Problem:
I have developed a chaincode. And there I have created a function to retrieve all the lands belongs to a particular person. The code looks like this.
async nthUsersLands(stub, args) {
if (args.length != 1) {
throw new Error(
"Incorrect number of arguments. Expecting NIC ex: 944999014V"
);
}
let nic = args[0];
let landsAsBytes = await stub.getQueryResult({
selector: {
docType: "land",
owner: nic
}
});
console.log(landsAsBytes.toString());
return landsAsBytes;
}
};
But when I invoking this transaction it leaves me to error like this.
Error: Illegal value for queryvalue element of type string: object
(not a string)
Can someone help me to solve this issue? I look for a solution to this problem on the Internet. But I was unable to find out any good solution to this problem. Thank you!
let landsAsBytes = await stub.getQueryResult({
JSON.stringify("selector": {
"docType": "land",
"owner": nic
})
});
The reason is that your query needs to be a string, not an object.
Related
I'm trying to write an eslint rule that enforces making sure the name property is defined on any classes that extend from other Error/Exception named classes (and fixes them).
As far as I can tell, it works in the astexplorer.net individually, but when I'm running it alongside other rules, it ends up getting ran multiple times, so the name property ends up being repeated multiple times in the resulting "fixed" file.
Is there anything in particular I can do to prevent it being run multiple times? I'm assuming what's happening is that it's inserting my name = 'ClassName';, then prettier is needing to reformat the code, which it does, but then maybe it's re-running my rule? I'm not sure.
Rule/fix code shown below. I've tried things like using *fix and yield, but that doesn't seem to help either (see commented code below, based on information in the eslint documentation)
module.exports = {
meta: {
hasSuggestions: true,
type: 'suggestion',
docs: {},
fixable: 'code',
schema: [], // no options,
},
create: function (context) {
return {
ClassDeclaration: function (node) {
const regex = /.*(Error|Exception)$/;
// If the parent/superClass is has "Error" or "Exception" in the name
if (node.superClass && regex.test(node.superClass.name)) {
let name = null;
const className = node.id.name;
// Test class object name
if (!regex.test(className)) {
context.report({
node: node,
message: 'Error extensions must end with "Error" or "Exception".',
});
}
// Find name ClassProperty
node.body.body.some(function (a) {
if (a.type === 'ClassProperty' && a.key.name === 'name') {
name = a.value.value;
return true;
}
});
// Name property is required
if (!name) {
context.report({
node: node,
message: 'Error extensions should have a descriptive name',
fix(fixer) {
return fixer.replaceTextRange(
[node.body.range[0]+1, node.body.range[0]+1],
`name = '${className}';`
);
},
// *fix(fixer) {
// name = className;
// yield fixer.replaceTextRange(
// [node.body.range[0]+1, node.body.range[0]+1],
// `name = '${className}';`
// );
//
// // extend range of the fix to the range of `node.parent`
// yield fixer.insertTextBefore(node.body, '');
// yield fixer.insertTextAfter(node.body, '');
// },
});
}
}
},
};
},
};
Turns out I had the AST Explorer set to the wrong parser, so it was showing me the wrong string name for the ClassProperty node. I should have been using PropertyDefinition instead.
Currently for my discord bot I am trying to make a repeat command for me and my friends but the issue is since I'm new to discord.js and node I don't know any good alternatives to "startswith", what this means is while the "//repeat #user" command works, "//repeattesttext #user" also does the same thing. Is there any way to prevent this? Here is my code:
if (!msg.guild) return;
if (msg.content.startsWith('//repeat')) {
if (msg.member.roles.cache.has("744347114255155201")) {
if (!active4) {
const user = msg.mentions.users.first();
if (user) {
const memb = msg.guild.member(user);
if (memb) {
if (active4) {
active4 = false;
msg.channel.send("Repeat Deactivated.")
} else {
id2 = memb.id
active4 = true
msg.channel.send("Repeat Activated")
}
}
}
} else {
active4 = false
msg.channel.send("Repeat Deacivated.")
}
return
} else {
msg.channel.send("You don't have RBLX permissions.")
return
}
}
Any help would be appreciated and since I'm new if you can please explain how your code works. Even if you can't I'll still be grateful for an answer of any kind!
Instead of checking if the string starts with //repeat, you should check if the first word is equal to that.
This can be achieving by separating the msg.content in an array containing its words.
msg.content.split(' ') gives that array.
msg.content.split(' ')[0] === '//repeat' is the if statement you are looking for.
i'm coding a Discord bot with JDA 4.1.1_101. I created the "ban" command, but i can't make the unban command work. I can't really understand why... Thank you for your help.
if (args[0].equalsIgnoreCase(Main.prefix + "unban")) {
if(event.getGuild().getSelfMember().hasPermission(Permission.BAN_MEMBERS)) {
if (args.length > 0 && args.length < 3) {
try {
event.getMessage().delete().queue();
User member = event.getMessage().getMentionedMembers().get(0).getUser();
String id = member.getId();
event.getGuild().unban(id).queue();
EmbedBuilder ban = new EmbedBuilder();
ban.setColor(Color.GREEN);
ban.setTitle("UnBan");
ban.setDescription("UnBan Report");
ban.addField("Staffer: ", event.getMessage().getAuthor().getName(), true);
ban.addField("Unban: ", member.getName(), true);
logs.sendMessage(ban.build()).queue();
} catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException exx) {
EmbedBuilder error = new EmbedBuilder();
error.setColor(0xff3923);
error.setTitle("Error: User");
error.setDescription("Invalid user.");
event.getChannel().sendMessage(error.build()).queue(message -> {
message.delete().queueAfter(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
});
}
} else {
EmbedBuilder error = new EmbedBuilder();
error.setColor(0xff3923);
error.setTitle("Error: Wrong usage.");
error.setDescription("Use: .unban [#user].");
event.getChannel().sendMessage(error.build()).queue(message -> {
message.delete().queueAfter(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
});
}
}
}
The problem is, that you are trying to retrieve the user from the mention in the message.
Since the user isn't part of the guild anymore, it seems like this doesn't work.
In order to work around this issue, you have to retrieve the ID manually.
A mention is always in the format <#userid> or <!#userid>.
To get the ID you could just split the message and replace the unnecessary parts, e.g. String id = event.getMessage().getContentRaw().split("<")[1].split(">")[0].replace("!", "").replace("#", "");
I'm sure there are better and smoother ways for doing this. ;)
A better way of retrieving the ID would be using a regex such as <#!?(\d+)> as mentioned by Minn.
In order to get the name of the user, you just need the ID via event.getJDA().getUserById(id).getName().
It's important to mention that you can't properly mention a user who isn't on the server (which is the case when they are banned).
(Addition: I tried using .getMentionedUsers() with the same result as OP.)
I am wondering if it is possible to fetch a job by requisitionId in Google Cloud Talent Solution. requisitionId has to be unique across jobs so it seems like a natural candidate for looking a job up.
When a job is created the api returns a job name that can be used to look the job up:
You can retrieve the details of a previously inserted job by sending a GET request to the Cloud Talent Solution. The URI should include the previously inserted job name returned by the original create request, as a URL parameter.
I'd like to avoid storing these names if possible. In my view storing them adds unnecessary complexity since I already have a unique requisitionId. To be clear the API does not let you add jobs with a duplicate requisitionId:
Job projects/{my_app_id}/jobs/{google_assigned_id} already exists. Request ID for tracking: ... Related Job requisition ID: ...
So can I look up jobs by requisitionId?
I could parse the error message that's returned to get the job name..but that seems pretty brittle.
It turns out the list method takes requisitionId so for a full, read-create-update cycle we can do:
const listRequest = {
parent: `projects/${projectId}`,
'filter': `companyName="${companyName}" AND requisitionId="${requisitionId}"`
}
const listResult = await jobService.projects.jobs.list(listRequest)
const existingJobs = listResult.data.jobs || [];
let existingJob = null
if (existingJobs && existingJobs.length > 0) {
existingJob = existingJobs[0]
}
let googleJob
if (!existingJob) {
const createRequest = {
'parent': `projects/${projectId}`,
'resource': {
'job': {
companyName,
requisitionId,
title,
description,
applicationInfo: {
emails: ['email#example.com']
}
}
}
}
googleJob = await jobService.projects.jobs.create(createRequest)
.then(result => result)
.catch(resp => {
console.error("ERROR")
console.error(resp)
})
} else {
const patchRequest = {
'name': existingJob.name,
'resource': {
'job': {
companyName,
requisitionId,
title,
description,
applicationInfo: {
emails: ['email#example.com']
}
}
}
}
googleJob = await jobService.projects.jobs.patch(patchRequest)
.then(result => result)
.catch(resp => {
console.error("ERROR")
console.error(resp)
})
}
Docs: https://cloud.google.com/talent-solution/job-search/docs/reference/rest/v3/projects.jobs/list?authuser=0&hl=de
Notes:
The double quotes in the filter parameter are important. It will not accept single quotes and will give a cryptic error message.
The patch request cannot take a parent parameter even though everything else requires a parent parameter...
one can add it as custom attribute:
Map<String, CustomAttribute> attributes = new HashMap<>();
attributes
.put("requisitionId", new CustomAttribute().setStringValue(requisitionId)
.setFilterable(true));
Job job = new Job()
...
.setCustomAttributes(attributes);
Job jobCreated = createJob(job);
String jobName = jobCreated.getName();
and then search for requisitionId with a custom attribute filter:
JobQuery jobQuery = new JobQuery().setCustomAttributeFilter(filter);
this is a little redundant, but JobQuery has no method .setRequisitionId().
here's the documentation.
I need to use a WCF API to save data into a DB. Ordinarily, I'd use chaining, like the example below:
IClientBroker clientBroker = UIContext.CreateWcfInterface<IClientBroker>("Data/ClientBroker.svc");
clientBroker.BeginSetClientBusinessName(_client.ID, businessName, (result) =>
{
_client = ((IClientBroker)result.AsyncState).EndSetClientBusinessName(result);
clientBroker.BeginSetClientAddress(_client.ID, addressObservableCollection, postcodeZip, (result2) =>
{
_client = ((IClientBroker)result2.AsyncState).EndSetClientAddress(result2);
clientBroker.BeginSetClientTelephone(_client.ID, telephone, (result3) =>
{
_client = ((IClientBroker)result3.AsyncState).EndSetClientTelephone(result3);
clientBroker.BeginSetClientFax(_client.ID, fax, (result4) =>
{
_client = ((IClientBroker)result4.AsyncState).EndSetClientFax(result4);
if (customFields.Save(validationSummaryBridge))
{
CloseWindow(true, "ClientID=" + _client.ID.ToString());
}
else
{
validationSummary.Errors.Add(new ValidationSummaryItem("Failed to save Custom Fields"));
}
}, clientBroker);
}, clientBroker);
}, clientBroker);
}, clientBroker);
}
This gives me faux-synchronous behaviour which I need so exceptions are thrown in a timely fashion and I can react on validation events.
This doesn't map well, however, when I have a loop of fields to save. For example, what pattern would be best to save the following list of "Custom Fields", where each Custom Field must be saved using a single WCF call?
ICustomFieldsBroker customFieldsBroker = UIContext.CreateWcfInterface<ICustomFieldsBroker>("Data/CustomFieldsBroker.svc");
foreach (CustomField customField in _customFields)
{
string newValue=_customFieldControlDictionary[customField].CustomField.Value;
customFieldsBroker.BeginSetCustomFieldValueForItem(DataTypeID, DataItemID, customField.Key, newValue, (result) =>
{
((ICustomFieldsBroker)result.AsyncState).EndSetCustomFieldValueForItem(result);
}, customFieldsBroker);
}
In the above example, this would just set off, say, 5 requests to the WCF API/threads which would potentially return AFTER the form has closed. I need them to "line up", so I can list their status and return to the form.
Thanks very much.
Don't let the WCF distract you, but if you have any comments, do let me know. :)
This is the answer I was looking for:
http://www.netfxharmonics.com/2008/11/Understanding-WCF-Services-in-Silverlight-2#WCFSilverlightThreadWaiting