Lets say I set up and create a new Azure Account and Subscription. Azure automatically creates me an Azure AD called "somedomain.onmicrosoft.com".
Later I deploy REST API and Angular SPA app to Azure. Since I'm using Azure AD for authentication and authorization on both of the applications I register them on my Azure AD, under the domain "somedomain.onmicrosoft.com".
Everything works fine, however after some time I realize that I want to allow access to my services/apps to other organizations. After doing some research I realize that what I want to achieve is multi-tenancy.
In order to register a new tenant I do the following:
Go to Azure portal.
On the left blade menu click on "Create a resource" and search for "Azure Active Directory".
Create a new directory called "tenant-1.onmicrosoft.com".
Next, I update my registered apps (on "somedomain.onmicrosoft.com") according to this documentation - enabling multi tenancy and common endpoint.
After all of this, both users from AD "somedomain.onmicrosoft.com" and "tenant-1.onmicrosoft.com" should be able to authenticate and access my services.
Question
Is this the correct way of achieving and implementing multi tenancy?
You don't need to create a new Azure AD tenant (xyz.onmicrosoft.com). Just register the application in the existing tenant or mark the existing application as multi-tenant. Then, existing other AAD tenants will be able to signup to use your app without doing further registrations. You will need to modify your app code to accept tokens from other tenants, e.g. enter link description here This link points to a regular .NET web app, not SPA. You will need to translate it to your SPA environment.
I'm not sure of your high level use case but one thing to note about the AAD multi-tenant approach. You are assuming that person signing in has an Azure AD tenant, for example through Office365.
If they don't have an Azure AD then they won't be able to sign in.
You 'could' create an AAD for each new tenant and create a user account in there.
They would have the bob#mydomain.onmicrosoft.com address and could add their own domain later.
That way they can then take advantage of all the enterprise features of AzureAD.
It might be a use case, but I think you would need an AAD per tenant and I'm not sure of the limits or if this is best practice.
You can also look at B2C if you want social logins/other OpenIDConnect.
Related
I'm exploring options I have when it comes to implementing user authentication and authorization in Angular app with ASP.NET Core 3.1 backend that will be deployed to Azure AppService.
Only selected, invited users will be allowed to use application. There will be no "Create account" page accessible to everyone. There is a possibility that subset of those users will be our company users so leveraging their Active Directory identity and allowing SSO would be great. Application will be multi-tenant. Multi factor authentication might be needed for selected tenants/users (based on role for example). We don't want to allow logging in with 3rd party Identity Providers like FB, Google and so on.
Based on my explorations on I have 2 (4?) options.
ASP.NET Core Identity - simple, builtin, well known. But probably won't allow me to to implement SSO and users will need another login/pass. I'm not sure if it supports inviting users (out of the box) or is this something I would need to implement myself. Same with password resets. It allows me to add custom properties to stored user entity (TenantId) to allow me to implement multitenancy, but I need to deploy SQL Server database and manage it myself.
Azure AD (B2B, B2C) - this is new to me. How I understand it is that with Azure AD Connect I could synchronize users between AD and Azure AD and this would allow me to implement SSO for our company users. Only selected OU's could be synchronized and based on groups in AD they could be assigned different roles in our app. Then assigning roles is responsibility of people which are already managing those users in AD. If person is released and their account is removed/locked in AD they lose access to our app. If they're removed from specific group they lose access to our app. And probably all our company users are already in Azure AD - I see myself and my colleagues in it when I use my work e-mail to login to Azure portal. When it comes to supporting users which are not in our AD I tested that I can add "Guest users". At first I thought this is something I would need Azure AD B2C for but looks like it's not the case. Then what is Azure B2B and B2C for? In this case I don't need to manage SQL database and have user managment for free. Both on AD and Azure Portal site. I don't know if I can add custom properties to users (TenantId).
Which one of those options is better? Maybe there are other options?
Azure AD B2B is indeed the way to go for your requirements.
B2C is required when you would like to open up your application to external users while allowing them to login using social providers.
You can read more about the differences between Azure AD B2B and B2C.
Summary: How do I make a multi tenant app available to other Azure AD tenants?
Details:
I am writing a C# ASP.NET library using which I want to create subscriptions and register for change notifications.
I am using Microsoft Graph API v1.0 for this operation.
I followed this documentation to obtain the access token for a service account.
The first step listed in the documentation requires us to register the app on Azure AD Portal
Since I am building this app for multiple customers, I want this to be a multi tenant app. I followed this reference to register a multi tenant application, but I have a query as to how to make this app discover-able by other tenants ?
Do I need to publish it to be able to achieve this? If yes, can anyone please direct me towards any article which tells how to do that ?
Do I need to publish it to be able to achieve this?
No, you don't. For a multi-tenant application, the initial registration for the application lives in the Azure AD tenant used by the developer. When a user from a different tenant signs in to the application for the first time, Azure AD asks them to consent to the permissions requested by the application. If they consent, then a representation of the application called a service principal is created in the user’s tenant.
Do you mean under Enterprise applications blade of any tenant or the
one where it was created ?
It will exist in any tenant once a user from that tenant signs in to the application.
I am quite new to the wonderful world of Azure development. I currently work on a Xamarin.Form project with an Azure backend. After researching a lot, I found this post: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-in/resources/samples/active-directory-b2c-xamarin-native/
that explain how to do signIn in Azure from XF2.4.
But I am a little bit lost in all the portal offered by Microsoft. I create my backend on the portal.azure.com and at first I create the application in the portail.azure too. But I rapidly understand that I need to use the new apps.dev.microsoft.com to create the application. Now I am able to Singin from my XF project correctly.
My question: it is the correct way to do that? Now I try to add some Admin and "Normal user" application roles, then assigned roles to users. But the application created in the apps.dev.microsoft.com is not listed in the AzurePortal and the configuration available in apps.dev.micorosft.com is very simple.
How I can do that? Thanks
To register an app that works with the v2.0 endpoint, you must use a new app registration portal: apps.dev.microsoft.com . And refer to document :
The v2.0 endpoint does not support issuing role or group claims in ID tokens.
The workaround would be add users to different groups , use microsoft graph api in you application to get user's group membership , then model Role based access control on top of Security Groups.
In addition .If you want to use Azure AD B2C , you should register the app in b2c application blade . And refer to this thread for how to manually retrieve these claims the group claims(need register a separate application) and inject them into the token.
This is basically a follow up to my prev question - https://stackoverflow.com/a/44738654/2896495. I've implemented an Azure B2C sign up and auth in my web app (.NET Core 2.0) and now I want to add a custom sign up logic with Graph API (as described here - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/active-directory-b2c-devquickstarts-graph-dotnet).
But I'm confused about app registrations. For B2C auth I created an app in the Portal under Azure AD B2C -> Applications. Now, in order to use custom sign up logic I need another app registration under Portal -> App Registrations -> New Application Registration (where I can grant necessary permissions to Azure AD, like Read and Write directory data).
So, if I need auth AND custom sigh up, how should I set up my app? What's the right way of doing this?
For simplicity's sake, as well as a healthy separation of concerns, I would indeed make a separate app for the custom sign-up. It doesn't have to be a full-fledged app, a microservice that does the sign-ups for the main B2C app would be fine.
If you want to use the custom attribute to implement the custom sign up process, you need to register two apps as the document you mentioned in the post. One app is for integrating with Azure AD B2C for login, and the other is using the Azure AD Graph to query the custom attribute.
After that, you can using the Azure AD Graph REST to query the relative info and handle your own business logic in the web app. And to query the extension info, we just need to query the user info like below:
If you are just trying to have your own look and feel, as opposed to the default templates with your logos and other branding, then look into providing a template for UI customizations:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/active-directory-b2c-reference-ui-customization
Also, see this other answer to a similar question:
Azure AD B2C UI Customization
If you are trying for a whole different workflow, the you will want to create a custom policy.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/active-directory-b2c-overview-custom
Or if that does not work, then I guess you could just use the GraphApi, but that is the most laborious of options and completely destroys the entire purpose of using B2C in the first place. I do not recommend this approach.
Update:
I would not do everything you want to do in a custom policy. Separating the signup into it's own application/service would be a great approach (as #camsoper suggested), but only use the policies for the bare amount needed to create the initial account or authenticate an approved user. I've never used a policy to change the "accountActive" attribute, but I would be inclined to use the GraphApi to modify the user profile after the account is created by using the "NewAccount" attribute to key off. There is a "Block sign in" setting on a users profile in the azure portal which can be used to restrict access (and the signup application could set the default after the account is created), but I'm not sure if that corresponds to the "accountActive" attribute or not (yet).
Most of the administration you've described can be done in the azure portal, such as changing the "Block sign in" setting on a users profile can be used to restrict access (and the signup application could set the default after the account is created). If there is some capability that the portal does not offer, I would put that into a separate application. Avoid duplicating functionality in your customized admin app, and instead just redirect the admin to the users profile in "portal.azure.com".
https://portal.azure.com/#blade/Microsoft_AAD_IAM/UserDetailsMenuBlade/Profile/userId/{objectId}
Note: there may be some issues with that URL template if the admin has access to more than one Directory for her account. It will try to pull up the directory that her account was created on by default.
We want to create a MVC web application using claims-based authentication, expecting roles as one of the claims. We want to Federate authentication providers using the Azure Access Control Service to manage this federation. One of the authentication providers is our Azure AD.
The problem is that Azure AD doesn't seem to be able to generate role (or even group) claims. What is the appropriate method to manage group or role access in Azure AD and have role claims served by Azure Access Control Service.
Thanks.
Edit:
A previous comment asked for details: We want to provide access to our cloud application to 3rd parties using their active directory (to simplify user management for them). Our application has a few levels of access to information that the 3rd parties can configure. We were hoping they could do this in their AD (based on our instructions). Groups seemed like the obvious choice, but if there is another way that works, as long as we can provide instructions, it'll work.
We want our application to get claims for a user's level of access. If we had only one partner that was using Azure AD, we could use the graph API against that endpoint, but with multiple partners changing over time, we wanted to federate them so our application only needs to trust the federation server. We were assuming that we needed Azure ACS to manage the federation.
AAD does support roles / groups and you can administer them from the Azure Portal.
Howeve, these are not passed in the "canned" set of claims.
You need to use the Graph API and then convert them e.g. Windows Azure Active Directory: Converting group memberships to role claims.
Update:
ACS requires something to federate with. You can't hook a customer AD up to ACS - you need something like ADFS on top of their AD.
I assume your cloud app. runs in Azure?
Then make your app. multi-tenanted. If your customers have their own Azure tenant, it will work. You just need to add the Graph API code to your app. ACS is not required.
Your customers then run DirSync. This keeps their Azure tenant in sync. with their AD changes.
So two options:
Customer does not have Azure tenant. They install ADFS and federate with AAD.
Customer's who do have Azure tenant use DirSync.
Good news: we have recently turned on the Application Roles and Groups Claim features in Azure AD.
Get a quick overview here: http://blogs.technet.com/b/ad/archive/2014/12/18/azure-active-directory-now-with-group-claims-and-application-roles.aspx
Deep dive post and video on app roles feature is here: http://www.dushyantgill.com/blog/2014/12/10/roles-based-access-control-in-cloud-applications-using-azure-ad/
Deep dive post and video on app roles feature is here: http://www.dushyantgill.com/blog/2014/12/10/authorization-cloud-applications-using-ad-groups/
Hope that helps.
Groups aren't the best choice because they are unique within each directory. Unless you get your customers to define a set of groups that have well-known names and match against the strings, that is (the object IDs of a group is different per directory even if they have the same name). I'm actually from the Azure AD team and we are seriously considering releasing a feature to allow you to define roles in your app that your customers can assign their users to. Please stay tuned on this. In the meantime, unfortunately groups are the only way to go. You would have to call "GetMemberGroups" using the Graph to retrieve the groups that the user is assigned to.
What are your timelines for releasing this application? You can contact me directly to see if we can work with your scenario.