I have to configure my Microsoft Azure server like below scenario
So it is like a request comes with a public IP which represents application gateway having SSL and the request passes from app gateway to the load balancer.
LB just forward to the virtual machine(having SSL) on the basis of the port number.
Here there is only one public IP and virtual machine selected according to the port.
I made the configuration but the only thing I am missing that is SSL configuration with Application gateway and same SSL in a virtual machine.
I don't know my configure pattern is right or wrong please suggest me if you have a good option.
My goal is to achieve the request (with the public IP) passes from the application gateway having SSL to the virtual machine also having the same SSL on the basis of ports with the same public IP, Is there any better option than my configuration pattern?
Please help me, How to achieve it.
You can use the following Settings in Application Gateway and you don't need ILB in-front of your VM.
Create a Application gateway. Create 3 Multi-site Listener. Upload Certificates and enter Host Name and the respective ports.
Create 3 Backend Pool and add your VMs to it.
Create 3 HTTP Settings. Upload authentication certificates and configure respective ports. Create and attach Health Probes to HTTP Settings.
Create rules where you link corresponding listeners with HTTP Settings and backend pool.
Check if the Health Probes are healthy. If yes, then your setup is complete.
In Application Gateway you can achieve end to end SSL and you can create multiple HTTP Settings with different SSL port to achieve this without ILB.
If that is the case you will not get the High Availability as you only have one VM for each SSL port.
Can you explain why you need to use different SSL port for each Machine? Are you hosting multiple Site?
If yes, you can easily achieve with Application Gateway. Please let me know your entire setup and if you have any follow up questions. I am here to help you.
Related
I have a pretty simple setup with an Application Gateway (AG), that sends traffic to a virtual machine running Ubuntu. The AG is loaded with an SSL certificate. The VM is set up to only allow incoming traffic from the AG, but it's an HTTP connection. This works, but I want to secure the traffic between my VM and AG. I can't find any relevant settings or documentation for this however.
How do I encrypt traffic between an Application Gateway and Virtual Machine? I considered a private link to at least force traffic over the Azure network, but private links only support PaaS products, where a VM is IaaS.
I assume your use the private IP of your VM in the backend settings of your Application Gateway. If so, this means that the traffic stays within your VNET and thus on the Microsoft network and also within the same region. You do not not need something like Private Link here.
So the only thing you could potentially do is to SSL-enable the endpoint on the VM and use an encrypted HTTPS connection between AppGW and your VM.
you have to do the same thing as with the api-gateway, load a certificate into de service deployed in the virtual machine and expose the API of this service using SSL protocol so the communication will be encrypted using that certificate.
The way to do it is different depending on which technology you are using to deploy your service. For example, if you are using spring-boot you can see how to do it here
https://www.baeldung.com/spring-boot-https-self-signed-certificate
However, you can use mutual-tls if you want that the only service that could connect to your VM's deployed service is the AG.
https://developers.cloudflare.com/access/service-auth/mtls
Say, I have two app service (HTTPS only is enabled):
https://myapp1.azurewebsites.net
https://myapp2.azurewebsites.net
I can call both app service endpoints using HTTPS successfully.
Then I created a traffic manager and add above two endpoints to traffic manager, say:
myapps.trafficmanager.net
After the traffic manager is created and endpoint added, the trafficmanger host name myapps.trafficmanager.net is also automatically added into custom domains of two app services. But without SSL binding to traffic manager host name.
Then if I call traffic manager endpoint using HTTPS: https://myapps.trafficmanager.net, I will got untrusted SSL cert error/warning. That is expected.
Since traffic manager just works on DNS level, the real request is actually send to the app service endpoint which has correct SSL cert binding. My question is:
From security point of view, is it safe to call the non-cert binding traffic manager endpopint using HTTPS in my code (say, using .NET HttpClient) but just ignore the cert error?
I recently set one of these up as well and fought with it for a bit. The short answer is that it is probably safe, but it sounds like you may be using the Traffic Manager incorrectly. You shouldn't be using the URL in the Traffic Manager as your end point if you want to use SSL. Instead configure your vanity domain name, mycoolsite.com to point to myapps.trafficmanager.net, using a DNS CNAME record.
If you want to use SSL and a single URL you should configure the custom URL and install an SSL cert at the service level. It should be same custom URL on both app services. This must be configured at in the app service, not in Traffic Manager.
I had to read this a few times to understand how it works under the hood, but it was helpful.
So in summary, to set it up properly, the steps would be:
Configure custom/vanity domain on both app services
Install the SSL cert on both app services
Setup and configure the Traffic Manager
Point the custom/vanity URL to the traffic manager using a DNS CNAME record
There is no need to bind a cert with traffic manager since the server certificate is not validated when using traffic manager health probes via HTTPS. Moreover, the traffic manager works at the DNS level. The clients connect directly to the selected endpoint, not through Traffic Manager.
In this case, you could use HTTPS for endpoints and use health probe via HTTPS. Even you could not bind a cert with traffic manager, you could make sure that the monitoring port is configured correctly in Traffic Manager (e.g. 443 instead of 80) and also your monitoring path points to a valid page for your service.
Another SO answer explains this more details. If you still want to make this warning disappearing, you can get a free SSL from letsencrypt.org and add that to your custom domain with the *.trafficmanager.net.
So I have setup a web app, virtual network, application gateway using this link. I also added a virtual network gateway to the vnet so that I can integrate my web app to the vnet.
Now correct me if I am wrong but isn't the purpose of integrating your web app with virtual network to make it more secure? if so then I should only be able to access my web app through the application gateway public IP correct?
Currently when I hit the the myapp.azurewebsites.net, I get to the application.
Do I have to do something extra here?
You are mixing several different things here.
Application gateway is just a proxy (more or less). It has no control over whatever server it is routing traffic to. It cannot magically make it not accept traffic not from application gateway. That is for the server to decide (in your case you need to use web.config as far as I remember to restrict incoming IP addresses only to the IP addresses of the application gateway). So adding application gateway to the mix doesnt make it more or less secure.
Vnet integration works only one way, FROM the webapp inside the Vnet. Things inside the vnet cannot talk back to the webapp using "internal" vnet traffic, they have to use external IP address. So this wont really help you.
If you want your webapp to be available only inside the VNet your best bet is App Service Environment, but its a lot more expensive :(
I am having trouble with getting SSL/HTTPS working on a Azure WAF (ApplicationGateway) (http / port:80 is working fine)
I will explain the scenario as basic as possible:
The developer has made two websites (for this example: let’s say X.com and Y.com) both on a Linux Front End server in AZURE which sit behind a NSG as well as a Azure Application Gateway WAF
The developer points DNS records of X.com and Y.com to the WAF's single IP (appGatewayFrontendIP)
Users can browse through to both websites http / port:80 with no problem.
The trouble now lies with how to get SSL working, so far:
The developer has applied SSL certificates to both websites on the Linux Web Server in Azure
How does one get SSL working on the WAF?
I have been looking through MS Docs all day but not really sure how to get this to work (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/create-ssl-portal)
I see we need to put a PFX certificate inside - I am assuming a selfsigned one is NOT the way to go. However I am non the wiser as to what I do in this scenario -
How do I get a PFX certificate and how does this work when you have 2 websites on a single Front End Linux Server -
Do I need to take off the SSL Certs on the Front End Linux server and instead of .cert get a .PFX cert and upload via Azure Portal?
Any help truly welcome! :)
Thanks
If you want the front-end (ie public IP) to serve up HTTPS you'll need the PFX certificate assigned to the listener of the appropriate back-end site.
For example:
XPfxCert should be assigned to the listener that directs traffic to the X.com app
YPfxCert should be assigned to the listener that directs traffic to the Y.com app
This will encrypt traffic between your customers and the WAF. You'll need to obtain one from a certificate authority (eg. comodoca.com) to ensure your end user does not get one of those errors like you'd see here if you used self-signed: https://self-signed.badssl.com/
In addition you'll need different certs for the back-end. This will encrypt traffic between the WAF and your apps (even though they're all in Azure you'll still need this). It gets assigned in the HTTPSettings. You may be able to get away with self-signed here; however, at our work we use CA provided certs for both.
Lastly, if the goal is to host both X.com and Y.com on the same VM you should be able to configure path based rules that would direct traffic appropriately. As an alternative you could have multiple NICs on your VM and configure multiple back-end pools to direct traffic to the appropriate site.
References:
https://vincentlauzon.com/2017/07/17/azure-application-gateway-anatomy/
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/application-gateway-end-to-end-ssl-powershell
Assuming you have two different certificates for X.com and Y.com, then you should associate these certificates with the corresponding multi-site listeners which you would have created listening on port 443. The you should create two new rules which associate these listeners to corresponding backend pools using HTTP setting. Please remember to delete any other rules apart from the 4 rules (2 for HTTPS listener and 2 for HTTP listener).
At this point you should be able to send traffic to these listeners which would terminate SSL and run WAF rules. Since your backend is already configured to listen on port 80, it should work as is with existing HTTP Settings. The backend communication is over HTTP.
If you want to enable end to end SSL - ie rencrypt the traffic to backend then you should follow documentation on enabling end to end SSL on the above setup.
We try to migrate our Platform from classical IIS hosting to a service fabric micro service architecture. So fare we learned that a service fabric lives in a virtual machine scale set and uses Load balancer to communicate to the outside world.
The Problem we now facing is that we have different access points to our application. Like one for browser, one for mobile app. Both use the standard https port, but are different applications.
In iis we could use host headers to direct traffic to one or the other application. But with service fabric we can’t. easiest way for us would be multiple public IP’s. With that we could handle it with dns.
We considered a couple solutions with no success.
Load balancer with Multiple public ip’s. Problem: it looks like that only works with Cloud Services and we need to work with the new Resource Manager World there it seems to be not possible to have multiple public ip’s.
Multiple public load balancer. Problem: Scale Sets accept only on load balancer instance pert load balancer type.
Application Gateway. Seems not to support multiple public ip’s or host header mapping.
Path mapping. Problem: we have the same path in different applications.
My questions are:
Is there any solution to use multiple IP’s and map the traffic internally to different ports?
Is there any option to use host header mapping with service fabric?
Any suggestion how I can solve my problem?
Piling on some Service Fabric-specific info to Eli's answer: Yes you can do all of this and use an http.sys-based self-hosted web server to host multiple sites using different host names on a single VIP, such as Katana or WebListener in ASP.NET Core 1.
The piece to this that is currently missing in Service Fabric is a way to configure the hostname in your endpoint definition in ServiceManifest.xml. Service Fabric services run under Network Service by default on Windows, which means the service will not have access to create a URL ACL for the URL it wants to open an endpoint on. To help with that, when you specify an HTTP endpoint in an endpoint definition in ServiceManifest.xml, Service Fabric automatically creates the URL ACL for you. But currently, there is no place to specify a hostname, so Service Fabric uses "+", which is the strong wildcard that matches everything.
For now, this is merely an inconvenience because you'll have to create a setup entry point with your service that runs under elevated privileges to run netsh to setup the URL ACL manually.
We do plan on adding a hostname field in ServiceManifest.xml to make this easier.
It's definitely possible to use ARM templates to deploy a Service Fabric cluster with multiple IPs. You'll just have to tweak the template a bit:
Create multiple IP address resources (e.g. using copy) - make sure you review all the resources using the IP and modify them appropriately
In the load balancer:
Add multiple frontendIPConfigurations, each tied to its own IP
Add loadBalancingRules for each port you want to redirect to the VMs from a specific frontend IP configuration
Add probes
As for host header mapping, this is handled by the Windows HTTP Server API (see this article). All you have to do is use a specific host name (or even a URL path) when configuring an HTTP listener URL (in OWIN/ASP.NET Core).