How to control the usage of APIs by consumers during a given period in Azure function app Http trigger. Simply how to set a requests throttle when exceed the request limit, and please let me know a solution without using azure API Gateway.
The only control you have over host creation in Azure Functions an obscure application setting: WEBSITE_MAX_DYNAMIC_APPLICATION_SCALE_OUT. This implies that you can control the number of hosts that are generated, though Microsoft claim that “it’s not completely foolproof” and “is not fully supported”.
From my own experience it only throttles host creation effectively if you set the value to something pretty low, i.e. less than 50. At larger values then its impact is pretty limited. It’s been implied that this feature will be will be worked on in the future, but the corresponding issue has been open in GitHub with no update since July 2017.
For more details, you could refer to this article.
You can use the initialVisibilityDelay property of the CloudQueue.AddMessage function as outlined in this blog post.
This will throttle the message to prevent the 429 error if implemented correctly using the leaky bucket algorithm or equivalent.
Related
My application sends requests to Azure Machine Learning REST API in order to invoke a batch endpoint and start scoring jobs as described here. It works well for small number of requests, but if the app sends many concurrent requests the REST API sometimes responds with status code 429 "TooManyRequests" and message "Received too many requests in a short amount of time. Retry again after 1 seconds.". For example, it happened after sending 77 requests at once.
The message is pretty clear and the best solution I can think about is to throttle outgoing requests. That is making sure the app doesn't exceed limits when it sends concurrent requests. But the problem is I don't know what are the request limits for Azure Machine Learning REST API. Looking through the Microsoft documentation I could only find this article which provides limits for Managed online endpoints whereas I'm looking for Batch endpoints.
I would really appreciate if someone helped me to find the Azure ML REST API request limits or suggested a better solution. Thanks.
UPDATE 20 Jun 2022:
I couldn't find out how many concurrent requests are allowed by Azure Machine Learning batch endpoints. So I ended with a limit of 10 outgoing requests which solved the "TooManyRequests" problem. In order to throttle requests I used SemaphoreSlim as described here.
According to the document, there is chance to enhance the quota of the request limit which is the way to solve the request limit exceed issue. Regarding batch quota limit, here is the document designed by Microsoft.
According to the above image, change the quota values.
Document Credit: prkannap and team
Alternatively, you could reduce the number of requests by storing multiple input files in a folder and invoking the job with the folder path.
If you want further assistance, please file a support ticket and a customer support engineer will assist you.
I have an Azure function with ServiceBusTrigger which will post the message content to a webservice behind an Azure API Manager. In some cases the load of the (3rd party) webserver backend is too high and it collapses returning error 500.
I'm looking for a proper way to implement circuit breaker here.
I've considered the following:
Disable the azure function, but it might result in data loss due to multiple messages in memory (serviceBus.prefetchCount)
Implement API Manager with rate-limit policy, but this seems counter productive as it runs fine in most cases
Re-architecting the 3rd party webservice is out of scope :)
Set the queue to ReceiveDisabled, this is the preferred solution, but it results in my InputBinding throwing a huge amount of MessagingEntityDisabledExceptions which I'm (so far) unable to catch and handle myself. I've checked the docs for host.json, ServiceBusTrigger and the Run parameters but was unable to find a useful setting there.
Keep some sort of responsecode resultset and increase retry time, not ideal in a serverless scenario with multiple parallel functions.
Let API manager map 500 errors to 429 and reschedule those later, will probably work but since we send a lot of messages it will hammer the service for some time. In addition it's hard to distinguish between a temporary 500 error or a consecutive one.
Note that this question is not about deciding whether or not to trigger the circuitbreaker, merely to handle the appropriate action afterwards.
Additional info
Azure functionsV2, dotnet core 3.1 run in consumption plan
API Manager runs Basic SKU
Service Bus runs in premium tier
Messagecount: 300.000
I have an Azure function app triggered by an HttpRequest. The function app reads the request, tosses one copy of it into a storage table for safekeeping and sends another copy to a queue for further processing by another element of the system. I have a client running an ApacheBench test that reports approximately 148 requests per second processed. That rate of processing will not be enough for our expected load.
My understanding of function apps is that it should spawn as many instances as is needed to handle the load sent to it. But this function app might not be scaling out quickly enough as it’s only handling that 148 requests per second. I need it to handle at least 200 requests per second.
I’m not 100% sure the problem is on my end, though. In analyzing the performance of my function app I found a LOT of 429 errors. What I found online, particularly https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/resource-manager-request-limits, suggests that these errors could be due to too many requests being sent from a single IP. Would several ApacheBench 10K and 20K request load tests within a given day cause the 429 error?
However, if that’s not it, if the problem is with my function app, how can I force my function app to spawn more instances more quickly? I assume this is the way to get more throughput per second. But I’m still very new at working with function apps so if there is a different way, I would more than welcome your input.
Maybe the Premium app service plan that’s in public preview would handle more throughput? I’ve thought about switching over to that and running a quick test but am unsure if I’d be able to switch back?
Maybe EventHub is something I need to investigate? Is that something that might increase my apparent throughput by catching more requests and holding on to them until the function app could accept and process them?
Thanks in advance for any assistance you can give.
You dont provide much context of you app but this is few steps how you can improve
If you want more control you need to use App Service plan with always on to avoid cold start, also you will need to configure auto scaling since you are responsible in this plan and auto scale is not enabled by default in app service plan.
Your azure function must be fully async as you have external dependencies so you dont want to block thread while you are calling them.
Look on the limits. Using host.json you can tweek it.
429 error means that function is busy to process your request, so probably when you writing to table you are not using async and blocking thread
Function apps work very well and scale as it says. It could be because request coming from Single IP and Azure could be considering it DDOS. You can do the following
AzureDevOps Load Test
You can load test using one of the azure service . I am very sure they have better criteria of handling IPs. Azure DeveOps Load Test
Provision VM in Azure
The way i normally do is provision the VM (windows 10 pro) in azure and use JMeter to Load test. I have use this method to test and it works fine. You can provision couple of them and subdivide the load.
Use professional Load testing services
If possible you may use services like Loader.io . They use sophisticated algos to run the load test and provision bunch of VMs to run the same test.
Use Application Insights
If not already you must be using application insights to have a better look from server perspective. Go to live stream and see how many instance it would provision to handle the load test . You can easily look into events and error logs that may be arising and investigate. You can deep dive into each associated dependency and investigate the problem.
The scaling documentation for Azure Functions is a bit light on details for how Azure Functions decide when to add more instances of an app.
Say for example I have a function that is triggered by a Github webhook. 10,000 people simultaneously commit to the Github repo (with no merge conflicts ;) ), and Github calls my function 10,000 times in a very short period of time.
What can I expect to happen? Specifically,
Will Azure Functions throttle the webhook calls? i.e., will Azure Functions reject certain function calls if my function app is under high load?
Does Azure Functions queue the requests somehow? If so, where/how?
How many instances of my function app will Azure Functions create in this scenario? One for each request (i.e., 10,000), and each will run in parallel?
If my app function was scaled down to zero instances, because there was no load on it, could I expect to see some "warm-up time" before the first function is executed? Roughly how long?
Azure Functions won't reject a webhook call, but in the case of sudden, extreme load, some requests may timeout. For web apis, please include retry on the client, as a best practice.
They aren't queued in any persistent place. They are (implementation detail) managed by IIS.
(Implementation detail) Number of instances isn't a hard set thing. We have certain, unpublished protections in place, but we're designed to scale quite far. Your requests will be handled by multiple instances.
Yes. Right now, it's pretty hefty (seconds), but we'll be working to improve it. For perf sensitive situations, a canary or a timer trigger to keep it awake is recommended.
I'm from the Azure Functions team. The things I marked as implementation details aren't promises and will likely also change as we evolve our service; just an attempt at transparency.
tested today. it took more than seconds :(
ACTUAL PERFORMANCE
--------------
ClientConnected: 13:58:41.589
ClientBeginRequest: 13:58:41.592
GotRequestHeaders: 13:58:41.592
ClientDoneRequest: 13:58:41.592
Determine Gateway: 0ms
DNS Lookup: 65ms
TCP/IP Connect: 40ms
HTTPS Handshake: 114ms
ServerConnected: 13:58:41.703
FiddlerBeginRequest: 13:58:41.816
ServerGotRequest: 13:58:41.817
ServerBeginResponse: 14:00:36.790
GotResponseHeaders: 14:00:36.790
ServerDoneResponse: 14:00:36.790
ClientBeginResponse: 14:00:36.790
ClientDoneResponse: 14:00:36.790
Overall Elapsed: **0:01:55.198**
Today at a customer we analysed the logs of the previous weeks and we found the following issue regarding Windows Azure Service Bus Queues:
The request was terminated because the entity is being throttled.
Please wait 10 seconds and try again.
After verifying the code I told them to use the Transient Fault Handing Application Block (TOPAZ) to implement a retry policy like this one:
var retryStrategy = new Incremental(5, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1), TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2));
var retryPolicy = new RetryPolicy<ServiceBusTransientErrorDetectionStrategy>(retryStrategy);
The customer answered:
"Ah that's great, so it will also handle the fact that it should wait
for 10 seconds when throttled."
Come to think about it, I never verified if this was the case or not. I always assumed this was the case. In the Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.WindowsAzure.TransientFaultHandling assembly I looked for code that would wait for 10 seconds in case of throttling but didn't find anything.
Does this mean that TOPAZ isn't sufficient to create resilient applications? Should this be combined with some custom code to handle throttling (ie: wait 10 seconds in case of a specific exception)?
As far as throttling concerned, Topaz provides a set of built-in retry strategies, including:
- Fixed interval
- Incremental intervals
- Random exponential back-off intervals
You can also write your custom retry stragey and plug-it into Topaz.
Also, as Brent indicated, 10 sec wait is not mandatory. In many cases, retrying immediately may succeed without the need to wait. By default, Topaz performs the first retry immediately before using the retry intervals defined by the strategy.
For more info, see Ch.6 of the "Building Elastic and Resilient Cloud Apps" Developer's Guide, also available as epub/mobi/pdf from here.
If you have suggestions/feature requests for Topaz, please submit them via the uservoice.
As I recall, the "10 second" wait isn't a requirement. Additionally, TOPAZ I believe also has backoff capabilities which would help you over come thing.
On a personal note, I'd argue that simply utilzing something like TOPAZ is not sufficient to creating a truely resilient solution. Resiliency goes beyond just throttling on a single connection point, you'll also need to be able to handle failover to a redundant endpoint which TOPAZ won't do.