Is that possible?
It would be very convenient, to have all branches with an open PR deployed somewhere, where I can have a shareable link.
There are the PR-Branch Triggers, but AFAIK it can only deploy one branch to one environment at the time. And another PR update would just overwrite the state.
EDIT to clarify what I mean:
Each feature branch (or bugfix or whatever) of our webapp should be deployed to an app service (or whatever), so when we create the feature, we always have a link to share during development, in which our designers (or whoever) could find issues in early development. At another cloude storage provider, we had something like that and we would always receive a unique link after successful deployment.
I'm a bit late but working on this now. What I intend to do:
Pull request on selected feature branches triggers task 2
Task will create app services via Terraform (Link)
Use the 'app service deploy' task to push the artifact from that pull request to the new app service created in the prior task.
We'll see how it goes
If deploying each feature branch to an app service is what you are trying to achieve.
You can try below steps(Only for classic pipeline view):
1,In your CI build pipeline, Go to triggers page, add each of your feature branch to branch filters, So that each Pull request made to your feature branch can trigger a build.
2, in your CD release pipeline(Classic view), add different stages, each for an artifacts which built from feature branches:
3, for each stage, In the pre-deployment conditions page, add an artifacts filters to its corresponding feature branch. So that the artifacts from this specific feature branch will trigger to deploy its corresponding stage.
4, Change the settings and parameters of the tasks in each stage according to each feature branch. So that each app service deployed for each feature branch has its own settings and configurations,
5,Configure your app service deploy tasks in each stage.
With above steps done,each time when a new pull request is merged to the feature branch, the corresponding stage will be automatically triggered to deploy this pull request to the configured app service.
Related
I am setting up an environment for ADF. I have multiple projects and Segments which I need to support. I have noticed that I can only set up one publish branch in ADF.
Should we create ADF for each project?
What is the recommended approach for setting up an environment ?.
Multiple ADFs are required if there is complete different project with different data. If you want to work in same project and just need to manage different environment like development, testing and prod; all this can be managed in one ADF.
A developer creates a feature branch to make a change. They debug their pipeline runs with their most recent changes. For more information on how to debug a pipeline run, see Iterative development and debugging with Azure Data Factory.
After a developer is satisfied with their changes, they create a pull request from their feature branch to the main or collaboration branch to get their changes reviewed by peers.
After a pull request is approved and changes are merged in the main branch, the changes get published to the development factory.
When the team is ready to deploy the changes to a test or UAT (User Acceptance Testing) factory, the team goes to their Azure Pipelines release and deploys the desired version of the development factory to UAT. This deployment takes place as part of an Azure Pipelines task and uses Resource Manager template parameters to apply the appropriate configuration.
After the changes have been verified in the test factory, deploy to the production factory by using the next task of the pipelines release.
Note
Note: Only the development factory is associated with a git repository. The test and production factories shouldn't have a git repository associated with them and should only be updated via an Azure DevOps pipeline or via a Resource Management template.
I'm working on an API in core3.1. We have a build pipeline that builds and unit tests any change for any branch. And release pipelines for development and master branches. These deploy to designated app services in Azure.
Now we would like a release pipeline for feature branches. So what we want is a pipeline that can dynamically created app-services per feature branch and deploy to that app service. And preferably dynamically delete the app-service when the branch is deleted.
Just to clarify, the proces how we would like it:
a developer creates feature branch and pushes it >
the build pipeline builds it >
an app service gets created automatically >
stuff gets deployed to that app service >
developers work on the branch and changes get build and deployed to the app service like normal >
at some later point a developer deletes branch >
app service gets deleted automaticcaly
Is there any way to accomplish this? Maybe there is a standard way?
Feature branches are located in a subfolder, e.g. "feat/feature-branch-name".
I'm fairly new to Azure and DevOps.
Any help is appriciated. Thanks in advance.
You should follow the practice of Infrastructure as Code (IaC) and use ARM templates in your pipeline to create/update/delete your Azure resources. You can also use the built-in tasks available in Azure DevOps to deploy your ARM templates.
I'm trying to create a CI/CD pipeline for an example prototype. Thus, I've started simple enough to test my infrastructure - I'm using an almost untouched boilerplate of ASP.NET Framework Web App (targeting 4.6.1). The steps I've completed are:
App is deployed to an Azure App Service.
Its version control is hosted with Azure DevOps.
A build pipeline with the following tasks has been created, set-up and tested if it executes (tasks and their order, come from a template):
Azure Deployment Options/Settings are bound to the repository DevOps, thus builds are also displayed in Azure, and should be deployed there if successful.
The Build Pipeline is bound to the correct repository inside DevOps
Builds get triggered by pushing to the master branch
The next step was to verify that a broken build, because of failed tests or any other reason is not deployed to production in Azure. I've created a failing test for this reason.
And this is where I'm left stumped. Builds do fail as expected and the "App Service Deploy" task is skipped, because the build tasks before it have a failure:
And yet those broken builds still get deployed to Azure and to production without even waiting for the pipeline to finish. I'm verifying that a change has actually happened with small visual updates.
Build started and finished in Azure as soon as a push occurs before the pipeline in DevOps is fully traversed (or even started, if finding an agent takes longer):
(DevOps still not finished):
What am I doing wrong here? Am I understanding the pipeline wrong? Have I missed a set-up step somewhere? I'm lost.
Edit: As asked by Josh, here's my trigger as well:
Edit 2.2 A bit more clarification of my deployment options in my App Service in Azure, related to Daniel's comments:
This turned out to be the issue.
This is the only option I'm allowed to choose when tying my deployment to DevOps. I'm not allowed to choose a pipeline, just a project and a branch. In a tutorial I've compared with, the settings are the same (at least in this menu), but the build does not get triggered from the repository, but expects the pipeline to reach the appropriate step first, which is why I haven't considered it to be the culprit. Is there some additional setting up, I've missed to do, to indicate that it must look for a pipeline, rather than fire straight away from branch changes?
The deployment you have set up in the Azure portal is tied to source control only, not your build definition. So every time you commit to source control, two things happen that are totally disconnected from each other and start in parallel since they listen to the same repository for changes:
A build fires off in the pipeline.
The Azure website is updated with the version you just pushed to source control, since its deployment options are bound to it.
Remove #2 and your problem will go away. You set the App Service you want updated in the pipeline, you don't need an additional hook in the App Service itself.
My team has an Azure App Services Web App where we house three major components:
Our main Node.js server and API, which is at the root
A secondary API, which is in a virtual directory
Our front-end web app (also served from a Node.js server), which is in another virtual directory
Each of those three components is maintained in its own git repo in VSTS. Additionally, the Web App has three slots: dev, ppe, and prod.
We are trying to move our build processes out of Azure and into VSTS. What we'd like to be able to do is the following:
When there's a new commit to master in any of the three repos, create a dev build and deploy it directly to the appropriate virtual directory in the dev slot.
When a component is ready to be released - whether that means a new commit in a special RELEASE branch or manually triggering a release process - create a production build, deploy it to ppe and, on user approval, swap the ppe and prod slots.
The complication here is that, when any component is deployed to ppe, we also need to deploy the latest released versions of all three components to ppe, since Azure does not have the ability to swap virtual directories independently.
What I currently have is the following:
A build process for each of the three repositories, which is triggered on commits to master or RELEASE. It creates both a development build and a production build and publishes them.
A dev release process that is triggered on any new builds of master in any of the three repositories. It takes the latest dev build from master from all three repos and deploys them to their appropriate virtual directories in dev.
A production release process that is triggered on any new build of RELEASE in any of the three repositories. It takes the latest production build from RELEASE from all three repos, deploys them to the appropriate virtual directories in ppe and, on user approval, swaps ppe and prod.
This works, but it seems pretty clunky, has a lot of wasted work, and it doesn't feel like we're exactly taking advantage of the power of the VSTS build/release pipeline. Is there a better or more accepted way of doing this?
There is Filters based on the artifacts feature in environment triggers of release, so you can base on the build tag(s) to trigger corresponding environments.
Regarding build, you can set the build tag(s) per to current branch by calling logging commands through PowerShell task (##vso[build.addbuildtag]build tag)
Regarding ppe scenario, I recommend that you can create a new CI build definition just for ppe related branch and build all components (get others source code by calling git clone command through Command Line task or other tasks (e.g. PowerShell)), then publish results of them, after that deploy them to corresponding slots and Virtual directory in release.
I have two sites set up in Azure, a staging site and a production site.
Both sites are connected to the master branch of my git repository.
The stage site gets automatically updated when I commit a change to the master branch. What I'd like to do is have production set up so that it won't automatically be updated, but I can manually update it when I want to.
Basically so that changes will get pushed to stage, and when I'm ready for them to go to production, I can manually push them.
Is there a way to do that in Azure?
You have a couple of options:
Use a separate branch to deploy to production. For example a release branch. When you commit to the release branch, production will be deployed. This way you decide when will be deployed to production.
Another option, which is a bit more work. (especially if you have not done it before), but has it's advantages because of more control over the deployment:
Create a VSTS account in Azure. In the VSTS account create a project. Setup a build against your source to create artifacts which can be used in release management. Create a release which can deploy to Staging, and for example after a approval to production. (It's also possible to configure a swap here if you like, to release to producton)
For information about this:
https://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/docs/build/apps/aspnet/aspnet4-to-azure
https://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/docs/build/apps/cd/deploy-webdeploy-webapps