I've just seen
# Combined model trains generators to fool discriminators
self.combined = Model(inputs=[img_A, img_B],
outputs=[ valid_A, valid_B,
reconstr_A, reconstr_B,
img_A_id, img_B_id ])
self.combined.compile(loss=['mse', 'mse',
'mae', 'mae',
'mae', 'mae'],
loss_weights=[ 1, 1,
self.lambda_cycle, self.lambda_cycle,
self.lambda_id, self.lambda_id ],
optimizer=optimizer)
in CycleGan - what does the list of losses mean / do? Before, I only worked with exactly one loss function per model.
This model has multiple inputs (two) and multiple outputs (six), so you need to specify one loss function for each output. That's why there is a list of losses.
Additionally a model can only be trained with a single loss function, and for a multi-output model, this is accomplished by creating a virtual loss that is a weighted combination of all per-output losses, and this is what the loss_weights parameter is for.
It is also worth noting that you need to provide a list of loss functions for a multi-output model only if the loss functions used are NOT all the same. For example, if all the output layers use the Mean Squared Error loss, then you only need to provide loss='mse'.
Related
I am currently turning my Binary Classification Model to a multi-class classification Model. Bare with me.. I am very knew to pytorch and Machine Learning.
Most of what I state here, I know from the following video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7q7E91pHoW4&t=654s
What I read / know is that the CrossEntropyLoss already has the Softmax function implemented, thus my output layer is linear.
What I then read / saw is that I can just choose my Model prediction by taking the torch.max() of my model output (Which comes from my last linear output. This feels weird because I Have some negative outputs and i thought I need to apply the SOftmax function first, but It seems to work right without it.
So know the big confusing question I have is, when would I use the Softmax function? Would I only use it when my loss doesnt have it implemented? BUT then I would choose my prediction based on the outputs of the SOftmax layer which wouldnt be the same as with the linear output layer.
Thank you guys for every answer this gets.
For calculating the loss using CrossEntropy you do not need softmax because CrossEntropy already includes it. However to turn model outputs to probabilities you still need to apply softmax to turn them into probabilities.
Lets say you didnt apply softmax at the end of you model. And trained it with crossentropy. And then you want to evaluate your model with new data and get outputs and use these outputs for classification. At this point you can manually apply softmax to your outputs. And there will be no problem. This is how it is usually done.
Traning()
MODEL ----> FC LAYER --->raw outputs ---> Crossentropy Loss
Eval()
MODEL ----> FC LAYER --->raw outputs --> Softmax -> Probabilites
Yes you need to apply softmax on the output layer. When you are doing binary classification you are free to use relu, sigmoid,tanh etc activation function. But when you are doing multi class classification softmax is required because softmax activation function distributes the probability throughout each output node. So that you can easily conclude that the output node which has the highest probability belongs to a particular class. Thank you. Hope this is useful!
I have a supervised learning task f(X)=y where X is a 2-dimentional np.array of np.int8 and y is a 1-dimentional array of np.float64 containing probabilities (so numbers between 0 and 1). I want to build a Neural Network model that performs regression in order to predict said probabilities y given X.
As the output of my Network is one real value (i.e. the output layer has one neuron) and is a probability (so in the range [0, 1]), I believe I should use softmax as the activation function of the output layer (i.e. output neuron) in order to squash the network's output to [0, 1].
As it is a regression task, I opted for using the mean_squared_error loss (instead of cross_entropy_loss that is typically used in classification tasks and often paired with softmax).
However, as I am trying to fit(X, y) the loss does not change at all between epochs and remains constant. Any ideas why? Is the combination of softmax and mean_squared_error loss wrong for some reason and why?
If I remove the softmax it does work, but then my model would also predict non probabilities which I do not want. Yes, I could squash it myself later but it doesn't seem right.
My code basically is (after removing some irrelevant additional callbacks for EarlyStopping and learning rate scheaduling):
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(W1_size, input_shape=(input_dims,), activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='softmax'))
# compile model
model.compile(optimizer=Adam(), loss='mse') # mse is the standard loss for regression
# fit
model.fit(X, y, batch_size=batch_size, epochs=MAX_EPOCHS)
Edit: Turns out I needed the sigmoid function to squash one real value to [0, 1] as the accepted answer suggests. The softmax function for a vector of size 1 is always 1.
As you stated you want to perform a regression task. (Which means, finding a continuous mapping between your input and desired output).
The softmax function creates a pseudo-probability distribution for multi-dimensional outputs (all values sum up to 1). This is the reason why the softmax function perfectly fits for classification tasks (predicting probabilities for different classes).
As you want to perform a regression task and your output is one-dimensional, softmax would not work properly because it is always 1 for a one-dimensional input.
A function which maps a one-dimensional input continuously to [0,1] works fine here (e.g Sigmoid).
Note that you can also interpret both the output of the sigmoid and the softmax function as probabilities. But be careful: these are only pseudo-probabilities and it is not representing the certainty or uncertainty of your model in making predictions.
In Keras I often see people compile a model with mean square error function and "acc" as metrics.
model.compile(optimizer=opt, loss='mse', metrics=['acc'])
I have been reading about acc and I can not find an algorithm for it?
What if I would change my loss function to binary crossentropy for an example and use 'acc' as metrics? Would this be the same metrics as in first case or Keras changes this acc based on loss function - so binary crossentropy in this case?
Check the source code from line 375. The metric_fn change dependent on loss function, so it is automatically handled by keras.
If you want to compare models using different loss function it could in some cases be necessary to specify what accuracy method you want to grade your model with, such that the models actually are tested with the same tests.
I have a set of sentences and their scores, I would like to train a marking system that could predict the score for a given sentence, such one example is like this:
(X =Tomorrow is a good day, Y = 0.9)
I would like to use LSTM to build such a marking system, and also consider the sequential relationship between each word in the sentence, so the training example shown above is transformed as following:
(x1=Tomorrow, y1=is) (x2=is, y2=a) (x3=a, y3=good) (x4=day, y4=0.9)
When training this LSTM, I would like the first three time steps using a softmax classifier, and the final step using a MSE. It is obvious that the loss function used in this LSTM is composed of two different loss functions. In this case, it seems the Keras does not provide the way to address my problem directly. In addition, I am not sure whether my method to build the marking system is correct or not.
Keras support multiple loss functions as well:
model = Model(inputs=inputs,
outputs=[lang_model, sent_model])
model.compile(optimizer='sgd',
loss=['categorical_crossentropy', 'mse'],
metrics=['accuracy'], loss_weights=[1., 1.])
Based on your explanation, I think you need a model that first, predict a token based on previous tokens, in NLP domain it usually called Language model, and then compute a score which I assume it is a sentiment (it is applicable to other domain).
To do so, you can train your language model with LSTM and pick the last output of LSTM for your ranking task. To this end, you need to define two loss function: categorical_crossentropy for the language model and MSE for the ranking task.
This tutorial would be helpful: https://www.pyimagesearch.com/2018/06/04/keras-multiple-outputs-and-multiple-losses/
I am using functional API in Keras to build a neural network model with multiple output layers.
I was wondering how the loss is evaluated when updating the weights during optimization (When doing back-prop). Assuming that the same loss function is used, is then the average loss of all outputs used to minimize the cost function or is each output evaluated separately to update the weights?
Thanks in advance!
There is always only one loss that is used to backpropagate the errors, when a model has multiple outputs, then each output is associated one loss, and then a "global" loss is constructed by weighting the loss for each output. You can set the weight for each loss when you compile the model.