I can see experiment 2 is in deleted, but when it will be deleted actually?
2 test hdfs:///1234/mlflow deleted
If the experiment is not deleted automatically, how can I delete it?
I am assuming you use sql store?
Currently there is no way to tell mlflow to hard-delete experiments. We are working with open source contributors to add a cli command that would perform garbage-collection of deleted experiments. This should be added soon in one of the upcoming mlflow releases. In the meantime, you can connect to your sql store and delete the experiments manually.
Related
When creating a second migration and attempting to migrate up to add it, the task fails because the first migration was already run. It seems to be running (and failing) rather than skipping previously successful/complete migrations.
I have tried with --no-check-order but I don't want to do that everytime I got new migrations to add.
I have my database locally.
Using node-pg-migrate and postgreSQL
In a general way, the order of migrations matters as you can e.g. alter the same type and the last run migration wins.
It can happen e.g. if you have pull requests and merge them to base branch in a different order than the migrations were created.
You can now e.g. rename migration so it is sorted on disk in the correct order (before not-run-migrations) and update records in pgmigrations table, or you can put new migrations aside (so they do not trigger this error) and run as many down migrations as needed, then restore migrations definitions on disk and run up migrations.
for the first time I updated an app with the jhipster upgrade command.
It seems all ok but at the end of the updating it noticed me about three conflicts that I have to resolve manually.
My first problem is: how to update the Liquibase scripts?
In this case, have been added some uniqueConstraintName but I can't to add them in my scripts because they have already been executed.
So, which is the best solution? Don't update the scripts? Mark them as merged? Add manually another script in order to add these constraints?
And how I have to solve other conflicts like the image below?
Simply copy and paste from new file to old file?
Thanks a lot,
Andrea
If you have a live database, then you must not upgrade your liquibase scripts but add new ones to do the migration. What you can do is running the new scripts against a blank dev database (same type of db as prod), then revert to old scripts, then call ./mvnw liquibase:diff to get the delta script, then add the delta script to the scripts to run.
I want to create rollback task for Release Management in visual basic online.
i have some steps but it will take more time.
steps are:
Back Up: perform a backup of the original files to use for rollback later.
Deploy:Copy latest files from artifact to the target folder.
3.Configure — Make configuration changes to the setup.
4.Rollback — Rollback the files from backup in case Deploy failed. Delete backup before exiting.
we can see it will take long time while backup a database . So how we can optimize ?
is there any other method so we can implement and take less time when we will do rollback task ?
There isn’t the built-in feature/task to rollback changes in release, you need to do it by your own script.
There are various options that can be considered as a rollback
strategy.
Option#1 : Undo the change by redeploying the previous release
The first option is to simply redeploy the previously successful
release. This might work well for standalone applications.
Whenever an application depends on some external services or has a
database involved, this approach does not work well. The dependent
services might have upgraded and no longer compatible with the
previous release. The database might have changed the schema making
the previous release no longer healthy.
Option#2 : Fix the issue, do another release
The second option is to simply do nothing. Something went wrong,
troubleshoot it and fix it. Once we fix the issue, we can do another
release.
This however means the environment would remain unhealthy for some
time, as long as it takes for the fix to be ready and deployed.
Option#3 : Understand what failed in the deployment and make a temporary change for the time being
Both the above options are both valid approaches but with some
limitations.
That brings us to a third option. While the fix is getting ready
(option 2), make a minimum change to the environment to get it
temporarily healthy.
More information, please refer to: Implement Rollback with Release Management for TFS 2015 (Apply to VSTS)
You can't really optimise the backup/restore process.
If you use a Virtual Machene to deploy to then you should snapshot it prior to the upgrade, then a roll back is simply restoring the snapshot.
This will be much quicker, seconds, rather than minutes or hours...
Is there a way to rollback a Windows Azure Website and SQL deployment / publishing?
I published a website, now it's causing a lot of errors, and I want to get back to the previous state and work on the code some more.
Is this possible?
If you use Git or TFS you can take advantage of deployment rollback by selecting the previous deployment (as explained by Nathan Totten):
To rollback the database you can do several things. The easiest could be to use EF Migrations:
Run EF Migrations from your Application_Start (not sure if this is something you want to do
(Manually) call migrations.exe:
Migrate.exe MyApp.exe /startupConfigurationFile=”MyApp.exe.config” /targetMigration=”MyPreviousVersion”
I have an app that I have been working on and I did a bunch of changes and then realized later I should have been adding versioning to the Core Data model. So I'm trying to go back and do that now.
Basic information:
I think everything I've done would fall under the lightweight migration feature.
I'm using git
I already have the app in user's hands
My question is: what is the easiest way to do this?
Since I'm using git, could I simply checkout the data model from when I submitted it to apple, create a new version for it, and add my changes? My main fear with this idea is that my project.pbxproj file would be incorrect. Would this an issue? Is there a way to get around this?
IF I could do this, would I need to recreate my class files or would that be ok (assuming I get it back to being identical to what I currently have).
IF I CAN'T do this, then what can I do? If its a matter of starting from the last version I pushed to Apple and applying changes I guess I should look into doing it with git rebase, right?
This has nothing to do with git.
You need to create a new version of your app, provide the new data model, set it for lightweight migration and then release it as an update. Core Data will basically assume that any model without version info is version zero and attempt a migration to the new version.
When the user downloads the update, the automatic migration will trigger the first time the app runs.
Creating a new version means nothing more than changing the version number in the project info. When submitted, that will trigger the upgrade and the migration.