I came across a new release from the Azure about identity security as mentioned in the below docs.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/fundamentals/concept-fundamentals-continuous-access-evaluation#example-flows
I would like to evaluate and integrate with my application.
Looking for more informations about the process. Any pointers/links/docs would be really appreciable.
Continuous Access Evaluation is a new security feature that enables near real-time enforcement of policies on relying parties consuming Azure AD Access Tokens when events happen in Azure AD (such as user account deletion). Rolling this feature out first for Teams and Outlook clients. For more details, please refer this blog and documentation.
Related
We have an Azure AD tenant and on-prem AD and use AD Connect to keep them in sync. I'm told that I can leverage Azure AD to implement PAM on-prem but can't find any approach on how to do this, step by step. We also do not want to use MIM since it's already at EOL and would like to avoid using another 3rd party tool.
On-prem it is no problem for us to set up the second bastion forest but we don't know how Azure AD would be able to work with this.
Thanks!
MIM (formerly Forefront Identity Manager, and Identity Lifecycle Manager before that) is a widely used service for managing user lifecycles and access rights in Active Directory.Right now, it is moving into well-earned retirement phase.
In simple terms, yes. It is no longer actively developed by Microsoft. Mainstream support for MIM ended in January 2021. Azure AD Premium customers can get extended support until 2026.
The closest replacement is, Azure AD. It has a range of features that enable simple identity and access management for internal and external users.
Azure AD is the closest substitute. By adding third-party tools you can easily replace all of MIM’s features, and add many new ones.
Note these functionalities are only available at the Azure AD Premium P2 license level.
Would suggest you follow this link to get it apply: https://www.predicagroup.com/blog/azure-ad-identity-governance/
Or you can reach out to their MS support for information or predicagorup support as well.
Here are the first steps to developing your MIM migration roadmap:
Review your MIM implementation. What are the key functionalities you use and need to migrate?
Reduce the dependency on MIM 2016 infrastructure by implementing the quick wins listed above
Consider Azure AD Identity Governance for simple governance of your cloud resources.
Enable SSO for on-premises and SaaS applications with Azure AD SSO
Evaluate Omada Identity for hybrid access governance. Start by introducing the key elements alongside your MIM implementation.
Do I have the client setup an account using their payment, contact info etc? or do I use my own account then somehow transfer everything to the client? Also, How do I give access to devs?
Thanks.
There are different strategies you can employ to decide how you want to design and organize your Subscriptions. The Subscription decision guide within the Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework for Azure can help you establish that structure.
As for granting access to others, Azure role-based access control (Azure RBAC) is a system that provides fine-grained access management of Azure resources. Using Azure RBAC, you can segregate duties within your team and grant only the amount of access to users that they need to perform their jobs. Instead of giving everybody unrestricted permissions in your Azure subscription or resources, you can allow only certain actions at a particular scope. You can further refer to the best practices for Azure RBAC doc to know more.
We will be building a couple of non-interactive scripts and console applications which will be invoking the Azure DevOps REST API to do various tasks. These apps and scripts will be executed via a job scheduler. What authentication scheme would be the correct one to use for this scenario? It seems like a PAT would work, however, I really don't want the jobs to be tied to a specific user identity and Azure DevOps does not support service principles. Is the correct approach to establish a "fake" Azure Active Directory user and use that user as the owner of the PATs? Is there something else that I am missing here?
Looking at the Authentication Guide, it seems like all of the mechanisms referenced result in some form of interactivity.
Also, we have Conditional Access Policies being enforced in our Azure DevOps organization. One of those policies is the requirement for MFA. If we use a PAT, how will that work? According to this link, it sounds like access may be blocked.
Personal access tokens (PATs) are used for personal authentication. They are alternate passwords that you can use to authenticate into Azure DevOps.
Really don't want the jobs to be tied to a specific user identity and Azure DevOps does not support service principles.
Yes, as you have pointed out. It doesn’t support to create a PAT token with a service account in Azure DevOps Service.
That would be ok to use the public fake MFA account to login Azure DevOps Service. And then use that account to generate PAT token. When request API, others simply use that generated PAT token to authenticate.
With CAP enabled the doc is clear. For Web flows, CAP is honored 100%. That means in most of the situations, Rest API will not be affected.
The limitation is third-party client flow. Some actually due to configuration of third-party. There's nothing we can do in Azure DevOps. You have to follow the policy mentioned in that link. If users do not meet IP range, it will be blocked.
I have a business requirement where Azure Subscription owner will Provision User Groups like Infrastructure Admin, Billing Admin, Enterprise Users. Ifra Admin people should login to this Portal & can only see options related to Infra provisioning. Billing Admin people should have access to Azure usage Enterprise wide - And they should be able to generate bills for respective teams(which are part of the organization). Enterprise Users are those who want to procure azure storage, VMs etc. and they want estimate cost for required infra.
I am looking out for a solution/approach for this requirement. If Azure Portal is already providing this feature then please provide me reference material. If i should build new custom Web application which internally use Azure APIs then let me know about that option as well.
If there are any products which already doing this even am open for that.
Deeply appreciating your help. Thanks a lot :)
Vishal.
Let me answer by breaking your question in 2 parts:
Managing Users - This is something you can do today in Azure. Some time ago, Azure announced Role-based access control (RBAC) and that fits the bill nicely for you as far as managing users and granting them permissions to do things. So in your scenario, the owner will create users and groups in Azure Active Directory and then put these users and groups in appropriate roles. When a user or a group member tries to manage the resources (either by logging into the portal or using other tools like Azure PowerShell Cmdlets), they will only be able to do things the role they are in allows.
Managing Billing - Though Azure Portal exposes the billing functionality (and there's a billing/usage REST API), it does not have the capability you're looking for. What you would need to do is look for ITFM (IT Financial Management) Systems that has support for Azure. Off the top of my head, two tools come to my mind - Cloudyn & Cloud Cruiser. You can learn more about it here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-in/documentation/articles/billing-usage-rate-card-overview/. You could always consume the Billing/Usage REST API to create a solution of your own. If you're writing your own solution, you may want to check out Billing Samples on GitHub.
I am trying to make my way through a lot of Azure documentation on multitenant identity management, for a bespoke ASP.NET MVC SaaS site. It is difficult as it seems that a lot of the online examples and articles are now outdated and not applicable to latest VS templates, and other vague aspects, such as determining what is Preview and what is not. Also, MS tend to use the word "multitenant" when specifically dealing with partner companies who have their own Azure AD, which is not our case.
Our proposed system will offer a web application to different customers. The backend will have a separate db per customer (tenant). The front end will select which db connection (and probably use impersonation) depending on the logged in user. The identity management would preferably be offloaded to Azure ACS, so that in future if we want to integrate with corporations with their own Federation identity provider we can, but for those smaller companies that don't have their own domain, we want to create accounts on their behalf.
I am thinking that a good way to do this is by using Azure ACS (for federating with corporate customers) and a general Azure AD directory (for everyone else), where in the second case I create a group per tenant (customer). Then, in Azure ACS, I translate all claims, either the group from my own AD, or the company name from the federated identity provider, and use that in the MVC app to establish the tenant.
Is this an OK way to do it? Am I overlooking some standard, simple way that Azure already offers? Is this future proof wrt to the Azure roadmap?
for the latest multi tenant samples please see https://github.com/Azure-samples?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=multiten. We are about to release more documentation on how to handle multi tenancy in Azure AD. I would strongly advise against using ACS in any new project, given that we are no longer adding any features and we are actively working on migrating functionality from ACS to Azure AD. See http://blogs.technet.com/b/ad/archive/2015/02/12/the-future-of-azure-acs-is-azure-active-directory.aspx for more details.