Spark Structured Streaming NOT process Kafka offset expires - apache-spark

We have Spark structured streaming app that push the data from Kafka to S3.
Spark Job runs fine for a few days then it start accumulating lag. We have Kafka topic with expiry of 6 hours. If lag increases and some of the offset starts expiring then Spark cannot find the offset and it starts logging following warning. On the surface Spark job seems be running but it is NOT processing any data. When I try to manually restart the system I am getting GC issues (Seen in the screen shot below). I have set "failOnDataLoss" to "false". We want system to not STOP processing when offsets are not found. I do not see any error in the logs except the warning mentioned below.
Only warn we see is this:
The current available offset range is AvailableOffsetRange(34066048,34444327).
Offset 34005119 is out of range, and records in [34005119, 34006993) will be
skipped (GroupId: spark-kafka-source-6b17001a-01ff-4c10-8877-7677cdbbecfc--1295174908-executor, TopicPartition: DataPipelineCopy-46).
Some data may have been lost because they are not available in Kafka any more; either the
data was aged out by Kafka or the topic may have been deleted before all the data in the
topic was processed. If you want your streaming query to fail on such cases, set the source
option "failOnDataLoss" to "true".
20/05/17 17:16:30 INFO Fetcher: [Consumer clientId=consumer-7, groupId=spark-kafka-source-6b17001a-01ff-4c10-8877-7677cdbbecfc--1295174908-executor] Resetting offset for partition DataPipelineCopy-1 to offset 34444906.
20/05/17 17:16:30 WARN InternalKafkaConsumer: Some data may be lost. Recovering from the earliest offset: 34068782
20/05/17 17:16:30 WARN InternalKafkaConsumer:
The current available offset range is AvailableOffsetRange(34068782,34444906).
Offset 34005698 is out of range, and records in [34005698, 34007572) will be
skipped (GroupId: spark-kafka-source-6b17001a-01ff-4c10-8877-7677cdbbecfc--1295174908-executor, TopicPartition: DataPipelineCopy-1).
Some data may have been lost because they are not available in Kafka any more; either the
data was aged out by Kafka or the topic may have been deleted before all the data in the
topic was processed. If you want your streaming query to fail on such cases, set the source
option "failOnDataLoss" to "true".
ome data may have been lost because they are not available in Kafka any more; either the
data was aged out by Kafka or the topic may have been deleted before all the data in the
topic was processed. If you want your streaming query to fail on such cases, set the source
option "failOnDataLoss" to "true".
org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.OffsetOutOfRangeException: Offsets out of range with no configured reset policy for partitions: {DataPipelineCopy-1=34005698}
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.internals.Fetcher.parseCompletedFetch(Fetcher.java:970)
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.internals.Fetcher.fetchedRecords(Fetcher.java:490)
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.KafkaConsumer.pollForFetches(KafkaConsumer.java:1259)
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.KafkaConsumer.poll(KafkaConsumer.java:1187)
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.KafkaConsumer.poll(KafkaConsumer.java:1115)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer.fetchData(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:470)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer.org$apache$spark$sql$kafka010$InternalKafkaConsumer$$fetchRecord(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:361)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer$$anonfun$get$1.apply(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:251)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer$$anonfun$get$1.apply(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:234)
at org.apache.spark.util.UninterruptibleThread.runUninterruptibly(UninterruptibleThread.scala:77)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer.runUninterruptiblyIfPossible(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:209)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer.get(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:234)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaDataConsumer$class.get(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:64)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaDataConsumer$CachedKafkaDataConsumer.get(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:500)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaMicroBatchInputPartitionReader.next(KafkaMicroBatchReader.scala:357)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.v2.DataSourceRDD$$anon$1.hasNext(DataSourceRDD.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.InterruptibleIterator.hasNext(InterruptibleIterator.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$13$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:636)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage2.processNext(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$13$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:636)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeExternalRowSorter.sort(UnsafeExternalRowSorter.java:216)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SortExec$$anonfun$1.apply(SortExec.scala:108)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SortExec$$anonfun$1.apply(SortExec.scala:101)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:836)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$24.apply(RDD.scala:836)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:52)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:123)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner$$anonfun$10.apply(Executor.scala:408)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinally(Utils.scala:1360)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:414)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
20/05/17 17:16:30 WARN ConsumerConfig: The configuration 'consumer.commit.groupid' was supplied but isn't a known config.
20/05/17 17:16:30 INFO AppInfoParser: Kafka version : 2.0.0
Before above failure system seems to be working just fine, BUT NOT PROCESSING ANY NEW DATA FROM KAFKA.

"The current available offset range is AvailableOffsetRange(34066048,34444327). Offset 34005119 is out of range"
It seems your program is processing the records much slower than you expect it to. causing the logs from kafka to get deleted due to retention may be . can you check what is the retention you have set. The offset your job is looking for certainly less than the available offset range.

It seems the records been remarked as "unvisible",before your app (kafka comsumer) processing them. as mentions What determines Kafka consumer offset?
my solutions:
1.create a new consumer group and restart your app.(your kafka confsumer offset policy set to earliest at first)
2.if step1 isn't work increase the kafka log retention window ( kafka broker parameters: log.retention.hours or log.retention.ms or log.cleaner.delete.retentions.ms , that rely on your product env).
and step2 works fine for me.

Related

Recovering from "Offsets out of range with no configured reset policy for partitions"

I've got Spark Structured Streaming application (Spark 2.4.5) which is consuming from Kafka. The application was down for a bit, but when I restarted it I get the below error.
I fully understand why I'm getting the error, and I'm ok with that. But I cannot seem to get around it. Based on the logs I see "Recovering from the earliest offset: 1234332978" but this does seem to be happening. I've tried deleting the 'source' folder in my checkpoint location which also didn't help.
My code is using a mapGroupWithState function, so I do have State data which I don't want to lose, as a result deleting the entire Checkpoint directory isn't my preferred approach.
I have set:
.option("failOnDataLoss", false)
.option("startingOffsets", "latest")
But it seems this only applies to new partitions.
Is there a way to tell Spark to just accept that there are missing offsets and continue? Or some approach to delete the offset data manually without impacting the application 'state'?
20/07/29 01:02:40 WARN InternalKafkaConsumer: Cannot fetch offset 1215191190 (GroupId: spark-kafka-source-f9562fca-ab0c-4f7a-93c3-20506cbcdeb7--1440771761-executor, TopicPartition: cmusstats-0).
Some data may have been lost because they are not available in Kafka any more; either the
data was aged out by Kafka or the topic may have been deleted before all the data in the
topic was processed. If you want your streaming query to fail on such cases, set the source
option "failOnDataLoss" to "true".
org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.OffsetOutOfRangeException: Offsets out of range with no configured reset policy for partitions: {cmusstats-0=1215191190}
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.internals.Fetcher.parseCompletedFetch(Fetcher.java:970)
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.internals.Fetcher.fetchedRecords(Fetcher.java:490)
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.KafkaConsumer.pollForFetches(KafkaConsumer.java:1259)
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.KafkaConsumer.poll(KafkaConsumer.java:1187)
at org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.KafkaConsumer.poll(KafkaConsumer.java:1115)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer.fetchData(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:470)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer.org$apache$spark$sql$kafka010$InternalKafkaConsumer$$fetchRecord(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:361)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer$$anonfun$get$1.apply(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:251)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer$$anonfun$get$1.apply(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:234)
at org.apache.spark.util.UninterruptibleThread.runUninterruptibly(UninterruptibleThread.scala:77)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer.runUninterruptiblyIfPossible(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:209)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.InternalKafkaConsumer.get(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:234)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaDataConsumer$class.get(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:64)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaDataConsumer$CachedKafkaDataConsumer.get(KafkaDataConsumer.scala:500)
at org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaMicroBatchInputPartitionReader.next(KafkaMicroBatchReader.scala:357)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.v2.DataSourceRDD$$anon$1.hasNext(DataSourceRDD.scala:49)
at org.apache.spark.InterruptibleIterator.hasNext(InterruptibleIterator.scala:37)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$13$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:636)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:462)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.write(BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.java:125)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:99)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:55)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:123)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner$$anonfun$10.apply(Executor.scala:408)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinally(Utils.scala:1360)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:414)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
20/07/29 01:02:40 WARN InternalKafkaConsumer: Some data may be lost. Recovering from the earliest offset: 1234332978
20/07/29 01:02:40 WARN InternalKafkaConsumer:
The current available offset range is AvailableOffsetRange(1234332978,1328165875).
Offset 1215191190 is out of range, and records in [1215191190, 1215691190) will be
skipped (GroupId: spark-kafka-source-f9562fca-ab0c-4f7a-93c3-20506cbcdeb7--1440771761-executor, TopicPartition: cmusstats-0).
Some data may have been lost because they are not available in Kafka any more; either the
data was aged out by Kafka or the topic may have been deleted before all the data in the
topic was processed. If you want your streaming query to fail on such cases, set the source
option "failOnDataLoss" to "true".
It turns out, that the Structured Streaming application recovered eventually. For a period of time, many errors about 'Cannot fetch offset' were being logged. But after a period of time the processing continued with the earliest offset.
I cannot explain why I got so many of these errors before the processing starting continuing but it did continue in the end.

Spark can not recover from checkpoint ProvisionedThroughputExceededException: Rate exceeded for shard shardId

I have a spark application which consume from Kinesis with 6 shards. Data was produced to Kinesis at at most 2000 records/second. At non peak time data only comes in at 200 records/second. Each record is 0.5K Bytes. So 6 shards is enough to handle that.
I am using EMR 5.23.0, Spark 2.4.0, spark-streaming-kinesis-asl 2.4.0
I have 6 r5.4xLarge in my cluster, plenty of memory
Recently I am trying to checkpoint the application to S3. I am testing this at nonpeak time so the data incoming rate is very low like 200 records/sec. I run the Spark application by creating new context, checkpoint is created at s3, but when I kill the app and restarts, it failed to recover from checkpoint, and the error message is the following and my SparkUI shows all the batches are stucked:
19/12/24 00:15:21 WARN TaskSetManager: Lost task 571.0 in stage 33.0 (TID 4452, ip-172-17-32-11.ec2.internal, executor 9): org.apache.spark.SparkException: Gave up after 3 retries while getting shard iterator from sequence number 49601654074184110438492229476281538439036626028298502210, last exception:
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator$$anonfun$retryOrTimeout$2.apply(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:288)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator.retryOrTimeout(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:282)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator.getKinesisIterator(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:246)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator.getRecords(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:206)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator.getNext(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:162)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator.getNext(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:133)
at org.apache.spark.util.NextIterator.hasNext(NextIterator.scala:73)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$12.hasNext(Iterator.scala:439)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:462)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:187)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:99)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:55)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner$$anonfun$10.apply(Executor.scala:402)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinally(Utils.scala:1360)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:408)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.model.ProvisionedThroughputExceededException: Rate exceeded for shard shardId-000000000004 in stream my-stream-name under account my-account-number. (Service: AmazonKinesis; Status Code: 400; Error Code: ProvisionedThroughputExceededException; Request ID: e368b876-c315-d0f0-b513-e2af2bd14525)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.handleErrorResponse(AmazonHttpClient.java:1712)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeOneRequest(AmazonHttpClient.java:1367)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeHelper(AmazonHttpClient.java:1113)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.doExecute(AmazonHttpClient.java:770)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeWithTimer(AmazonHttpClient.java:744)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:726)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.access$500(AmazonHttpClient.java:686)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutionBuilderImpl.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:668)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:532)
at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:512)
at com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient.doInvoke(AmazonKinesisClient.java:2782)
at com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient.invoke(AmazonKinesisClient.java:2749)
at com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient.invoke(AmazonKinesisClient.java:2738)
at com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient.executeGetShardIterator(AmazonKinesisClient.java:1383)
at com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient.getShardIterator(AmazonKinesisClient.java:1355)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator$$anonfun$3.apply(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:247)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator$$anonfun$3.apply(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:247)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kinesis.KinesisSequenceRangeIterator.retryOrTimeout(KinesisBackedBlockRDD.scala:269)
... 20 more
My batch interval is 2.5 minutes, and I create the stream the regular way:
val kinesisStreams = (0 until 6).map { i =>
KinesisUtils.createStream(ssc, "MyKinesisStreamName", settings.kinesis_stream, settings.kinesis_endpoint, settings.kinesis_region, settings.kinesis_initial_position, Milliseconds(settings.spark_batchinterval_seconds*1000), StorageLevel.MEMORY_AND_DISK)
}
val unionStreams = ssc.union(kinesisStreams)
.map(linebytes => new String(linebytes, "UTF-8").replace("\"", ""))
Someone reported the same problem and does not seem to have an answer:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spark-issues/201807.mbox/%3CJIRA.13175528.1532948992000.116869.1532949000171#Atlassian.JIRA%3E
Checkpointing records with Amazon KCL throws ProvisionedThroughputExceededException
Since Spark consuming from Kinesis with checkpoint are such a common thing in many Spark application, I am wondering whether I did anything wrong? Is there any other person experiencing the same and how to resolve this?
I am wondering if this is because my batch interval 2.5 minutes (150 seconds) is too long? because 150 seconds*200 record/second = 30000 records per batch and when checkpoint recovery is trying to load 30000 records from kinesis it will throw the error? Should I increase my shard count to 30 from 6?
Please help, I have to find an answer so this is frustrating.
Appreciate your help.

Is there any parameter partitioning when Spark reads RDBMS through JDBC?

When I run the spark application for table synchronization, the error message is as follows:
19/10/16 01:37:40 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 0.0 in stage 3.0 (TID 51)
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.
at com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.SQLError.createCommunicationsException(SQLError.java:590)
at com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.SQLExceptionsMapping.translateException(SQLExceptionsMapping.java:57)
at com.mysql.cj.jdbc.ConnectionImpl.createNewIO(ConnectionImpl.java:1606)
at com.mysql.cj.jdbc.ConnectionImpl.<init>(ConnectionImpl.java:633)
at com.mysql.cj.jdbc.ConnectionImpl.getInstance(ConnectionImpl.java:347)
at com.mysql.cj.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:219)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.DriverWrapper.connect(DriverWrapper.scala:45)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JdbcUtils$$anonfun$createConnectionFactory$1.apply(JdbcUtils.scala:63)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JdbcUtils$$anonfun$createConnectionFactory$1.apply(JdbcUtils.scala:54)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JDBCRDD.compute(JDBCRDD.scala:272)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:52)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:324)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:288)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:90)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner$$anonfun$10.apply(Executor.scala:408)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinally(Utils.scala:1360)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:414)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
I think this is caused by the large amount of data in the table. I used the parameters related to the mongo partition before,such as:spark.mongodb.input.partitioner,spark.mongodb.input.partitionerOptions.partitionSizeMB
I want to know if Spark has similar parameters for partitioning when reading RDBMS via JDBC?
Below are the parameters along with their description which we can use while reading the RDBMS table using spark jdbc.
partitionColumn, lowerBound, upperBound -These options must all be specified if any of them is specified. In addition, numPartitions must be specified. They describe how to partition the table when reading in parallel from multiple workers. partitionColumn must be a numeric, date, or timestamp column from the table in question. Notice that lowerBound and upperBound are just used to decide the partition stride, not for filtering the rows in table. So all rows in the table will be partitioned and returned. This option applies only to reading.
numPartitions-The maximum number of partitions that can be used for parallelism in table reading and writing. This also determines the maximum number of concurrent JDBC connections. If the number of partitions to write exceeds this limit, we decrease it to this limit by calling coalesce(numPartitions) before writing.
fetchsize - The JDBC fetch size, which determines how many rows to fetch per round trip. This can help performance on JDBC drivers which default to low fetch size (eg. Oracle with 10 rows). This option applies only to reading.
Please note that all the above parameters should be used in together. Below is an example:-
spark.read.format("jdbc").
option("driver", driver).
option("url",url ).
option("partitionColumn",column name).
option("lowerBound", 10).
option("upperBound", 10000).
option("numPartitions", 10).
option("fetchsize",1000).
option("dbtable", query).
option("user", user).
option("password",password).load()

Spark 2 application failed with Couldn't find leader offsets for Error

I have my spark applciation reading data from Kafka and ingesting into Kudu. It has run successfully for almost 25hrs and ingested data into Kudu. After that, I see new leader was elected for kafka partitions from kafka logs. My application went into FINISHED state with the following error,
org.apache.spark.SparkException: ArrayBuffer(kafka.common.NotLeaderForPartitionException, org.apache.spark.SparkException: Couldn't find leader offsets for Set([test,0]))
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka.DirectKafkaInputDStream.latestLeaderOffsets(DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala:133)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka.DirectKafkaInputDStream.compute(DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala:158)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.DStream$$anonfun$getOrCompute$1$$anonfun$1$$anonfun$apply$7.apply(DStream.scala:342)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.DStream$$anonfun$getOrCompute$1$$anonfun$1$$anonfun$apply$7.apply(DStream.scala:342)
at scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:58)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.DStream$$anonfun$getOrCompute$1$$anonfun$1.apply(DStream.scala:341)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.DStream$$anonfun$getOrCompute$1$$anonfun$1.apply(DStream.scala:341)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.DStream.createRDDWithLocalProperties(DStream.scala:416)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.DStream$$anonfun$getOrCompute$1.apply(DStream.scala:336)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.DStream$$anonfun$getOrCompute$1.apply(DStream.scala:334)
at scala.Option.orElse(Option.scala:289)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.DStream.getOrCompute(DStream.scala:331)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.dstream.ForEachDStream.generateJob(ForEachDStream.scala:48)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.DStreamGraph$$anonfun$1.apply(DStreamGraph.scala:122)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.DStreamGraph$$anonfun$1.apply(DStreamGraph.scala:121)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:241)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$flatMap$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:241)
at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray$class.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:59)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:48)
at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.flatMap(TraversableLike.scala:241)
at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.flatMap(Traversable.scala:104)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.DStreamGraph.generateJobs(DStreamGraph.scala:121)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.scheduler.JobGenerator$$anonfun$3.apply(JobGenerator.scala:249)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.scheduler.JobGenerator$$anonfun$3.apply(JobGenerator.scala:247)
at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.scheduler.JobGenerator.generateJobs(JobGenerator.scala:247)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.scheduler.JobGenerator.org$apache$spark$streaming$scheduler$JobGenerator$$processEvent(JobGenerator.scala:183)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.scheduler.JobGenerator$$anon$1.onReceive(JobGenerator.scala:89)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.scheduler.JobGenerator$$anon$1.onReceive(JobGenerator.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.util.EventLoop$$anon$1.run(EventLoop.scala:48)
Does it mean that, whenever a new leader is elected Spark application will fail?
I have seen a lot of posts on Stackoverflow where everyone said that they are not able to launch the application with this error. But, in my case, it ran for 25hrs and then FINISHED.
Any thoughts on what might have gone wrong? I searched on Kafka issues with no luck related to this.
The exception is thrown when the count of the topicPartition expected by the spark streaming doesn't match with the topic partition provided by simple Kafka client [Used by spark to get the topicPartition-Leader offsets].
So by the time Spark Streaming requested for the offsets, the leader for topicPartition [test, 0] was not available. Hence Spark threw the exception message. What version of Spark and Kafka are you using?

SparkStreaming+Kafka: Failed to get records after polling for 60000

I'm doing Spark Streaming over Kafka. The streaming job starts fine and runs for a few hours before it runs into the following issue:
17/05/18 03:44:47 ERROR Executor: Exception in task 8.0 in stage 1864.0 (TID 27968)
java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed: Failed to get records for spark-executor-c10f4ea9-a1c6-4a9f-b87f-8d6ff66e10a5 madlytics-rt_1 3 1150964759 after polling for 60000
at scala.Predef$.assert(Predef.scala:170)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka010.CachedKafkaConsumer.get(CachedKafkaConsumer.scala:74)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka010.KafkaRDD$KafkaRDDIterator.next(KafkaRDD.scala:227)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka010.KafkaRDD$KafkaRDDIterator.next(KafkaRDD.scala:193)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:462)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:461)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:461)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:461)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:461)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:461)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
at org.apache.spark.util.collection.ExternalSorter.insertAll(ExternalSorter.scala:192)
at org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.SortShuffleWriter.write(SortShuffleWriter.scala:63)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:86)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Also, i increased the values of heartbeat.interval.ms, session.timeout.ms and request.timeout.ms appropriately as suggested here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19275
Given below are some relevant configs:
batch.interval = 60s
spark.streaming.kafka.consumer.poll.ms = 60000
session.timeout.ms = 60000 (default: 30000)
heartbeat.interval.ms = 6000 (default: 3000)
request.timeout.ms = 90000 (default: 40000)
Also, the Kafka cluster is a 5 node one, and the topic that i'm reading has 15 partitions. Some other Kafka configs are listed below:
num.network.threads=8
num.io.threads=8
Any help will be much appreciated. Thanks.
I solved the issue using a simple configuration change which was quite apparent but it took me sometime to realize how such a default (mis)configuration could be left untreated.
The primary issue is Spark config spark.streaming.kafka.consumer.poll.ms (default 512ms in KafkaRDD) or spark.network.timeout (default 120sec, if spark.streaming.kafka.consumer.poll.ms is not set) is always less than Kafka consumer request.timeout.ms (default 305000ms in Kafka newconsumerapi) ... hence spark polling always times out before timeout happens at Kafka consumer request/poll (when there are no records available in Kafka topic).
Simply increasing spark.streaming.kafka.consumer.poll.ms to a value greater than Kafka request.timeout.ms should do the trick. Also adjust Kafka consumer max.poll.interval.ms to be always less than request.timeout.ms.
Q.E.D and Good luck.
In my experience this particular failure is a symptom of a Kafka cluster which is overloaded. The usual suspects are always GC worldstops and threads starving.
On top of this, everything might be fine with Kafka on the surface, but perhaps not.
Is it spending a lot of time rebalancing after you added a partition? Or is it maintaining a humongous offsets topic because of all the load tests you performed?
What happened to me once is that the cluster was fine on the surface, but this timeout came out here and there. On a brand new, and even smaller, cluster, this issue disappeared.

Resources