We have set up Application Insights for our Dev & Prod environments, not with the SDK but through the Portal. We're now in the process of installing the SDK so we can have more control over customizing logging, what to measure in performance, etc.
I have found how to separate the environments in code (separate Instrumentation Key in different config files etc), but I have found nothing when it comes to my local environment. Which instrumentation key should I use there, the dev one? Wouldn't then this skew our dev metrics everytime one of the developers runs the app locally?
And also, doesn't it make sense to have a separate App Service slot just for the local environment, so I can test everything and see the logs I'm trying out locally, and not have to deploy to dev everytime I want to see what I'm doing?
I've tried creating a separate slot for local, but it generates a weird url based on the name I give, which I can't change later.
I've googled for a couple of days already and couldn't find any (or very little) helpful advice when it comes to this.
I realise there is a "Just add the SDK to try local only mode" option in Visual Studio, but then I would have to use it exclusively locally. What I want is to use all three - my local, dev & prod.
We're using .net core 2.2 for our backend and Angular 7 for front end.
I'm an idiot.
The url set up automatically basically means nothing. I solved the problem by just adding another App Service slot (created from our App Service production one, just like dev), and added this key to the local settings in our project.
Now we can use this key to get real time results as we debug, and use the other two for dev & production.
Related
I am trying to stand up a sitecore site inside a fresh app service in Azure. This already works in our production Azure account, but we would like to see how to set it up from scratch.
The build and deploy succeed in pushing it out to the app service, however, I am getting:
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.Http.Cors, Version=5.2.3.0
and no further information. I verified that system.web.http.dll is present in the bin folder. I read in some other articles that sometimes the wrong version could cause issues but this works on my work machine. Is there another step I need to do to make this work in an app service? Some configuration change, maybe?
The dll is missing in the published (deployed environment). That is the reason why it is working in the local i.e. Visual Studio but not in the Azure Website Environment.
Just do Copy Local = true in the properties for the assembly(System.Web.Http.Cors) and then do a redeploy, it should work fine.
If Copy Local is already set to true and you cannot update the WebApi because of dependencies, there is that trick to set Copy Local to false, build, then set Copy Local back to true and build.
I want to deploy Strapi to my Azure. Anyone here who has an experience doing such and making it up and running completely? Somehow I couldn't find any detailed instructions how to do that in Azure.. I'm looking for something that is as easy as deploying it to Heroku - but it's fine though if it'll require more steps as long as I can make it to work completely.
This is the complete instruction I have also created in the README of the repository.
Strapi-Azure 3.1.3
This is a working repository of Strapi 3.1.3 which you can already deploy as an Azure Web App. This requres a paid subscription, minimum of B1 plan (32 USD estimated), so we can enable the 64-bit platform configuration and the Always On feature.
To get started, let us first create and configure our Azure Web App:
Create an instance:
Name: The name of your choice that is still available
Publish: Code
Runtime staci: Node 12 LTS
Operating System: Windows
Region: select near you
Sku and Size: select B1 (minimum)
Configure the Environment variables:
Add the following key-value pairs:
For the HOST make a ping to your .azurewebsites.net instance and get the IP
Configure the Platform Settings
In the General Settings tab (beside the Application Settings), change the Platform from 32 Bit to 64 Bit
To confirm if you are indeed now on 64 Bit mode, go to Console and run node -p "process.arch"
Install yarn:
Go again to Console and run: npm install -g yarn
Deploy from your github account a copy of strapi-azure repo
In the Deployment Center tab, connect your GitHub account and browse your copy of strapi-azure
Select App Service build service as your build provider
Select repository and branch
Deploy!
Build your Admin UI using Kudu service
Go to Advance Tools -> Go -> expand Debug console from the toolbar -> CMD
Inside the wwwroot directory (site/wwwroot/), execute yarn build
See it in action 😊
It should not be any different than installing Strapi on any VM (Azure, AWS, GCP or even local VM).
Quick start guide should help you setup things and run Strapi server --> https://strapi.io/documentation/3.x.x/getting-started/quick-start.html
Primarily: Install nodejs, npm and strapi (via npm). Execute strapi new cms --quickstart and you should be good to go (with default configuration).
Assuming you have it within a GIT repository, I may have some useful insights.
When I set mine up, I created an app service hosted on windows - for some reason I found the Linux ones very unstable. I then used the Deployment Center to then setup the connection between my repository hosted on Azure Devops onto my App Service. When it deploys IISNode will automatically be setup with an appropriate web.config file for getting a NodeJS server up and running.
You may need to ensure you are running in production (assuming this is what you want), you can set this up by going to the App Service - Configuration - Application Settings (tab) - set up new variable called
"NODE_ENV" and set this "PRODUCTION".
I also found it useful to set
"WEBSITE_NODE_DEFAULT_VERSION" and specify the version - in my case it was "10.15.2".
For the database I used a ComosDB with the Mongo API, this was hosted on azure and it worked OK - the main problem I found was that I was getting charged a lot for the usage of it, not quite sure at this stage how to get around it.
One thing that did catch me out was setting the "port" variable within the config/environments/production/server.json - I was hard coding a port which doesn't work within IISNode - this needs to be set to something like
"host": "your.domain.com"
"port": "${process.env.PORT || 1280}"
You will also need to setup your database settings in config/environments/production/database.json file.
Happy to work through any further points, let me know
I had a site running asp.net 5 beta4, and decided to upgrade to beta5. The site runs locally fine. I pushed the changes to master and it was picked up from bitbucket and deployed successfully.
When I try to hit the site in azure, I get a 500 Internal Server Error. I've tried a number of things, but can't seem to track down the root cause of the failure. I'm looking for suggestions as I'm hitting a wall. From what I've tried below it seems like some fundamental initialization is failing.
Here's what I've tried:
Enabling customerrors="off". I added a web.config to the wwwroot folder with system.web/customErrors mode="Off". I've verified that the web.config is populated correctly in the deployed wwwroot and had the appsettings containing the dnxversion etc merged correctly.
Customizing the custom error page, adding runtimeinfo. I have the following set in my Startup.cs:
app.UseErrorHandler("/Home/Error");. I also have set the error page to display the exception. This doesn't seem to be hit.
Attached to the remote process to debug. Visual studio eventually freezes, so haven't gotten anywhere with this.
Enabled application insights. This registers events when I debug locally, but doesn't capture anything from the azure instance.
Enabled application logs and request failure tracing. The detailed errors show a 500.0, without much detailed information.
Imgur
Imgur
I've also verified through the console that the runtime is set correctly to beta5.
Update:
I set the ASPNET_ENV to Development and it loaded with appsettings loaded via the azure portal. Setting ASPNET_ENV to something else isn't working. I also removed any custom code from startup.cs pertaining to the non-development environments, with no help. I'm still looking for a means of capturing the original error.
Assuming you are targeting DNX451 and not dnxcore50, there is a good chance Azure it still trying to run it against the beta4 runtime instead of beta5. If that's the case, you won't get a decent error message.
Try adding an environment variable in Azure "SCM_DNX_VERSION" and set it to 1.0.0-beta5. It looks like kudu was recently upgraded to support beta5 https://github.com/projectkudu/kudu/commit/55175a017779bf493ff8e6ce87b96dd1451f7d7b, so you might want to try to redeploy from bitbucket in the case that the Kudu team has already deployed this change.
For a little more detail, you can check out my previous answer (although it is very dated and references the old "K" names) here:
Deploying ASP.NET vNext beta 2 on Azure with Kudu
Every time you update to a new beta, you will have to update your SCM_DNX_VERSION environment variable.
So I have been banging my head against a wall on this one...I am trying to publish an Azure Web Role and I have two ServiceConfiguration files:
ServiceConfiguration.Cloud.cscfg
ServiceConfiguration.Local.cscfg
In my publish xml I have:
<AzureServiceConfiguration>Cloud</AzureServiceConfiguration>
So my assumption here is that when I publish it will use the Cloud cfg.
For working locally, under the emulator I have set the flag for local debugging to use Local.
However it would seem that this flag here also determines the cscfg to use for the cloud...so I am a little confused - is this the correct behavior or am I missing something? I really want to have a separate one for local as I have different values I need.
Update
Suddenly it started to work fine today. Didn't really change anything.
Tom, your publish XML configuration file is OK, and your publish to Azure will use the .Cloud.cscfg.
You can pick which of the configuration files you want to use when publishing (right click > Publish...), on the second screen (under Service configuration).
What you did for your local environment should work fine, and use the .Local.cscfg file.
I have a solution in Visual Studio Team Services that has 2 Web Applications (specifically one project for WebAPI services and another for the actual site using MVC).
I'm trying to set up continuous delivery to Azure but all the information that I can find seems to assume that you only have a single Web Application within your solution (which seems a little unrealistic for all but the simplest of projects!).
The out of box continuous delivery process seems to just pick and deploy the first Web Application it finds (which isn't necessarily the same project each time!)
I've tried specifying the Deployment Settings file, but that seems to affect the destination rather than the project being deployed since again, it seems to just "pick" a project to deploy, and each time it deploys every single compiled assembly plus all dependencies rather than just the binaries and dependencies of the project actually being deployed, which can cause issues with MVC finding duplicate controller matches for a given name (this can of course be fixed by specifying the namespace of the controllers within the route configuration, but that seems less than ideal, and still doesn't fix the entire problem).
Ideally I'd like to find a way to deploy both projects with a single build, but as a temporary solution I'd be happy with 2 builds that are both triggered by a check-in of the single solution, that each reliably deploy 1 of the 2 Web Applications.
Does anyone know if this is possible? I guess I could write my own custom build template, but I'm hoping there is an easier answer (not least because I can't imagine that this isn't a problem being faced by other people!)
I did find this question TFSPreview.com and Azure continuous deployment for multiple solutions in TFS but since that's quite old and is specifically talking about AzureWebRoleProjects rather than Web Applications being deployed to the newer Azure Websites feature, I'm hoping that there is a more positive answer?
This is possible with multiple build configurations. In addition to Debug and Release you could specify two more, one for each app.
You can find these in Visual Studio at Build -> Configuration Manager. And then in the configurations specify only one of them to be built. Then running MSBuild with that configuration will output only one WebDeploy package.