make a change to one of the pages, adding a new field. The change was made in a test copy of the database, the app rebuilt and tested and all was fine.
The same change was then promoted into the live database, but after being rebuilt the error
Can't instantiate class: 'Cannot find class uk.co.xxx.beans.UpperCase in NSF'.
is being returned.
I have tried rebuilding the app and cleaning the project numerous times without success. I have also tried amending the code in the Java class and rebuilding.
If I remove all references to the UpperCase class it then complains about the ProperCase class. It appears as if the app has lost its reference to the Java classes and rebuilding isn't fixing the problem.
As an interim solution I have removed all uses of these classes so that users can at least display the page - but this is obviously not a long term solution. As soon as I reinstate one instance and rebuild, the error returns.
The only change in the app has been the addition of the new field. Removing it makes no difference.
Can you suggest anything else I can try and what may be causing the problem?
Open production db in designer and using Navigator view open WebContent/WEB-INF and delete classes folder. Then rebuild the app or refresh it from template again.
Sometimes classes are not updated correctly. I've seen it few times.
I have seen this too (domino 8.5.3). I recompile until it eventually works. With a restart of the http task thrown in for good measure. How are you deploying the classes within the db or as jar files in lib/ext?
I ran into similar issues with 8.53 FP2 with the same "can't instantiate errors" if accessed by a designer client. I even put a PRD in at IBM for it.
In order to fix this problem we had to update to the server and clients to FP5. We had a work around before we could update the FP5. We had to modify how the application was rolled out. Once the database was updated from a template we had to do a clean then a build while use our Application ID used for signing applications.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21639571
JDAE8ZV2CX
XPage With Java Design Element Breaks When Domino Designer opens after applying 8.5.3 Fix Pack 2 interim fix of any 853 Fix Pack 2/Fix Pack 3 hotfix
I am converting my iOS app to android using apportable, I need help implementing google play licensing into my code, I am confused about how to include google play license verification library (LVL)into my code. I know how to call java code using Bridgekit but how will I include LVL, because when we work in eclipse we need to download and install Google Market Licensing package from sdk manager.
what steps do i have to take to include LVL into my project and start coding
The Apportable platform already includes the required LVL libraries, since they are required for the Google Expansion Files feature.
You should be able to follow all the other steps in the docs: http://developer.android.com/google/play/licensing/index.html
For more info on how to add the check_license permission, see the android manifest documentation: http://docs.apportable.com/config.html#manifest-options
For adding the Google "public key string" (via the SIGNING_PUBKEY environment variable) see the expansion files documentation: http://docs.apportable.com/publishing.html#large-installers
The rest should be possible via BridgeKit and maybe also by adding a small java shim.
This is just odd.
I'm getting a build error in ServiceStack.Text after just bringing down the latest build from GitHub.
if (endpointUrl.IsNullOrEmpty() || !endpointUrl.StartsWith("http"))
return null;
Error 1 No overload for method 'IsNullOrEmpty' takes 0 arguments
ServiceStack\src\ServiceStack.Common\Messaging\ClientFactory.cs 10 18
ServiceStack.Common
I'm also getting bunch of other build errors:
Error 35 'int' does not contain a definition for 'Times' and no extension method 'Times' accepting a first argument of type 'int' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) ServiceStack.Redis\src\ServiceStack.Redis\Messaging\RedisMqServer.cs 192 37 ServiceStack.Redis
and after downloading the ServiceStack branch, I even tried opening ServiceStack-master\src\ServiceStack.sln and tried to build and it's totally broken:
I don't know what's going on here, there can't possibly be this many build errors if any right? I pray not but it seems as such.
Purpose of this post, what I'm asking about and need help clarifying and resolving (mythz???)
I need input from ServiceStack here on the following:
1) are the builds really this broken? Am I imagining this?
2) The branch stucture on GitHub is all over the place meaning I'm finding dup project folders all over and I do not know what this ServiceStack branch is as in it's src folder has a ton of projects there, different versions, as well as doesn't have projects like ServiceStack.Text, etc. so I don't know what's going on here. I want to use the basic core of service stack but there's like repeated stuff everywhere overall on GitHub. I need ServiceStack to clear all this up for me.
Here is my code, so you can see for yourself, it doesn't build.
This one won't build in terms of the ServiceStack projects - it's my solution in which I'm simply trying to include the ServiceStack projects I need along with my own projects that are using ServiceSTack. All I did was downoad those individual projects from https://github.com/ServiceStack then added them to my solution and made sure that any references to each other were now Project references, no longer binary..I removed the binary refs and readded them as project refs. So for example ServiceStack.Common depends on ServiceStack.Text but it was referencing it via binary so I removed it and readded the reference to ServiceStack.Text as a project ref now because in the end we plan on being able to look at and work with the base Stack code. The errors I posted above are happening in this Solution for ServiceStack related projects.
This one won't build - it's a download of the ServiceStack branch master (originally folder name is ServiceStack-master, I removed the -master)
UPDATE: yes I confirmed it's a bad build checked in on the GitHub site (refering to the ServiceStack branch master right above here). I had to remove unused using statements that were causing the build to fail and one of these was a dup using statement causing part of the build failure. I am surprised at this...this stuff should build and people should be checking in code that BUILDS successfully! common! Yes mythz, any dev trying to consume your API would be pissed that there are so many build erros all the time, I can't even get our protype going because this is not the only solution that won't build. First we had the Examples solution all breaking and now the core. I'm willing to fix these if I can but I honestly can't believe it's been a mountain to try to even use this API because of these checked in builds that are failing.
This one Will build because it was Nuget down, so ServiceStack is referencing other layers via binary references in the lib folder so this builds...probably builds here because someone has a working set of builds across all core projects but the stuff on the site for download is not the same revision and broken when you try to use them as project references (source code)?? Just my conclusion as it's only building IF you are using binary references to the lib folder. We want the source, not the binaries to work inside our solution so this is a brick wall for me
There are a lot of big changes happening on master right now - it will be unstable for a while.
I suggest you branch from the v3-fixes tag or pull the references from nuget.
#CoffeeAddict
Yesterday, the mythz answered about these problems in your previous question
"#CoffeeAddict like I said before, ServiceStack's is undergoing significant re-factoring and master in alpha and not for public use. While everything still builds for me and tests still pass in CI, it will be frequently unstable until its in beta. You're likely mixing v3 with v4 dlls which are technically incompatible. The release on NuGet is off the v3 branches of each project, that's what you should checkout if you want to build from src. Any contribs should be done to v3-fixes only - see Contributing docs for more info. – mythz 9 hours ago"
well looks like when I had downloaded all the stack branches, at the time earlier today contributors had checked in broken builds. Fabulous.
I just got latest early this morning, and appears people must have fixed the build and checked some stuff back in for various core projects. Now it builds.
Suggestion to mythz, get CI in place NOW. Don't wait for v4. This cost me a freakin day of trying various things to get this stuff to build and the problems were across several projects. This shouldn't happen, setup CI please. It's 2am and nobody using this project should have to deal with it.
I will contribute but first I had to get a full build to work! Not too happy as no dev would be wasting an entire day getting ServiceStack to build.
To compile v3:
Would someone with true knowledge post PROPER instructions on compiling v4 or v3? I had no luck with the build.bat files for v3 or v4, and opening solutions will not compile for most.
git clone servicestack, servicestack.text, redis, ormlite
make a new directory and copy from under src so you have these:
ServiceStack
ServiceStack.Client
ServiceStack.Common
ServiceStack.Interfaces
ServiceStack.OrmLite
ServiceStack.Redis
ServiceStack.Server
ServiceStack.Text
open csproj for ServiceStack.Interfaces ... right click properties, go to the signing tab, click the combo, new, type in your own signing pfx, I used servicestackInterfaces.pfx (doesn't matter) and make up a password.
Compiles fine, since it has not much referenced.
saved solution as ServiceStackV3 in folder C:\2015\SSv3compile
add csproj ServiceStack.Text, set signature, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.Common, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.Client, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for client, common, interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.OrmLite, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for common, interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.Redis, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for common, interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.ServiceStack.Server, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for Servicestack, ServiceStack.Client, ServiceStack.Common, ServiceStack.Interface, ServiceStack.Text, ServiceStack.Ormlite, ServiceStack.Redis
compiles ok
have some more trouble compiling the tests...
and finding so many tweaks and changes which are for me maddening to find
(endless agentransack searching for "namespace ISomethinMissing" in *.cs
... there seems to be namespace ServiceStack with cs code contained in projects other than Servicestack...
isn't that VERY improper? (now you require both DLLs? why not one?)
whatever...its free and works for what I wanted.
looks like there is some code leakage from v4...
after getting my head around v3, not sure I want to buy v4 - I will probably buy it in the future, I expect, and hope someday I can just clone and compile from the solution
ANyway, I love servicestack and have been
replacing old webservices
and the config nightmares of WCF with great happiness...
I say it is well worth the initial hassle.
I put this all in code block because I found the editor wouldn't accept this simple text when it was in a numbered list. whatever.
I'm trying to run sample projects (viz. BestSellers and Conference) that are present in MvvmCross v3 branch. I resolved the strong assembly reference issues successfully. However each time I run a sample project, I get System.TypeLoadException in MvxFullBinding and MvxValueConverterRegistryFiller classes.
Exception in MvxFullBinding class:
Exception in MvxValueConverterRegistryFiller class:
Is anybody able to run the sample projects successfully? How do I get around these exceptions?
It looks like you're running this as the 'Touch' projects from Visual Studio? In which case you are way ahead of what I've managed to achieve.
If that is correct, then I suspect that what you are seeing is that you have:
built proper PCLs built in VS/Windows against the portable reference assemblies
but these cannot be executed against the current MonoTouch/Xamarin.iOS runtime.
If you try, you may see issues like: iOS black screen and MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'System.Type.op_Equality'
For some more info see 'almost portable binaries' on http://slodge.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/almost-portable-binaries.html
There is 'proper' PCL support currently being worked on within XamLabs - so I am hopeful that there may be a solution to this problem arriving in the Xamarin.Android Alpha channel any day now - but don't expect this to be painless initially.
Of course, I might be wrong on this - this really is new territory and I will be fascinated to hear/read about your adventures. If you want to try to find more detail, then it may help to try looking deeper into the exception details, and looking into the console log trace on your mac.
For these two particular exceptions, I can confirm that both samples...
... although that is when I'm working on my Mac.