I've just started playing around with threejs and first thing I'm trying to do is applying textures to models. I am able to load a PNG texture with something like:
var material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
map: THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture('textures/wood.png'),
});
object.material = material;
and it fits perfectly to the 3D model without doing anything else. I assume to have exported the .obj with the correct options (as PNG fits perfectly), so I attempted to create the same texture from an SVG instead.
var canvasElement = document.getElementById('svgTexture');
var img = new Image();
img.onload = function() {
canvasElement.getContext('2d').drawImage(img, 0, 0);
var texture = new THREE.CanvasTexture(
canvasElement,
THREE.UVMapping,
THREE.ClampToEdgeWrapping, THREE.ClampToEdgeWrapping,
THREE.LinearFilter, THREE.LinearFilter,
);
material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
map: texture
});
}
img.src = 'textures/wood.svg';
Unfortunately, the SVG texture gets loaded but mapping is all messed up. It seems Threejs is able to "use" the exported UVMaps if I do use a PNG, whereas It can't with the SVG.
NOTE: both files are the same texture, with same dimensions. Indeed, the PNG was created right from the SVG with SVG Converter (OS X).
Related
I have the .obj of a T-Shirt, it contains a few meshes and materials and I'm coloring it using a CanvasTexture fed by an inline svg.
Now I should add a logo at a specific location (more or less above the heart), but I'm struggling to understand which is the best/proper way of doing it (I'm quite new to 3D graphics and Three.js). This is what I tried so far:
since I'm coloring the T-Shirt through a CanvasTexture fed by an inline svg, I thought it would have been easy to just draw the logo into the svg at specific coordinates. And it was easy indeed, but the logo gets not rendered (or is not visible in some way) on the texture/mesh, although it is visible in the inline svg. So CanvasTexture probably doesn't work with embedded images (I tried both base64 and URL)
so, I started looking into more 3d "native" ways of doing it, but I haven't found one that really makes sense to me. I know there's ShaderMaterial in threejs, which I could use to selectively render pixels of the logo or pixels of the cloth, but that means making a lot of complex computation to figure out where the logo should be and I can't believe drawing a simple JPEG or PNG with specific coordinates and size can be so complex... I must have missed an obvious solution.
EDIT
Here is how I'm adding the image to the inline svg (option 1 above).
Add the image to the inline svg
const groups = Array.from(svg.querySelectorAll('g'));
// this is the "g" tag where I want to add the logo into
const targetGroup = groups.find((group: SVGGElement) => group.getAttribute('id') === "logo_placeholder");
const image = document.createElement('image');
image.setAttribute('width', '64');
image.setAttribute('height', '64');
image.setAttribute('x', '240');
image.setAttribute('y', '512');
image.setAttribute('xlink:href', `data:image/png;base64,${base64}`);
targetGroup.appendChild(image);
Draw inline svg to 2d canvas
static drawSvgToCanvas = async (canvas: HTMLCanvasElement, canvasSize: TSize, svgString: string) => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
canvas.width = canvasSize.width;
canvas.height = canvasSize.height;
const ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
const image = new Image(); // eslint-disable-line no-undef
image.src = `data:image/svg+xml;base64,${btoa(svgString)}`;
image.onload = () => {
if (ctx) {
ctx.drawImage(image, 0, 0);
resolve();
} else {
reject(new Error('2D context is not set on canvas'));
}
};
image.onerror = () => {
reject(new Error('Could not load svg image'));
}
});
};
Draw 2d canvas to threejs Texture
const texture = new Three.CanvasTexture(canvas);
texture.mapping = Three.UVMapping; // it's the default
texture.wrapS = Three.RepeatWrapping;
texture.wrapT = Three.RepeatWrapping; // it's the default
texture.magFilter = Three.LinearFilter; // it's the default
texture.minFilter = Three.LinearFilter;
texture.needsUpdate = true;
[...add texture to material...]
For some reason, canvases don't like SVGs with embedded images, so for a similar project I had to do this in two steps, rendering the SVG and the image separately:
First, render the SVG on the canvas, and then render the image on top of that (on the same canvas).
const ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
ctx.drawImage(imgSVG, 0, 0);
ctx.drawImage(img2, 130, 10, 65, 90);
const texture = new THREE.CanvasTexture(canvas);
Example: https://jsfiddle.net/0f9hm7gx/
I'm new to three.js and WebGL in general and I'm trying to make a simple earth globe in 3D with a SVG texture applied on it (so that I can zoom in without quality loss).
I tried to load a svg image instead of my png image. I worked, but the image was "rasterized" removing all advantages of using svg :/
Is is possible to do that ? If yes how ?
Thanks
this.loader = new THREE.TextureLoader();
this.loader.load("someimage.svg", texture => {
//create the sphere
const sphere = new THREE.SphereGeometry(RADIUS, SEGMENTS, RINGS);
//map the texture to the material. Read more about materials in three.js docs
const material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({
map: texture,
overdraw: 0.5
});
//create a new mesh with sphere geometry.
const mesh = new THREE.Mesh(sphere, material);
//add mesh to globe group
this.globe.add(mesh);
});
I am having trouble in rendering svg element to pdf using jspdf . Iam using plugin https://github.com/CBiX/svgToPdf.js/ to do this.
Below is my code
// I recommend to keep the svg visible as a preview
var tmp = document.getElementById("chartContainer");
var svgDoc = tmp.getElementsByTagName("svg")[0];
var pdf = new jsPDF('p', 'pt', 'a4');
svgElementToPdf(svgDoc, pdf, {
scale: 72 / 96, // this is the ratio of px to pt units
removeInvalid: false // this removes elements that could not be translated to pdf from the source svg
});
pdf.output('datauri'); // use output() to get the jsPDF buffer
It is generarting blank pdf. Please help
You can do that using canvg.
Step1: Get "SVG" markup code from DOM
var svg = document.getElementById('svg-container').innerHTML;
if (svg)
svg = svg.replace(/\r?\n|\r/g, '').trim();
Step 2:
Use canvg to create canvas from svg.
var canvas = document.createElement('canvas');
canvg(canvas, svg);
Step 3:
Create image from canvas using .toDataURL()
var imgData = canvas.toDataURL('image/png');
// Generate PDF
var doc = new jsPDF('p', 'pt', 'a4');
doc.addImage(imgData, 'PNG', 40, 40, 75, 75);
doc.save('test.pdf');
Check the demo here http://jsfiddle.net/Purushoth/hvs91vpq/193/
Canvg Repo: https://github.com/gabelerner/canvg
I've tried both svg2pdf.js and addSvgAsImage using canvg internally.
Both didn't work well for me, the resulting images in the pdf where either incorrectly positioned or displayed.
I've ended up doing the following which works very well:
convert the SVG to PNG without any libraries, see my answer to "Convert SVG to image (JPEG, PNG, etc.) in the browser".
just add the result to the pdf using the normal addImage method
I think the current jspdf version (2.3.1) has an addSvgAsImage method, but it takes the svg as a string. I guess you could use an ajax call to retrieve the SVG content, but I just have the SVG in my code and pass it in that way.
I've been beating around the bush a lot, so I'll explain my problem here and hope with the whole picture, somebody has some ideas. With the following image:
I need to detect a mouseover on the blobs over her eyes and mouth, and solve this problem in a general form. The model and blobs are on two different layers, so I can produce one image with only the blobs, and one with only the model, and somehow synchronise a virtual cursor over the blobs while it actually hovers over the model.
I can also make the blobs polygons, for hit testing, but I think a colour hit test would be much easier. If I hit blue, I am on her mouth and I show lipstick images; if I hit pink, I'm over her eyes, and display eye makeup images.
What are the suggestions and conversation of the learned ones here?
The simpler way to do it would be to load the layer image in a canvas, then get all its pixel data. When the mouse is hovering the model image, find out what color is currently selected and if it is different from a previous one, trigger an event to indicate that the selection has changed.
Here is an example, feel free to toy with it; but be aware that it doesn't handle all cases:
what if the layer and the model image are not the same size
what if the layer and the model image are not the same width/height ratio
what if you want to use some alpha channel (the example doesn't take it into account)
$(function() {
/* we load all the image data first */
var imageData = null;
var layerImage = new Image();
layerImage.onload = function() {
var canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
canvas.width = this.width;
canvas.height = this.height;
context = canvas.getContext('2d');
context.drawImage(this, 0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
imageData = context.getImageData(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height).data;
};
/* it's easier to set the image data for example as base64 data */
layerImage.src = "";
var pColor = null;
/* on mouse over the model image */
$("#model").mousemove(function(event) {
/* we correct the offset */
var offset = $(this).offset();
var relX = event.pageX - offset.left;
var relY = event.pageY - Math.round(offset.top);
/* and get the pixel values at this place (note we are not keeping the alpha channel; it's your decision whether or not it is valuable */
var pixelIndex = relY * layerImage.width + relX;
var dataIndex = pixelIndex * 4;
var color = [imageData[dataIndex], imageData[dataIndex + 1], imageData[dataIndex + 2]];
if (pColor == null) {
/* we trigger when first entering the image */
$(this).trigger("newColor", {
message: "Initial layer color",
data: color
});
} else if (pColor[0] != color[0] || pColor[1] != color[1] || pColor[2] != color[2]) {
/* we trigger if the new position is a new color in the layer image */
$(this).trigger("newColor", {
message: "Changed layer color",
data: color
});
}
pColor = color;
});
/* some small help to convert rgb to css colors */
function rgb2hex(red, green, blue) {
var rgb = blue | (green << 8) | (red << 16);
return '#' + (0x1000000 + rgb).toString(16).slice(1)
}
/* there you have the new layer color event management; for the example sake we change the color of some text */
$("#model").on("newColor", function(event, eventData) {
$("#selector").css("color", rgb2hex(eventData.data[0], eventData.data[1], eventData.data[2]));
});
});
img {
border: 1px solid silver
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<body>
<h4>Model image</h4>
<img id="model" src="data:image/png;base64, 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"
/>
<p>You are pointing at some <strong><span id="selector">color</span></strong>
</p>
<hr/>
<h4>Layer image (reference only, not displayed in page)</h4>
<img id="layer" src=""
/>
</body>
If you can have both images (the one with the blob and the one without), I think you can do this using HTML5 canvas.
draw the image normally
draw the blob image beneath the master image so it is invisible
copy the blob to a Canvas
onMouseOver, retrieve pixel data (R,G,B and alpha) for the Canvas at the appropriate coordinates
profit
Twist: you might be able to do this with only one image and its alpha channel, if you don't need it for anything else - give the pixels a full opacity (A=255) everywhere except in blobs 1, 2 and 3, which will have opacity equal to 255-(1,2,3...). You can't have too many different blobs or the transparency will become noticeable. Haven't tried, but it should work. Given the likely compressibility of a "blob-only" image, a pair of images (one without transparency, one also without transparency and with only N+1 colours, PNG compressed) should yield better results.
More-or-less-pseudo code with two images, using jQuery (can be done without):
var image = document.getElementById('mainImage')
var blobs = document.getElementById('blobImage');
// Create a canvas
canvas = $('<canvas/>')[0];
canvas.width = image.width;
canvas.height = image.height;
// IMPORTANT: for this to work, this script and blobImage.src must be both
// in the same security domain, or you'll get "this operation is insecure"
canvas.getContext('2d').drawImage(blobs, 0, 0, image.width, image.height);
// Now wait for it.
$('#mainImage').mouseover(function(event) {
// TO DO: offset clientX, clientY by margin on mainImage
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
// Get one pixel
var pix = ctx.getImageData(event.clientX, event.clientY, 1, 1);
// Retrieve the red component
var red = pix.data[0];
if (red > 128) {
// ... do something for red
}
});
You could use SVG graphics to layer over the image.
My example uses an ellipse but you could use a polygons just as easily.
You could use the colour like you stated in your question or add an extra property to the svg element. The example uses onclick but mouseover works as well.
example js:
function svg_clicked(objSVG)
{
alert(objSVG.style.fill);
alert(objSVG.getAttribute('data-category'));
}
example svg:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
<ellipse cx="110" cy="80" rx="100" ry="50" style="fill:red;" onclick="svg_clicked(this);" data-category="lipstick" />
</svg>
Here's a fiddle (move the mouse over the O's in the picture)
It still works if you make the svg element transparent (using fill:transparent).
You can change the overlay to a colour or outline quickly for testing.
I highly recommend the time tested method.
The easiest way to both create blobs and to detect if the mouse is over them is to use svg graphics on top of the other image. SVG supports mouseover events and allows vector shapes which are going to give you far greater precision than using <map> or <area>.
I found this question that might also shed some light on where I am coming from: Hover only on non-transparent part of image. Read the second answer down because it will likely be prefered in your situation.
The svg elements on your image would be transparent (or whatever you would want), and you could easily detect the mouse over events.
The library from that question is called raphael. Hopefully this proves to be useful.
Good day.
I use script Imagecropper
Script:
<img src="http://test.com/img/1362244329.jpg" id="yui_img" height="768" width="1024">
<script>
(function() {
var Dom = YAHOO.util.Dom,
Event = YAHOO.util.Event;
var crop = new YAHOO.widget.ImageCropper('yui_img');
})();
</script>
result:
But if i do not specify the image size, then i get next(see image):
<img src="http://test.com/img/1362244329.jpg" id="yui_img">
result:
And if i specify the wrong picture size, the window will increase the portion of the image:
<img src="http://test.com/img/1362244329.jpg" id="yui_img" height="333" width="500">
result:
How to make in tag image does not necessarily will been to specify its size?
First of all I'd like to point you to YUI 3 since YUI 2 is no longer supported. You shouldn't write new code using YUI 2. There's an ImageCropper component I wrote for YUI 3 that works just like the YUI 2 version in the YUI Gallery: http://yuilibrary.com/gallery/show/imagecropper. Since it copies what the YUI 2 ImageCropper did, it shares these issues with the older version.
What to do when the size of the image isn't specified
The reason why you're getting a small ImageCropper is that you're creating the widget before the image has been fetched and so the browser doesn't know its size yet. What you can do is wait for the image's onload event. You can listen to that event and create the ImageCropper after it fires:
(function() {
var Dom = YAHOO.util.Dom,
Event = YAHOO.util.Event;
var yui_img = Dom.get('yui_img');
Event.addListener(yui_img, 'load', function () {
var crop = new YAHOO.widget.ImageCropper(yui_img);
});
})();
Why the ImageCropper doesn't work with images with the wrong size
Neither the YUI 2 ImageCropper nor my YUI 3 version work with images when they don't have the right size. The reason is that both use the background: url() CSS style for showing the image inside the crop area (the non-darkened part of the widget). CSS backgrounds don't let you use a resized/zoomed image.
I plan on using another strategy at some point for the YUI 3 version that will fix the issue. However, you need to keep in mind that the ImageCropper component is designed so that you send the crop coordinates to the server for it to actually crop the image. That means that if you have the wrong size set to the image, the coordinates that the image cropper returns with its getCropCoords method wouldn't be the coordinates that match with the full sized image. Instead you'd also have to send the server the size of the image you've been using and do extra math to crop the image correctly.
In conclusion, you shouldn't use the image with the wrong size. You can fix the size of the image in two ways:
Use the HTML5 naturalWidth and naturalHeight attributes of the image. Those return the real size of the image even if it's resized. Unfortunately these attributes are not yet supported by all browsers.
Create a new image with JS, set it the same src as the image you're using, listen to its load event and get that image's size.
Something like this:
(function () {
var Dom = YAHOO.util.Dom;
var yui_img = Dom.get('yui_img'),
new_img = new Image();
new_img.onload = function () {
yui_img.width = new_img.width;
yui_img.height = new_img.height;
// create the ImageCropper
};
new_img.src = yui_img.src;
}());
A YUI3 version
You can easily do all this with YUI3:
YUI().use('gallery-imagecropper', function (Y) {
var img = Y.one('#yui_img');
img.on('load', function () {
var cropper = new Y.ImageCroper({
srcNode: img,
width: img.get('width'),
height: img.get('height')
});
cropper.render();
});
});
Typo in code. Should be
var cropper = new Y.ImageCropper({
You missed a letter "p".