How to use DI in this example? - azure

I followed this example https://learn.microsoft.com/pt-br/azure/app-service/webjobs-sdk-get-started and it is working fine. What I want to do is to make the connection strings (strongly typed) available in all methods within Functions class. My Connection Strings object:
namespace MyApp.Domain
{
public class Secrets
{
public class ConnectionStrings
{
public string SqlServer {get; set;}
public string Storage {get; set;}
public string SendGrid {get; set;}
public string AzureWebJobsDashboard { get; set; }
public string AzureWebJobsStorage {get; set;}
}
}
}
In web project I use (and it works perfectly):
services.Configure<Secrets.ConnectionStrings>(Configuration.GetSection("CUSTOMCONNSTR_ConnectionStrings"));
and in the classes' constructors I use:
public class EmailController: ControllerBase
{
private readonly MyEmail _myEmail;
public EmailController(MyEmail MyEmail)
{
_myEmail = MyEmail;
}
[HttpGet]
public async Task<ActionResult<string>> SendEmail()
{
try
{
...
return await _myEmail.SendMailMI3D(myMsg);
}
catch (System.Exception ex)
{
return ex.Message + " - " + ex.StackTrace;
}
}
[HttpGet("sendgrid")]
public string GetSendGrid(long id)
{
return _myEmail.SendGridConnStr();
}
}
But this way doesn't work on webjobs (console apps).
I tried to insert a simple Console.WriteLine in Functions' constructor but it doesn't work as well. So I think this is the problem: Functions' constructor is not being called. So when I insert a message in my queue I receive this error message related to DI Connection String:
Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Host.FunctionInvocationException: Exception while executing function: Functions.ProcessQueueMessage ---> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Can anybody please help me? Thanks a lot.
public Functions(IOptions<Secrets.ConnectionStrings> ConnectionStrings)
{
_connectionStrings = ConnectionStrings;
Console.WriteLine("Simple line");
Console.WriteLine($"Functions constructor: ${_connectionStrings.Value.SendGrid}");
}
Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Host.FunctionInvocationException: Exception while executing function: Functions.ProcessQueueMessage ---> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

Dependency Injection is available in WebJobs but you do need to take the extra step to create an IJobActivator to define the injection.
namespace NetCoreWebJob.WebJob
{
public class JobActivator : IJobActivator
{
private readonly IServiceProvider services;
public JobActivator(IServiceProvider services)
{
this.services = services;
}
public T CreateInstance<T>()
{
return services.GetService<T>();
}
}
}
Inside Main()
var config = new JobHostConfiguration();
config.JobActivator = new JobActivator(services.BuildServiceProvider());
That should allow the runtime to utilize the parameterized constructor.

Related

accessing Azure Cloud Storage with the new Configuration in ASP.NET Core 2.0

Is there a way to configure my Azure Cloud storage in ConfigureServices of the Startup class, the same way I configure my DatabaseContext?
var connection = Configuration.GetConnectionString("myDatabaseConnectionString");
services.AddDbContext<DatabaseContext>
(options => options.UseSqlServer(connection));
I know I could access the connection string from within a controller by adding the IConfiguration instance to the service collection as a singleton object in ConfigureServices and then inject IConfiguration in the controller.
But how do I access this in the following class or is this a bad practice and there is a better way (e.g. in the services.Add ...) ?
public class ClassifiedsToProcess
{
public static void AddMessage(string message)
{
var storageConnectionString = Configuration.Get("AppSettings:ConnectionString");
storageAccount = CloudStorageAccount.Parse(storageConnectionString);
...
}
}
Thanks !
Here is how I solved my problem using IOptions as suggested by Martin Brandl
Controller code
private string makeJson;
private MyAzureQueue MyAzureQueue;
public AdminController(IOptions<AzureOptions> optionsAccessor)
{
MyAzureQueue = new MyAzureQueue(optionsAccessor);
}
public IActionResult Index()
{
MyAzureQueue.AddMessage("my message");
return View();
}
MyAzureQueue class
public interface IMessageRepository
{
void AddMessage(string message);
}
public class MyAzureQueue: IMessageRepository
{
private readonly CloudQueue _queue;
public ClassifiedsToProcess(IOptions<AzureOptions> optionsAccessor)
{
CloudStorageAccount storageAccount = AzureStorageHelper.getStorageAccount(optionsAccessor.Value.StorageConnectionString);
_queue = AzureStorageHelper.GetQueue(storageAccount, "mystorageaccount");
}
public void AddMessage(string message)
{
CloudQueueMessage cloudQueueMessage = new CloudQueueMessage(message);
_queue.AddMessageAsync(cloudQueueMessage);
}
}
Azure Options class
public class AzureOptions
{
public AzureOptions()
{
}
public string StorageConnectionString { get; set; }
}
In the Startup.cs ConfigureServices method I added the following two lines
services.AddOptions();
services.Configure<AzureOptions>(Configuration.GetSection("Azure"));
And this is what my appsettings.json looks like
{
"Azure": {
"StorageConnectionString": "DefaultEndpointsProtocol=https;AccountName=mystorageaccount;AccountKey=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX;EndpointSuffix=core.windows.net"
}
}
You should try to avoid using IConfiguration directly and use the Option pattern in
ASP.NET Core instead.
In your example, I would e. g. implement an IMessageRepository which uses the storage account to persist the messages.
Your ClassifiedsToProcess class would have a constructor dependency to it and your AddMessage method would used it (it shouldn't be static since you want to access the repository).

AmbiguousMatchException exception in ServiceStack?

PFB my code.
namespace ManualCSharpe
{
public class MyServices : Service
{
[Route("/L/hello/")] //RequestDTO one
public class HelloL
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
[Route("/H/hello/")] //RequestDTO two
public class HelloH
{
public string Name1 { get; set; }
}
public class HelloResponse //ResponseDTO
{
public string Result { get; set; }
}
public class HelloServiceL : Service //Service One
{
public object Get(HelloL request)
{
return new HelloResponse { Result = "Low" };
}
}
public class HelloServiceH : Service //Service
{
public object Get(HelloH request)
{
return new HelloResponse { Result = "High" };
}
}
//Define the Web Services AppHost
public class AppHost : AppSelfHostBase
{
public AppHost()
: base("HttpListener Self-Host",new Assembly[] {typeof(HelloServiceL).Assembly, typeof(HelloServiceH).Assembly}) { }
public override void Configure(Funq.Container container) { }
}
//Run it!
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var listeningOn = args.Length == 0 ? "http://*:133/" : args[0];
var appHost = new AppHost()
.Init()
.Start(listeningOn);
Console.WriteLine("AppHost Created at {0}, listening on {1}",
DateTime.Now, listeningOn);
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
}
When I am tring to added two service then it is show below exception.
An unhandled exception of type 'System.Reflection.AmbiguousMatchException' occurred in ServiceStack.dll
Additional information: Could not register Request 'ManualCSharpe.MyServices+HelloL' with service 'ManualCSharpe.MyServices+HelloServiceL' as it has already been assigned to another service.
Each Request DTO can only be handled by 1 service.
I have below douts.
Here I have created two different DTO for Two Service. Why it is showing error like Each Request DTO can only be handled by 1 service. In simple word, Two route mapped with two DTO with two Service.
Can I create one route for multiple RequestDTO with multiple service? In Simple word, One Route/L/hello/ can be mapped with two DTO HelloL and HelloH.
You can't have Service class implementations nested inside another outer MyServices class:
public class MyServices : Service
{
[Route("/L/hello/")] //RequestDTO one
public class HelloL
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
[Route("/H/hello/")] //RequestDTO two
public class HelloH
{
public string Name1 { get; set; }
}
public class HelloResponse //ResponseDTO
{
public string Result { get; set; }
}
public class HelloServiceL : Service //Service One
{
public object Get(HelloL request)
{
return new HelloResponse { Result = "Low" };
}
}
public class HelloServiceH : Service //Service
{
public object Get(HelloH request)
{
return new HelloResponse { Result = "High" };
}
}
}
Remove the outer MyServices class completely and just have the DTO's and Service classes directly under a C# namespace.
Also routes shouldn't end with a / suffix, so I'd change:
[Route("/L/hello/")]
to:
[Route("/L/hello")]
#mythz answer is correct for OP but I came here looking for an answer for a different situation which the cause was not particularly obvious - you will get this exception if you attempt to register the same assembly twice, for example, if you move a service implementation into the same assembly and were pulling it in like so:
public AppHost() : base("App", typeof(AdminService).GetAssembly(), typeof(InboundService).GetAssembly(),typeof(ProductService).GetAssembly())
For those of you who come here from a google search, a AmbiguousMatchException exception in ServiceStack can sometimes be triggered within ServiceStack but handled internally.
You can change your exception setting so it doesn't break on this exception.
I had changed my exception setting to break on all exceptions and this had me stuck for a while.

Property injection with Unity

i encoutered problem with unity, i want to use property injection, here is what i had in my code :
config of the container :
public static void RegisterTypes(IUnityContainer container)
{
container.RegisterType<GTModelContainer, GTModelContainer>(new HttpContextLifetimeManager<GTModelContainer>())
.RegisterType<IUnitOfWork, UnitOfWorkGT>()
.RegisterType<ILogger, Logger>(new ContainerControlledLifetimeManager())
.RegisterType<ISocieteServices, SocieteServices>() ;
}
SocieteService Class :
public class SocieteServices : ISocieteServices
{
private IUnitOfWork UnitOfWork;
public SocieteServices(IUnitOfWork unitOfWork)
{
UnitOfWork = unitOfWork;
}
}
i tried to use property injection (i can't use constructor injection with custom data annotation) and here what i had done :
public class CodeSocieteUniqueAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
[Dependency]
public ISocieteServices SocieteService {get; set;}
[InjectionMethod]
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value, ValidationContext validationContext)
{
string codeSociete = value as string;
var societe = SocieteService.getSocieteByCode(codeSociete);
if (societe == null) return ValidationResult.Success;
else return new ValidationResult(FormatErrorMessage(validationContext.DisplayName));
}
}
the problem is that the societeService in CodeSocieteUniqueAttribute class is not injected.
Assuming that your class for registering types is publicly accessible and has a IUnityContainer object, ie:
public static class Resolver
{
public static IUnityContainer Container { get; set; }
public static void RegisterTypes(IUnityContainer container)
{
// type registrations here
container.RegisterType<GTModelContainer, GTModelContainer>(new HttpContextLifetimeManager<GTModelContainer>())
.RegisterType<IUnitOfWork, UnitOfWorkGT>()
.RegisterType<ILogger, Logger>(new ContainerControlledLifetimeManager())
.RegisterType<ISocieteServices, SocieteServices>() ;
// Now, set the container
Container = container;
}
}
You could access the container you've built up and resolve these types during method execution.
For instance,
public class CodeSocieteUniqueAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
[Dependency]
public ISocieteServices SocieteService { get; set; }
[InjectionMethod]
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value, ValidationContext validationContext)
{
var societeServices = Resolver.Container.Resolve<ISocieteServices>();
SocieteService = societeServices; // Or, you know, just use this since it's resolved.
string codeSociete = value as string;
var societe = SocieteService.getSocieteByCode(codeSociete);
if (societe == null) return ValidationResult.Success;
else return new ValidationResult(FormatErrorMessage(validationContext.DisplayName));
}
}
This is actually pretty standard practice, and this MSDN article describes resolving items during runtime.
Another option is to pop the resolution into a default constructor like this:
public class CodeSocieteUniqueAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
[Dependency]
public ISocieteServices SocieteService {get; set;}
public CodeSocieteUniqueAttribute()
{
var societeServices = Resolver.Container.Resolve<ISocieteServices>();
SocieteService = societeServices;
}
// the rest of the class omitted for brevity
}

GWT serialization policy file

I have a GWT2.6.1 application. I uses a RPC call. I defined service, serviceAsync, serviceImpl. But I consistently got following errors:
INFO: javax.servlet.ServletContext log: logLevelServlet: ERROR: The serialization policy file '/analytics/E4322B1E292CEFFC5E147EAE677D2BFF.gwt.rpc' was not found; did you forget to include it in this deployment?
com.google.appengine.tools.development.ApiProxyLocalImpl log
INFO: javax.servlet.ServletContext log: logLevelServlet: ERROR: The serialization policy file '/analytics/E4322B1E292CEFFC5E147EAE677D2BFF.gwt.rpc' was not found; did you forget to include it in this deployment?
com.google.appengine.tools.development.ApiProxyLocalImpl log
INFO: javax.servlet.ServletContext log: logLevelServlet: Downloaded serialization policy from http://localhost:9876/policies/E4322B1E292CEFFC5E147EAE677D2BFF.gwt.rpc
EPARecord.java
public class EPARecord implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -6723643433565890894L;
private String timeStamp;
private String logLevel;
private String event;
private String comment;
public EPARecord(){}
public String getTimeStamp() {
return timeStamp;
}
public void setTimeStamp(String timeStamp) {
this.timeStamp = timeStamp;
}
public String getLogLevel() {
return logLevel;
}
public void setLogLevel(String logLevel) {
this.logLevel = logLevel;
}
public String getEvent() {
return event;
}
public void setEvent(String event) {
this.event = event;
}
public String getComment() {
return comment;
}
public void setComment(String comment) {
this.comment = comment;
}
}
LogLevelService.java
#RemoteServiceRelativePath("loglevel")
public interface LogLevelService extends RemoteService {
EPARecord[] getEAPRecords(String level) throws IllegalArgumentException;
}
LogLevelServiceAysnc.java
public interface LogLevelServiceAsync {
void getEAPRecords(String level, AsyncCallback<EPARecord[]> callback) throws IllegalArgumentException;
}
I cleard browser cache, and I clear the project and rebuild it. It always give the same erorr. I suppose EPARecord file has all String attributes and it is serializable. And in remote interface, it transfer array of EPARecord, it shall be ok without customerized implementation of serializable.
i take some problem.you can remove it and run again your app,if you have "inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.theme.clean.Clean'" code line into your *.gwt.xml file.
I had this problem when I wanted to connect to the local database with the GAE application. When I recreated my applications without GAE the problem disappeared.

ServiceStack's Funq.Container not Newing-Up Properties

My service uses a utility class and that utility class has several public properties. Is there something special I need call to ensure these public properties are setup?
The service uses a ASP.NET host. Inside of Global.ASAX I have declared a new AppHostBase:
public class MyServiceHost : AppHostBase
{
public MyServiceHost() : base("My Service Host", typeof(ServiceLibrary).Assembly) {}
public override void Configure(Funq.Container container)
{
container.Register<IDbConnectionFactory>(dbConFactory);
container.RegisterAutoWired<UtilityLibrary>();
container.RegisterAutoWired<RepositoryLibrary>();
}
}
Within both my repository library and utility library is a main class. This may class receives the Container and registers more specific utilities and repositories:
public class UtilityLibrary
{
public UtilityLibrary(Funq.Container container)
{
container.RegisterAutoWired<WidgetAActions>();
container.RegisterAutoWired<WidgetBActions>();
}
}
In the example below, WidgetARepository was set in the constructor of the RepositoryLibrary class. The RepositoryLibrary class, which contains the WidgetARepository, was supplied to the Container in the Configure method of the AppHost (first snippet above). Even still, the WidgetARepository (below) is never set:
public class WidgetAActions
{
public WidgetARepository WidgetARepository { get; set; }
public WidgetA Get(string id)
{
var item = this.WidgetARepository.Get(id);
if (item == null) { return null; }
// Do something else
return item;
}
}
Must I manually call Resolve()? This seems like it would defeat the purpose of injection by doing this.
If you are using wanting to use the Funq Container Autowire IoC outside of the ServiceStack service then you need to call Container.AutoWire yourself to have the container inject the relevant dependencies. This call is made behind the scenes in the ServiceStack request pipeline.
For ServiceStack v4:
HostContext.Container.AutoWire(objectToPopulate);
For ServiceStack v3:
AppHostBase.Instance.Container.AutoWire(objectToPopulate);
I would typically add this call to the construtor method of the object I want populated with the injections. So in your case:
public class WidgetAActions
{
public WidgetARepository WidgetARepository { get; set; }
public WidgetAActions()
{
// (Substitute with v3 usage if required.)
HostContext.Container.AutoWire(this);
}
...
}
Hope this helps.
Edit: Have you considered having the container inject the corresponding repository to WidgetAActions's constructor?
container.RegisterAutoWired<WidgetAActions>(c => new WidgetAActions(c.Resolve<WidgetARepository>()));
public class WidgetAActions
{
public WidgetARepository WidgetARepository { get; private set; }
public WidgetAActions(WidgetARepository repository)
{
WidgetARepository = repository;
}
...
}
Edit: Or you could resolve and set the public property of your object to the repository and then you don't have to have a constructor:
container.RegisterAutoWired<WidgetAActions>(c =>
new WidgetAActions { WidgetARepository = c.Resolve<WidgetARepository>() }
);
public class WidgetAActions
{
public WidgetARepository WidgetARepository { get; set; }
...
}
Or you could call autowire at time of resolving WidgetAActions:
container.RegisterAutoWired<WidgetAActions>(c => {
var actions = new WidgetAActions();
container.AutoWire(actions); // All dependencies injected
return actions;
});
public class WidgetAActions
{
public WidgetARepository WidgetARepository { get; set; }
...
}

Resources