Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-anaconda-on-ubuntu-18-04-quickstart
Using this link,I followed steps and I could download Anaconda 64 bit, however my Computer OS is 32 bit. I am using Linux.
$ cd /tmp
$ curl -O https://repo.anaconda.com/archive/Anaconda3-2019.03-Linux-x86_64.sh
I want the link to Anaconda 32 bit after curl -O. In the Anaconda distribution link https://www.anaconda.com/distribution/#linux there are only python with 64 bit OS links.
Currently Python 2.7 is installed on my computer.
Please help.
Looking at https://repo.anaconda.com/archive it seems anaconda has stopped providing 32-bit x86 Linux packages. The latest 32-bit x86 Linux package seems to be https://repo.anaconda.com/archive/Anaconda2-2018.12-Linux-x86.sh
(You might want to consider upgrading to x86-64 Linux yourself as well, but that's a separate topic)
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I have installed the latest stable version of Ubuntu (Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS).
I remarked that when I search for library like "Eigen or openMp", I have no result. However, in older Ubuntu versions, I could install lot of libraries. I know that I can install them via terminal, but I prefer to find them via the software-center. Is there a trick to let the software-center find such libraries ?
Some libraries receive updates to support latest ubuntu versions after a considerable period of time.What you can do is downloading the debian package from internet and install it using Ubuntu Software Manager.Visit the link below for more details.
vitux.com/3-ways-to-install-software-from-deb-packages-in-ubuntu/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I've received a linux-yocto box. I now I'm trying to installing some software, on ubuntu I use apt-get but it seems not to work/installe. so I've tried yum same result.
so my question is, is there a way to find out which package manager is install on my linux system ?
thanks in advance !
Yocto is using either rpm, dpkg, or opkg as the package manager. If the tools are installed on the image, which isn't a requirement, then the binaries are either dnf (or yum if it is a really old release), apt-get, or opkg respectively.
There's a reasonable chance that you've been given an image without a package manager or a working feed though. The joy of Yocto is that it is so flexible, so you should ask whoever gave you the software.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
As I wanted to learn Linux better, after using Fedora for a while I installed Arch Linux. Install was ok and working fine. But while I was installing KDE desktop environment, I didn't choose default(all) option, rather I choose randomnly a number for every step. KDE got installed and working. However I didn't used KDE before. I'm suspecting everything didn't installed. Did I made mistake choosing a random option instead choosing default? Can I install those packages for KDE?
It's recommended to choose "all" from the group plasma under Pacman to have a full working desktop environment.
But, not choosing "all" is not a mistake at all.
You can at any time install the package you want one by one with:
pacman -S nameOfPackage
or install all non-installed packages from plasma with:
pacman -S plasma
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to compile my code on Linux 3.14.17 (vanilla) kernel.
Can anyone help me find a distro which comes with this kernel by default.
If there is no distro which comes with this kernel then how can I use this kernel or which Linux distro is based on the above kernel.
Thanks
Kumar
The simplest solution is to use your favorite distro (for example Ubuntu) and to compile the kernel at the desired version.
On this link, there is a step-by-step explanation on how to compile a vanilla kernel for Ubuntu.
Adapt for the given version you want.
Ubuntu provides special repository with packaged kernels for alomost every upstream version. This folder provides kernel packages for 3.14.17. Just download and install them them via
dpkg -i *.deb
Check your architecture i.e. i386 or amd64 before downloading.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have prepared partition, Mint iso and Windows 7. Can I easily install Mint directly from Windows without using pen drive or CD?
You should not do that. You create another partition and put a Linux live image there. Then you boot this system and install Linux Mint like you would from CD or USB
You shouldn't have many issues.
During the install on Mint, you will be allowed to select install options. If Mint detects a preexisting OS, it defaults to "install along side OS xxx."
I believe from there you can select your partition or create new ones.