I am in the process of moving multiple websites to Azure under one Premium App Service plan. Following the instructions provided here https://dotnetthoughts.net/deploying-multiple-application-in-webapp/ I was able to host multiple sites under one App Service Plan but I am struggling to figure out how I can make use of Deployment Slots for multiple sites. It looks like there is only one "Production" Slot per App Service plan which means I can only swap a Deployment Slot with the only Production Slot. Does someone know how each website can have a Production Slot and a corresponding "Testing" Slot?
You can have multiple web apps under a single Azure App Service Plan. Meanwhile, under every web app(App Service), you can create multiple slots and you can have production and staging for every web app separately.
Each App Service plan tier supports a different number of deployment slots. Azure App Service Plan Premium (v2) supports = 20 and standard supports = 5 deployment slots.
Based on your requirement you can put all your apps in one App Service plan and have multiple deployment slots. If you have multiple deployment slots for an app, all deployment slots also run on the same VM instances.
Since you pay for the computing resources your App Service plan allocates, you can potentially save money by putting multiple apps into one App Service plan. You can continue to add apps to an existing plan as long as the plan has enough resources to handle the load. However, note that the apps in the same App Service plan all share the same compute resources. Overloading an App Service plan can potentially cause downtime for your new and existing apps.
You don't get charged for using the App Service features that are available to you (configuring custom domains, SSL certificates, deployment slots, backups, etc.)
Checkout this document for more details: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/deploy-staging-slots
Related
I am curious about the difference is when creating an App Service in the reservations for 3 years and just having an App Service Plan which I can add multiple App Services to ?
The cost is much lower than an App Service Plan, but I was wondering if its the exact same concept as an App Service Plan ?
Meaning I can create multiple App Services and have them all in the same App Service Plan ?
Or is the Reservation App Service for a single app alone ?
Yes, you can deploy multiple App Services in the same App Service Plan though it is normal or reserved.
You can also create multiple App Services within the same region or across regions supported by Azure in which this flexibility makes ASEs ideal for horizontal scaling feature.
Features of Normal ASP and Reserved ASP were almost same, and you'll get some discount on the Reserved ASP cost.
In the Middle of Reserved ASP, you can increase the Number of instances in that ASP based on your requirement or load balancing.
Refer to Azure App Service Pricing doc and How Reservation works in Azure App Service for more information.
What is different azure function app and app service plan ?
I think;
Function app is a core layer - where hosted code and execute
App service plan is higher layer of function app - it can be covering function app. For example, it can cover network layer for function app.
But I see in function app has Vnet integration feature and app service plan has virtual network integration too.
I am confused with it.
What is different azure function app and app service plan in network part ?
p/s: I have created virtual network and assign app service plan to that VNET. then I deployed a function app into app service, but this function does not stay in that VNET. how to verify that ?
There are a few things that will help you to understand this little better and you can also verify through Azure Portal. After all, it's all the hosting plan you want to use.
App Service Plan: This is something a root consumption plan you are paying for. kind of resources you want for much of your work. (I would say - choose this wisely)
Function App: This resource has 3-4 different kinds of hosting plan options
(i) Consumption plan (ii) Premium Plan (iii) App Service Plan (iV) ASE.
now, if you have notice - App Service Plan (item iii) is also one of the options. Not necessary that is only an option. So, in other words; Function App can sit outside the App Service plan (like Consumption plan) where it will deploy separately.
At this moment Question might come - what could be a difference. for that visit Microsoft's well-documented link here which states you are paying and resources are getting allocated during the function real-use whereas, App Service Plan uses your own app Dedicated service plan which you already have decided a lot earlier in the cycle.
Your last question - How do we confirm? well, Open App Service Plan inside Azure Portal and there is an essential section where you will find App(s)/ Slot(s). Click on that you will see how many app services/ function apps already sharing that specific App Service Plan like below:
An App Service Plan is the environment which you pay for.
You can then run different workloads including function apps within the App Service Plan. Grouping workloads in a single App Service Plan can save you money compared with having different App Service Plans for each App Function.
The VNET configuration is both at the App Service Plan and the App Service / Function App level. You do not necessarily want all App Services / Function Apps in the same App Service Plan to run on the same VNET.
The consumption plan is based on function runtime, which means only when your function is running else no.
Premium plan you need to specify prewarmed instances that will always be online. so it's kind of minimum fixed billing and it can go beyond if you use it for resources.
The app service plan (Dedicated plan) is Running function like other apps. It will use the same app service plan.
Refer to this documentation for more details.
I'm writing an API that will basically provide services to read and write to a Database.
My goal would be to have three environment. Dev, Stage and Production.
The first idea was to have three different resource groups, each with three different App Service Plans to host each environment.
Then i started reading and the recommended strategy seems to be to have all of the environments hosted within one App Service Plan. This way you could take advantage of swapping deployment slots. Also I'd be paying one third of the price.
But i also read that it's good to have a production environment isolated from the rest. So this way I'd need one App Service Plan for Prod, and another one for the rest of my environments.
So my first question is, is there a suggested/standard way to proceed setting up environments?
Is swapping exclusive to environments within a single App Service Plan?
Also i was comparing specs of Standard, Premium and Isolated tiers, and i couldn't find info on if Isolated App Services Plan have 'Staging Slots' for deployment. I know that Standard tier comes with 5 slots and Premium tier has 20. Does Isolated App Service Plans not support multiple deployment slots?
Thanks in advance for any insight that you guys can provide me.
is there a suggested/standard way to proceed setting up environments?
As far as I know, it is convenient for us to create deployment slot in the azure portal when the app is running in the Standard or Premium App Service plan tier.
Add a deployment slot
In the azure portal, open your app's resource blade-->Deployment slots-->Add Slot-->give the slot a name and select Configuration Source. If you have several slots, you could swap them manually or set the Auto Swap.
Configuration for deployment slots
When you using the swap feature, you should know the settings that can be swapped or not. Also, you could set slot setting, note that marking a configuration element as slot specific has the effect of establishing that element as not swappable across all the deployment slots associated with the app.
For more details, you could refer to this article.
Is swapping exclusive to environments within a single App Service Plan?
Per my understanding, App Service Plan is like a VM, it holds your app, deployment slot is like a copy of the web app that you can make different configurations. It also be held with the App Service Plan. If the App Service Plans have different pricing tier, they will have different features. So we could not swap the slots in different Service Plans.
Does Isolated App Service Plans not support multiple deployment slots?
Actually, Isolated App Service Plan supports deployment slots.You could view full details for App Service Plans.The Isolated tier is special.In the Isolated tier, the App Service Environment defines the number of isolated workers that run your apps, and each worker is charged hourly. In addition, there's an hourly base fee for the running the App Service Environment itself.
You could select the tier when creating the App Service Plan, but cannot scale up to this tier in the scale up option in the resource blade.
I am trying to wrap my head around the concept of Azure App Service plan and Azure App Services, with no luck.
My understanding is that an App Service Plan defines the capacity and the pricing, all apps assigned to a specific App Service plan will share the same resources, is that right?
If that is right, then what is the benefit of the scaling-out? If the scale out will create more instances of the same app which at the end will be hosted on the same App Service Plan (sharing the same resources)?
I read almost all the official and non-official documentation about Azure App Service plan and App Services but couldn't find an answer to this question, they are all saying that scaling is working on the app level (not the app service plan) and at the same time saying that the apps assigned to the same app service plan are actually sharing the same resources, so what is the benefit of the scale-out feature?
Regards,
My understanding is that an App Service Plan defines the capacity and
the pricing, all apps assigned to a specific App Service plan will
share the same resources, is that right?
Yes.
If that is right, then what is the benefit of the scaling-out? If the
scale out will create more instances of the same app which at the end
will be hosted on the same App Service Plan (sharing the same
resources)?
No one forces you to put all your apps on the same App Service Plan. When you create an App you put it into some App Service Plan. All the Apps on that (and only that) App Service Plan would share resources, but you could create a lot of App Service Plans.
Also, when you scale out you create more PaaS instances of the VM's hosting your App, so when you scale out you are not getting another App Pool in the same IIS, you are getting another App Pool on the other IIS on the other VM.
edit: to clarify the comment, the App Service Plan is a collection of Windows VM's with IIS installed on them. All the Apps assigned to that App Service Plan are hosted on ALL the instances of those VM's, when you scale out or scale up you change the number or capacity of those VM's.
There's no temporary App Service Plan. You pay for the Service Plan, not for the App. Apps cost nothing, they are simply consuming resources on the Service Plan, its the Service Plan that "eats" money. You are getting billed according to the Service Plan tier and scale.
Pricing is based on the size and number of VM instances you run.
As I know, the scale out would create multiple copies of your web app and add a Load Balance to distribute the requests between them automatically. And you don't need to configure the load balance separately by yourself.
Assuming that you create a website (a windows server with IIS), then your website would has the App Pool which defines the available resources for your website. Each instance could handle a limited number of requests, in order to reduce the response time, you could scale out your website into multiple instances, then each web-server could split the work load. For more details, you could refer to Scaling Up and Scaling Out in Windows Azure Web Sites and this tutorial for a better understanding of Azure Web App auto scale.
As #4c74356b41 said when you scale out you are going to get more physical resources (i.e VM's with more compute, memory and storage). Also one correction as per Azure documentation, scale out is going to effect all apps in app service plan. see below link and the point to note is
"The scale settings take only seconds to apply and affect all apps in your App Service plan. They do not require you to change your code or redeploy your application" -
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-scale/
The docs answer this clearly: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/overview-hosting-plans#how-does-my-app-run-and-scale
In this way, the App Service plan is the scale unit of the App Service apps. If the plan is configured to run five VM instances, then all apps in the plan run on all five instances. If the plan is configured for autoscaling, then all apps in the plan are scaled out together based on the autoscale settings.
I am using Azure app service for hosting my web application. I have three slots namely 1. Development, 2.Staging , 3.Production.
I usually go with publishing my website into Development slot and I will swap to Staging and Production.
Whether running additional two slots will affect my production slot performance? And will be billed separately?
As described in the Azure pricing page, specific tiers of Azure App Services contain a number of staging environments (deployment slots). These are included in the app service plan, whether you use them or not. Cost is based on tier and number of instances, not number of slots.
All resources within an App Service plan share the same resources (e.g. if you launch many web apps in the same App Service plan, they all share the same instances). All deployment slots for a given web app reside within the same App Service plan.