It is possible to trace a request along with any traces that I have added via the TelemetryClient. In a nutshell, I am using:
var id = "a very unique id";
using (telemetryClient.StartOperation<RequestTelemetry>("Name", id, id))
{
telemetryClient.Trace("I have done something", new Dictionary<string, string> { { "uniqueId", id } );
telemetryClient.Trace("I am doing something else", new Dictionary<string, string> { { "uniqueId", id } );
}
The problem here is that the operationId isn't set nor the operationParentId.
Perhaps I am using this incorrectly but I was hoping to do a join between traces and requests on operationParentId so I can get the full picture.
I suggest you use the latest version of Microsoft.ApplicationInsights 2.10.0
With the latest nuget package installed, I test the code you provide, operationId / operationParentId are set properly.
Code:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
TelemetryClient client = new TelemetryClient() { InstrumentationKey = "xxxx" };
string id = "b123456";
using (client.StartOperation<RequestTelemetry>("op_name",id,id))
{
client.TrackTrace("I have done something", new Dictionary<string, string> { { "my_uniqueId", id } } );
client.TrackTrace("I am doing something else", new Dictionary<string, string> { { "my_uniqueId", id } } );
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
In portal:
Request telemetry:
Trace telemetry:
Related
I'd like to test that the swagger document is correct for my application (mainly, because I've added a strategy to generate custom OperationIds and I want to ensure they are correctly unique)
However, the only solutions I found are all using a "real" server (cf https://stackoverflow.com/a/52521454/1545567), which is not an option for me since I do not have the database, message bus, etc... when I launch the unit tests in CI...
At the moment, I have the following but it always generate 0 paths and 0 models ...
using FluentAssertions;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.OpenApi.Models;
using SampleCheckIn;
using Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerGen;
using System;
using System.Linq;
using Xunit;
using SampleCheckIn.Def;
using Service.Utils;
using Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.Swagger;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting;
using Microsoft.Extensions.FileProviders;
namespace D4Interop.Tests
{
public class TmpTest
{
[Fact]
public void Tmp()
{
var controllers = typeof(Startup).Assembly.GetTypes().Where(x => IsController(x)).ToList();
controllers.Any().Should().BeTrue();
var services = new ServiceCollection();
controllers.ForEach(c => services.AddScoped(c));
services.AddLogging(logging => logging.AddConsole());
services.AddControllers(); //here, I've also tried AddMvcCore and other ASP methods...
services.AddSwaggerGen(c =>
{
c.SwaggerDoc("api", new OpenApiInfo { Title = Constants.SERVICE_NAME, Version = "_", Description = Constants.SERVICE_DESC });
//c.OperationFilter<SwaggerUniqueOperationId>(); //this is my filter that ensures the operationId is unique
c.CustomOperationIds(apiDesc =>
{
return apiDesc.TryGetMethodInfo(out var methodInfo) ? methodInfo.Name : null;
});
});
services.AddSingleton<IWebHostEnvironment>(new FakeWebHostEnvironment());
var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
var swaggerProvider = serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<ISwaggerProvider>();
var swagger = swaggerProvider.GetSwagger("api");
swagger.Should().NotBeNull();
swagger.Paths.Any().Should().BeTrue();
}
private bool IsController(Type x)
{
return typeof(Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ControllerBase).IsAssignableFrom(x);
}
}
internal class FakeWebHostEnvironment : IWebHostEnvironment
{
public FakeWebHostEnvironment()
{
}
public IFileProvider WebRootFileProvider { get => throw new NotImplementedException(); set => throw new NotImplementedException(); }
public string WebRootPath { get => "/root"; set => throw new NotImplementedException(); }
public string EnvironmentName { get => "dev"; set => throw new NotImplementedException(); }
public string ApplicationName { get => "app"; set => throw new NotImplementedException(); }
public string ContentRootPath { get => "/"; set => throw new NotImplementedException(); }
public IFileProvider ContentRootFileProvider { get => throw new NotImplementedException(); set => throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
}
Ok, I've finally found that I just need to mix the linked answer with my code :
[Fact]
public async Task TestSwagger()
{
var server = Host.CreateDefaultBuilder()
.ConfigureWebHostDefaults(options => { options.UseStartup<Startup>(); })
.Build();
var swagger = server.Services
.GetRequiredService<ISwaggerProvider>()
.GetSwagger("xxx"); //xxx should be the name of your API
swagger.Should().NotBeNull();
swagger.Paths.Any().Should().BeTrue();
swagger.Components.Schemas.Should().NotBeNull();
}
I am getting
"Response Identifier not found" error
Following is my code
public Docket api() {
return new Docket(DocumentationType.SWAGGER_2)
.select()
.apis(RequestHandlerSelectors.basePackage("com.example.demo"))
.paths(PathSelectors.any())
.build().apiInfo(apiInfo()).securitySchemes(Arrays.asList(securityScheme()))
.securityContexts(Arrays.asList(securityContext()));
}
#Bean
public SecurityConfiguration security() {
return new SecurityConfiguration(CLIENT_ID,null,"my","newapp","apiKey",ApiKeyVehicle.HEADER,"api_key","");
}
public SecurityScheme securityScheme() {
LoginEndpoint loginEndpoint =
new LoginEndpoint(AuthUrl);
GrantType grantType = new ImplicitGrant(loginEndpoint, "access_token");
SecurityScheme oauth = new OAuthBuilder().name("spring_oauth")
.grantTypes(Arrays.asList(grantType))
.scopes(Arrays.asList(scopes()))
.build();
return oauth;
}
private SecurityContext securityContext() {
return SecurityContext.builder()
.securityReferences(
Arrays.asList(new SecurityReference("spring_oauth", scopes())))
.forPaths(PathSelectors.any())
.build();
}
private AuthorizationScope[] scopes() {
AuthorizationScope[] scopes = {
new AuthorizationScope("openid", "for authenticating") };
return scopes;
}
Since i am new to this. please help.
My ultimate goal is to autenticate my swagger with azure AD.
Thank you in advance.....
I am trying to update the telephone number on all associated contacts of an account entity. the following is the code that i have used,
public class Plugin:IPlugin
{
public void Execute(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
IPluginExecutionContext context = (IPluginExecutionContext)
serviceProvider.GetService(typeof(IPluginExecutionContext));
Entity entity;
if (context.InputParameters.Contains("Target") &&
context.InputParameters["Target"] is Entity)
{
entity = (Entity)context.InputParameters["Target"];
if (entity.LogicalName != "account") { return; }
}
else
{
return;
}
try
{
string telephoneNum = string.Empty;
IOrganizationServiceFactory serviceFactory =(IOrganizationServiceFactory)serviceProvider.GetService(typeof(IOrganizationServiceFactory));
IOrganizationService service =serviceFactory.CreateOrganizationService(context.UserId);
var id = (Guid)context.OutputParameters["id"];
telephoneNum = entity.GetAttributeValue<string>("telephone1");
UpdateContact(service, id,telephoneNum);
}
catch (FaultException<OrganizationServiceFault> ex)
{
throw new InvalidPluginExecutionException(
"An error occurred in the plug-in.", ex);
}
}
private static void UpdateContact(IOrganizationService service, Guid id,string telephoneNUm)
{
using (var crm = new XrmServiceContext(service))
{
var res = from c in crm.CreateQuery("contact")
where c["parentcustomerid"].Equals(id)
select c;
foreach (var c in res)
{
Entity e = (Entity)c;
e["telephone1"] = telephoneNUm;
crm.UpdateObject(e);
}
crm.SaveChanges();
}
}
}
I register the plugin on update, and primary entity "account" but whenever i try to save the account form after change of number in the telephone field i see an error pop up. Am i missing something? Thank you all!
Just a hunch..but I think you are getting the Id in the wrong way..try getting it by:
Guid Id = context.PrimaryEntityId
But as Pedro suggested..you need to see what is the exact error or try to debug the plugin using attach to process..
I'm trying to write a target for NLog to send messages out to connected clients using SignalR.
Here's what I have now. What I'm wondering is should I be using resolving the ConnectionManager like this -or- somehow obtain a reference to the hub (SignalrTargetHub) and call a SendMessage method on it?
Are there performance ramifications for either?
[Target("Signalr")]
public class SignalrTarget:TargetWithLayout
{
public SignalR.IConnectionManager ConnectionManager { get; set; }
public SignalrTarget()
{
ConnectionManager = AspNetHost.DependencyResolver.Resolve<IConnectionManager>();
}
protected override void Write(NLog.LogEventInfo logEvent)
{
dynamic clients = GetClients();
var logEventObject = new
{
Message = this.Layout.Render(logEvent),
Level = logEvent.Level.Name,
TimeStamp = logEvent.TimeStamp.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff")
};
clients.onLoggedEvent(logEventObject);
}
private dynamic GetClients()
{
return ConnectionManager.GetClients<SignalrTargetHub>();
}
}
I ended up with the basic the same basic structure that I started with. Just a few tweaks to get the information I needed.
Added exception details.
Html encoded the final message.
[Target("Signalr")]
public class SignalrTarget:TargetWithLayout
{
protected override void Write(NLog.LogEventInfo logEvent)
{
var sb = new System.Text.StringBuilder();
sb.Append(this.Layout.Render(logEvent));
if (logEvent.Exception != null)
sb.AppendLine().Append(logEvent.Exception.ToString());
var message = HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(sb.ToString());
var logEventObject = new
{
Message = message,
Logger = logEvent.LoggerName,
Level = logEvent.Level.Name,
TimeStamp = logEvent.TimeStamp.ToString("HH:mm:ss.fff")
};
GetClients().onLoggedEvent(logEventObject);
}
private dynamic GetClients()
{
return AspNetHost.DependencyResolver.Resolve<IConnectionManager>().GetClients<SignalrTargetHub>();
}
}
In my simple testing it's working well. Still remains to be seen if this adds any significant load when under stress.
I'm trying to get windows workflows working, and I've become a little stumped.
I've gotten a single workflow working, but now I am trying to do something a little more complex: start a workflow, where each activity itself contains a workflow. (Picture something like the main program starts the activities "Input, logic, and output", and then each of those have additional activities like "prompt user, get input, etc.")
I've had it working fine, with the example from here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg535667.aspx), when I am not passing any parameters from the main program to the activites. My question is, how exactly does the 'Variables' and 'metadata.SetVariablesCollection' work in the NativeActivity, and how to I get the parameters to the low level activities?
This is what I am currently trying:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Activities;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Activities.Statements;
namespace Project1
{
internal class MainProgram
{
internal static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
var act = new SimpleSequence();
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Variables.Add(new Variable<string> ("stringArg", "TEXT"));
WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(act);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
System.Console.WriteLine("EXCEPTION: {0}", ex);
}
}
public class WriteSomeText : CodeActivity
{
[RequiredArgument]
public InArgument<string> stringArg { get; set; }
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context)
{
string output = context.GetValue(stringArg);
System.Console.WriteLine(output);
}
}
public class SimpleSequence : NativeActivity
{
Collection<Activity> activities;
Collection<Variable> variables;
Variable<int> current = new Variable<int> { Default = 0 };
public Collection<Activity> Activities
{
get
{
if (this.activities == null)
this.activities = new Collection<Activity>();
return this.activities;
}
set
{
this.activities = value;
}
}
public Collection<Variable> Variables
{
get
{
if (this.variables == null)
this.variables = new Collection<Variable>();
return this.variables;
}
set
{
this.variables = value;
}
}
protected override void CacheMetadata(NativeActivityMetadata metadata)
{
metadata.SetChildrenCollection(this.activities);
metadata.SetVariablesCollection(this.variables);
metadata.AddImplementationVariable(this.current);
}
protected override void Execute(NativeActivityContext context)
{
if (this.Activities.Count > 0)
context.ScheduleActivity(this.Activities[0], onChildComplete);
}
void onChildComplete(NativeActivityContext context, ActivityInstance completed)
{
int currentExecutingActivity = this.current.Get(context);
int next = currentExecutingActivity + 1;
if (next < this.Activities.Count)
{
context.ScheduleActivity(this.Activities[next], this.onChildComplete);
this.current.Set(context, next);
}
}
}
}
}
This ends up throwing the following exception:
EXCEPTION: System.Activities.InvalidWorkflowException: The following errors were encountered while processing the workflow tree:
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
at System.Activities.Validation.ActivityValidationServices.ThrowIfViolationsExist(IList`1 validationErrors)
at System.Activities.Hosting.WorkflowInstance.ValidateWorkflow(WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensionManager)
at System.Activities.Hosting.WorkflowInstance.RegisterExtensionManager(WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensionManager)
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.EnsureInitialized()
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.RunInstance(WorkflowApplication instance)
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.Invoke(Activity activity, IDictionary`2 inputs, WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensions, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.Activities.WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(Activity workflow, TimeSpan timeout, WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensions)
at System.Activities.WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(Activity workflow)
at Project1.MainProgram.Main(String[] args) in c:\users\user\documents\visual studio 2010\Projects\ModelingProject1\Project1\MainProgram.cs:line 25
I know, I only pass 1 parameter, but the exception still says that I am missing 3 parameters. I am missing something as to how to do this properly.
You're correctly declaring stringArg as an InArgument but you're not passing any value to it when calling it inside SimpleSequence.
You can pass something using the constructor, while constructing the all activity itself, like this:
public class WriteSomeText : CodeActivity
{
[RequiredArgument]
public InArgument<string> stringArg { get; set; }
public WriteSomeText(string stringArg)
{
this.stringArg = stringArg;
}
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context
{
string output = context.GetValue(stringArg);
System.Console.WriteLine(output);
}
}
// Calling the activity like this:
internal static void Main(string[] args)
{
var act = new SimpleSequence()
{
Activities =
{
new WriteSomeText("hello"),
new WriteSomeText("world"),
new WriteSomeText("!")
}
};
WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(act);
Console.WriteLine("Press any key to exit");
Console.ReadKey();
}
Also notice that is a best practice to use the constructor to initialize collections:
public SimpleSequence()
{
activities = new Collection<Activity>();
variables = new Collection<Variable>();
}
This way is even more intuitive to initialize the activity:
var act = new SimpleSequence()
{
Activities =
{
new WriteSomeText("hello"),
new WriteSomeText("world"),
new WriteSomeText("!")
},
Variables =
{
new Variable<int>("myNewIntVar", 10),
// ....
}
};
EDIT:
There are a couple of other ways to approach the problem. This is your best friend while starting in the WF4 world.
Check WF\Basic\CustomActivities\Code-Bodied for a little push with this particular case.