I'm trying to use this https://npm.runkit.com/globalpayments-api script but I can't figure what I'm doing wrong.
When I run the Runkit and add the first code to create a new Credit Card it throws error "ReferenceError: CreditCardData is not defined":
const card = new CreditCardData();
card.number = "4111111111111111";
card.expMonth = "12";
card.expYear = "2025";
card.cvn = "123";
How I can point CreditCardData to var globalpaymentsApi = require("globalpayments-api") which contains all this consts?
Demo: https://runkit.com/embed/8hidbubpbk8n
What I'm doing wrong?
Most likely in your code, function CreditCardData() doesn't exist - this means you didn't import it. Try adding this at the beginning of your .js file:
const { CreditCardData } = require('globalpayments-api');
Related
I have a query with the syntax in the require statement. Please refere the sample code below.
const nodemailer = require("nodemailer");
const {google} =require('googleapis');
const {OAuth2}=google.auth;
Some times , I see sample codes which use
const {<variable>} = require('moduleName')
Other times, I see like below
const <variable> = require('moduleName')
What is the difference between them?
Thanks in Advance.
Grateful to the Developers Community.
So, you use { } in this context when you want to do object destructuring to get a property from the exported object and create a module-level variable with that same name.
This:
const { google } = require('googleapis');
is a shortcut for this:
const __g = require('googleapis');
const google = __g.google;
So, within this context, you use the { google } only when you want the .google property from the imported module.
If you want the entire module handle such as this:
const nodemailer = require("nodemailer");
then, you don't use the { }. The only way to know which one you want for any given module is to consult the documentation for the module, the code for the module or examples of how to use the module. It depends entirely upon what the module exports and whether you want the top level export object or you want a property of that object.
It's important to realize that the { } used with require() is not special syntax associated with require(). This is normal object destructuring assignment, the same as if you did this:
// define some object
const x = { greeting: "hello" };
// use object destructuring assignment to create a new variable
// that contains the property of an existing object
const { greeting } = x;
console.log(greeting); // "hello
When you import the function with {}, it means you just import one function that available in the package. Maybe you have've seen:
const {googleApi, googleAir, googleWater} = require("googleapis")
But, when you not using {}, it means you import the whole package, just write:
const google = require("googleapis")
So, let say when you need googleApi in your code. You can call it:
google.googleApi
I was testing a very simple module to see if it works and keep on getting an error stating that node cannot find my module.
//mymodule.js
greeting = 'hello'
module.exports = greeting;
// main.js
const s = require('exportsPractice\mymodule.js');
console.log(s);
The error I get is shown here
Try using:
const s = require('./exportsPractice/mymodule.js');
And make sure the path is correct.
I'm new to node js programming and I have the following :
var myObj = {
AD: '{+376}',
AF: '{+93}',
AG: '{+1268}'
};
NOTE: I cannot modify this object data, as it comes from a third party component. I have only put an example of what data is returned to me in a local object for debugging purposes.
I'd like to be able to search this object for "AD" and pull out just the +376 from this line
"AD": "{+376}"
this does not seem to work:
var i = myObj.indexOf("AD");
console.log(i);
UPDATE
Sorry... I was using stringify on the object and the output I was seeing in the terminal window was wrong... I have corrected the question
UPDATE again
OK... running it using myObj works in a local sandbox... but using it on the actual data that comes back from the NPM object does not. Here is a RunKit:
https://npm.runkit.com/country-codes-list
This code does returns the number...
var ccl = require("country-codes-list")
var l = ccl.customList('countryCode', '+{countryCallingCode}');
console.log(l.AD);
BUT I need a variable instead of .AD like this:
var ad = 'AD'
var ccl = require("country-codes-list")
var l = ccl.customList('countryCode', '+{countryCallingCode}');
console.log(l.ad); // doesn't work !
This should work.
var ad = 'AD'
var ccl = require("country-codes-list")
var l = ccl.customList('countryCode', '+{countryCallingCode}');
console.log(l[ad]);
You can use the key to reach for the value.
var string = '{"AD":"{+376}","AF":"{+93}","AG":"{+1268}"}';
var object = JSON.parse(string);
function search(id) {
return object[id];
}
console.log(search('AD')) //--> {+376}
Error that I am getting
ReferenceError: LAST_PAYMENT_AMOUNT is not defined
part of nodejs code
const LAST_PAYMENT_AMOUNT = [LAST_PAYMENT_AMOUNT];
const LAST_PAYMENT_DATE = [LAST_PAYMENT_DATE];
const NEXT_PAYMENT_DATE = [NEXT_PAYMENT_DATE];
const accountIntentMap = {
payment_summary_payoff: {
LAST_PAYMENT_AMOUNT: "lastPaymentAmount",
You're trying to access: LAST_PAYMENT_AMOUNT, LAST_PAYMENT_DATE & NEXT_PAYMENT_DATE before initialization.
That code won't work, and doesn't make sense. You probably want to assign something different to each const.
Consider I want to expose a method called Print
Binding method as prototype:
File Saved as Printer.js
var printerObj = function(isPrinted) {
this.printed = isPrinted;
}
printerObj.prototype.printNow = function(printData) {
console.log('= Print Started =');
};
module.exports = printerObj;
Then access printNow() by putting code require('Printer.js').printNow() in any external .js node program file.
Export method itself using module.exports:
File Saved as Printer2.js
var printed = false;
function printNow() {
console.log('= Print Started =');
}
module.exports.printNow = printNow;
Then access printNow() by putting code require('Printer2.js').printNow() in any external .js node program file.
Can anyone tell what is the difference and best way of doing it with respect to Node.js?
Definitely the first way. It is called the substack pattern and you can read about it on Twitter and on Mikeal Rogers' blog. Some code examples can be found at the jade github repo in the parser:
var Parser = exports = module.exports = function Parser(str, filename, options){
this.input = str;
this.lexer = new Lexer(str, options);
...
};
Parser.prototype = {
context: function(parser){
if (parser) {
this.contexts.push(parser);
} else {
return this.contexts.pop();
}
},
advance: function(){
return this.lexer.advance();
}
};
In the first example you are creating a class, ideally you should use it with "new" in your caller program:
var PrinterObj = require('Printer.js').PrinterObj;
var printer = new PrinterObj();
printer.PrintNow();
This is a good read on the subject: http://www.2ality.com/2012/01/js-inheritance-by-example.html
In the second example you are returning a function.
The difference is that you can have multiple instances of the first example (provided you use new as indicated) but only one instance of the second approach.