I have a set of data that I wanna make dynamically by clicking dropdown and to reflect that on chart. The problem is, I have like small tables (like in Example, Material A, B, C..) with their certain columns, and that is always the same. But how to connect them to the chart so that I only click which Material I wanna?
seems simple but I am not figuring out with more selections like this...
PivotTables is one of the option, I just managed...but I would like to know with functions also.
To answer this problem, actually the best option is Pivot tables. So to put in one sheet all the data (one column for material, other for date and so on..), because theyre in the same shape lets say, and in my case I know I will always get the same shape and set of data, just date/tonnage and registration is gonna be changed. So, hit the refresh button inside Pivot and there you have it.
That looks great using Pivot Charts, without any kind of formulas or functions that gave me a thought at the beginning.
Greets!
Related
I have built a table with a lot of columns. I would like to create a user form to show a majority of the information in the columns so I can hide the columns in the spreadsheet so there isn't so much to look at. A lot of columns can be overwhelming when looking at it. I know some of the most popular ways to write VBA so that data in the user form makes it into the table. However I noticed that if I ever needed to add a column I then have to edit the vba code to make sure the data still goes in the correct cells.
So my question is this. Is there a way to write the code using the table column headers so the code uses the header label as a point of reference instead of the column number?
I am trying to create a simple pivot table which will tell me how many community residents reported a particular problem, and what percentage of them reported each problem type. I have a data set with name, and then columns for each type of problem. Here's an small sample of the data set:
I have created a pivot table which sums each of these columns and also provides me the total number of people who reported any type of problem at all. Here's what I have:
I want to add a second column to this pivot table that gives the percent of times each problem type was reported. Sounds simple, but because of the structure of the original data set, I can't figure out how to do it. I can set up formulas outside of the Pivot Table which reference the table, but in doing so I forfeit the ability to graph the percentages on a pivot chart. Any ideas how to create a calculated field for this pivot table?
Just to be clear, what I want is something like this, except all contained in the structure of the pivot table:
Edit: I've changed the example of the data set. Here's an explanation of the pivot table. The values under the "# Reporting Issue" column are counts of all the 1's under each corresponding column in the data set. This meant that I had to add each row to the pivot table independently, as you can see here:
I'm open to the idea that I need to change the formatting of the data set, but I'm not sure of the best way to do it. This was set up initially because it allowed for easy compilation into a data table, but Pivot Tables seem to be a different story.
Hopefully this edit clarifies things.
You need to unpivot your data so that you turn it into a Flat File...something that the PivotTable can consume properly.
The easiest way is to use something called PowerQuery, which is baked in to Excel 2016 but available as a free addin from Microsoft for any other versions. Google PowerQuery Unpivot and you will turn up hundreds of tutorials, such as this one from my good pal Chandoo . PowerQuery looks slightly daunting at first to a first time user, but it is freakin easy once you get your head around how to use it. PQ is by far the best addition to Excel in years. PowerPivot being a close second.
If you can't install PowerQuery, then you can use your current data structure to make a 'staging pivot', and then drag the Values label that will appear in the Columns area to the bottom of the ROWS pane, like in this excerpt from a book I'm writing:
Note that my Year categories are equivalent to your Issues categories.
That will emulate the flat file layout you’re after. All you need to do then is turn this intermediate PivotTable back into a normal range, change that Values heading to Issue, and add a Count heading and you’ve got the flat file you need to build a useable PivotTable.
You can also use VBA. Google Unpivot VBA and turn up hundreds of results, including this blazingly fast code I posted some time back. (Look for the code under the —Update 26 November 2013— heading.)
You can also use the DoubleClick extraction trick.
My apologies if this question is posted elsewhere, but I believe part of my problem is that I'm not familiar with the terminology. Searching becomes rather difficult when you don't know the keywords to use...
I've inherited a PivotTable that pulls data from an SQL database. Three of the columns in this table are "grouped." By this I mean that all duplicate items in these columns are always next to each other. I want to removing these groupings so that sorting the table is easier. Does anybody know how to do this?
EDIT:My work computer has both snipping tool and paint disabled...So here is a picture of something similar. In my table, all of the data is pulled from the database. The left two columns (in this example) have repeated data, so it groups them like so. These sections are collapsible and expandable.
(source: datapigtechnologies.com)
There is an option on the Pivot Table menu Design->Report Layout->Repeat All Item Labels. This will repeat all the labels when combined with a Tabular or Outline style layout. You will also do better (more than likely) to remove the subtotals as well.
Menu and before
After
I had this issue as well. Remove ALL filtering so you ONLY have those two columns at once. Once all filtering is removed it will allow you to ungroup them and the extra column will go away.
Does anyone know if its possible to select one column in an Excel PivotChart (i.e. Name in my example) but sum the values by ID without displaying the ID column in the chart?
In the example below, we have two Johns. I want to view both of them in the chart like in chart two, but I don't want to display their ID fields in the chart.
[EDIT]
Real case scenario is that I need to filter on top 10 file views by file name. And if we have a bunch of files named image1.jpg (because people don't properly name their files), we end up bucketing them all together and it looks like image1.jpg has way more views than it actually has; causing the chart to be skewed. I know it might be confusing to have two same data labels, but oh well. :) The user will just have to drill into one to see other details.
I did find a clean way of doing this using hierarchies in PowerPivot, but with a large dataset the performance is horrible.
Create a hierarchy in powerpivot with ID and Name. Use the hierarchy in the PivotChart category. Only ID field shows up initially. Expand entire field and the names show up. Hide level ID, and voila. You get all Names without ID column, but only to be used on smaller datasets.
datamodel,
easiest way to do this is created a calculated column in PowerPivot window where you will combine filename AND file id.
With that, it's very easy and still should be quite good from performance perspective. Better yet if you could prepare this column in your import file / on your server.
Result could then look like this:
From a data visualisation point of view it will be most confusing to have two data points with the same label and no means of differentiating them. So, having the ID in the X axis is actually helping the reader to make sense of the information.
From a technical point of view, you can create a chart that is based on the pivot table, but is not a pivot chart. Use the pivot table as the source for a regular chart and select only the Name as the X axis label.
If the pivot table dimensions may change when it is refreshed, you can use dynamic range names to ringfence the ranges required for the chart.
In the screenshot below, the label range chtLabels uses the formula
=OFFSET(Sheet1!$F$38,1,0,COUNTA(Sheet1!$F:$F)-1,1)
The range chtValues uses
=OFFSET(chtLabels,0,1)
When adding the range names to the chart source dialogues, they must be preceded with the sheet name or the file name.
I have got two adjacent tables. When I apply data filter on first table, it filters the whole row hiding rows from 2nd table as well. How do I restrict filter to only the first table range?
To answer your direct question How do I restrict filter to only the first table range? the answer is - you can't.
Reading the comments it seems what you need is to display the filtered table data next to a chart and another table. There is a little know tool in Excel that you can use to achieve this - the Camera Tool. With this you can create a dynamic image of a range and place it where you want. The image updates when a filter is applied to the source range, without affecting the rows on the Dashboard sheet.
Screenshots to demonstrate:
Setup with tables on seperate sheets, and camera images beside chart on dashboard sheet
With Filter applied to Table A
The Camera tool is not on the Ribbon (Excel 2010) or the standard toolbars (Excel 2003). You need to add it using Customisation. (Add to Qucik Access Toolbar in 2010 or Tools/Customisation Menu in 2003)
Unfortunately you won't be able to do that. When you filter, it filters the entire row (something to think about would be how the row number would display if that weren't the case). You will need to restructure your setup if you wish to prevent that (not sure of your particular use case, so sorry I can't give a more specific suggestion).
I had a similar issue, where i had a table I wanted to remain static - like a key, but wanted to filter the main table.
To get around this, I copied the static table, and pasted it as an image. This way, when you filter on the main table, the image remains where you have put it.
A simple workaround for this general issue that others may have mentioned (but I don't see here):
You can't filter just a range (e.g. a few columns in a spreadsheet), but you can sort just a range. And by sorting the range, then deleting some blocks of unwanted cells in the range, then sorting the range back to the original order, you can fake a filter.
A bit clunky, but easy for some jobs if you're careful.