I'm working on a project to investigate the possibility of adding touch support to an application and so far the findings have been somewhat disappointing. My company uses Scientific Linux 6.4 (Linux kernel 2.6.32) and so far, I've found information suggesting that 2.6.30+ supports multi-touch HID, but I've also seen information suggesting that the multi-touch in this kernel doesn't work with Xorg interfaces.
Putting aside market availability of touchscreens that are compatible with Linux, is there a way we can verify whether or not multi-touch inputs are generated on the system? We have an older ViewSonic touchscreen that has multi-touch capability, and after looking at the output from the evtest tool, I didn't notice any multi-touch events, but I don't know whether evtest is reading the touch events from X or the hardware level.
I have no experience dealing with hardware programming or device drivers, so if anyone could give me some guidance on how to verify multi-touch HID compatibility with our version of Linux, whether we have to write our own driver, or read raw data from somewhere, any information you could provide would be great.
EDIT: The evtest program lists supported events for the device and I don't see anything related to multi-touch, so it doesn't seem like it's supported, but is this an issue with the kernel, the specific device, or something else? The specific monitor I'm testing is a ViewSonic, which is listed as a "Quanta Optical Touchscreen" device. I saw somewhere that a driver for Quanta was added in 2.6.34. Am I just out of luck (for this particular device at least)?
I went ahead and tested the monitor with a laptop that had Linux kernel 4.4.0, and it worked right away, so it seems that it's definitely the kernel. I don't know if there are any touchscreens that WILL work with kernel 2.6.32, but the ones based on the Quanta display definitely don't work.
Related
I'm new to device drivers in Linux. And my first day task is to debug driver using GDB in Linux.
I need to debug some XYZ (PCIe device driver supports ethernet) device driver to know about the flow and what is going on device's registers and all.
I have installed the driver with patch file and insmod command.
The device is working properly. But am not getting any solution to debug the device driver.
All I know is that how to debug C program using GDB in Linux(fedora20). I got one link similar to my Problem but from that also I have not got any knowledge.
Can anybody please share your thoughts that how can I start from scratch.
I am very specific to learn about Debugging device drivers in Linux. Especially that init or probe function inside my driver I need to know the flow.
The gdb debugger is useful to debug user-space application level programs (since it uses ptrace(2)).
For kernel code, things are different. Consider using kgdb (I don't know the details). You might also add debug prints ....
I recommend at least reading more about operating systems, e.g. Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces (freely downloadable), and reading something about Linux programming (perhaps the old ALP, and also intro(2), syscalls(2) and related stuff). Don't dare coding Linux loadable kernel modules without good familiarity with Linux programming (in user-land). See also kernelnewbies.
BTW, you should prefer writing user-land code than kernel modules. A very simple rule of thumb is to avoid writing kernel code when possible.
To begin with, you may need to understand basics of device driver and kernel in linux. Subsequently focus as per the type of driver in-hand. You also need to understand the functionality (specification / manual / datasheet) of the device you are working on.
The very basic approach for debugging can be using printk. Normally there will be debug logs that can be enabled through compilation flags. If it is present, enable it so that it can give important pointers else you might need to add it on your own.
Start with verification of driver registration and verification of loading of your driver (static or loadable module as per your requirement). Check whether it is getting listed as part of sysfs or proc as applicable. Check whether probe is successful and subsequently the appropriate read/write/open/close/other calls as per your driver / device functionality.
The dmesg shall be very helpfull for viewing the kernel messages. There are also tools like kdb, LTT, strace that can be useful as per the scenario.
A friend of mine bought a laptop that unfortunately comes with an unsupported touchpad. The good news is that it comes with full documentation.
Is this documentation enough to make a driver with multi-touch support?
Is it advisable to base the driver from another (similar) touchpad driver as a starting point? If so, which one shall I use?
As far as I know, this controller is already supported by Linux. Just make sure your kernel version is recent enough to have the driver/input/mouse/byd.c source file, and that it is enabled by checking for the presence of the CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_BYD token in your kernel configuration.
I am trying to setup a Tegra 3 (Toradex Apalis T30) based system that will have an OpenGL ES based user interface on a touch screen. Unfortunately the standard Linux4Tegra kernel is seriously outdated and the provided graphics driver requires X11 integration. I have found though that I can build the Vanilla Linux kernel and get it running just fine on my board (tested 3.18). I have also found that a DRM Tegra driver is included in the kernel these days and I enabled it in menuconfig and built the kernel using it. I have also managed to get many distros working with the kernel (though I haven't really tried getting X working on any one).
My problem is that beyond this point, I am stuck. I cannot figure out what to do next in order to get GLES rendering up and running with the DRM driver. I have looked around a bit and have seen that Mesa might support GLES via DRM but I am not sure if this will allow me to do so without X? Also, how on earth to I get Mesa configured and compiled for the Tegra DRM driver?
Also, how does one go about configuring the output display using this DRM driver? My target screen is a 24bit parallel RGB display but I have not got that hooked up yet and would like to test with HDMI first. I have literally no idea how one should go about configuring the output display. The only information that I can find that might help involves X and xorg.conf which I will hopefully not be using. My device does output the console correctly on the HDMI display, how does it know to do that? Might this process somehow involve the device tree?
PS. I guess this question is a bit stupid but I am very new to embedded Linux and have just figured out how to build the vanilla kernel etc. and have really no idea of how the Linux display system works beyond just configuring X. Finding information regarding this is also proving hard.
EDIT:
I have gotten XFCE sort of running on HDMI (login does not work and the login windows is very tiny) on Fedora using the OpenTegra driver which in term uses the DRM driver if I am not mistaken so hopefully that is good news?
Nvidia-setting can usually clear things up if you've gotten this far. Typically the video will work if the kernel has been given the correct vesa mode to show the system bootup messages. These are somewhat cryptic but they simple turn into an argument you append to the kernel boot parameters "vga=###".
Context
Debian 64 bit. kernel 3.18.x
Litterally struggling to understand how a network driver is initialized.
I mean how to choose which flag to set. I dig in the kernel for days now to train myself. The card setup is the only point I miss.
I take the intel 82574 as an example. I downloaded the card's datasheet, saw many information but not a clue on how to setup the hardware.
Question
Where to start to know what flags to set ? The datasheet didn't helped me (i am not very experienced but willing to learn).
Please give me a starting point, a tip or anything to help me understand what is going on in the already written open sourced driver.
How can a developer knows how to initialize his nic ? (yes reinventing the wheel the time to understand)
You'll need to read the source code of the kernel module that handles your specific NIC.
EDIT: Of course, to develop such a module, you'd usually just use a register map as specified in a data sheet or application node; often, manufacturers develop their linux drivers themselves, so the driver developers might even be the same people that developed the chipset (because it's really handy to have a platform to test against -- it's impossible to test hardware without having something like a driver, so you might as well write a proper driver).
Furthermore, devices often come with code examples -- no one is going to build a device based on an IC that he has not seen in action.
If you've got access to neither proper documentation nor source, you can only reverse engineer - and that's an incredibly large field.
Using your example with the Intel 82574 Network Adapter, Intel provides a zip file of the source code used to build the Linux driver. The driver is like all drivers in that it hooks into the OS API for Networking.
The Linux networking API is document on both the linux.org site and discussed on popular Linux sites like lwn.org. Below is the link to lwn's chapter on Network drivers using the networking API called NAPI.
https://static.lwn.net/images/pdf/LDD3/ch17.pdf
You'll notice in the Intel igb driver source code that the NAPI net_device data structure is one of the first things that is setup. It registers the driver with the OS. This way the OS knows which igb functions to call when loading/unloading the driver, or when needing to send/receive data.
The igb functions read/modify/write the necessary bits in the 82574's memory-mapped registers that control and monitor the device. The device registers are all documented in the 82574 datasheet available on Intel's site. And this is usually the case for almost any networking company like Broadcom/Chelsio/Mellanox/Marvell.
Hope that helps a little more.
I have a Linux network driver that was originally written for 2.4 kernel. It works perfect.
I want to port it to kernel 2.6.31 and then to ARM Linux with same kernel i.e. 2.6.31. I have actually done some minor changes to the driver so that it is able to compile under kernel 2.6.31 and it also loads and unloads without crashing. It also cross compiles for the ARM Linux. But I am unable to test it on ARM so far.
How do I check that the driver is fully compatible with the target kernel, and what considerations shall be made to make it compatible with ARM.
The driver is a virtual network device driver.
Thanks in advance.
Maybe you could use Qemu ( http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Page) to emulate an ARM platform to be able to test your driver.
You cannot check the driver like that - you have to consider the API changes within 2.6.x series kernel. The changes are quite significant and the overall of the API's from the 2.4 series which is not currently in use.
I would suggest you to go here to the Amazon book store for this book in particular. The book is called 'Essential Linux Device Drivers', by Sreekrishnan Venkateswaran. A very well detailed explanation that will be your guidance in ensuring it works properly.
Since you mentioned the device driver is a network, presumably char device (You're not accessing it in blocks), well, the good news is that the 2.6.x series kernel APIs for the character devices are significantly easier and more centralized to focus on - in fact a lot of the framework is already in place in which the author of said book explains very clearly.
By the way, the book focusses on the latter 2.6.x series after 2.6.19, so this will help you clue in on what needs to be done to ensure your driver works.
You did not specify the ARM chipset you're targetting?
As for testing... well.. perhaps the best way to do this, this is dependant on how you answer the above question to you regarding ARM chipset - if its ARMv6, then perhaps, a cheap android handset that you can easily unlock and root, and pop the kernel in there and see what happens - sorry for sounding contrived but that's the best thing I can think of and that's what pops into my head, to enable you to test it out for ease of testing :)
PS: A lot of cheap ARMv6 handsets would have kernel 2.6.32 running Froyo if that's of any help!