I'm on Evolus Pencil Project 3.1.0 on Linux 64x.
Both elements seem to be exactly the same?
I thought that "HTML text" could allow you to type directly with HTML tag, contrary to Richtext, but if it's not the case.
(For example, if I type in the HTML text box:
look to this link, it doesn't appear as a link)
Related
I want to add on my site a text who is writing, as in http://www.whoismrrobot.com/
I use the code <Marquee>Text Here</Marquee> but this code only rolls the text.
The effect on your example site is not achieved with the marquee tag, and it can't be done this way. I guess the site is using some combination of JavaScript, CSS and maybe server side scripting.
Generally using the marquee tag is a bad idea, as it is some remnant of the "old times", when format and content both were provided by the html page itself. Even back then the marquee tag wasn't part of the html-specification and not supported by every browser.
For further details see this description of the tag.
I have just installed lotus designer 9, and I created a new project with a notebook template. Now I am looking through forms, views, pages etc. and I can see all the controls, at the bottom I have so-called 'programmers pane', but if I wanted to put some of my own html, or adjust a little bit the existing one, I cannot.
So my question is - how do I enable html view? When I open a form, and go to View, I can see that there is an option HTML Editor, but it is grayed out, what am I missing?
HTML is not the storage format for forms, behind the scenes. Forms are stored in a proprietary rich text format, and conversion between that and HTML is not exact. So there is no "HTML view" of a Notes form.
You can type HTML text onto the form, highlight it, and designate it as "pass-thru" (Menu 'Text > Pass-Thru HTML'). If accessed via the web, the exact HTML you enter here will be included in the HTML sent to the browser. The Notes client will also convert pass-thru HTML to Notes rich text for display, provided this option has been enabled in the form properties.
I was provided some documentation in SGML format. Not being familiar with the format I searched the web to find a suitable viewer but cant seem to locate one. Is there such a thing as a modern SGML viewer?
There is no such thing as an SGML viewer, because SGML is not a "document format" (or "document type") that could be visually displayed.
SGML is a language that is used to describe a document type.
You need to look for a "viewer" for your specific document type, and not for SGML.
SGML document types
You need to find out which document type your SGML file uses, and then find a viewer for that document type. You can see which document type your SGML file uses at the very top of the SGML file, where it says <!DOCTYPE .... E.g for a file that uses the document type XHTML it looks like this:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" []>
Document types described using SGML might be:
ATA iSpec 2200 AMM
CMM (Component Maintenance Manual)
HTML4
...
(SGML document types are described by "document type definitions" (DTD).)
Viewers / Editors
Of course, for HTML the "viewer" would be a web browser.
For other formats, the "viewer" (or "editor") will often be some kind of custom software, such as Arbortext Editor with custom extensions, or custom scripts or software that converts this specific document type into e.g. PDF. There is usually some kind of "styling file" involved, like CSS or FOSI, which describes how each element should be formatted and layouted.
Sometimes, the SGML files are not meant to be displayed as a whole at all, but are used to store data or transfer data between data bases and other software, which might only display small portions of the data at once.
In my WordPress blog, I have "Posted ? days ago" on every post. I have 10 posts on my homepage. So according to most keyword analysis tools, "days ago" is a top keyword on my blog, but I don't want it to be. How can I hide those words from search engines?
I don't want to use Javascript. I can easily use PHP and the $_SERVER variable, but I'm afraid I might get penalized for cloaking. Is there a HTML tag or an attribute like rel="nofollow" that I can use?
From Is there any way to have search engines not index a certain section of a page?
Supposedly you can add the class
robots-nocontent to elements on your
page, like this:
<div class="robots-nocontent">
<p>Ignore this stuff.</p>
</div>
Yahoo respects this, though I
don't know if other search engines
respect this. It appears Google is
not supporting this at this time.
I suspect if you load your content via
ajax you would get the same effect of
it not being present on the page.
and
There's no general way to do that and
personally I wouldn't bother with it.
Search engines are pretty good at
recognizing relevant content on a
page, and even though that content
might show up in the keywords that
search engines have found, it doesn't
mean that it would make the page
relevant for those keywords.
If you have a page about "Fish" and a
page about "Dogs" (that has the link
to the page about "Fish" somewhere in
the sidebar), search engines will
generally be able to recognize that
the page about "Fish" is much more
relevant for "Fish" than the page
about "Dogs" that mentions "Fish" in
the sidebar. It's possible that both
pages might be found at some point,
but generally given that mostly one
page from the site is shown in the
search results, that's not something
worth worrying about.
There's no need to be fancy with that,
and search engines are likely to just
get more confused if you try (eg if
you use JavaScript to hide the
content, you never know when search
engines will start to find that
content regardless). Similarly, using
iframes with robots.txt disallows or
AJAX will frequently degrade the
quality of your pages to users (slow
it down or make it less usable on a
variety of devices), so unless there
is a very, very strong & proven reason
that you need to do this, I would
strongly recommend not bothering with
it.
What I have found on wiki:
For Yandex:
<!--noindex-->Don't index this text.<!--/noindex-->
For Yahoo:
<div class="robots-nocontent">Don't index this text.</div>
For Google:
<!--googleoff: index--> Don't index this text.<!--googleon: index-->
Linksku, I'm fairly sure you shouldn't be worried about that particular piece of text. Our algorithms do a relatively good job detecting boilerplate text. As far as I can tell from your question, this text is boilerplate and we likely already know that.
As for detecting Googlebot and don't serving this text for it, you're right, that would be cloaking and you should never do it. In this case if you hide that text from us, we will also have a hard time detecting it's boilerplate and you would end up doing exactly what you're trying to avoid :)
I worked this out and posted it up at: http://www.scivillage.com/thread-2580.html
This should work, however more testing of it and feedback would be appreciated.
.x:before{
content:attr(title);
display:inline;
}
<ul>
<li><span class="x" title="Homepage"></span></li>
<li><span class="x" title="Contact" /></li>
</ul>
(I kept the class name short to reduce mark-up creep)
The search engines should ignore HTML tags with empty values when comes to looking for keywords, this should mean that it ignores what is written in the title attribute. (It assumes that the value is what's important, if it's empty then there is no point checking the attributes)
It was suggested that it's possible to negate having the closing tag in HTML5 due reduced strictness, however there is counter suggestions that end tags are still required.
I'd suggest not using it directly on a (anchor) tags since they can be used for sitemaps (using #), so it's means they would like have the Title spidered.
Although it is possible that it might assume any title content is there to inflate keywords through hidden elements, however I can not confirm this.
To exclude specific text from Google search results you can add data-nosnippet attribute.
https://developers.google.com/search/reference/robots_meta_tag#data-nosnippet-attr
From google documentation
You can also prevent certain parts of the page text content from being shown in a snippet by using data-nosnippet.
HTML:
<div class="hasHiddenText">_</div>
It is important that you leave a non-whitespace character between the element with a hidden text.
External CSS:
.hasHiddenText{
content: "Your hidden text here...";
/*This ovewrites the default content of the div but it isn't supported by all browsers.*/
}
.hasHiddenText::before{
content: " Your hidden text here...";
/*Places a hidden text above the div.*/
}
The "hidden text" pertains to content hidden to all search engines but visible to visitors.
You can also use nextline and all sorts of Unicode characters by escaping them with \uXXXX. To display linebreak characters correctly, be sure to add the
white-space:pre-line;
property.
At what stage does my input in the textarea change from being this raw text, and become HTML?
For example, say I indent 4 spaces
like this
Then the WMD Showdown.js will render it properly below this textarea I type in. But the text area still literally contains
like this
So is PHP server side responsible for translating all the same things the showdown.js does to permanently be HTML in the SoF Database?
There are some other posts here about this, but basically it works like this. Or at least this is how I do it on my website using WMD; see my profile if you're interested in checking out my WMD implementation.
User enters the Markdown on the client, and showdown.js runs in real time in the browser (pure client-side JavaScript; no AJAX or anything like that) to give the user the preview.
Then when the user posts to the server, WMD sends the Markdown (you have to configure WMD to do this though; by default WMD sends HTML).
Run showdown.js server-side to convert the Markdown to HTML. In theory you could use some other method but it makes sense to try to get the same transformation on the server that the user sees on the client, other than any HTML tag filtering you want to do server-side.
As just noted, you'll need to do appropriate HTML tag filtering to avoid cross-site scripting (XSS) issues. This is both important and nontrivial, so be careful.
Save both the Markdown and the HTML in the database—the Markdown because if users want to edit their posts, you want to give them the Markdown, and the HTML so you don't have to transform Markdown to HTML every time you display answers.
Here are some related posts.
Convert HTML back to Markdown for editing in wmd: Tells how to configure WMD to send Markdown to the server instead of HTML.
What HTML tags are allowed on Stack Overflow?: Useful for thinking about HTML tag filtering.
Well first of all StackOverflow is built on ASP.NET, but yes essentially the characters in the rich text box gets translated back and forth.