I am testing anomaly detector on metrics of count of specific event per hour for last 90 days. For some reason I always get spikes (isPositive) only, but never drops, while I'm mostly interested to detect drops.
Data has weekly seasonality (expected drops on weekends) and definitely has abnormal drops mid week unusual for this day of week.
I also tried to play with specific hours to take them to extremely low for this time and week day. I tried different values for sensitivity (between 90 and 20).
On the positive side I get too many spikes, which create a lot of noise, while low sensitivity value didn't help to get rid of them.
Below is a link to request JSON.
Request JSON
You can try to set the maxRatio to 0.01, it should be what you expect.
Currently the sensitivity control is not good enough for low value. But we will rollout a new version in next week to improve it.
And you can also leverage https://aka.ms/addemo, and use a CSV to have more test.
Related
Context
I have created a streaming job using Azure portal which aggregates data using a day wise TUMBLINGWINDOW. Have attached a code snippet below, modified from the docs, which shows similar logic.
SELECT
DATEADD(day, -1, System.Timestamp()) AS WindowStart
System.Timestamp() AS WindowEnd,
TollId,
COUNT(*)
FROM Input TIMESTAMP BY EntryTime
GROUP BY TumblingWindow(day, 1), TollId
Now that the job has been running and can see it producing output I want to be able to reduce the costs ideally by setting some sort of time scheduling so that the job can run and still produce the same output without being on all the time.
The only real constraint being that the aggregated output at the end of each TUMBLINGWINDOW has to remain the same as if it were running all the time (no impact of stop-starting on output).
This then brings me to my question.
Update: 2021-02-28
Before going into the question another thing that drove me was that through Azure portal you can manually start and stop a job. When you start/restart a job you can set a custom start time for the job/query. With this level of control say I start a job (or have a job running) and then decide to stop it for majority of the day and then turn it on at say 11:30pm each day with a custom start time of midnight of the current day then it would be able to be on for approx 30min before it would output the results (yet still to my understanding produce the same aggregation results/effect compared to if it was on the whole day up until that point). This job could then be paused again at 00:30am ( the next day for which it stays paused for the majority of the day (1380min total until 11:30pm again) upon which the same above logic is applied.
This way it remains off the majority of the day yet still can produce the same output for each day wise window (correct me if I am wrong in my thinking). The only issue with this to me seems to be the fact someone would have to manually perform this. Thus I was driven to the docs looking for a way to automate this.
Question
How can I start and stop a job in an automated fashion such that the required output would still remain intact but so that the job doesn't have to remain on all the time (like it currently is)?
Does the documentation linked above suffice given the context above, if so what are some possible arrangements for the N minutes (on) and M minutes (off) time variables for this to work?
Is this possible given the scenario that I want to aggregate on a one day TUMBLINGWINDOW window (whereby I want each window to start and end at midnight of each day, as per its default behaviour.)?
Eg
Window start: 2022-02-20 00:00:00 Window end: 2022-02-21 00:00:00 (aggregation performed),
Window start: 2022-02-21 00:00:00 Window end: 2022-02-22 00:00:00 (aggregation performed),
Window start: 2022-02-22 00:00:00 Window end: 2022-02-23 00:00:00 (aggregation performed),
....so on
Thoughts
I found this documentation from Microsoft regarding auto-pausing jobs using a few methods
However came across a paragraph (quoted below) which made me doubtful whether it seems reasonable in my particular use case (TUMBLING 1 day window as described in my question section).
Note
There are downsides to auto-pausing a job. The main ones being the loss of the low latency /real time capabilities, and the potential risks from allowing the input event backlog to grow unsupervised while a job is paused. Auto-pausing should not be considered for most production scenarios running at scale.
Could this method
There are 3 ways to lower costs:
downscale your job, you will have higher latency but for a lower cost, up to a point where your job crashes because it runs out of memory over time and/or can't catch up with its backlog. Here you need to keep an eye on your metrics to make sure you can react before it's too late
going further, you can regroup multiple queries into a single job. This job most likely won't be aligned in partitions, so it won't be able to scale linearly (adding SUs is not guaranteed to give you better performance). Same comment as above, plus you need to remember that when you need to scale back up, you probably will have to break down that job into multiple jobs to again be able to scale in a linear fashion
finally you can auto-pause a job, one way to implement that being explained in the doc you linked. I wrote that doc, and what I meant by that comment is that here again you are taking the risk of overloading the job if it can't run long enough to process the backlog of events. This is a risky proposition for most production scenarios
But if you know what you are doing, and are monitoring closely the appropriate metrics (as explained in the doc), this is definitely something you should explore.
Finally, all of these approaches, including the auto-pause one, will deal with tumbling windows transparently for you.
Update: 2022-03-03 following comments here
Update: 2022-03-04 following comments there
There are 3 time dimensions here:
When the job is running or not: the wall clock
When the time window is expected to output results: Tumbling(day,1) -> 00:00AM every day, this is absolute (on the day, on the hour, on the minute...) and independent of the job start time below
What output you want produced from the job, via the job start time
Let's say you have the job running 24/7 for multiple months, and decide to stop it at noon (12:00PM) on the 1st day of March.
It already has generated an output for the last day of February, at 00:00AM Mar1.
You won't see a difference in output until the following day, 00:00AM Mar2, when you expect to see the daily window of Mar1, but it's not output because the job is stopped.
Let's start the job at 01:00AM Mar2 wall clock time. If you want the missing time window, you should either pick a start time at 'when last stopped' (noon the day before), or a custom time any time before 23:59PM Mar1. What you are driving is the output window you want. Here you are telling ASA you want all the windows from that point onward.
ASA will then reload all the data it needs to generate that window (make sure the event hub has enough retention for that, we don't cache data between restarts in the job): Azure Stream Analytics will automatically look back at the data in the input source. For instance, if you start a job “Now” and if your query uses a 5-minutes Tumbling Window, Azure Stream Analytics will seek data from 5 minutes ago in the input. The first possible output event would have a timestamp equal to or greater than the current time, and ASA guarantees that all input events that may logically contribute to the output has been accounted for.
Iam facing one dillema.
For performance reasons, I'm creating recording rules for my Nginx request/second metrics.
Original Query
sum(rate(nginx_http_request_total[5m]))
Recording Rule
rules:
- expr: sum(rate(nginx_http_requests_total[5m])) by (cache_status, host, env, status)
record: job:nginx_http_requests_total:rate:sum:5m
In original query I can see that my max traffic is 6.6k but in recording rule, its 6.2k. That's 400 TPS difference.
This is the metric for last one week
Question :
Is there any way to take the max of the original query and save it as recording rule. As it's TPS, I only care about the max, not the min.
I think having having 6% difference on value in some very short burst is pretty OK.
In your query your are getting (and recording) an average TPS during the last 5 minutes. There is no "max" being performed there.
The value will change depending on the exact time of the query evaluation - possibly why you see difference between raw query and values stored by recording rule.
Prometheus will extrapolate data some when executing functions like rate(). If you have last data point at time t, but running query at t+30s, then Prometheus will try to extrapolate value at t+30s (often this is noticed as a counter for discrete events will show fractional values)
You may want to use irate() function if you are really after peak values. It will use at each evaluation two most recent points to calculate most current increase as opposed to X minutes average that rate() provides.
I have data in the format { host | metric | value | time-stamp }. We have hosts all around the world reporting metrics.
I'm a little confused about using window operations (say, 1 hour) to process data like this.
Can I tell my window when to start, or does it just start when the application starts? I want to ensure I'm aggregating all data from hour 11 of the day, for example. If my window starts at 10:50, I'll just get 10:50-11:50 and miss 10 minutes.
Even if the window is perfect, data may arrive late.
How do people handle this kind of issue? Do they make windows far bigger than needed and just grab the data they care about on every batch cycle (kind of sliding)?
In the past, I worked on a large-scale IoT platform and solved that problem by considering that the windows were only partial calculations. I modeled the backend (Cassandra) to receive more than 1 record for each window. The actual value of any given window would be the addition of all -potentially partial- records found for that window.
So, a perfect window would be 1 record, a split window would be 2 records, late-arrivals are naturally supported but only accepted up to a certain 'age' threshold. Reconciliation was done at read time. As this platform was orders of magnitude heavier in terms of writes vs reads, it made for a good compromise.
After speaking with people in depth on MapR forums, the consensus seems to be that hourly and daily aggregations should not be done in a stream, but rather in a separate batch job once the data is ready.
When doing streaming you should stick to small batches with windows that are relatively small multiples of the streaming interval. Sliding windows can be useful for, say, trends over the last 50 batches. Using them for tasks as large as an hour or a day doesn't seem sensible though.
Also, I don't believe you can tell your batches when to start/stop, etc.
Is it anyhow possible to get the count, how often DynamoDB throughput (write units/read units) was downscaled within the last 24 hours?
My idea is to downscale as soon as an hugo drop e.g. 50% in the needed provisioned write units occur. I have really peaky traffic. Thus it is interessting to me to downscale after every peak. However I have a analytics jobs running at night which is provisioning a huge amount of read units making it necessary to be able to downscale after it. Thus I need to limit downscales to 3 times within 24 hours.
The number of decreases is returned in a DescribeTable result as part of the ProvisionedThroughputDescription.
We have a metric that we increment every time a user performs a certain action on our website, but the graphs don't seem to be accurate.
So going off this hunch, we invested the updates.log of carbon and discovered that the action had happened over 4 thousand times today(using grep and wc), but according the Integral result of the graph it returned only 220ish.
What could be the cause of this? Data is being reported to statsd using the statsd php library, and calling statsd::increment('metric'); and as stated above, the log confirms that 4,000+ updates to this key happened today.
We are using:
graphite 0.9.6 with statsD (etsy)
After some research through the documentation, and some conversations with others, I've found the problem - and the solution.
The way the whisper file format is designed, it expect you (or your application) to publish updates no faster than the minimum interval in your storage-schemas.conf file. This file is used to configure how much data retention you have at different time interval resolutions.
My storage-schemas.conf file was set with a minimum retention time of 1 minute. The default StatsD daemon (from etsy) is designed to update to carbon (the graphite daemon) every 10 seconds. The reason this is a problem is: over a 60 second period StatsD reports 6 times, each write overwrites the last one (in that 60 second interval, because you're updating faster than once per minute). This produces really weird results on your graph because the last 10 seconds in a minute could be completely dead and report a 0 for the activity during that period, which results in completely nuking all of the data you had written for that minute.
To fix this, I had to re-configure my storage-schemas.conf file to store data at a maximum resolution of 10 seconds, so every update from StatsD would be saved in the whisper database without being overwritten.
Etsy published the storage-schemas.conf configuration that they were using for their installation of carbon, which looks like this:
[stats]
priority = 110
pattern = ^stats\..*
retentions = 10:2160,60:10080,600:262974
This has a 10 second minimum retention time, and stores 6 hours worth of them. However, due to my next problem, I extended the retention periods significantly.
As I let this data collect for a few days, I noticed that it still looked off (and was under reporting). This was due to 2 problems.
StatsD (older versions) only reported an average number of events per second for each 10 second reporting period. This means, if you incremented a key 100 times in 1 second and 0 times for the next 9 seconds, at the end of the 10th second statsD would report 10 to graphite, instead of 100. (100/10 = 10). This failed to report the total number of events for a 10 second period (obviously).Newer versions of statsD fix this problem, as they introduced the stats_counts bucket, which logs the total # of events per metric for each 10 second period (so instead of reporting 10 in the previous example, it reports 100).After I upgraded StatsD, I noticed that the last 6 hours of data looked great, but as I looked beyond the last 6 hours - things looked weird, and the next reason is why:
As graphite stores data, it moves data from high precision retention to lower precision retention. This means, using the etsy storage-schemas.conf example, after 6 hours of 10 second precision, data was moved to 60 second (1 minute) precision. In order to move 6 data points from 10s to 60s precision, graphite does an average of the 6 data points. So it'd take the total value of the oldest 6 data points, and divide it by 6. This gives an average # of events per 10 seconds for that 60 second period (and not the total # of events, which is what we care about specifically).This is just how graphite is designed, and for some cases it might be useful, but in our case, it's not what we wanted. To "fix" this problem, I increased our 10 second precision retention time to 60 days. Beyond 60 days, I store the minutely and 10-minutely precisions, but they're essentially there for no reason, as that data isn't as useful to us.
I hope this helps someone, I know it annoyed me for a few days - and I know there isn't a huge community of people that are using this stack of software for this purpose, so it took a bit of research to really figure out what was going on and how to get a result that I wanted.
After posting my comment above I found Graphite 0.9.9 has a (new?) configuration file, storage-aggregation.conf, in which one can control the aggregation method per pattern. The available options are average, sum, min, max, and last.
http://readthedocs.org/docs/graphite/en/latest/config-carbon.html#storage-aggregation-conf