Detailed examples of what Keras cannot do but Pytorch can? - keras

I read many articles saying Keras is too high level and hard to be used for research. I found Keras has Lambda layer, and custom layer, so what are some detailed examples of what Pytorch can achieve while Keras cannot or is very tricky to? Thanks.

Related

What type of optimization to perform on my multi-label text classification LSTM model with Keras?

I'm using Windows 10 machine. Libraries: Keras with Tensorflow 2.0 Embeddings: Glove(100 dimensions).
I am trying to implement an LSTM architecture for multi-label text classification.
I am using different types of fine-tuning to achieve better results but with no luck so far.
The main problem I believe is the difference in class distributions of my dataset but after a lot of tries and errors, I couldn't implement stratified-k-split in Keras.
I am also experimenting with dropout layers, batch sizes, # of layers, learning rates, clip values, validation splits but I get a minimum boost or worst performance sometimes.
For metrics, I use mainly ROC and F1.
I also followed the suggestion from a StackOverflow member who said to delete some of my examples so I can balance my dataset but if I do that I will have a very low number of examples.
What would you suggest to me?
If someone can provide code based on my implementation for
stratified-k-split I would be grateful cause I have checked all the
online resources but can't implement it.
Any tips, suggestions will be really helpful.
Metrics Plots
Dataset form+Embedings form+train-test-split form
Dataset's labels distribution
My LSTM implementation

Tensorflow and Bert What are they exactly and what's the difference between them?

I'm interested in NLP and I come up with Tensorflow and Bert, both seem to be from Google and both seem to be the best thing for Sentiment Analysis as of today but I don't understand what are they exactly and what is the difference between them... Can someone explain?
Tensorflow is an open-source library for machine learning that will let you build a deep learning model/architecture. But the BERT is one of the architectures itself. You can build many models using TensorFlow including RNN, LSTM, and even the BERT. The transformers like the BERT are a good choice if you just want to deploy a model on your data and you don't care about the deep learning field itself. For this purpose, I recommended the HuggingFace library that provides a straightforward way to employ a transformer model in just a few lines of code. But if you want to take a deeper look at these models, I will suggest you to learns about the well-known deep learning architectures for text data like RNN, LSTM, CNN, etc., and try to implement them using an ML library like Tensorflow or PyTorch.
Bert and Tensorflow is not different thing , There are not only 2, but many implementations of BERT. Most are basically equivalent.
The implementations that you mentioned are:
The original code by Google, in Tensorflow. https://github.com/google-research/bert
Implementation by Huggingface, in Pytorch and Tensorflow, that reproduces the same results as the original implementation and uses the same checkpoints as the original BERT article. https://github.com/huggingface/transformers
These are the differences regarding different aspects:
In terms of results, there is no difference in using one or the other, as they both use the same checkpoints (same weights) and their results have been checked to be equal.
In terms of reusability, HuggingFace library is probably more reusable, as it is designed specifically for that. Also, it gives you the freedom of choosing TensorFlow or Pytorch as deep learning framework.
In terms of performance, they should be the same.
In terms of community support (e.g. asking questions in github or stackoverflow about them), HuggingFace library is better suited, as there are a lot of people using it.
Apart from BERT, the transformers library by HuggingFace has implementations for lots of models: OpenAI GPT-2, RoBERTa, ELECTRA, ...

Is there a pretrained model that can detect and classify if a human is in a photo?

I am trying to find a pre-trained model that will classify images based on if there is a human present in the photo or not.
You can use the models trained on the COCO dataset for this.
For example, for Pytorch you can have a look at the official documentation concerning the provided models here.
There are more variety of models if you give it a simple search both for Pytorch and other frameworks.
You can check out the COCO homepage if you need more information concerning the dataset and the tasks it supports.
You may also find These useful:
Detecting people using Yolo-OpenCV
Yolo object detection in pytorch
Another Yolo implementation in Pytorch
Similar question on ai.stackexchange
You can also utilize frameworks such as Detectorn2, mmdetection for these tasks.(Or Tensorflow's ObjectDetectionAPI , ect)

Keras layers explaination

I want to get a deep idea about how this keras layers works in a model. What does each layer doing in the model etc. I followed kers documentation and information isn't enough. If any of you know place to get more knowledge let me know.Thanks in advance
Keras layers are widely used CNN, DNN and RNN layers. There is atleast one research paper for each of them and there is a lot of educational material out there. If you are really curious you could look at keras' code. Some links for you:
https://github.com/keras-team/keras/tree/master/keras/layers
http://cs231n.github.io/convolutional-networks/
https://leonardoaraujosantos.gitbooks.io/artificial-inteligence
http://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume15/srivastava14a/srivastava14a.pdf

Can i turn the CIFAR-10 dataset to grayscale images and convert it to same dimension as MNIST dataset. Will the model be invalid or fail to learn?

I'm new in the field of Deep Neural Network. There are various deep learning frameworks nearby. Notably Theano, Torch7, Caffe, and recently open sourced TensorFlow. I have tried out a couple of tutorials with TensorFlow provided on their site. Specifically the MNIST dataset. I guess this is the hello world of every deep learning framework out there. I also viewed tutorials from here. This one was explained in detail, but they do not provide hands on experience with any deep learning frameworks. So which framework should be better for beginners? I looked up similar questions asked on Quora. Some said that theano is tougher to learn but it gives more control, Caffe is easier, but it gives less control over the network. And nothing on Tensorflow, as it is new, but from what i've seen the documentation is not That well written, also it seems tougher to understand. So as a newbie what should i choose to learn?
Another question, As I said, MNIST is the hello world of every deep learning framework, and many neural networks can be found for recognizing MNIST dataset. So, if I use the same network to detect other dataset, say CIFAR-10 dataset, will it work?? Let's just say that i turn the CIFAR-10 dataset to grayscale images and convert it to same dimension as MNIST dataset. Will the model be invalid or fail to learn? or have bad accuracy or what?

Resources