Im using AWS CloudFront to deliver audio file (mp3) over the network.
There is a delay in 7-10 seconds until the audio file start playing in Safari. No delay in Chrome. The file size is ~30MB.
How to avoid or minimize this delay. It affects on user experience significantly.
It looks like Safari loads full audio file.
Thank you for any idea.
Related
I have a service which uses azure media service v3 sdk to upload(and transform)video files. At the moment I am working with some solution for video virus scanning.
Have a question
As they are re-encoding video files to host on their streaming service does it negate the requirement to scan these files?
Thanks
Reencoding video pulls apart the source video by decoding the original audio and video 'in the clear' and then reencoding it. This would limit the attack vectors since the MP4 header would be rewritten, the video and audio are not the original, and a limited amount of metadata gets copied from the old header.
For a virus attack it is less common to hide something in an actual video file and instead just disguise the video as something executable with no video in the file. For example, a .exe file made to appear as a video would not survive the reencoding process since it is not an actual video file. This does not mitigate all risk, but it does mitigate a lot of it.
I have a content creation site I am building and im confused on audio and video.
If I have a content creators audio or video stored in s3 and then I want to display their file will the html video player or audio player stream the media or will it download it fully then play it?
I ask because what if the video or audio is significantly long. like 2 hours for example. I need to know how to solve the use case.
Lastly what file type is most acceptable for viewing on webpages? It seems like MPEG-4 is the best bet. Is that true?
Most video player clients and browsers will attempt to stream the video if they can.
For an mp4 video file hosted on a server, so long as the header is at the start and the server accepts range requests, this will mean the player downloads the video in chunks and starts playing as soon as it has enough to decide the first frames.
For more professional streaming services, they will generally use an adaptive bit rate streaming protocol like DASH or HLS (see this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/42365034/334402) and again the video will be streamed in chunks, or segments, and will start playing while it is streaming.
To answer your last question you need to be aware that the raw video is encoded (e.g. h.264, VP9 etc) and the video, audio, subtitle etc tracks stored in a video container (e.g. mp4, Web etc).
The most common format is probaly h.264 encoded and mp4 containers at this time.
The particular profile for h.264 can matter also depending on the device - baseline is probably the most supported profile at this time. You can find examples of media support for different devices online, e.g. for Android: https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/media/media-formats
#Mick's answer is spot on. I'll just add that mp4 (with h264 encoding) will work in just about every browser out there.
The issue with mp4 files (especially with a 2 hour long movie) isn't so much the seeking & streaming. If your creator creates a 4K video - thats what you'll deliver to everyone (even mobile phones). HLS streaming on the other hand has adaptive bitrates - where the video adapts to both the screen & the available network speeds. You'll get better playback results with less buffering (and if you're using AWS - a LOT LESS data egress) with video streaming.
(there are a bunch of APIs and services that can help you do this - including api.video (where I work), Mux and others).
We are using AVPlayerLayer to play the content in iOS application. Some time there is a black screen occurred while playing the content but content continue playing audio during playback. This can be observed randomly during the playback also when initially starts playing the content or seek the content at specified time. This is not happening all the time but occurring frequently. Please note that we are using FairPlay Streaming protected content to play the video using AVPlayer.
Sometime we didn't get any such issue during whole playback and player play the content smoothly.
This issue is not related to the player as such. Rather it is because of the DRM flags used in the Fairplay license.
It looks like the HDCP enforcements is the one affecting your playback. The licensing server can set different flags for HDCP (HDCP not required, Type-0, Type-1). By default, Type-0 is enforced by the FPS server unless changed.
Generally, a 'Type-0' or a 'HDCP not required' enforcement should playback your content seamlessly.
I'm currently on edge with what container I should use for the videos I put on my website.
I recently started uploaded videos of game play/walkthroughs and saw the need for a container that could hold HD video without limitations on file size, codecs (AAC or AVC), or resolution (in the future I want to be able to support 5K video) and 5.1 Dolby digital and up audio. Of course I don't expect the 5K to be efficient at being streamed, I just want it to be available.
This is where the confusion started.
I currently use the .flv container because people state it is all around better. Less resource consumptive, widely used, and supports the common codecs. The problem with this is simple. It cannot support the HD content I want to show: 5.1 dolby audio and limitless file size.
MP4 is everything I need, but I heard that it can be slow to respond, pseudostreaming modules are not widely accepted by browsers, and I don't have time to change containers everytime someone wants to update to .mp5, 6, 12, etc.
That's where I am including .mkv as the container. .MKV also supports everything I want (HD, 3D), all codecs, universal, and limitless file attributes. THE ONLY problem is that it cannot be streamed.
I know this is a programmers site, but may be in the future, being that we can only advance web connections, I or someone else could program a module for apache .mkv streaming. I'm don't know where an apache module source is, so I cannot do it at this time.
I leaning between .flv and .mkv. I'm not really concerned about .mp4 because if I want to be future-proof I need .mkv, if I'm not concerned about the future or updates I should stay with .flv.
What do you all think. Would it really be so difficult to program a .mkv streaming module?
Excluding web streaming, which of the 3 would be all around better. Video quality (AAC AVC), file size limits, universal, web support, etc.
Thanks,
You can use the window media streaming platform. After that they will look after your every problem. However ,MP4 with h264 video and aac audio and streamed/played with flash is also good.
I'm developing a video chat-like application using Flash RTMFP and Stratus. So far, I'm having good success. I can build from source, tweak settings, and get video and audio in both directions.
There's one glaring problem I haven't been able to solve, however -- when using a client on a Linux machine, the video received by the other end looks very poor. It's blocky and pixellated, almost as if it's rendering 160x120 in a much larger frame. When sending from a Mac (my other dev machine), the video looks quite good.
I've tried modifying all the settings I can think of -- frame rate, "quality", size, audio settings -- with no discernible improvement. I've tried running it as a local file and from a remote server. The network where I'm working is extremely fast, so that shouldn't be an issue.
Is there anything else I can try? Any suggestions or ideas are greatly appreciated.
Many thanks!
Bad camera or bad camera driver?
Stratus does not change video encoding, it simply is another variation of the RTMFP protocol for transferring exactly the same compressed stream.
One way you can check whether Stratus indeed plays any role in this is to try to stream the same stuff through Adobe Flash Media Server, the development version is free from adobe.com.
I have done Stratus applications, and have not experienced any degradation of video quality compared to Flash Media Server solution. In fact when the camera quality is set to 100, you won't notice the difference between raw camera video and compressed stream when using loopback mode. Apart from possibly limited framerate, if you specify bandwidth (the three are intimately related - bandwidth, framerate, quality, as per documentation of Camera.setQuality or Camera.setMode)