I'm trying to filter messages for my Subscription Clients in Azure Service Bus. I'd like to check if the property does not exist or the property has a certain value. This is how I add the filter:
var rules = await subscriptionClient_.GetRulesAsync();
if (!rules.Any(r => r.Name == "FilteringRule"))
{
var filter = new SqlFilter($"sys.CustomProperty='{CustomValue}' OR sys.CustomProperty IS NULL");
await subscriptionClient_.AddRuleAsync("FilteringRule", filter);
}
And the same value is passed over to the Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.Message object:
Message msg = new Message();
msg.UserProperties.Add("CustomProperty", "CustomValue");
Checking it in Service Bus explorer displays that the message indeed has the property.
I'm trying to figure out how to filter Subscriptions programmatically, not by ARM templates.
The reason the filter is not working because you're trying to treat custom properties as system properties. Please try to change your filter expression to:
var filter = new SqlFilter($"CustomProperty='{CustomValue}' OR CustomProperty IS NULL");
and things should work. Please note that I have removed sys. prefix from your filter expression.
Related
I am trying to migrate from the Legacy Azure service bus SDK to the new one "Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus". I don't see the equivalent of the "UserProperties" property with the new Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus.ServiceBusMessage. Where can I set the user properties? I see a property called "ApplicationProperties". Is that the one to go for?
Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.Message msg = new Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.Message(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(message.Body));
if (message.Headers != null)
{
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, object> item in message.Headers)
{
msg.UserProperties.Add(item.Key, item.Value); //I need help for this statement.
}
}
Yes, ApplicationProperties is the new custom headers collection to use.
My module creates a custom content item through the controller:
private ContentItem createContentItem()
{
// Add the field
_contentDefinitionManager.AlterPartDefinition(
"TestType",
cfg => cfg
.WithField(
"NewField",
f => f
.OfType(typeof(BooleanField).Name)
.WithDisplayName("New Field"))
);
// Not sure if this is needed
_contentDefinitionManager.AlterTypeDefinition(
"TestType",
cfg => cfg
.WithPart("TestType")
);
// Create new TestType item
var newItem = _contentManager.New("TestType");
_contentManager.Create(TestItem, VersionOptions.Published);
// Set the added boolean field to true
BooleanField newField = ((dynamic)newItem).TestType.NewField as BooleanField;
newField.Value = true;
// Set title (as date created, for convenience)
var time = DateTime.Now.ToString("MM-dd-yyyy h:mm:ss tt", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture).Replace(':', '.');
newItem.As<TitlePart>().Title = time;
return newItem;
}
The end result of this is a new TestType item with a field that's set to true. Viewing the content item in the dashboard as well as examining ContentItemVersionRecord in the database confirms that the value was set correctly.
However, queries don't seem to work properly on fields that are set in this manner. I found the record IntegerFieldIndexRecord, which is what I assume projections use to fill query result pages. On this, the value of TestField remains at 0 (false), instead of 1 (true).
Going to the content item edit page and simply clicking 'save' updates IntegerFieldIndexRecord correctly, meaning that the value is now picked up by the query. How can the record be updated for field values set programmatically?
Relevant section of migration:
SchemaBuilder.CreateTable(typeof(TestTypePartRecord).Name, table => table
.ContentPartRecord()
);
ContentDefinitionManager.AlterTypeDefinition(
"TestType",
cfg => cfg
.DisplayedAs("Test Type")
.WithPart(typeof(TitlePart).Name)
.WithPart(typeof(ContainablePart).Name)
.WithPart(typeof(CommonPart).Name)
.WithPart(typeof(IdentityPart).Name)
);
Edit: The fix for this is to manually change the projection index record whenever changing a field value, using this call:
_fieldIndexService.Set(testResultItem.As<FieldIndexPart>(),
"TestType", // Resolves as TestTypePart, which holds the field
"newField",
"", // Not sure why value name should be empty, but whatever
true, // The value to be set goes here
typeof(bool));
In some cases a simple contentManager.Publish() won't do.
I've had a similar problem some time ago and actually implemented a simple helper service to tackle this problem; here's an excerpt:
public T GetStringFieldValues<T>(ContentPart contentPart, string fieldName)
{
var fieldIndexPart = contentPart.ContentItem.As<FieldIndexPart>();
var partName = contentPart.PartDefinition.Name;
return this.fieldIndexService.Get<T>(fieldIndexPart, partName, fieldName, string.Empty);
}
private void SetStringFieldValue(ContentPart contentPart, string fieldName, IEnumerable<int> ids)
{
var fieldIndexPart = contentPart.ContentItem.As<FieldIndexPart>();
var partName = contentPart.PartDefinition.Name;
var encodedValues = "{" + string.Join("},{", ids) + "}";
this.fieldIndexService.Set(fieldIndexPart, partName, fieldName, string.Empty, encodedValues, typeof(string));
}
I've actually built this for use with MediaLibrary- and ContentPicker fields (they encode their value as string internally), so it might not be suitable for the boolean field in your example.
But it can't be that hard to implement, just look at the existing drivers and handlers for those fields.
There are 2 ways to fix this:
1) Ensure the newly created item is getting published by calling ContentManager.Publish() as Orchard.Projections.Handlers.FieldIndexPartHandler listens to the publish event to update the FieldIndexPartRecord
2) use IFieldIndexService to update FieldIndexPartRecord manually, see implementation of Orchard.Projections.Handlers.FieldIndexPartHandler to get in idea how to do this
Hope this helps.
:edit
Due to calling Create(...Published) the ContentManager.Published() won't do anything as the item is already considered published.
You can do the following to force the publish logic to run:
bool itemPublished = newItem.VersionRecord.Published;
// unpublish item first when it is already published as ContentManager.Publish() internally first checks for published flag and when set it aborts silently
// -> this behaviour prevents calling publish listeners
if (itemPublished)
_contentManager.Unpublish(newItem);
// the following call will result in calls to IContentHandler.Publishing() / IContentHandler.Published()
_contentManager.Publish(newItem);
or just create the item as a draft and publish it when everything is setup correctly.
We Have Contact Entities in contact Entitie one lookup filed company Name in that lookup having two values 1.Account and 2.Contact . When we are selecting contact show the address filed when we select account hide the address filed we needs to write the plugin to Execute that works. Kindly any one help me on the same.
Thanks!!
Rajesh Singh
First, if you need to make change on a form, you can't use plug-ins. Plug-ins are made for bussinees logics, like Update another record when the first one is created, make complex logic, etc...
What you need it is a javascript that executes on the OnLoad of the form and OnChange event in that OptionSet.
The lines you are looking for are:
function ShowField()
{
// The field is present on the form so we can access to its methods
var optionSet = Xrm.Page.getAttribute("custom_attribute");
if (optionSet == undefined)
{
return;
}
// The control is present on the form so we can access to its methods
var controlAddress = Xrm.Page.getControl("custom_address");
if (controlAddress == undefined)
{
return;
}
var valueOptionSet = optionSet.getValue(); // This is the value you set creating the OptionSet
switch (valueOptionSet)
{
case 0: // Your account value, show
controlAddress.setVisible(true);
case 1: // Your contact value, hide
controlAddress.setVisible(false);
default:
return;
}
}
You need to register a web resource and register the event, if you need more information about the code or why this stuff is here and why this not just tell me.
I have a sharepoint field in a list that can be either a user or a group. Using the Server Object Model, I can identify easily whether the user is a group or not.
However, I cannot find a way to achieve this using the Managed Client Object model. Is there a way to know.
I only managed to make it work by looping the list of groups and checking if the there is a group with the name. Howver, this is not exactly correct or efficient. Maybe there is a way to find out using the ListItem of the user. But I did not see any fields that show that user is administrator. I have also tried EnsureUser. This crashes if the user is not a group. So I could work out by using a try/catch but this would be very bad programming.
Thanks,
Joseph
To do this get the list of users from ClientContext.Current.Web.SiteUserInfoList and then check the ContentType of each item that is returned to determine what it is.
Checking the content type is not very direct though, because all you actually get back from each item is a ContentTypeID, which you then have to look-up against the content types of the user list at ClientContext.Current.Web.SiteUserInfoList.ContentTypes. That look-up will return a ContentType object, and you can read from the Name property of that object to see what the list item is.
So an over simplified chunk of code to do this would be:
using Microsoft.SharePoint.Client;
...
ClientContext context = ClientContext.Current;
var q = from i in context.Web.SiteUserInfoList.GetItems(new CamlQuery()) select i;
IEnumerable<ListItem> Items = context.LoadQuery(q);
context.ExecuteQueryAsync((s, e) => {
foreach (ListItem i in Items) {
//This is the important bit:
ContentType contenttype = context.Web.SiteUserInfoList.ContentTypes.GetById(i["ContentTypeId"].ToString());
context.Load(contenttype); //It's another query so we have to load it too
switch (contenttype.Name) {
case "SharePointGroup":
//It's a SharePoint group
break;
case "Person":
//It's a user
break;
case "DomainGroup":
//It's an Active Directory Group or Membership Role
break;
default:
//It's a mystery;
break;
}
}
},
(s, e) => { /* Query failed */ }
);
You didn't specify your platform, but I did all of this in Silverlight using the SharePoint client object model. It stands to reason that the same would be possible in JavaScript as well.
Try Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.Utilities.Utility.SearchPrincipals(...):
var resultPrincipals = Utility.SearchPrincipals(clientContext, clientContext.Web, searchString, PrincipalType.All, PrincipalSource.All, null, maxResults);
The return type, PrincipalInfo, conveniently has a PrincipalType property which you can check for Group.
I'm working with Windows Azure Table Storage and have a simple requirement: add a new row, overwriting any existing row with that PartitionKey/RowKey. However, saving the changes always throws an exception, even if I pass in the ReplaceOnUpdate option:
tableServiceContext.AddObject(TableName, entity);
tableServiceContext.SaveChangesWithRetries(SaveChangesOptions.ReplaceOnUpdate);
If the entity already exists it throws:
System.Data.Services.Client.DataServiceRequestException: An error occurred while processing this request. ---> System.Data.Services.Client.DataServiceClientException: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<error xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata">
<code>EntityAlreadyExists</code>
<message xml:lang="en-AU">The specified entity already exists.</message>
</error>
Do I really have to manually query for the existing row first and call DeleteObject on it? That seems very slow. Surely there is a better way?
As you've found, you can't just add another item that has the same row key and partition key, so you will need to run a query to check to see if the item already exists. In situations like this I find it helpful to look at the Azure REST API documentation to see what is available to the storage client library. You'll see that there are separate methods for inserting and updating. The ReplaceOnUpdate only has an effect when you're updating, not inserting.
While you could delete the existing item and then add the new one, you could just update the existing one (saving you one round trip to storage). Your code might look something like this:
var existsQuery = from e
in tableServiceContext.CreateQuery<MyEntity>(TableName)
where
e.PartitionKey == objectToUpsert.PartitionKey
&& e.RowKey == objectToUpsert.RowKey
select e;
MyEntity existingObject = existsQuery.FirstOrDefault();
if (existingObject == null)
{
tableServiceContext.AddObject(TableName, objectToUpsert);
}
else
{
existingObject.Property1 = objectToUpsert.Property1;
existingObject.Property2 = objectToUpsert.Property2;
tableServiceContext.UpdateObject(existingObject);
}
tableServiceContext.SaveChangesWithRetries(SaveChangesOptions.ReplaceOnUpdate);
EDIT: While correct at the time of writing, with the September 2011 update Microsoft have updated the Azure table API to include two upsert commands, Insert or Replace Entity and Insert or Merge Entity
In order to operate on an existing object NOT managed by the TableContext with either Delete or SaveChanges with ReplaceOnUpdate options, you need to call AttachTo and attach the object to the TableContext, instead of calling AddObject which instructs TableContext to attempt to insert it.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.services.client.dataservicecontext.attachto.aspx
in my case it was not allowed to remove it first, thus I do it like this, this will result in one transaction to server which will first remove existing object and than add new one, removing need to copy property values
var existing = from e in _ServiceContext.AgentTable
where e.PartitionKey == item.PartitionKey
&& e.RowKey == item.RowKey
select e;
_ServiceContext.IgnoreResourceNotFoundException = true;
var existingObject = existing.FirstOrDefault();
if (existingObject != null)
{
_ServiceContext.DeleteObject(existingObject);
}
_ServiceContext.AddObject(AgentConfigTableServiceContext.AgetnConfigTableName, item);
_ServiceContext.SaveChangesWithRetries();
_ServiceContext.IgnoreResourceNotFoundException = false;
Insert/Merge or Update was added to the API in September 2011. Here is an example using the Storage API 2.0 which is easier to understand then the way it is done in the 1.7 api and earlier.
public void InsertOrReplace(ITableEntity entity)
{
retryPolicy.ExecuteAction(
() =>
{
try
{
TableOperation operation = TableOperation.InsertOrReplace(entity);
cloudTable.Execute(operation);
}
catch (StorageException e)
{
string message = "InsertOrReplace entity failed.";
if (e.RequestInformation.HttpStatusCode == 404)
{
message += " Make sure the table is created.";
}
// do something with message
}
});
}
The Storage API does not allow more than one operation per entity (delete+insert) in a group transaction:
An entity can appear only once in the transaction, and only one operation may be performed against it.
see MSDN: Performing Entity Group Transactions
So in fact you need to read first and decide on insert or update.
You may use UpsertEntity and UpsertEntityAsync methods in the official Microsoft Azure.Data.Tables TableClient.
The fully working example is available at https://github.com/Azure-Samples/msdocs-azure-data-tables-sdk-dotnet/blob/main/2-completed-app/AzureTablesDemoApplicaton/Services/TablesService.cs --
public void UpsertTableEntity(WeatherInputModel model)
{
TableEntity entity = new TableEntity();
entity.PartitionKey = model.StationName;
entity.RowKey = $"{model.ObservationDate} {model.ObservationTime}";
// The other values are added like a items to a dictionary
entity["Temperature"] = model.Temperature;
entity["Humidity"] = model.Humidity;
entity["Barometer"] = model.Barometer;
entity["WindDirection"] = model.WindDirection;
entity["WindSpeed"] = model.WindSpeed;
entity["Precipitation"] = model.Precipitation;
_tableClient.UpsertEntity(entity);
}