I'm trying to create my own custom testing framework for learning purpose. Test files are written in following way
import { somemethod } from './some/module'
test(/I click on a button)/, () => {
browser.get("someSelector").should("have.text",somemethod());
});
I user require(file) to load test files. But it throw error SyntaxError: Unexpected token {
for import statement in test file. I'm using node js version 11.15.
If I switch to node v13.14 and define "type": "module" in my package.json then it doesn't let me use require(file) to load a test file or any module in my package.
How can I import tests files considering the user may be importing the modules using import or require?
This answer is very empirical...
Considering that it works using canonical commonjs approach you can try to debug it with newer version of NODE (currently I would use 14). For it, I would suggest you to use a node version manager like NVM so you can switch between node version easily and test that accordling seeing differences between various node installations.
Make a minimal project with npm init with a single dependency, save your index with the .mjs extension and try an import the above dependency. If you are be able to import that dependency with that minimal environment you can blame either your previous node or your configuration or both of them.
At the moment you should only create a small 2 files project to reproduce the problem. It seems your current node does not consider the "type": "module" configuration and runs everything in its classic way.
Regarding your comments....
As far as I know import can be used even in your code, not just at the beginning:
(async () => {
if (somethingIsTrue) {
// import module for side effects
await import('/modules/my-module.js');
}
})();
from https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import
Additionally you can try Webpack with a configuration like:
// webpack.config.js
const nodeExternals = require('webpack-node-externals');
module.exports = {
mode: 'production',
target: 'node',
externals: [nodeExternals()],
entry: {
'build/output': './src/index.js'
},
output: {
path: __dirname,
filename: '[name].bundle.js',
libraryTarget: 'commonjs2'
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.js$/,
use: {
loader: 'babel-loader',
options: {
presets: [
['env', {
'targets': {
'node': 'current'
}
}]
]
}
}
}]
}
};
With NodeExternals you don't put your node dependencies in the bundle but only your own code. You refer to node_modules for the rest. You might not want that.
Related
How can I bundle my NPM package in a way that I can have different import paths for different parts of the package? I have found webpack approaches, but I am using Vite and TS.
My package looks like this:
- src
- atoms
- molecules
- organism
- index.ts (currently simply imports and exports everything)
Now I can use this currently like this
import { Button } from '#mypackage/library'
How can I do it, so I get this outcome:
import { Button } from '#mypackage/library/atom'
Here is the relevant part of my package.json
{
"entry": "src/index.ts",
"main": "dist/index.cjs.js",
"module": "dist/index.es.js",
"types": "dist/index.d.ts",
"files": [
"dist",
"src"
],
"exports": {
".": {
"import": "./dist/index.es.js",
"require": "./dist/index.cjs.js",
"types": "./dist/index.d.ts"
},
"./package.json": "./package.json",
"./atoms": "./src/atoms/index.ts",
"./molecules": "./src/molecules/index.ts",
"./organisms": "./src/organisms/index.ts",
"./theme": "./src/theme/index.ts"
},
}
Here is my vite.config.ts
export default defineConfig({
build: {
lib: {
entry: path.resolve(__dirname, 'src/index.ts'),
formats: ['es', 'cjs'],
name: '#workdigtital/component-library-react',
fileName: (format) => `index.${format}.js`
},
rollupOptions: {
external: ['react', 'react-dom'],
output: {
globals: {
react: 'React',
'react-dom': 'ReactDOM'
},
exports: 'named'
}
}
},
plugins: [react(), dts({ insertTypesEntry: true })],
resolve: {
alias: {
'#': path.resolve(__dirname, './src')
}
}
});
If I currently try an import like this, inside another project (Laravel+React), in which installed the library.
import { ThemeProvider } from '#workdigital/component-library-react/theme';
I get the following run time error (But no Typescript errors, even IntelliSense is working):
Failed to load url /resources/js/theme/ThemeProvider (resolved id: /resources/js/theme/ThemeProvider). Does the file exist?
My resulting Dist folder looks like this:
You can't have TypeScript exports, this simply won't work. An npm package should have only JS exports.
If you want to be able to selectively import different parts of your package, you must transpile them to different files.
rollup can do it, but it is lots of work, as you will have to set up a separate target for each exported file. Normally you use rollup to create a single bundle, this what this tool is made for.
tsc with a tsconfig.json will be a much better choice in your case. It does this by default, you only need to specify the output directory and it will produce a separate file for each source.
There is an excellent guide on the TypeScript site about packaging TypeScript libraries, you should probably start there.
// Project Tree View: My idea about using Webpack.
+ Toolkit:
- D:/Toolkit/Webpack/webpack.config.js
+ Project:
- D:/Project/A/build/index.ts
- D:/Project/B/build/index.ts
- D:/Project/C/build/index.ts
// Toolkit: [webpack.config.js] file
const path = require('path');
module.exports = (env) => {
let project_root = env.path;
console.log(env);
console.log(__dirname);
return {
mode: env.mode,
entry: project_root+'/build/index.ts',
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.ts$/,
use: 'ts-loader',
include: [
path.resolve(project_root, 'build'),
path.resolve('./node_modules'),
]
}, {
test: /\.scss$/,
use: [
"style-loader",
"css-loader",
"sass-loader",
]
}
]
},
output: {
publicPath: 'public',
filename: 'script.js',
path: path.resolve(project_root, 'assets/js')
},
resolve: {
modules: ['node_modules'],
},
}
}
Build command: yarn build --env=path=D:/Project/C
The command works without error, but when importing any library from the node_modules
Ex:
import {lib} from "example_lib";
import {lib} from "~example_lib";
import {lib} from "#example_lib";
import {lib} from "node_modules/example_lib";
import {lib} from "./node_modules/example_lib";
The Error
ERROR in ../A/build/index.ts 1:0-52
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'example_lib' in 'D:\Project\A'
resolve 'example_lib' in 'D:\Project\A'
Parsed request is a module
No description file found in D:\Project\A\build or above
resolve as module
D:\Project\A\build\node_modules doesn't exist or is not a directory
...
D:\node_modules doesn't exist or is not a directory
ERROR in D:\Project\A\build\index.ts
../A/build/index.ts 1:20-49
[tsl] ERROR in D:\Project\A\build\index.ts(1,21)
TS2792: Cannot find module 'example_lib'. Did you mean to set the 'moduleResolution' option to 'node', or to add aliases to the 'paths' option?
webpack 5.26.2 compiled with 2 errors in 1939 ms
error Command failed with exit code 1.
info Visit https://yarnpkg.com/en/docs/cli/run for documentation about this command.
The Question is:
How to use ONLY 1 Webpack node_modules for all projects ?
Gulp can resolve this issue but how about Webpack ?
I do not want every project to have 1 node_modules or webpack, package,... inside (it trash my PC !)
The issue has been resolved !
The above code is correct.
Format ".js" works normally; however ".ts" need to add // #ts-ignore above every import external node_modules.
This is the answer !
// #ts-ignore
import {lib} from "example_lib";
NOTE: 7 days researching Webpack
This is my opinions:
Gulp is much more than Webpack even it has lower user
These are the Pros about Gulp that Webpack should have !
Less time for controlling the core.
User-friendly.
Clear and Clean Structure, less bracket.
Easy and Flexible for creating the custom config.
Easy to use, develop through time.
Not just for web field, on the backup data, auto,... as well.
1 node_modules for all external projects (Gulp less bug and coding line than Webpack).
Compile time are the same.
👉🏾 Gulp is the King 👑 !
I am having a bit of trouble reconciling the path of a dynamic import for i18n locales. Here's the relevant code -
function getLoader(
lang: SupportedLanguage,
ns: SupportedNamespace
): NamespaceLoader | undefined {
const matrixToCheck = UNSUPPORTED_MATRIX[ns];
const isSupported = matrixToCheck && matrixToCheck.indexOf(lang) === -1;
if (isSupported) {
const path = `./locales/${lang}/${ns}.json`;
const name = `${lang}_${ns}`;
const named = {
[name]: () => import(`${path}`),
};
return named[name];
}
}
...
// eventual output
const SUPPORTED_LANGUAGES = {en: {namespace1: () => import('./locales/en/namespace1.json')}
My goal is manage all of the relevant translations in a single npm package, handle all of the dynamic import set-up at build time, and then consumers can invoke the getter (getTranslation in this case) in their respectives apps for the language and namespace of their choice to get the payload at runtime.
Based on this GH thread, I wanted to reconcile the locale dist path via the package.json
...
"exports": {
".": "./dist/src/main.js",
"./": "./dist/"
},
...
e.g. when I publish the package, based on that exports config, the consumer would know know how to reconcile the path, either relative or package-name-prefix when the getter is invoked
const fn = () => import('./locales/fr/myNamespace.json') /// doesn't work
const anotherFn = () => import('#examplePackageName/locales/fr/myNamespace.json') /// doesn't work
Since everything is dynamic, I am using the CopyWebpackPlugin to include the locales in the dist folder.
This works as expected locally, but when I create the dist, I get the error Error: Module not found ./relative/path/to/the/json/I/want.json.
My question:
What am I missing? Is there a simple way to expose these translations so that other apps can include them in their bundles via an npm-installed package?
Here's my Webpack config, happy to provide other info as needed
const path = require("path");
const CopyPlugin = require("copy-webpack-plugin");
const { CleanWebpackPlugin } = require("clean-webpack-plugin");
const getPlugins = () => {
return [
new CleanWebpackPlugin(),
new CopyPlugin({
patterns: [{ from: "locales", to: "locales" }],
}),
];
};
module.exports = {
mode: "production",
entry: {
main: "./src/main.ts",
},
output: {
path: path.join(__dirname, "dist"),
filename: "src/[name].js",
chunkFilename: "chunk.[name].js",
libraryTarget: "commonjs2",
},
resolve: {
extensions: [".json", ".ts", ".js"],
alias: {
"#locales": path.resolve(__dirname, "locales/*"),
},
},
plugins: getPlugins(),
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.ts$/,
exclude: [/\.test\.ts$/],
include: path.join(__dirname, "src"),
loader: "ts-loader",
},
],
},
};
Exports directive prescribes to define all files allowed for import explicitly (documentation). It allows developer to hide internal package file structure. What's not exported by this directive is only available to import inside the package and not outside of it. It's made to simplify maintenance. It allows developers to rename files or change file structure without fear of breaking dependent packages and applications.
So if you want to make internal files visible for import, you should export them with exports directive explicitly, like this:
{
"exports": {
".": "./dist/esm/src/main.js",
"./dist/shared/locale/fr_fr.json": "./dist/shared/locale/fr_fr.json"
}
}
I'm not sure wether Webpack handling this case, because it's an experimental feature yet. But this is how Node.js works now.
Why it is so
Changing your app file structure is a major change in semver terms, so you need to bump a version everytime you rename or delete files. To avoid it you can specify which files are part of public interface of the package.
I am trying to implement webpack in my project which contains node-red. However, I keep getting the following warning. Please suggest how to solve this error -
WARNING in ./node_modules/node-red/red/runtime/storage/localfilesystem/projects/git/node-red-ask-pass.sh 1:26
Module parse failed: Unexpected token (1:26)
You may need an appropriate loader to handle this file type.
> "$NODE_RED_GIT_NODE_PATH" "$NODE_RED_GIT_ASKPASS_PATH" "$NODE_RED_GIT_SOCK_PATH" $#
|
# ./node_modules/node-red/red/runtime/storage sync ^\.\/.*$ ./localfilesystem/projects/git/node-red-ask-pass.sh
# ./node_modules/node-red/red/runtime/storage/index.js
# ./node_modules/node-red/red/runtime/index.js
# ./app.js
My webpack.config.js is -
const path = require('path');
var nodeExternals = require('webpack-node-externals');
module.exports = {
target: 'node',
externals: [nodeExternals()],
entry: './app.js',
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, './output'),
filename: 'bundle.js'
},
resolve: {
extensions: ['.js','.json', '.sh'],
modules: [
'node_modules'
],
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test:/\.css$/,
use:['style-loader','css-loader']
},
{
test: /\.coffee$/,
use: [ 'coffee-loader' ]
}
]
}
};
For Webpack, every file is a .js. In order to handle other extensions, like .css or .sh, you're supposed to use a loader, like you did with css-loader, that will tranform CSS rules into JS.
The issue you're facing is that you've got an import chain (./app.js -> .../index.js -> .../index.js -> .../node-red-ask-pass.sh), so Webpack will, at some point, will import a .sh file, but will throw an error because shell code is obviousouly invalid JavaScript. that is why you're seeing the error that you have.
By the way, I couldn't reproduce the issue you're facing:
npm init -y
npm i node-red
# ./node_modules/node-red/red is not a directory
So it was probably a node-red bug. Update the package to the latest version.
I'm trying to get a very simple Angular2 app working, with Webpack as a module bundler. I'm following this code, and I copied all the configuration files as they are, only changing file paths. However, when I run npm-start, I get the following error, which I think is a Webpack error:
ERROR in ./hello.js
Module parse failed: /home/marieficid/Documentos/cloud/cloud/hello.js Line 1: Unexpected token
You may need an appropriate loader to handle this file type.
| import {bootstrap} from "angular2/platform/browser";
| import {Component} from "angular2/core";
|
# ./app.ts 2:0-21
As a result, the Angular2 code in my app isn't loaded.
This is my app.ts:
import "./hello.js";
This is hello.js, where the error seems to be (which I take to mean that webpack parsed app.ts just fine):
import {bootstrap} from "angular2/platform/browser";
import {Component} from "angular2/core";
#Component({
selector: 'app',
template: '<div>Hello world</div>'
})
class App{}
bootstrap(App);
And this iswebpack.config.js:
var webpack = require('webpack');
var HtmlWebpackPlugin = require('html-webpack-plugin');
var path = require('path');
module.exports = {
entry: {
'app': './app.ts',
'vendor': './vendor.ts'
},
output: {
path: "./dist",
filename: "bundle.js"
},
plugins: [
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin('vendor', 'vendor.bundle.js'),
new HtmlWebpackPlugin({
inject: false,
template: './index.html'
})
],
resolve: {
extensions: ['', '.ts', '.js']
},
module: {
loaders: [
{ test: /\.ts$/, loader: 'ts-loader' },
],
noParse: [ path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules', 'angular2', 'bundles') ]
},
devServer: {
historyApiFallback: true
}
};
All these files and node_modules are in the same directory.
I have found similar questions online but nothing worked for me. I also didn't install babel because the sample code I'm using as base doesn't use it, but if it's necessary I'm will.
As suggested by #napstablook
Since in your webpack.config.js file you have
resolve: {
extensions: ['', '.ts', '.js']
},
Webpack will try to handle those .js files but it needs a specific loader to do so which is, if I'm not wrong, script-loader.
In your case the solution is as simple as deleting the .js files, or changing their extension to be .ts.
For me this issue occurred when I ran ng test,
please check below points,
Console will list out the files that is causing the error.
Check the html file is correctly mapped from the typescript.
styleUrls file should point to the CSS file not html, this is the mistake I
did.
this error also comes up for me in angular forms when i had patch value set then an extra = sign
ncont.controls[position].patchValue({[cardname]:file}) = file
which is a dumb part on me and angular for not telling me