Can someone suggest another alternative in which I commit my projects into git? I'm used to right click on my project, go to Git and Add than commit but this time round when pressing Add the usual commit page isn't showing up.
Related
We recently migrated from using Subversion and Trac to Git and GitLab. We successfully migrated all of our old data.
I'm still trying to learn GitLab and generally like it better than Trac, but one thing I don't like as much is that when you reference a GitLab Issue in the git commit, it adds a reference and link to that commit under the issue, but you have to browse to the commit itself to see the associated Git commit message.
In Trac, we had it configured such that the Subversion commit messages were all displayed in the Trac ticket with the commit link, so it was easier to view all the relevant information for that ticket in one place.
Is there a way to configure GitLab to display the Git commit message with the Git commit link that shows up under Issues? The message does show up in the commit list, but not on a referenced Issue.
I thought about trying to use a server hook to generate a note with the Git commit message when a commit is made, but just wondering if there is an easier/better way to accomplish this?
There is no built-in way to show the commit message of a crosslinked commit in the issue log. After all, commits are handled the same way as any other mentions: in the issue's history/mention log.
While the example in GitLab's documentation unfortunately misses the opportunity to show an example of a mention in the commit, here's an issue from GitLab itself with a mention. This commit also shows how mentions often get used within commits—with keywords:
Merge branch '65375-broken-master-gitlab-svg-path-test-failing' into 'master'
Update failing jest snapshot
Closes #13186
See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!14933
These kind of commits close the specific issue and don't require any further user action. Adding that kind of noise to the discussion/comment section of an issue is, in my opinion, only cluttering the discussion between actual humans*. However, the commit still shows up in the log and is clickable and hoverable.
To get back to your question:
Is there a way to configure GitLab to display the Git commit message with the Git commit link that shows up under Issues?
If you hover over the linked commit, then you'll get the commit's subject. There's nothing more that can be achieved within GitLab itself.
I thought about trying to use a server hook to generate a note with the Git commit message when a commit is made, but just wondering if there is an easier/better way to accomplish this?
If you follow the usual commit/merge message based issue closing and use [Closes?|Fix(es)?] #issue in your commit message, you may end up with more noise in the comments than you would like too.
* well, except for some bots
in my new project I can't close Gitlab issue's automatically via commit. this is what I try to do:
git add .
git commit -m "close #32"
git push origin develop
in my previous project when I try this codes, issue closed automatically in Gitlab.
what should I do?
First, make sure the commit closing the issue is not the very first commit.
As documented in gitlab-org/gitlab-foss issue 54722, it would not work. By design.
Check if another new commit, with the same comment, works better.
If not, check the GitLab server log for any error mentioning a failure to process the commit comments.
Possibly the feature is disabled from GitLab for certain reason.
Go to GitLab -> Your Project -> Settings -> Repository and see the below screenshot. As seen, the checkbox needs to be enabled in order to avail the auto close functionality based on the reference in the commit message.
another little issue with my current choice of IDE , Bluej. I have set it up to be able to share a project (namely to commit and push changes) using GIT,and specifically through a gitlab repository.
After the first couple of successful pushes and commits(two weeks ago), I changed some code today, tried to do exactly the same procedure, and alas, the button OK in bluej to actually push the changes, is not active!
I have checked connection by entering password, all looks fine. Also, commits are happening fine locally, but when I try to push them through the TeamWorks of Bluej, the OK button remains inactive.
ps: a restart of the program did not solve the issue.
In that case:
switch to the command-line,
go to your repository folder,
and do a git fetch + git status
That should show you why a simple git push is not possible (possibly because you need to pull first)
I've just started using GitLab, and have created a set of issues, in order to keep an overview of what needs to be done for my application. I was wondering if it was possible to create a branch from these issues, such that the branch and issues are linked, similar as in jira and Stash from atlassian?
If you create a branch with the name <issue-number>-issue-description and push that branch to gitlab, it will automatically be linked to that issue. For instance, if you have an issue with id 654 and you create a branch with name 654-some-feature and push it to gitlab, it will be linked to issue 654.
Gitlab will even ask you if you want to create a merge request and will automatically add Closes #654 to the merge request description which will close issue 654 when the merge request is accepted.
Also if you go to a given issue page on gitlab, you should see a New Branch button which will automatically create a branch with a name of the form <issue-number>-issue-description.
On the Issue screen, you see a green button labeled "Create merge request", with a down-arrow to its right.
That's not a button, that's a drop down list of buttons.
Click on the down arrow
Choose "Create branch"
Click on "Create branch"
A branch is created from the issue number, plus the title of the branch
For example, my issue #2, with title "Test repoSearch with no repos"
will have a branch called:
2-test-reposearch-with-no-repos
Notice that it changes case to all-lower-case
TLDR: do a merge request add #2 in the title and/or in the comment box and/or the commit message and it will link the issue to the branch and commit, you could just do a MR right from the start to link it.
It seems the only option for Gitlab is name your branch following this format: <issue-number-some-branch> like 2-bad-ai this will autolink the branch to the issue.
However, I organize my branches so they live nicely in the .git/ref/heads folder structure like this feature/2-<some-branch> then when you do a merge request add #2 in the title and/or in the comment box and/or the commit message and it will link the issue to the branch and commit, you could just do a MR right from the start to link it.
$ ls .git/refs/heads/; ls .git/refs/remotes/upstream/
2-bad-ai dev feature/ hotfix/ master release/
2-bad-ai dev feature/ hotfix/ master release/
I'd much rather have feature/2-bad-ai in the above output...
From what I can tell on Github you can link pull-request to feature/2-<some-branch> but doesn't have the autolinking of 2-<some-branch> like GitLab
2017:
If you create a branch with the name -issue-description and push that branch to GitLab, it will automatically be linked to that issue.
This is now customizable, with GitLab 15.6 (November 2022):
Configure default names for branches created from issues
Define a custom template for naming branches created from issues. The previous setting {issue ID}-{issue-title-hyphenated} remains the default.
To define a custom template for your project, go to Repository Settings > Branch defaults.
See Documentation and Issue.
I want to cancel my last push, because a pushed the app/build folder changes Is it possible to revert a push or the last push in Gitlab?
Either you can delete the commit locally and use force push or create a revert commit via GitLab UI (GitLab 8.5 or newer):
Select your commit in the history you want to revert and click on the revert button:
There will be a modal dialog. You can choice if you want to create a Merge Request or directly commit it to the default branch:
More details