I was tried to continues training in keras.
because I was build keras multiclass classification model after I have new labels and values. so I want to build a new model without retraining. that is why I tried continuous train in keras.
model.add(Dense(10, activation='sigmoid'))
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop',
loss='sparse_categorical_crossentropy',
metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(training_data, labels, epochs=20, batch_size=1)
model.save("keras_model.h5")
after completing save the model , i want to do continues training. so i tried,
model1 = load_model("keras_model.h5")
model1.fit(new_input, new_label, epochs=20, batch_size=1)
model1.save("keras_model.h5")
I tried this. but it was thrown an error. like previously 10 classes. but now we add new class means an error occurred.
so what is my question is, is it possible for continues training in keras for multiclass classification for a new class?
tensorflow.python.framework.errors_impl.InvalidArgumentError: Received
a label value of 10 which is outside the valid range of [0, 9). Label
values: 10 [[{{node
loss/dense_7_loss/SparseSoftmaxCrossEntropyWithLogits/SparseSoftmaxCrossEntropyWithLogits}}]]
The typical approach for this type of situations is to define a common model that contains most of the inner layers and is reusable; and then a second model that defines the output layer and thus the number of classes. The inner model can be reused in subsequent outer models.
Untested example:
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow import keras
from tensorflow.keras.layers import *
from tensorflow.keras.models import Model
def make_inner_model():
""" An example model that takes 42 features and outputs a
transformation vector.
"""
inp = Input(shape=(42,), name='in')
h1 = Dense(80, activation='relu')(inp)
h2 = Dense(40)(h1)
h3 = Dense(60, activation='relu')(h2)
out = Dense(32)(h3)
return Model(inp, out)
def make_outer_model(inner_model, n_classes):
inp = Input(shape=(42,), name='inp')
hidden = inner_model(inp)
out = Dense(n_classes, activation='softmax')(hidden)
model = Model(inp, out)
model.compile('adam', 'categorical_crossentropy')
return model
inner_model = make_inner_model()
inner_model.save('inner_model_untrained.h5')
model1 = make_outer_model(inner_model, 10)
model1.summary()
# model1.fit()
# inner_model.save_weights('inner_model_weights_1.h5')
model2 = make_outer_model(inner_model, 12)
# model2.fit()
# inner_model.save_weights('inner_model_weights_2.h5')
Related
I'm attempting to find variable importance on a Neural Network I've built. Using tensorflow, it seems you can use either the tensorflow.keras way, or the kerasRegressor way. Admittedly, I have been reading documentation / stack overflow for hours and am confused on the differences. They seem to perform similarly but have slightly different pros/cons.
One issue I'm running into is when I use tf.keras to build the model, I am able to clearly compare my training data to my validation/testing data, and get an 'accuracy score'. But, when using kerasRegressor, I am not.
The difference here is the .evaluate() function, which kerasRegressor doesn't seem to have.
Questions:
How to evaluate performance of kerasRegressor model w/ same output as tf.keras.evaluate()?
kerasRegressor Code:
K.clear_session()
def base_model():
# 1- Instantiate Model
modelNEW = keras.Sequential()
# 2- Specify Shape of First Layer
modelNEW.add(layers.Dense(512, activation = 'relu', input_shape = ourInputShape))
# 3- Add the layers
modelNEW.add(layers.Dense(3, activation= 'softmax')) #softmax returns array of probability scores (num prior), and in this case we have to predict either CSCANCEL, MEMBERCANCEL, ACTIVE)
modelNEW.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
return modelNEW
# *** THIS IS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT OVERFITTING ***
from tensorflow.keras.callbacks import EarlyStopping
callbacks = [
EarlyStopping(patience=2)
]
yTrain = keras.utils.to_categorical(yTrain, 3)
yValidation = keras.utils.to_categorical(yValidation, 3)
currentModel = KerasRegressor(build_fn=base_model, epochs=100, batch_size=50, shuffle='True')
history = currentModel.fit(xTrain, yTrain)
Now if I want to test the accuracy, I have to use .predict()
prediction = currentModel.predict(xValidation)
# print(prediction)
# train_error = np.abs(yValidation - prediction)
# mean_error = np.mean(train_error)
# min_error = np.min(train_error)
# max_error = np.max(train_error)
# std_error = np.std(train_error)```
tf.Keras neural Network:
modelNEW = keras.Sequential()
modelNEW.add(layers.Dense(512, activation = 'relu', input_shape = ourInputShape))
modelNEW.add(layers.Dense(3, activation= 'softmax')) #softmax returns array of probability scores (num prior), and in this case we have to predict either CSCANCEL, MEMBERCANCEL, ACTIVE)
modelNEW.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
*** THIS IS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT OVERFITTING ***
from tensorflow.keras.callbacks import EarlyStopping
callbacks = [
EarlyStopping(patience=2)
]
yTrain = keras.utils.to_categorical(yTrain, 3)
yValidation = keras.utils.to_categorical(yValidation, 3)
history = modelNEW.fit(xTrain, yTrain, epochs=100, batch_size=50, shuffle="True")
This is the evaluation I need to see, and cannot with kerasRegressor:
# 6- Model evaluation with test data
test_loss, test_acc = modelNEW.evaluate(xValidation, yValidation)
print('test_acc:', test_acc)
Possible Workaround, still error:
# predictionTrain = currentModel.predict(xTrain)
predictionValidation = currentModel.predict(xValidation)
# print('Train Accuracy = ',accuracy_score(yTrain,np.argmax(pred_train, axis=1)))
print('Test Accuracy = ',accuracy_score(yValidation,np.argmax(predictionValidation, axis=1)))
: Classification metrics can't handle a mix of multilabel-indicator and binary targets
The end goal is to determine important features in a Neural Network model built within tensorflow keras OR kerasRegressor. The logic has been explained in this question, which utilizes eli5 by introducing noise for variables and measuring outcome.
I have been attempting for hours to implement this with no luck.
Question:
Why won't eli5 for feature importance work on either of my models?
My Current Error:
ValueError: Classification metrics can't handle a mix of multilabel-indicator and continuous-multioutput targets
I have built the model in both tf.keras && kerasRegressor reading somewhere that eli5 doesn't work with tensorflow.keras. I admit I do not truly understanding the difference b/n kerasRegressor & tf.keras.
Code for Keras Regressor Model:
def base_model():
# 1- Instantiate Model
modelNEW = keras.Sequential()
# 2- Specify Shape of First Layer
modelNEW.add(layers.Dense(512, activation = 'relu', input_shape = ourInputShape))
# 3- Add the layers
modelNEW.add(layers.Dense(3, activation= 'softmax')) #softmax returns array of probability scores (num prior), and in this case we have to predict either CSCANCEL, MEMBERCANCEL, ACTIVE)
modelNEW.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
return modelNEW
# *** THIS IS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT OVERFITTING ***
from tensorflow.keras.callbacks import EarlyStopping
callbacks = [
EarlyStopping(patience=2)
]
yTrain = keras.utils.to_categorical(yTrain, 3)
yValidation = keras.utils.to_categorical(yValidation, 3)
currentModel = KerasRegressor(build_fn=base_model, epochs=100, batch_size=50, shuffle='True')
history = currentModel.fit(xTrain, yTrain)
Code for tf.Keras model:
Only change is model name
modelNEW = keras.Sequential()
modelNEW.add(layers.Dense(512, activation = 'relu', input_shape = ourInputShape))
modelNEW.add(layers.Dense(3, activation= 'softmax')) #softmax returns array of probability scores (num prior), and in this case we have to predict either CSCANCEL, MEMBERCANCEL, ACTIVE)
modelNEW.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
*** THIS IS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT OVERFITTING ***
from tensorflow.keras.callbacks import EarlyStopping
callbacks = [
EarlyStopping(patience=2)
]
yTrain = keras.utils.to_categorical(yTrain, 3)
yValidation = keras.utils.to_categorical(yValidation, 3)
history = modelNEW.fit(xTrain, yTrain, epochs=100, batch_size=50, shuffle="True")
Attempting to implement eli5:
from keras.wrappers.scikit_learn import KerasClassifier, KerasRegressor
import eli5
from eli5.sklearn import PermutationImportance
from eli5 import show_weights
perm = PermutationImportance(currentModel, scoring="accuracy", random_state=1).fit(xTrain,yTrain)
eli5.show_weights(perm, feature_names = xTrain.columns.tolist())
I am using Keras functional API to build a classifier and I am using the training flag in the dropout layer to enable dropout when predicting new instances (in order to get an estimate of the uncertainty). In order to get the expected response one needs to repeat this prediction several times, with keras randomly activating links in the dense layer, and of course it is computational expensive. Therefore, I would also like to have the option to not use dropout at the prediction phase, i.e., use all the network links. Does anyone know how I can do this? Following is a sample code of what I am doing. I tried to look if predict has any relevant parameter but does not seem like it does (?). I can technically train the same model without the training flag at the dropout layer, but I do not want to do this (or better I want to have a more clean solution, rather than having 2 different models).
from sklearn.datasets import make_circles
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.utils import to_categorical
from keras.layers import Dense
from keras.layers import Dropout
import numpy as np
import keras
# generate a 2d classification sample dataset
X, y = make_circles(n_samples=100, noise=0.1, random_state=1)
n_train = 30
trainX, testX = X[:n_train, :], X[n_train:, :]
trainy, testy = y[:n_train], y[n_train:]
trainy = to_categorical(trainy)
testy = to_categorical(testy)
inputlayer = keras.layers.Input((2,))
d = keras.layers.Dense(500, activation = 'relu')(inputlayer)
d1 = keras.layers.Dropout(rate = .3)(d,training = True)
out = keras.layers.Dense(2, activation = 'softmax')(d1)
model = keras.Model(inputs = inputlayer, outputs = out)
model.compile(loss = 'categorical_crossentropy',metrics = ['accuracy'],optimizer='adam')
model.fit(x = trainX, y = trainy, validation_data=(testX, testy),epochs=1000, verbose=1)
# another prediction on a specific sample
print(model.predict(testX[0:1,:]))
# another prediction on the same sample
print(model.predict(testX[0:1,:]))
Running the above example I get the following output:
[[0.9230819 0.07691813]]
[[0.8222245 0.17777553]]
which is as expected, different class probabilities for the same input, since there is a random (de)activation of the links from the dropout layer.
Any suggestions on how I can enable/disable dropout at the prediction phase with the functional API?
Sure, you do not need to set the training flag when building the Dropout layer. After training your model you define this function:
mc_func = K.function([model.input, K.learning_phase()],
[model.output])
Then you call mc_func with your input and flag 1 to enable dropout, or 0 to disable it:
stochastic_pred = mc_func([some_input, 1])
deterministic_pred = mc_func([some_input, 0])
I studied Keras and created my first neural network model as the following:
from keras.layers import Dense
import keras
from keras import Sequential
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
tr_X, tr_y = getTrainingData()
# NN Architecture
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(16, input_dim=tr_X.shape[1]))
model.add(keras.layers.advanced_activations.PReLU())
model.add(Dense(16))
model.add(keras.layers.advanced_activations.PReLU())
model.add(Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
# Compile the Model
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
# Fit the Model
model.fit(tr_X, tr_y, epochs=1000, batch_size=200, validation_split=0.2)
# ----- Evaluate the Model (Using UNSEEN data) ------
ts_X, ts_y = getTestingData()
yhat_classes = model.predict_classes(ts_X, verbose=0)[:, 0]
accuracy = accuracy_score(ts_y, yhat_classes)
print(accuracy)
I am not sure about the last portion of my code, i.e., model evaluation using model.predict_classes() where new data are loaded via a custom method getTestingData(). See my goal is to test the final model using new UNSEEN data to evaluate its prediction. My question is about this part: Am I evaluating the model correctly?
Thank you,
Yes, that is correct. You can use predict or predict_classes to get the predictions on test data. If you need the loss & metrics directly, you can use the evaluate method by feeding ts_X and ts_y.
y_pred = model.predict(ts_X)
loss, accuracy = model.evaluate(ts_X, ts_y)
https://keras.io/models/model/#predict
https://keras.io/models/model/#evaluate
Difference between predict & predict_classes: What is the difference between "predict" and "predict_class" functions in keras?
Hello I have a some question for keras.
currently i want implement some network
using same cnn model, and use two images as input of cnn model
and use two result of cnn model, provide to Dense model
for example
def cnn_model():
input = Input(shape=(None, None, 3))
x = Conv2D(8, (3, 3), strides=(1, 1))(input)
x = GlobalAvgPool2D()(x)
model = Model(input, x)
return model
def fc_model(cnn1, cnn2):
input_1 = cnn1.output
input_2 = cnn2.output
input = concatenate([input_1, input_2])
x = Dense(1, input_shape=(None, 16))(input)
x = Activation('sigmoid')(x)
model = Model([cnn1.input, cnn2.input], x)
return model
def main():
cnn1 = cnn_model()
cnn2 = cnn_model()
model = fc_model(cnn1, cnn2)
model.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='mean_squared_error')
model.fit(x=[image1, image2], y=[1.0, 1.0], batch_size=1, ecpochs=1)
i want to implement model something like this, and train models
but i got error message like below :
'All layer names should be unique'
Actually i want use only one CNN model as feature extractor and finally use two features to predict one float value as 0.0 ~ 1.0
so whole system -->>
using two images and extract features from same CNN model, and features are provided to Dense model to get one floating value
Please, help me implement this system and how to train..
Thank you
See the section of the Keras documentation on shared layers:
https://keras.io/getting-started/functional-api-guide/
A code snippet from the documentation above demonstrating this:
# This layer can take as input a matrix
# and will return a vector of size 64
shared_lstm = LSTM(64)
# When we reuse the same layer instance
# multiple times, the weights of the layer
# are also being reused
# (it is effectively *the same* layer)
encoded_a = shared_lstm(tweet_a)
encoded_b = shared_lstm(tweet_b)
# We can then concatenate the two vectors:
merged_vector = keras.layers.concatenate([encoded_a, encoded_b], axis=-1)
# And add a logistic regression on top
predictions = Dense(1, activation='sigmoid')(merged_vector)
# We define a trainable model linking the
# tweet inputs to the predictions
model = Model(inputs=[tweet_a, tweet_b], outputs=predictions)
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop',
loss='binary_crossentropy',
metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit([data_a, data_b], labels, epochs=10)