I have a script that I'm trying to optimize with xargs. The current version uses find with -exec to call the command:
find -type f -iname "*.mp4" -print0 -printf '\n' -exec getfattr -d --absolute-names {} \;
after which I can pipe to grep with something like:
grep -z -P user\.md5\=\"$input_search_hash\"
to filter the results while keeping the whole output with -z.
I need the whole output returned from getfattr to be "preserved", per file, because I need the filename for which there is a matching extended attribute, which then is then passed to sed to extract it. There are also cases where I have multiple grep commands in sequence if I need to search for files with multiple matches in the extended attributes. The problem is that the output of:
find -type f -iname "*.mp4" -print0 | xargs -0 getfattr -d --absolute-names
is not formatted in such a way that grep will filter in this way. This does work with the -exec method. Can I pass an addional option to xargs or pipe in some additional command that will format the output to make grep properly replicate the behaviour of -exec? I'm guessing I need some sort of line-break before feeding to grep like what -printf '\n' does in the -exec method. I would just use getfattr to "search" the extended attributes instead of needing to grep the output at all, but it has no way to do this by suppling a xattr name and value.
Example
The input comes from the find command, which is a list of video files in an arbitrary directory structure. The output of each getfattr command, for each file is such:
# file: /path/to/file/test.mp4
user.md5="0e29a7f555af518872771689e28d998d"
user.quality="10"
user.sha256="d49ba58e3b30f4ef8c81d19ce960edcf6552977bb8adb79b5b9a677ba9a54b2b"
user.size="1645645"
If I attempt to grep the output of find using the + method, say for a value of "10" on the quality, I will get results like this:
# file: /path/to/file/test.mp4
user.md5="8cf97b888e6fdbed27b02233cd6779f5"
user.quality="12"
user.sha256="613d16b2a0270e2e5f81cfd58b1eacf710a65b82ce2dab49a1e415275440f429"
user.size="1645645"
# file: /path/to/file/test1.mp4
user.md5="3c5a39f1ceefce1e124bcd6786a99155"
user.quality="10"
user.sha256="0d7128a7642d24ea879bbfb3de812b7939b618d8af639f07d5104c954c8049c3"
user.size="5674567"
# file: /path/to/file/test2.mp4
user.md5="0e29a7f555af518872771689e28d998d"
user.quality="6"
user.sha256="d49ba58e3b30f4ef8c81d19ce960edcf6552977bb8adb79b5b9a677ba9a54b2b"
user.size="15645"
All files that find locates are returned and the string to be searched from grep, in this example user.quality="10", is highlighted, but the other files test.mp4 and test2.mp4 still have the output printed post-grep. In other words, find may locate 1000 mp4 files of which maybe 20 have a user.quality="10" entry, but even applying grep to search for that string still returns 1000 filenames (after sed).
This does not happen when using \;. The only thing I would get out from grep would be:
# file: /path/to/file/test.mp4
user.md5="3c5a39f1ceefce1e124bcd6786a99155"
user.quality="10"
user.sha256="0d7128a7642d24ea879bbfb3de812b7939b618d8af639f07d5104c954c8049c3"
user.size="5674567"
This is the expected behaviour.
xargs vs find -exec
To me it seems like you want to use xargs instead of find -exec {} \; to speed things up.
Yes, xargs is faster than find -exec {} \;, not because it does the same work more efficiently, but because it does different work!
find -exec {} \; calls once for each file (getfattr file1, then getfattr file2, and so on).
xargs crams as many files into one call as possible (getfattr file1 file2 file3 ...).
The same behavior (and even more speedup) can be achieved with find -exec {} + -- no need to use xargs for that.
With xargs and find -exec {} + you loose control over the output format. There is only one call of getfattr so that program decides what to print between file1, file2 and so on. getfattr has no option to customize its output format.
No problem! You can ...
Parse getfattr's output
... pretty easily.
For starters, we assume that all path names are pretty normal. Spaces, *, and ? are ok though. For really unusual path names containing backslashes and linebreaks see the last section.
If you output only the relevant attribute using -n user.md5 instead of -d, then you know that the output (if any) for each file is always of the form
# file: path in a single line
user.md5=encoded value of the attribute
Files without the attribute user.md5 are not printed at all. They cause a warning on stderr which can be suppressed by 2> /dev/null.
Now, grep for matching attributes. Use grep -B1 to print the line above each match (i.e. the path) too. Then use sed -n or grep -o to extract the filenames.
find -type f -iname '*.mp4' -exec getfattr -n user.md5 --absolute-names {} + 2> /dev/null |
grep -B1 -Fx "user.md5=\"$input_search_hash\"" |
sed -n 's/^# file: //p'
Above command prints the paths of all mp4 files having the attribute user.md5 with value $input_search_hash.
Handling Unusual Filenames
At least my version (getfattr 2.4.48 by Andreas Gruenbacher) on Debian 10 always prints the file name in a single line. Linebreaks are encoded using \012 and backslashes are encoded using \134. Therefore, safe processing of those files is possible.
Above command works, but prints only the encoded file names. To get the actual filenames you have to extend the sed command or add another command to interpret octal escape sequences. For me, getfattr only escapes \n, \r and \\, thus sed 's:\\012:\n:g;s:\\015:\r:g;s:\\134:\\:g' should be sufficient for printing. For further processing, you may want to use tr \\n \\0 | sed -z ... instead, such that filenames are separated by null bytes.
To test which characters are escaped for you, create a filename containing all allowed bytes and let getfattr print its name:
f=$(printf $(printf '\\%o' $(seq 1 255)) | tr -d /)
touch "$f"
setfattr -n user.md5 -v 123 "$f"
getfattr -n user.md5 "$f"
rm "$f"
Related
I have json files in the current directory, and subdirectories. All the files have a single line of content.
I want to a list of all files that contain the word XYZ, and the number of times it occurs in that file.
I want to print the list according to the following format:
file_name pattern_occurence_times
It should look something like:
.\x1\x2\file1.json 3
.\x1\file3.json 2
The problem is that grep counts the NUMBER of lines containing XYZ, not the number of occurrences.
Since the whole content of the files is always contained in a single line, the count is always 1 (if the pattern occurs in the file).
I used this command for that:
find . -type f -name "*.json" -exec grep --files-with-match -i 'xyz' {} \; -exec grep -wci 'xyz' {} \;
I wrote a python code, and it works, but I would like to know if there is any way of doing that using find and grep or any other command line tools.
Thanks
The classical approach to this problem is the pipeline grep -o regex file | wc -l. However, to execute a pipeline in find's -exec you have to run a shell (e.g. sh -c ... ). But all these things together will only print the number of matches, not the file names. Also, files with no matches have to be filtered out.
Because of all of this I think a single awk command would be preferable:
find ... -type f -exec awk '{$0=tolower($0); c+=gsub(/xyz/,"")}
END {if(c>0) print FILENAME " " c}' {} \;
Here the tolower($0) emulates grep's -i option. Make sure to write your search pattern xyz only in lowercase.
If you want to combine this with subsequent filters in find you can add else exit 1 at the end of the last awk block to continue (inside find) only with the printed files.
Use the -o option of grep, e.g. in conjunction with wc, e.g.
find . -name "*.json" | while read -r f ; do
echo $f : $(grep -ow XYZ "$f" | wc -l)
done
I am wondering if there is a one liner for doing what I am looking for, or if I have to write a bash script. What I am looking to do is search recursively in a directory, if the string I am looking for is found then search that same file for another string and print it to the screen. So in this example I want to find out if the score of the "X-Spam-Status" header is between a range in the email, if it is, print out the sender or the subject header in that email.
Example:
The command I am using is:
grep 'X-Spam-Status: .* score=[5-9]\.' /var/email/example.com/example/cur/* | wc -l
Here is the header that I need to locate this information in:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=6.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
If grep finds a match in the header above, find and echo this header from the same email:
From: "From the Desk of Allen Watson" <FromtheDeskofAllenWatson#emadest.eu>
Subject: Don't Live in Fear of Loud Noises
It can be either the subject or the from. It does not need to be both.
This solution first uses a find, which has a file filter.
To make sure, spaces in filenames are correctly handled, the switch -print0 is used to create a list of null terminated filenames.
This list is used by xargs to pass the arguments to the grep command, which outputs a null terminated line too. You can use as many xargs grep combinations as you like.
The last command in the pipe is without the -Z, if you want to read the output. In our case I just used a head -2 to output the first two lines of the file.
function grep2strings_recursive() {
if [ '0' = "$#" ]; then
echo "Usage: $FUNCNAME <dir> <string1> <string2>"
return
fi
find "$1" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -lZ "$2" | xargs -0 grep -lZ "$3" | xargs -0 head -2
}
grep2strings_recursive '/var/email/example.com/example/cur' 'X-Spam-Status: .* score=[5-9]\.' 'From'
It is important to use the null output terminators (-print0 and -Z) and the null input terminators (-0) to ensure correct behaviour in case of space/tab/newlines characters in filenames.
Something like this?
find /path/to/files -type f | xargs -i grep "searchterm" {} | grep -o "othersearchterm"
i.e.
find /path/to/files -type f | xargs -i grep "X-Spam-Status" {} | egrep -o '(From|Subject).*'
OS Linux Mint
Like the title says finally I would like to find and copy all images in a directory.
I found:
find all jpg (or JPG) files in a directory and copy them into the folder /home/joachim/neu2:
find . -iname \*.jpg -print0 | xargs -I{} -0 cp -v {} /home/joachim/neu2
and
find all image files in a direcotry:
find . -name '*' -exec file {} \; | grep -o -P '^.+: \w+ image'
My problem is first of all, I don't really understand the syntax. Could someone explain the code?
And secondly can someone connect the two codes for generating a code that does what I want ;)
Greetings and thanks in advance!
First, understand that the pipe "|" links commands piping the output of the first into the second as an argument. Your two shell codes both pipe output of the find command into other commands (grep and xargs). Let's look at those commands one after another:
First command: find
find is a program to "search for files in a directory hierarchy" (that is the explanation from find's man page). The syntax is (in this case)
find <search directory> <search pattern> <action>
In both cases the search directory is . (that is the current directory). Note that it does not just search the current directory but all its subdirectories as well (the directory hierarchy).
The search pattern accepts options -name (meaning it searches for files the name of which matches the pattern given as an argument to this option) or -iname (same as name but case insensitive) among others.
The action pattern may be -print0 (print the exact filename including its position in the given search directory, i.e. the relative or absolute path to the file) or -exec (execute the given command on the file(s), the command is to be ended with ";" and every instance of "{}" is replaced by the filename).
That is, the first shell code (first part, left of the pipe)
find . -iname \*.jpg -print0
searches all files with ending ".jpg" in the current directory hierarchy and prints their paths and names. The second one (first part)
find . -name '*' -exec file {} \;
finds all files in the current directory hierarchy and executes
file <filename>
on them. File is another command that determines and prints the file type (have a look at the man page for details, man file).
Second command: xargs
xargs is a command that "builds and exectues command lines from standard input" (man xargs), i.e. from the find output that is piped into xargs. The command that it builds and executes is in this case
cp -v {} /home/joachim/neu2"
Option -I{} defines the replacement string, i.e. every instance of {} in the command is to be replaced by the input it gets from file (that is, the filenames). Option -0 defines that input items are not terminated (seperated) by whitespace or newlines but only by a null character. This seems to be necessary when using and the standard way to deal with find output as xargs input.
The command that is built and executed is then of course the copy command with option -v (verbose) and it copies each of the filenames it gets from find to the directory.
Third command: grep
grep filters its input giving only those lines or strings that match a particular output pattern. Option -o tells grep to print only the matching string, not the entire line (see man grep), -P tells it to interpret the following pattern as a perl regexp pattern. In perl regex, ^ is the start of the line, .+ is any arbitrary string, this arbitrary should then be followed by a colon, a space, a number of alphanumeric characters (in perl regex denoted \w+) a space and the string "image". Essentially this grep command filters the file output to only output the filenames that are image files. (Read about perl regex's for instance here: http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/Perl/matching.html )
The command you actually wanted
Now what you want to do is (1) take the output of the second shell command (which lists the image files), (2) bring it into the appropriate form and (3) pipe it into the xargs command from the first shell command line (which then builds and executes the copy command you wanted). So this time we have a three (actually four) stage shell command with two pipes. Not a problem. We already have stages (1) and (3) (though in stage (3) we need to leave out the -0 option because the input is not find output any more; we need it to treat newlines as item seperators).
Stage (2) is still missing. I suggest using the cut command for this. cut changes strings py splitting them into different fields (seperated by a delimiter character in the original string) that can then be rearranged. I will choose ":" as the delimiter character (this ends the filename in the grep output, option -d':') and tell it to give us just the first field (option -f1, essentialls: print only the filename, not the part that comes after the ":"), i.e. stage (2) would then be
cut -d':' -f1
And the entire command you wanted will then be:
find . -name '*' -exec file {} \; | grep -o -P '^.+: \w+ image' | cut -d':' -f1 | xargs -I{} cp -v {} /home/joachim/neu2
Note that you can find all the man pages for instance here: http://www.linuxmanpages.com
I figured out a command only using awk that does the job as well:
find . -name '*' -exec file {} \; |
awk '{
if ($3=="image"){
print substr($1, 0, length($1)-1);
system("cp " substr($1, 0, length($1)-1) " /home/joachim/neu2" )
}
}'
the substr($1, 0, length($1)-1) is needed because in first column file returns name;
The above answer is really good. but it could take longer if it a huge directory.
here is a shorter version of it , if you already know your file extension
find . -name \*.jpg | cut -d':' -f1 | xargs -I{} cp --parents -v {} ~/testimage/
Here's another one which works like a charm.
It adds the EPOCH time to prevent overwriting files with the same name.
cd /media/myhome/'Local station'/
find . -path ./jpg -prune -o -type f -iname '*.jpg' -exec sh -c '
for file do
newname="${file##*/}"
newname="${newname%.jpg}"
mv -T -- "$file" "/media/myhome/Local station/jpg/$newname-$(date +%s).jpg"
done
' find-sh {} +
cd ~/
It's been designed by Kamil in this post here.
Find a specific type file from a directory:
find /home/user/find/data/ -name '*' -exec file {} \; | grep -o -P '^.+: \w+ image'
Copy specific type of file from one directory to another directory:
find /home/user/find/data/ -name '*' -exec file {} \; | grep -o -P '^.+: \w+ image' | cut -d':' -f1 | xargs -I{} cp -v {} /home/user/copy/data/
I have a list containing about 1000 file names to search under a directory and its subdirectories. There are hundreds of subdirs with more than 1,000,000 files. The following command will run find for 1000 times:
cat filelist.txt | while read f; do find /dir -name $f; done
Is there a much faster way to do it?
If filelist.txt has a single filename per line:
find /dir | grep -f <(sed 's#^#/#; s/$/$/; s/\([\.[\*]\|\]\)/\\\1/g' filelist.txt)
(The -f option means that grep searches for all the patterns in the given file.)
Explanation of <(sed 's#^#/#; s/$/$/; s/\([\.[\*]\|\]\)/\\\1/g' filelist.txt):
The <( ... ) is called a process subsitution, and is a little similar to $( ... ). The situation is equivalent to (but using the process substitution is neater and possibly a little faster):
sed 's#^#/#; s/$/$/; s/\([\.[\*]\|\]\)/\\\1/g' filelist.txt > processed_filelist.txt
find /dir | grep -f processed_filelist.txt
The call to sed runs the commands s#^#/#, s/$/$/ and s/\([\.[\*]\|\]\)/\\\1/g on each line of filelist.txt and prints them out. These commands convert the filenames into a format that will work better with grep.
s#^#/# means put a / at the before each filename. (The ^ means "start of line" in a regex)
s/$/$/ means put a $ at the end of each filename. (The first $ means "end of line", the second is just a literal $ which is then interpreted by grep to mean "end of line").
The combination of these two rules means that grep will only look for matches like .../<filename>, so that a.txt doesn't match ./a.txt.backup or ./abba.txt.
s/\([\.[\*]\|\]\)/\\\1/g puts a \ before each occurrence of . [ ] or *. Grep uses regexes and those characters are considered special, but we want them to be plain so we need to escape them (if we didn't escape them, then a file name like a.txt would match files like abtxt).
As an example:
$ cat filelist.txt
file1.txt
file2.txt
blah[2012].txt
blah[2011].txt
lastfile
$ sed 's#^#/#; s/$/$/; s/\([\.[\*]\|\]\)/\\\1/g' filelist.txt
/file1\.txt$
/file2\.txt$
/blah\[2012\]\.txt$
/blah\[2011\]\.txt$
/lastfile$
Grep then uses each line of that output as a pattern when it is searching the output of find.
If filelist.txt is a plain list:
$ find /dir | grep -F -f filelist.txt
If filelist.txt is a pattern list:
$ find /dir | grep -f filelist.txt
Use xargs(1) for the while loop can be a bit faster than in bash.
Like this
xargs -a filelist.txt -I filename find /dir -name filename
Be careful if the file names in filelist.txt contains whitespaces, read the second paragraph in the DESCRIPTION section of xargs(1) manpage about this problem.
An improvement based on some assumptions. For example, a.txt is in filelist.txt, and you can make sure there is only one a.txt in /dir. Then you can tell find(1) to exit early when it finds the instance.
xargs -a filelist.txt -I filename find /dir -name filename -print -quit
Another solution. You can pre-process the filelist.txt, make it into a find(1) arguments list like this. This will reduce find(1) invocations:
find /dir -name 'a.txt' -or -name 'b.txt' -or -name 'c.txt'
I'm not entirely sure of the question here, but I came to this page after trying to find a way to discover which 4 of 13000 files had failed to copy.
Neither of the answers did it for me so I did this:
cp file-list file-list2
find dir/ >> file-list2
sort file-list2 | uniq -u
Which resulted with a list of the 4 files I needed.
The idea is to combine the two file lists to determine the unique entries.
sort is used to make duplicate entries adjacent to each other which is the only way uniq will filter them out.
After a few searches from Google, what I come up with is:
find my_folder -type f -exec grep -l "needle text" {} \; -exec file {} \; | grep text
which is very unhandy and outputs unneeded texts such as mime type information. Any better solutions? I have lots of images and other binary files in the same folder with a lot of text files that I need to search through.
I know this is an old thread, but I stumbled across it and thought I'd share my method which I have found to be a very fast way to use find to find only non-binary files:
find . -type f -exec grep -Iq . {} \; -print
The -I option to grep tells it to immediately ignore binary files and the . option along with the -q will make it immediately match text files so it goes very fast. You can change the -print to a -print0 for piping into an xargs -0 or something if you are concerned about spaces (thanks for the tip, #lucas.werkmeister!)
Also the first dot is only necessary for certain BSD versions of find such as on OS X, but it doesn't hurt anything just having it there all the time if you want to put this in an alias or something.
EDIT: As #ruslan correctly pointed out, the -and can be omitted since it is implied.
Based on this SO question :
grep -rIl "needle text" my_folder
Why is it unhandy? If you need to use it often, and don't want to type it every time just define a bash function for it:
function findTextInAsciiFiles {
# usage: findTextInAsciiFiles DIRECTORY NEEDLE_TEXT
find "$1" -type f -exec grep -l "$2" {} \; -exec file {} \; | grep text
}
put it in your .bashrc and then just run:
findTextInAsciiFiles your_folder "needle text"
whenever you want.
EDIT to reflect OP's edit:
if you want to cut out mime informations you could just add a further stage to the pipeline that filters out mime informations. This should do the trick, by taking only what comes before :: cut -d':' -f1:
function findTextInAsciiFiles {
# usage: findTextInAsciiFiles DIRECTORY NEEDLE_TEXT
find "$1" -type f -exec grep -l "$2" {} \; -exec file {} \; | grep text | cut -d ':' -f1
}
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 file | grep -P text | cut -d: -f1 | xargs grep -Pil "search"
This is unfortunately not space save. Putting this into bash script makes it a bit easier.
This is space safe:
#!/bin/bash
#if [ ! "$1" ] ; then
echo "Usage: $0 <search>";
exit
fi
find . -type f -print0 \
| xargs -0 file \
| grep -P text \
| cut -d: -f1 \
| xargs -i% grep -Pil "$1" "%"
Another way of doing this:
# find . |xargs file {} \; |grep "ASCII text"
If you want empty files too:
# find . |xargs file {} \; |egrep "ASCII text|empty"
How about this:
$ grep -rl "needle text" my_folder | tr '\n' '\0' | xargs -r -0 file | grep -e ':[^:]*text[^:]*$' | grep -v -e 'executable'
If you want the filenames without the file types, just add a final sed filter.
$ grep -rl "needle text" my_folder | tr '\n' '\0' | xargs -r -0 file | grep -e ':[^:]*text[^:]*$' | grep -v -e 'executable' | sed 's|:[^:]*$||'
You can filter-out unneeded file types by adding more -e 'type' options to the last grep command.
EDIT:
If your xargs version supports the -d option, the commands above become simpler:
$ grep -rl "needle text" my_folder | xargs -d '\n' -r file | grep -e ':[^:]*text[^:]*$' | grep -v -e 'executable' | sed 's|:[^:]*$||'
Here's how I've done it ...
1 . make a small script to test if a file is plain text
istext:
#!/bin/bash
[[ "$(file -bi $1)" == *"file"* ]]
2 . use find as before
find . -type f -exec istext {} \; -exec grep -nHi mystring {} \;
Here's a simplified version with extended explanation for beginners like me who are trying to learn how to put more than one command in one line.
If you were to write out the problem in steps, it would look like this:
// For every file in this directory
// Check the filetype
// If it's an ASCII file, then print out the filename
To achieve this, we can use three UNIX commands: find, file, and grep.
find will check every file in the directory.
file will give us the filetype. In our case, we're looking for a return of 'ASCII text'
grep will look for the keyword 'ASCII' in the output from file
So how can we string these together in a single line? There are multiple ways to do it, but I find that doing it in order of our pseudo-code makes the most sense (especially to a beginner like me).
find ./ -exec file {} ";" | grep 'ASCII'
Looks complicated, but not bad when we break it down:
find ./ = look through every file in this directory. The find command prints out the filename of any file that matches the 'expression', or whatever comes after the path, which in our case is the current directory or ./
The most important thing to understand is that everything after that first bit is going to be evaluated as either True or False. If True, the file name will get printed out. If not, then the command moves on.
-exec = this flag is an option within the find command that allows us to use the result of some other command as the search expression. It's like calling a function within a function.
file {} = the command being called inside of find. The file command returns a string that tells you the filetype of a file. Regularly, it would look like this: file mytextfile.txt. In our case, we want it to use whatever file is being looked at by the find command, so we put in the curly braces {} to act as an empty variable, or parameter. In other words, we're just asking for the system to output a string for every file in the directory.
";" = this is required by find and is the punctuation mark at the end of our -exec command. See the manual for 'find' for more explanation if you need it by running man find.
| grep 'ASCII' = | is a pipe. Pipe take the output of whatever is on the left and uses it as input to whatever is on the right. It takes the output of the find command (a string that is the filetype of a single file) and tests it to see if it contains the string 'ASCII'. If it does, it returns true.
NOW, the expression to the right of find ./ will return true when the grep command returns true. Voila.
I have two issues with histumness' answer:
It only list text files. It does not actually search them as
requested. To actually search, use
find . -type f -exec grep -Iq . {} \; -and -print0 | xargs -0 grep "needle text"
It spawns a grep process for every file, which is very slow. A better solution is then
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -IZl . | xargs -0 grep "needle text"
or simply
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -I "needle text"
This only takes 0.2s compared to 4s for solution above (2.5GB data / 7700 files), i.e. 20x faster.
Also, nobody cited ag, the Silver Searcher or ack-grep¸as alternatives. If one of these are available, they are much better alternatives:
ag -t "needle text" # Much faster than ack
ack -t "needle text" # or ack-grep
As a last note, beware of false positives (binary files taken as text files). I already had false positive using either grep/ag/ack, so better list the matched files first before editing the files.
Although it is an old question, I think this info bellow will add to the quality of the answers here.
When ignoring files with the executable bit set, I just use this command:
find . ! -perm -111
To keep it from recursively enter into other directories:
find . -maxdepth 1 ! -perm -111
No need for pipes to mix lots of commands, just the powerful plain find command.
Disclaimer: it is not exactly what OP asked, because it doesn't check if the file is binary or not. It will, for example, filter out bash script files, that are text themselves but have the executable bit set.
That said, I hope this is useful to anyone.
I do it this way:
1) since there're too many files (~30k) to search thru, I generate the text file list daily for use via crontab using below command:
find /to/src/folder -type f -exec file {} \; | grep text | cut -d: -f1 > ~/.src_list &
2) create a function in .bashrc:
findex() {
cat ~/.src_list | xargs grep "$*" 2>/dev/null
}
Then I can use below command to do the search:
findex "needle text"
HTH:)
I prefer xargs
find . -type f | xargs grep -I "needle text"
if your filenames are weird look up using the -0 options:
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -I "needle text"
bash example to serach text "eth0" in /etc in all text/ascii files
grep eth0 $(find /etc/ -type f -exec file {} \; | egrep -i "text|ascii" | cut -d ':' -f1)
If you are interested in finding any file type by their magic bytes using the awesome file utility combined with power of find, this can come in handy:
$ # Let's make some test files
$ mkdir ASCII-finder
$ cd ASCII-finder
$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=binary.file bs=1M count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1048576 bytes (1.0 MB, 1.0 MiB) copied, 0.009023 s, 116 MB/s
$ file binary.file
binary.file: data
$ echo 123 > text.txt
$ # Let the magic begin
$ find -type f -print0 | \
xargs -0 -I ## bash -c 'file "$#" | grep ASCII &>/dev/null && echo "file is ASCII: $#"' -- ##
Output:
file is ASCII: ./text.txt
Legend: $ is the interactive shell prompt where we enter our commands
You can modify the part after && to call some other script or do some other stuff inline as well, i.e. if that file contains given string, cat the entire file or look for a secondary string in it.
Explanation:
find items that are files
Make xargs feed each item as a line into one liner bash
command/script
file checks type of file by magic byte, grep checks if ASCII
exists, if so, then after && your next command executes.
find prints results null separated, this is good to escape
filenames with spaces and meta-characters in it.
xargs , using -0 option, reads them null separated, -I ##
takes each record and uses as positional parameter/args to bash
script.
-- for bash ensures whatever comes after it is an argument even
if it starts with - like -c which could otherwise be interpreted
as bash option
If you need to find types other than ASCII, simply replace grep ASCII with other type, like grep "PDF document, version 1.4"
find . -type f | xargs file | grep "ASCII text" | awk -F: '{print $1}'
Use find command to list all files, use file command to verify they are text (not tar,key), finally use awk command to filter and print the result.
How about this
find . -type f|xargs grep "needle text"