I have an existing and functioning OOT block in GNU radio. I am just trying to add an extra parameter to it to increase the block's flexibility.
I have made appropriate modifications in all the .h, .cc files corresponding to the block as well as the .cxx and swig.py. While executing the block, I still get an error saying 'RuntimeError: More keyword list entries (7) than format specifiers (6)' Im unable to find why. Is there an online resource apart from GNU tutorial which can guide me.
So, I'm going to assume version 3.7 because you mentioned swig.
The out of tree block is drawn according to the xml file in the grc folder.
Did you update the function calls in the xml to match your updates in the .h?
Related
I am attempting to convert parts of an Android app to iOS using Doppl, and I am getting a strange result: Doppl keeps trying to pull in android.arch.lifecycle:reactivestreams, even though I don't want it to.
Specifically, in app/build/j2objcSrcGenMain/android/arch/lifecycle/, there is a reactivestrams/ subdirectory with R.h and R.m files in it. This seems to make Xcode cranky and may explain why I had some oddities with pod install.
My app/build.gradle has compile "android.arch.lifecycle:reactivestreams:$archVer", because my activity is using LiveDataReactiveStreams.fromPublisher(). However:
The activity is not in the translatePattern (and since its code is not showing up in app/build/j2objcSrcGenMain/, I have to assume that the translatePattern is fine)
I do not have a doppl statement related to reactivestreams, because there does not appear to be a Doppl conversion of this library (nor should it be needed here)
AFAIK, nowhere else in this app am I referring to LiveDataReactiveStreams, which AFAIK is the one-and-only public class from the reactivestreams library
So, the questions:
What determines whether Doppl creates R.h and R.m files for some dependency? It's not the existence of a doppl statement, as I have doppl statements for a lot of other dependencies (RxJava, RxAndroid, Retrofit) and those do not get R.h and R.m files. It's not whether the dependency is referenced from generated code, as my repository definitely uses RxJava and Retrofit, yet there are no R files for those.
How can I figure out why Doppl generates R.h and R.m for reactivestreams?
Once I get this cleared up... do I re-run pod install, or is there some other pod command to refresh an existing pod with a new implementation?
Look into 'app/build/generated/source/r/debug' and confirm there's an R.java being created for the architecture component. It'll be under 'android/arch/lifecycle/reactivestrams'.
I think there are 2 problems here.
Problem 1
Somehow Doppl/J2objc is of the opinion that this file should be transpiled. It could be either that 'translatePattern' matches with it, or that something in the shared code is referencing it. If you can't figure out which, please post a comment and I'll try to help (or post in slack group).
Problem 2
Regardless of why that 'R.java' is being sucked into the translate step, because of how stock J2objc is configured, the code is being generated with package folders instead of creating One Big Name. That generated file should be called 'AndroidArchLifecycleReactivestramsR.h' (and AndroidArchLifecycleReactivestramsR.m). Xcode really doesn't like package folders. That's why there's a slightly custom J2ojbc being used with Doppl, so we can have files with big names instead of folders.
In cases where you intentionally use package names that match with what J2objc considers to be "system" classes, you need to provide a header mapping file to force long names. The 'androidbase' doppl library needs to add a lot of files that are in the 'android' package, which J2objc considers "system". We override those names in the mapping file.
build.gradle
https://github.com/doppllib/core-doppl/blob/master/androidbase/build.gradle#L19
mapping file
https://github.com/doppllib/core-doppl/blob/master/androidbase/src/main/java/androidbase.mappings
I screwed up.
In my dopplConfig, I have:
translatePattern {
include '**/api/**'
include '**/arch/**'
include '**/RepositoryTest.java'
}
In this case, **/arch/** not only matches my arch package, but also the arch package from the Architecture Components.
Ordinarily, this would not matter, because the Architecture Components source code is not in my project. But, R.java gets generated, due to resources, and the translatePattern includes generated source code in addition to lovingly hand-crafted source code. So, that's where my extraneous Objective-C was coming from.
Many thanks to Kevin Galligan for his assistance with this, out on the #newbiehelp Doppl Slack channel!
I'm building NWChem on Cray. libtcmalloc_minimal is already added to an archive file by the cc in my Cray environment. In my configure routine, it explicitly appends a second -ltcmalloc_minimal resulting in a multiple definition and a configure fail. But none of the configure.* files or makefiles (or any files included with NWChem) contain any reference to tcmalloc_minimal.
How is tcmalloc_minimal getting in there?
How can I keep it out?
The autoconf _AC_FC_LIBRARY_LDFLAGS macro (called as part of AC_PROG_FC) and other macros querying library flags and objects retrieves this value from the verbose compiler output (which contains this library on Cray systems). For this reason Cray's patched autoconf contains a change of the above macro to get rid of the flag. I'm currently in the process of figuring out an override to the macro so configure scripts produced by unpatched versions of autoconf also work on Cray systems. I'll post an update once I've figured out something reliably working.
I'm trying to write a plugin for 3ds max, I went through the entire sdk installation process to the letter as described in the help files.
The problem I'm facing though is intellisence complaining about an invalid macro definition
"IntelliSense: command-line error: invalid macro definition:_CRT_SECURE_CPP_OVERLOAD_STANDARD_NAMES_COUNT =1"
I found the definition in project settigs -> c/c++ -> preprocessor definitions as inherited from parent or project default.
I tried disabling the inherited definitions and re-entered them, this time without the space between the name and the = and all works fine so I'm guessing its a typo on their part?
Anyway, I want to change the default project or whatever to not repeat it every time i start a new project. The project is created with a wizard which required me to copy over some files to appear and after which I had to enter the sdk path.
The files I copied are plain text with some fancy extensions and not much in them so I'm guessing the defaults are described in the sdk directory.. somewhere. Does anybody know what kind of a file I'm looking for?
EDIT: I found a file called root.vcxproj_template and it has a section for preprocessor definitions but all it contains is
<PreprocessorDefinitions>_USRDLL;%(PreprocessorDefinitions)</PreprocessorDefinitions>
and no mention of the broken one
EDIT2: in another part of the file there was a path to a property sheet (maxsdk\ProjectSettings\propertySheets\3dsmax.common.tools.settings) which included the faulty definition. I fixed it an no more complaints from VS.
_CRT_SECURE_CPP_OVERLOAD_STANDARD_NAMES_COUNT = 1 means that compiler should replace all old C run-time routines such as sprintf, strcpy, strtok with new versions such as strprintf_s, strcpy_s, strtok_s and similar. It goes in pair with following definition _CRT_SECURE_CPP_OVERLOAD_STANDARD_NAMES = 1.
More you can find here: (MSDN) https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175759.aspx. However I tried to use this but without success. It says that you can use this only for statically allocated buffers like char buffer[32], but compilers was still complaining bout unsecure strcpy.
I am trying to run the PumpingSystem Example in the openmodelica Fluid library using the nightly build 1.9.1+dev (r21018). Unfortunately the simulation crashes saying it failed to solve NLS at initialization.
I tried to modify the model either by creating a new one extending it (which only permits the modification of the parameters but not the structure, I understand that this is probably what extension means) or by copying the text view of the model to a new file, but then OMEdit crashes.
Will you please advise how I can create a copy that I can modify?
Thank you.
PS: I am running this on Linux, the Windows version seems to translate all libraries,creates an infinite amount of translation errors "expected package to have within ; but got ..." and then terminates with a translation error "C:/OpenModelica1.9.1Nightly/lib/omlibrary/Modelica 3.2.1/Blocks/Continuous/Internal/Filter/Utilities/normalizationFactor.mo:14:3-42:27] Error: An element with name normalizationResidue is already declared in this scope."
You can not modify the system libraries. You can only extend them.
Creating a copy of the model is currently not supported. You can follow this ticket https://trac.openmodelica.org/OpenModelica/ticket/2190
If you just copy paste the text, as you already did, you need to manually update the relative paths used in the model.
HOW I CAME ACROSS THIS
I wrote code for a simple stopwatch which can also double up as a Rubik's cube timer. The source code and the executable are here:
Cube timer
Anyway my doubt is not regarding this code(It works fine).
I downloaded the executable that I had uploaded to check if it worked fine and at that time I was greeted with this screen:
Open file - security warning
And under this dialogue box there was a field that said:
Publisher : Unknown Publisher
SCREEN SHOT:
DOUBT
Is there some way programatically or otherwise by which I can change the publisher field?
SPECS
I have compiled the code with Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Express.
You can easily change the publisher, either when linking/compiling by setting the appropriate resources for your project (e.g. CompanyName), or modifying the resources with a resource editor.
Your problem is really that there is no signature, so even if a publisher field is present it cannot be trusted.
You can find an example resource rc file near the end of http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa381058%28v=vs.85%29.aspx.
To add resources to your VC project check:
How do I embed version information into a windows binary?
VC++ 2012: How to include version info from version.inc (maintained separately) into the .rc file
The .rc file(s) will be compiled to binary (.res) and linked into your final executable.
To add or modify an existing executable, you should be able to use this tool (login required, this will cause the signature to be invalid in an already signed binary of course).
The Microsoft Authenticode documentation includes tutorials.
CAcert.org will sign a certificate you can use, and have instructions for getting started with Authenticode.
Sorry I can't be more helpful with VC, I don't use it, I usually using mingw and make, from some time ago targetting win32:
given a VERSIONINFO in a text version.rc file use mingw32-windres to compile it to a .o file (I actually had a bunch of .rc files, they were each #include-d in a single resources.rc so I only needed to run windres on that single file, and link a single extra object file)
include that version.o (or combined resources.o) in the final CC command, assuming compile and link to executable in one step
I also included -lversion when linking, AFAIR this was just because I used GetFileVersionInfo() for the code to check and display its own version in the 'About' dialog.
Make your program in a batch file, then using Advanced BAT to EXE Converter, convert it to EXE & fill out all of the fields. This sure helped me! :)