In device driver programming we are using following items:
1. Device driver code
2. Device file
3. Actual physical Hardware (till now not used in my coding)
4. User space application code
What I understood is device file is a intermediate bridge between device driver code and user application code. And device file is a temporary (like bidirectional pipe) buffer.
Can anybody clarify me whatever I understood is correct? Also explain me how above four listed things are communicated internally in kernel. Even tried from LDD3 book, but still I am not getting correct picture.
Related
I want to learn how Linux OS understands the underlying hardware.Can anyone suggest me where to start for getting this understanding,As of now i just know the '/dev' sub-directory plays a vital role in that.
It has the device special files which are like a portal to the device driver which then takes it to the physical device.
I read somewhere that Udev daemon listens to the netlink socket to collect this information and Udev device manager detects addition and removal of devices as they occur.
But with these i am just not satisfied with the thought of how Linux reads the hardware.
Please let me know where to start to understand this, i am so thankful to anyone trying to help.
I think at first you need to find out how the memory mapping works. What is the address space and how it relates to physical memory. Then you could read about how the hardware is mapped in address space and how to access it. It is a big amount of docs to read.
Some of those information are in Linux Documentation Project.
Additionally some knowledge about electronic would be helpful.
In general - Linux for communication with devices needs some "channel" of communication. This channel may be for example ISA, PCI, USB, etc bus. For example PCI devices are memory mapped devices and Linux kernel communicates with them via memory accesses. So first Linux needs to see given device in some memory area and then it is able to configure this device and do some communication with it.
In case of USB devices it is a little bit complicated because USB devices are not memory mapped. You need to configure USB host first to be able to communicate with USB devices. Every communication with USB device is achieved via USB host.
There are also devices which are not connected via ISA, PCI or USB. They are connected directly to the processor and visible under some memory address. This solution is usually implemented in embedded devices. For example ARM processors use this approach.
Regarding udev - it is user-space application which listens for events from Linux kernel and helps other applications with recognizing device addition and configuration.
I'm trying to write a Linux character device driver for a device that just happens to communicate over I2C. The device is an Atmel microcontroller with code that provides an I2C address. It already works using the typical i2c-dev method on the Linux-side.
So now I want to replicate i2c-dev as a new driver that works specifically with this particular device, so that I can add some of my own device-specific abstraction code on top. But I'd like to trim out all the unnecessary code from i2c-dev that currently makes it generic. What can be removed in this situation?
What can be removed in this situation?
You're actually asking an XY question.
You would be better off looking at and adapting an existing I2C device driver that is already similar in required functionality, rather than hacking a special case driver for userspace access.
So now I want to replicate i2c-dev as a new driver that works specifically with this particular device, so that I can add some of my own device-specific abstraction code on top
So then you actually need to write a "Client driver" as described below (from Linux Documentation/i2c/summary):
When we talk about I2C, we use the following terms:
Bus -> Algorithm
Adapter
Device -> Driver
Client
An Algorithm driver contains general code that can be used for a whole class
of I2C adapters. Each specific adapter driver either depends on one algorithm
driver, or includes its own implementation.
A Driver driver (yes, this sounds ridiculous, sorry) contains the general
code to access some type of device. Each detected device gets its own
data in the Client structure. Usually, Driver and Client are more closely
integrated than Algorithm and Adapter.
Details are in Documentation/i2c/writing-clients.
To find a driver of similar functionality, scan the list of I2C client drivers. Note that these I2C drivers are located in the Linux source tree by their functionality (e.g. drivers/rtc/ or drivers/hwmon/) and not their interface (i.e. I2C).
I am currently reading the Linux Module Programming Guide and I have stumbled onto two terms that have confused a bit - device files and device driver. Upon goggling these terms I have come across the following-
A device driver is a piece of software that operates or controls a particular type of device.
A device file is an interface for a device driver that appears in a file system as if it were an ordinary file. In Unix-like operating systems, these are usually found under the /dev directory and are also called device nodes.
What I would like to know is -
1) Are device files an interface between user space programs and the device driver?
2) Does the program access the driver in the kernel via the appropriate device special file?
eg, when using say spidev char dev file, does that allow my userspace program to interact with spi.c and omap2_mcspi.c etc using simple read, write and ioctl calls?
One of the primary abstractions in Unix is the file (source):
Programs, services, texts, images, and so forth, are all files. Input and output devices, and generally all devices, are considered to be files, according to the system.
This lets users treat a variety of entities with a uniform set of operations, even through the implementation of those operations may be wildly different.
As you were getting at with your question, device files are the user facing side of the abstraction. This is what the user sees; a file that they can write to, read from, open, close, etc. The device drivers are the implementation of those operations.
So the user will make a call to a file operation such as write, and then the kernel will then use the device driver to carry out the operation.
Device File like /dev/spidevX.Y is a SW abstraction of a SPI device which exposes Linux low level SPI API to the userspace with syscalls (in Linux driver world known as "file operations"):
That is read(), write(), ioctl()...
spidev.c is a special kind of driver which is registered for generic SPI client(chip) devices, and it's main goal is to export Kernel low level SPI API to userspace.
There is a whole Linux SPI layer in between defined in spi.c
Device driver representing real HW SPI controller is where callbacks (hooks) are implemented and registered to the kernel as a part of spi_master (spi_controller)structure.
Here is a callback initialization for SPI message transfer:
master->transfer_one_message = atmel_spi_transfer_one_message;
everything in linux is a file.
device driver is a software used by operating system to communicate with device.
device driver makes use of device files.
I am trying to find out a high-level overview of how the USB storage driver works in Linux. I'm looking for a simple article or even a picture/flowchart describing how it works.
Basically, I'm looking to get these questions answered:
When you plug the device into your computer, what happens? Is there a daemon that picks up on it, or does the event trigger an interrupt somewhere? Does the core USB driver read information about the device before passing control over to the USB storage driver? How does it decide what type of device it is? How does the device get mounted, and what allows it to communicate with the computer's filesystem? When I copy a file, what does the data flow look like in the kernel?
I hope the question isn't too vague - I tried Google to no avail, so I'm wondering if anyone knows any articles or diagrams that can explain this, or perhaps if they can explain it themselves without too much effort. Thanks.
No, it is a very good question.
The block writing is going in linux with the block device layer. The filesystems are working with this block dev layer.
If this layer wants to write something out, says it to the driver of the usb master device. This driver is talking with the usb controller chip of the motherboard.
This chip is very simple: the usb is practically a serial port, with a lot of extensions, mainly targeting the autoconfiguration and the power management. But basically, you can write out bytes, and read in bytes.
Your questions:
When you plug the device into your computer, what happens? Is there a daemon that picks up on it, or does the event trigger an interrupt somewhere?
The device (usb slave) says the master (in the motherboard): "I am here". The usb controller chip gets the message and says it to the kernel (normally) with an interrupt. The kernel reinitializes and rescans the usb bus, and says the udev: "here is a new 1234:5678 usb device on the usb tree 1.3.5"
"How does it decide what type of device it is?"
Usb devices have a vendor and model id, and they can say this on ask. Google for "usb ids".
"How does the device get mounted, and what allows it to communicate with the computer's filesystem?"
The kernel only loads the driver and says the udev (which is in userspace): "Here is a new block device on device number 22:16". From this, udev tries to mount this with some userspace daemon, it is already distribution-dependant.
I have a hardware device that consists of 3 separate chips on an I2C bus. I would like to group them together and expose them to userland as one logical device. The user would see the logical device represented by a single directory somewhere in /sys as well as the nodes you'd expect from the I2C chips under /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-?/*.
One of the chips is an MCP23017 which as far as I can tell already has a driver (drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c) and I'd like to reuse it. Another of the chips is a PCA9685 and I would like to contribute a driver for this chip that uses the PWM system in include/linux/pwm.h. The third chip is an MCU running custom firmware.
How should I structure the set of drivers? One idea I had is to register a platform driver to present the logical device, and use I2C drivers from within that. Is this a good way to go? Are there better ways?
The logical device is a motor driver board and IR receiver. I have a simple diagram of its structure.
I'm looking to create two interfaces. The first similar to /sys/class/gpio where motors can be 'exported' and then accessed via reading and writing attributes. This would be useful for shell script access and quick debugging of the mechanical parts of the system attached to the motors. The second a character device node in /dev where data can be read or written in binary format, more useful for application control.
it seems not usual design, are you sure you have access to I2C bus of all chips ?
I think you should be able to talk only to MCU, and MCU should manage other devices.
Otherwise, why MCU is there ?
However, I cannot see your diagram, perhaps link is wrong.