The plugin gulp-pug allows to pass global variables to pug files via data property.
What if we don't need full data set in each .pug file? To implement conditional data injection, we need to access to current vinyl file instance inside pipe(this.gulpPlugins.pug({}) or at least to know the source file absolute path. Possible?
const dataSetForTopPage = {
foo: "alpha",
bar: "bravo"
};
const dataSetForAboutPage = {
baz: "charlie",
hoge: "delta"
};
gulp.src(sourceFileGlobsOrAbsolutePath)
.pipe(gulpPlugins.pug({
data: /*
if path is 'top.pug' -> 'dataSetForTopPage',
else if path is 'about.pug' -> 'dataSetForAboutPage'
else -> empty object*/
}))
.pipe(Gulp.dest("output"));
I am using gulp-intercept plugin. But how to synchronize it with gulpPlugins.pug?
gulp.src(sourceFileGlobsOrAbsolutePath)
.pipe(this.gulpPlugins.intercept(vinylFile => {
// I can compute conditional data set here
// but how to execute gulpPlugins.pug() here?
}))
// ...
It was just one example, but we will deal with same problem when need to conditional plugins options for other gulp plugins, too. E. g:
.pipe(gulpPlugins.htmlPrettify({
indent_char: " ",
indent_size: // if source file in 'admin/**' -> 2, else if in 'auth/**' -> 3 else 4
}))
You'll need to modify the stream manually - through2 is probably the most used package for this purpose. Once in the through2 callback, you can pass the stream to your gulp plugins (as long as their transform functions are exposed) and conditionally pass them options. For example, here is a task:
pugtest = () => {
const dataSet = {
'top.pug': {
foo: "alpha",
bar: "bravo"
},
'about.pug': {
foo: "charlie",
bar: "delta"
}
};
return gulp.src('src/**/*.pug')
.pipe(through2.obj((file, enc, next) =>
gulpPlugins.pug({
// Grab the filename, and set pug data to the value found in dataSet by that name
data: dataSet[file.basename] || {}
})._transform(file, enc, next)
))
.pipe(through2.obj((file, enc, next) => {
const options = {
indent_char: ' ',
indent_size: 4
};
if(file.relative.match(/admin\//)) {
options.indent_size = 2;
} else if(file.relative.match(/auth\//)) {
options.indent_size = 3;
}
file.contents = new Buffer.from(html.prettyPrint(String(file.contents), options), enc);
next(null, file);
}))
.pipe(gulp.dest('output'));
}
For the pug step, we call through2.obj and create the pug plugin, passing it data grabbed from our object literal, indexed by filename in this example. So now the data passed into the compiler comes from that object literal.
For the html step you mention, gulp-html-prettify doesn't expose its transform function, so we can't reach into it and pass the transform back to the stream. But in this case that's OK, if you look at the source it's just a wrapper to prettyPrint in the html package. That's quite literally all it is doing. So we can just rig up our step using through2 to do the same thing, but changing our options based on the vinyl file's relative path.
That's it! For a working example see this repo: https://github.com/joshdavenport/stack-overflow-61314141-gulp-pug-conditional
Related
I have a config file. It has variables stored in the following manner.
[general]
webapp=/var/www
data=/home/data
[env]
WEBAPP_DEPLOY=${general:webapp}/storage/deploy
SYSTEM_DEPLOY=${general:data}/deploy
As you can see it has 2 sections general and env. Section env uses the variables from section general.
So I want to read this file into a variable. Let's say config. Here's I want config object to look like:
{
general: {
webapp: '/var/www',
data: '/home/data'
},
env: {
WEBAPP_DEPLOY: '/var/www/storage/deploy',
SYSTEM_DEPLOY: '/home/data/deploy'
}
}
I general I am looking for a config parser for nodejs that supports string interpolation.
I would assume most ini libraries don't include the variable expansion functionality, but with lodash primitives a generic "deep object replacer" isn't too complex.
I've switched the : delimiter for . so has and get can lookup values directly.
const { get, has, isPlainObject, reduce } = require('lodash')
// Match all tokens like `${a.b}` and capture the variable path inside the parens
const re_token = /\${([\w$][\w\.$]*?)}/g
// If a string includes a token and the token exists in the object, replace it
function tokenReplace(value, key, object){
if (!value || !value.replace) return value
return value.replace(re_token, (match_string, token_path) => {
if (has(object, token_path)) return get(object, token_path)
return match_string
})
}
// Deep clone any plain objects and strings, replacing tokens
function plainObjectReplacer(node, object = node){
return reduce(node, (result, value, key) => {
result[key] = (isPlainObject(value))
? plainObjectReplacer(value, object)
: tokenReplace(value, key, object)
return result
}, {})
}
> plainObjectReplacer({ a: { b: { c: 1 }}, d: 'wat', e: '${d}${a.b.c}' })
{ a: { b: { c: 1 } }, d: 'wat', e: 'wat1' }
You'll find most config management tools (like ansible) can do this sort of variable expansion for you before app runtime, at deployment.
I'm trying to select certain keys from an JSON array, and filter the rest.
var json = JSON.stringify(body);
which is:
{
"FirstName":"foo",
"typeform_form_submits":{
"foo":true,
"bar":true,
"baz":true
},
"more keys": "foo",
"unwanted key": "foo"
}
Want I want:
{
"FirstName":"foo",
"typeform_form_submits":{
"foo":true,
"bar":true,
"baz":true
}
}
I've checked out How to filter JSON data in node.js?, but I'm looking to do this without any packages.
Now you can use Object.fromEntries like so:
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(raw).filter(([key]) => wantedKeys.includes(key)))
You need to filter your obj before passing it to json stringify:
const rawJson = {
"FirstName":"foo",
"typeform_form_submits":{
"foo":true,
"bar":true,
"baz":true
},
"more keys": "foo",
"unwanted key": "foo"
};
// This array will serve as a whitelist to select keys you want to keep in rawJson
const filterArray = [
"FirstName",
"typeform_form_submits",
];
// this function filters source keys (one level deep) according to whitelist
function filterObj(source, whiteList) {
const res = {};
// iterate over each keys of source
Object.keys(source).forEach((key) => {
// if whiteList contains the current key, add this key to res
if (whiteList.indexOf(key) !== -1) {
res[key] = source[key];
}
});
return res;
}
// outputs the desired result
console.log(JSON.stringify(filterObj(rawJson, filterArray)));
var raw = {
"FirstName":"foo",
"typeform_form_submits":{
"foo":true,
"bar":true,
"baz":true
},
"more keys": "foo",
"unwanted key": "foo"
}
var wantedKeys =["FirstName","typeform_form_submits" ]
var opObj = {}
Object.keys(raw).forEach( key => {
if(wantedKeys.includes(key)){
opObj[key] = raw[key]
}
})
console.log(JSON.stringify(opObj))
I know this question was asked aways back, but I wanted to just toss out there, since nobody else did:
If you're bound and determined to do this with stringify, one of its less-well-known capabilities involves replacer, it's second parameter. For example:
// Creating a demo data set
let dataToReduce = {a:1, b:2, c:3, d:4, e:5};
console.log('Demo data:', dataToReduce);
// Providing an array to reduce the results down to only those specified.
let reducedData = JSON.stringify(dataToReduce, ['a','c','e']);
console.log('Using [reducer] as an array of IDs:', reducedData);
// Running a function against the key/value pairs to reduce the results down to those desired.
let processedData = JSON.stringify(dataToReduce, (key, value) => (value%2 === 0) ? undefined: value);
console.log('Using [reducer] as an operation on the values:', processedData);
// And, of course, restoring them back to their original object format:
console.log('Restoration of the results:', '\nreducedData:', JSON.parse(reducedData), '\nprocessedData:', JSON.parse(processedData));
In the above code snippet, the key value pairs are filtered using stringify exclusively:
In the first case, by providing an array of strings, representing the keys you wish to preserve (as you were requesting)
In the second, by running a function against the values, and dynamically determining those to keep (which you didn't request, but is part of the same property, and may help someone else)
In the third, their respective conversions back to JSON (using .parse()).
Now, I want to stress that I'm not advocating this as the appropriate method to reduce an object (though it will make a clean SHALLOW copy of said object, and is actually surprisingly performant), if only from an obscurity/readability standpoint, but it IS a totally-effective (and mainstream; that is: it's built into the language, not a hack) option/tool to add to the arsenal.
I am using Axios with NodeJs and trying to pass path parameters in axios.get() method. For example, if URL is url = '/fetch/{date}', I want to replace {date} with the actual date while calling axios.get(url).
I went through the source code on Github and StackOverflow, but couldn't find any method.
Is it possible to keep URLs with parameters as a placeholder and replace them while actually calling the get method of Axios?
Axios doesn't have this feature and it looks like the team don't want to add it.
With credit to previous responders for inspiration, to me this seems like the solution closest to what you (and me) are looking for:
1 - Where you want to store all your URLs and their parameters, define them as functions which use a template string to return the composed URL:
export var fetchDateUrl = (date) => `/fetch/${date}`;
If you need any type-specific formatting of the value being concatenated into the URL, this function is a good place to do it.
2 - Where you want to make the request, call the function with the correct parameters:
import { fetchDateUrl } from 'my-urls';
axios.get(fetchDateUrl(someDateVariable))...;
Another variation, if you really like the idea of naming the parameters at the call site, you can define the URL function to destructure an object like this:
var fetchDateUrl = ({date}) => `/fetch/${date}`;
which you'd then use like this:
axios.get(fetchDateUrl({date: someDateVariable}));
Use template strings
url = `/fetch/${date}`
Or just tag it on
url = '/fetch/'+ date
I think using axios interceptors is better to do this :
//create your instance
const instanceAxios = axios.create({
baseUrl: 'http://localhost:3001'
]);
instanceAxios.interceptors.request.use(config => {
if (!config.url) {
return config;
}
const currentUrl = new URL(config.url, config.baseURL);
// parse pathName to implement variables
Object.entries(config.urlParams || {}).forEach(([
k,
v,
]) => {
currentUrl.pathname = currentUrl.pathname.replace(`:${k}`, encodeURIComponent(v));
});
const authPart = currentUrl.username && currentUrl.password ? `${currentUrl.username}:${currentUrl.password}` : '';
return {
...config,
baseURL: `${currentUrl.protocol}//${authPart}${currentUrl.host}`,
url: currentUrl.pathname,
};
});
// use like :
instanceAxios.get('/issues/:uuid', {
urlParams : {
uuid: '123456789'
}
})
For typescript users, you will need to add this, in one of your .d.ts
declare module 'axios' {
interface AxiosRequestConfig {
urlParams?: Record<string, string>;
}
}
( this is a POC, not really tested, doesn't hesitate if you see something wrong )
You can use template strings ie:
let sellerId = 317737
function getSellerAnalyticsTotals() {
return axios.get(`http://localhost:8000/api/v1/seller/${sellerId}/analytics`);
}
Given some API /fetch/${date} you likely want to wrap your axios call in a function.
const fetchData = (date) => axios.get(`/fetch/${date}`);
fetchData(dateObject.toFormat('yyyy-mm-dd'))
.then(result => { ... });
This requires the calling code to format date correctly however. You can avoid this by using a DateTime library that handles date string parsing and do the format enforcement in the function.
const fetchData = (date) => axios.get(`/fetch/${date.toFormat('yyyy-mm-dd')}`);
fetchData(dateObject)
.then(result => { ... });
you can do like this:
getProduct = (id) => axios.get(`product/${id}`);
I always do it like this:
const res = await axios.get('https://localhost:3000/get', { params: { myParam: 123 } });
I find this to be much clearer than template strings.
More explanation here
My yeoman generator copies files from template to destination path:
this.fs.copyTpl(
this.templatePath(),
this.destinationPath(), {
appName: this.props.appName
});
During project generation, I need to assign value of this.props.appName to some of filenames.
Unfortunately I can't do this that way like I could do inside this files:
<%=appName%>-project.sln
All files that need to be renamed have appTemplate in their names, so what I need to do is simply replace appTemplate with value of this.props.appName.
Can I somehow configure copyTpl to rename some of files while copying them to another destination?
OK, I found a solution. According to yeoman docs:
Any generator author can register a transformStream to modify the file path and/or the content.
Using this method:
this.registerTransformStream();
What that means is I can pipe all generated files through some script:
var rename = require("gulp-rename");
//other dependecies...
module.exports = yeoman.Base.extend({
//some other things generator do...
writing: function() {
var THAT = this;
this.registerTransformStream(rename(function(path) {
path.basename = path.basename.replace(/(666replacethat666)/g, THAT.props.appName);
path.dirname = path.dirname.replace(/(666replacethat666)/g, THAT.props.appName);
}));
this.fs.copyTpl(
this.templatePath(),
this.destinationPath(), {
appName: this.props.appName
});
}
});
This script will pipe all files through gulp-rename, changing 666replacethat666 to something more intelligent.
If you cannot use registerTransformStream because you are using the composeWith() feature in Yeoman (which disconnects transform stream registrations), you can use the processDestinationPath, which works when you select multiple files (not when you specify a specific file in the first argument, for some reason).
this.fs.copyTpl(
this.templatePath("**/{.*,*}"),
this.destinationPath(),
{ /* usually your prompt answers are here */ },
{},
{
processDestinationPath: (filePath: string) =>
filePath.replace(/somedir\/a-file.js/g, 'newdir/better-filename.js'),
},
);
Source to documentation options: https://yeoman.github.io/generator/actions_fs.html#.copyTemplate
Which is based on https://github.com/SBoudrias/mem-fs-editor#copyfrom-to-options-context-templateoptions-
registerTransformStream with gulp-rename is still an issue. However, I get it working with glob.
const glob = require('glob');
writing() {
const files = glob.sync('**', { dot: true, nodir: true, cwd: this.templatePath() })
for (let i in files) {
this.fs.copyTpl(
this.templatePath(files[i]),
this.destinationPath( this.props.destinationFolderPath + '\\' + files[i].replace(/__fileName__/g,this.props.fileName)),
this.props
)
}
}
After copy, iterate over the paths of the output dir and regex replace all occurrences.
const getReplacement = (base, pathRel, match, replace) => {
let pathRelNew = pathRel.replace(match, replace);
let oldPathAbs = path.join(base, pathRel);
let newPathAbs = path.join(base, pathRelNew);
if (oldPathAbs != newPathAbs) {
return {
oldPath: oldPathAbs,
newPath: newPathAbs
}
}
}
const getReplacementsRecursive = (base, match, replace, replacements = []) => {
let pathsRel = fs.readdirSync(base);
pathsRel.forEach(pathRel => {
if (fs.statSync(path.join(base, pathRel)).isDirectory()) {
replacements = getReplacementsRecursive(path.join(base, pathRel), match, replace, replacements);
var replacement = getReplacement(base, pathRel, match, replace)
if (replacement) replacements.push(replacement);
} else {
var replacement = getReplacement(base, pathRel, match, replace)
if (replacement) replacements.push(replacement);
}
});
return replacements;
};
function replaceMatches(dir, match, replace) {
var replacements = getReplacementsRecursive(dir, match, replace);
replacements.forEach(function(replacement) {
fs.renameSync(replacement.oldPath, replacement.newPath);
});
}
module.exports = class extends Generator {
// ...
writing() {
// don't forget to set the output directory
let OUTPUT_DIR = "./out";
// this.fs.copyTpl(...);
// setTimeout is used to give some time for the copyTpl to finish
setTimeout(
() => {
var match = new RegExp( "666replacethat666", 'g' );
replaceMatches(OUTPUT_DIR, match, this.props.appName);
}, 1000);
}
}
I know that it is possible to pass a model to a view in express by doing something like this:
exports.locations = function(req, res){
Location.find(function(err, results) {
res.render('locations', { title: 'Locations', locations: results });
});
};
But is it possible to pass a model to my layout?
Assuming you have all (relevant) routes inside a single .js file, you could add a function like this:
function applyGlobals(pageModel) {
pageModel.myGlobalThing = "I'm always available";
pageModel.anotherGlobalThing = 8675309;
return(pageModel);
}
exports.locations = function(req, res){
Location.find(function(err, results) {
res.render('locations', applyGlobals({ title: 'Locations', locations: results }));
});
};
You could also create a more generalizable solution:
function Globalizer(baseContent) {
var theFunc = function(specificContent) {
var keys = Object.keys(baseContent);
for (var i = 0; i < keys.length; i++)
{
// the lets the page content override global content by not
// overwriting it if it exists;
if(!specificContent.hasOwnProperty(keys[i])){
specificContent[keys[i]] = baseContent[keys[i]];
}
}
return specificContent;
};
return theFunc;
};
// And use it like so.
var applyGlobals = new Globalizer({global1: 12, global2: 'otherthing'});
var pageVars = applyGlobals({item1: 'fifteen', 'item2': 15, global2: 'override'});
console.log(require('util').inspect(pageVars));
Which would emit:
{ item1: 'fifteen',
item2: 15,
global2: 'override',
global1: 12 }
Similarly, you could use one of the various mixin, extend assign or similar functions of various libraries like lodash, underscore, etc. See the doc for lodash.assign() which illustrates accomplishing the same sort of thing.
UPDATE One more way of doing it.
You might want to check out Express' app.locals documentation as well - it might work well for you.